General Theory of

Medical Science

 

-------- Written by Chencius Sino

 

Chapter 4

 

Effectiveness Means  Scientificity

For a long term, a gang of pseudo scholars who 

always want to ruin our TCM (Traditional Chinese 

Medicine) have their favorite trick, which is 

abusing science to ruin TCM.

In this way, they can to obtain two effects: 

The first  is to say "NO" to the scientific and 

effective nature of our TCM in treating diseases. 

The second is to assault all the persons who 

believe in our TCM. 

For this , those guys said: 

Believing in TCM means lacking of scientific 

literacy and knowledge, and so on. 

It should be admitted that what those guys have 

been doing are indeed very sly, to the extent that 

for a long time, few persons are able to beat back 

their reckless behavior. 

But in fact, our TCM does effectively treat many 

diseases, which has been proven by a large number 

of facts, and these facts are still emerging and the 

TV is also constantly introducing the principles and

methods of TCM for treating diseases.

So, faced with a large number of facts, that gang 

of pseudo scholars still don't how to understand

these facts, which is enough to prove that their 

own professional level is really limited.

As we know, the reason why those guys can be 

so hysterical and rampant to ruin our TCM for 

such a long time is also because they have a 

very vague understanding of scientific 

knowledge. 

For example, in order to deny a large number 

of facts that our TCM can effectively treat many  

diseases, those pseudo scholars are particularly 

adept at showing off how rich their professional 

knowledge is, as well as the systematic and 

rigorous nature of their professional knowledge, 

and then , they claim: 

Anyone who believes in TCM is the man 

who does not understand medical science 

and even be lack of scientific knowledge .

But in fact, it's not true at all ! 

So, in order to strongly beat back what they 

have said, I have thoroughly answered almost 

all questions about medical science in the third 

part of this book, and in the fourth part, I am 

going to discuss cognitive issues related to 

scientific knowledge.

When ruining our TCM, that gang of pseudo

scholars proudly boasted about the richness,

systematicness and rigor of their own 

professional knowledge, as if their knowledge 

was enough to negate the constantly emerging 

large number of facts ! 

This is enough to prove how arrogant they are !

But actually, in the face of a large number of 

facts, they have repeatedly performed such 

foolish performance for a long time, which 

is enough to prove that they are at most just 

some specialists in medical technology.  

So, they are really too far away from medical 

science, and they are even further away from 

science, and even more, they don't even have 

any scientific knowledge, although they know 

many professional terms.

Or let's think about the following questions:

1. Is that gang of pseudo scholars really rich 

in professional knowledge ? 

Faced with a constantly emerging large number 

of facts, that gang of pseudo scholars have been 

unable to understand these facts for a long time 

and even deny the facts.  

How can their professional knowledge be 

considered rich ?

Actually, the scholars with truly rich professional 

knowledge may be interested in the constantly 

emerging large number of facts, especially those 

that are temporarily incomprehensible.

Because these incomprehensible facts can often 

enlighten their thinking, broaden their ways of 

thinking, and enrich their problem-solving 

methods, thus continuously and really  enriching 

their professional knowledge.

2. Is the professional knowledge of those pseudo

scholars really systematic ? 

Faced with a constantly emerging large number 

of facts, those pseudo scholars have been unable 

to understand for a long time.  

For their own pitiful dignities, they simply deny 

these constantly emerging large numbers of facts 

and even oppose others studying these facts.  

Now that, how can their professional knowledge 

be considered systematic ? 

Actually, the scholars with truly systematic 

professional knowledge may inevitably be 

interested in the constantly emerging large 

number of facts, especially those that are 

temporarily incomprehensible. 

Because these incomprehensible facts often 

give them many opportunities to improve 

the systematization of their professional 

knowledge.  

3. Is their professional knowledge really 

rigorous ?

Now we can solemnly warn them: 

True rigor is respecting objective facts, rational 

analysis and adhering to the first law of medical 

science. 

Namely : 

We should discuss science according to 

objective facts, and meanwhile, we should 

discuss medical science according to actual 

curative effects . 

So, true rigor is never about digging logical 

traps in theory:  

In order to deny the scientific and effective 

treatment of TCM, those pseudo scholars  

have been abusing a large number of 

professional terms to weave various logical 

traps, attempting to make way for their own 

poor professional knowledge by suppressing 

the constantly emerging large number of facts 

for a long time ! 

However, it is is a kind of farce that only appears 

when their harming our TCM by having been long

suppressing the constantly emerging large number 

of facts to make way for their own poor professional

knowledge .  

Throughout the history of scien-tech development, 

this is extremely rare ! 

Strangely enough, for a long time, many 

professionals have always tolerated this 

kind of misconduct and even led to inaction !

I would like to ask some questions quietly:  

Do there be any qualified 

medical scientists here ?

And where ?  

So, now let me, an illiterate person, sweep away 

the scientific illiteracy for that gang of pseudo

scholars, and let me tell them what scientific 

knowledge is.  

In fact, regarding scientific knowledge, we should 

now have the following understanding: 

1. Effectiveness Is Scientific. 

2. Fact is knowledge  

A single fact is certainly the starting point 

of understanding, and when facts are 

gathered enough, some laws can be 

discovered.  

In a word, all knowledge must be based 

on facts. 

3.  About Meta-Knowledge: 

3.1 The systematicity and discreteness of 

knowledge

3.2 The relevance of knowledge

3.3 The Instrumentality  

3.4 The limitations of personal knowledge

3.5 The spatiotemporal characteristics of 

knowledge 

3.6 Inspiration and knowledge

3.7 Micro or macro 

 4. Absolute comparison can witness 

scientificity 

5.  Loving Science , No Matter New Or Old. 

6. Never be  servant for foreigners

7. Everyone Can Discuss Science 

8. The necessary and sufficient conditions

for scientific knowledge to play a positive 

role are that it is applied correctly, rationally 

and kindly. 

In short, scientific knowledge is a password 

to the unknown world, not a prop to deceive.  

So, as long as we all have such basic 

understandings, our TCM may no 

longer encounter any scoundrels !  

Actually, the gang of those guys who always 

want to ruin TCM are at most specialists in 

medical technology, because they do not 

understand the gap between science and 

technology, they do not understand what 

science is, they do not understand what 

medical science is. 

For example, they have never understood 

a DNA law about medical science, which is:

The combination of objective facts and 

actual therapeutic effects is the only DNA 

double strand of medical science, which  

can give birth to medical science.

Only the DNA double strand composed 

of the combination of "objective facts+

actual therapeutic effects" is the only 

intrinsic driving force to develop medical 

science in  a rapid and healthy way.

To this, the title of this chapter is Effectiveness 

is scientificity

 

Contents

  

4.1	Effectiveness Is Scientific
4.2	Science Is Never A Prop For Deception
4.3	To Validate Both Medical Science and Prescriptions
4.4	Absolute Comparison Can Witness Scientificity
4.5	Difficult to understand mean higher Sci-value
4.6	Origins Of Knowledge
4.7	Gap Between Knowledge Systems
4.8	Recognizing The Relevance Of Knowledge
4.9	Space.And.Time
4.10	One.Step.Or.More
4.11	Loving Science , No Matter New Or Old
4.12	Never Be  Servant For Foreigners
4.13	Everyone Can Discuss Science
Meta-Knowledge
4.14	1.Introduction
4.15	2.Systematicity And Discreteness
4.16	3.Hoaxing Arises From Shamelessness
4.17	4.Fresh or Not
4.18	5. Micro or Macro
4.19	6.Certainty And Fuzziness
4.20	7.1.Spatiotemporal.Characteristics.Regional
4.21	7.2 Spatiotemporal Characteristics Timing
4.22	8.Inspiration
4.23	9.Other Key Points

 

-------  Written on July 21, 2023

 

 （Refer to 医学通论.第四篇.有效性就是科学性 

for the original text）