加载中…Everyone.Can.Discuss.Science
(2023-07-09 13:54:06)| 分类： 医学通论.有效性就是科学性 |
Everyone Can Discuss
Science
Unfortunately
, there has never
been a shortage of
scumbags , and
so has academia , which has been
being
Medicine
) has suffered for the long term .
And all of
these sufferings have been being
caused
by a gang
of pseudo
scholars who have
almost
ruined
And
certainly , this gang of will
never
already
The first
huge
pitfall :
The
second huge pitfall:
Traditional Chinese medicine is
toxic
The third
huge pitfall :
But as a matter
of fact , I have independently completed
the
fill-up and fix-up work of all these pitfalls
theoretically
.
In order
to defend our TCM ( Traditional
Chinese
Medicine
) , I have already written more than
500
articles.
In these
articles , I have theoretically dealt a
devastating
blow to
all the words that harm our TCM , and have not
left any
possibility for them to refute my ideas, nor
have
I left
any theoretical loopholes for them that can be counterattacked
.
However ,
because I am only a nobody , the effect
is
almost
zero , so that I have to laugh at myself now
.
Recently
, I have read an article , which made it
clearer
to me why
few persons are interested in my articles .
This
article argues that not everyone is qualified
to
discuss
science .
The
article begins by saying :
" When you start talking
about science , are you
qualified to talk about
science ? "
The
article lists many terms such as
" ", " College Physics",
"Indefinite
Integrals
Medium " ,
and so on .
I was
really shocked by this article :
Am
I not qualified to talk about science ?
Later , I
found that I had learnt most of the
contents
listed in
that article , so I felt my heart was
much
calmer
.
And more
, the first huge pitfall dug by
the pseudo
scholars who
always want ruin our TCM is to question
the
scientific nature of our TCM , so firstly , I
have to
talk
In fact ,
I have spent a lot of energy theoretically
completing this work
:
Just
because I have put a lot of effort into finishing the
theoretical
(
Traditional Chinese Medicine ) , if someone
suddenly
jumps
out and shouts in my ear at this moment :
"Talk about science as soon as you speak ,
are you
qualified to talk about
science ? “
it's
really scary , and I can't help but ask myself
:
"May be a ghost jump out now
? "
In fact ,
now it's time to ask :
"If
you really haven
not learned any knowledge
mentioned
qualified to talk
about "
Really
not necessarily !
There are
at least four erroneous views in that article :
FIRST
, confusing the two different
concepts
of
scientific
For
example , many perpsons take it for
granted
that
:
A man with rich
professional knowledge is
certainly
But in
fact , this is not the case at all !
For
example :
Our TCM
can tell you about the differences between
professional knowledge and scientific spirit .
Namely ,
our TCM can effectively treat many diseases ,
which has
been proven by a large number of facts
,
and
However ,
some pseudo
scholars with very
rich
professional
knowledge
these
large numbers of
Then , we
can ask :
What is the scientific spirit of such guys
?
Actually
, this kind of guys are far away from science !
In fact ,
those guys have already filled their brains
with
a large
number of technical terms and pieces
of
knowledge
, which are all in mess .
Though
they may have made great achievements
in
their own
field of expertise , but once they
encounter
facts
they do not understand or dislike , they
invariably
deny
them .
It is
particularly noteworthy that they have
persistently
denied a
large number of facts and solemnly
declared
these
facts unscientific !
Is
this the spirit of science ?
So , we
can ask some more questions :
What kind of science dares to discuss
issues without
considering any truth , facts , effects
or logic ?
Or even more specifically , what kind of
medical
science dares to discuss
issues considering
any truth , facts , curative
effects or logic ?
Is science his own grocery store as if he
could sell
anything as soon as he wants , such as foot
wash
basins or toilet lids ?
As all of us know , those guys are
real pseudo
scholars
and what they lack are not professional
knowledge ,
but scientific spirit and even moral
integrity !
Unfortunately , our TCM ( Traditional
Chinese Medicine )
has been being besieged by
such for
more than 100 years , and
even few persons can
theoretically rescue our TCM
!
But in fact , I myself
have theoretically completed this
rescue work of our TCM alone , although
the effect has
been minimal , it
is because I am a
nobody , not
because my work is not enough
.
And it would be ridiculous for anyone to
use any " the
qualification to talk about
science " as a bluff to stop
others talking about science
.
Because science is used to solve
problems , not to bluff
people !
SECOND ,
confusing the two different concepts of technology and science
.
From the above discussion , it can also
be seen that
some persons are indeed top-notch in
their profession ,
but this does not mean that they could
understand
science .
Many persons are just experts in the
field of their own
professional technology , but
whether they have
scientific literacy is another matter
.
In fact , it is also very simple to
judge whether a person
has scientific literacy if by the
following two criteria :
The first criterion is to see if
he reasonably
understands
A person has no scientific quality as
soon as he always
hysterically argues and refuses to
acknowledge all the
objective facts that he is unable to
explain or he dislike .
And even if he is an expert , he is only
a technical talent ,
but he has nothing to do with any
scientific quality .
The second criterion is to see whether
he tolerates
cross disciplinary communication .
The person has no scientific quality as
soon as he
particularly dislikes technical experts
from other
majors discussing his own professional
issues , for
it is a typical manifestation of lack of
scientific
literacy .
Because subject
exchange is the norm in the
development of science and
technology .
But if someone regards his major as his
own private
space so that he hates any other
discussing his major ,
he has nothing to do with any scientific
literacy ,
even he is a technical talent , he will stays in
technology
or craft level for ever , far away from any science .
THIRDLY , neglecting
the Instrumentality of science .
Namely , science
itself does not possess good or evil ,
so
that
applied
And this can also be seen
from what our TCM
over the past 100 years
.
As we all know , our TCM
has been being damaged
for a long time , which is
essentially the rudely
behavior :
This gang
of have long
disregarded
a large number of facts
that out TCM can effectively
treat many diseases , and
those guys even intentionally
ignore the pain and
helplessness of similar patients
.
For it , those guys could
calmly play with the pitiful
professional terminology
they can understand , making
excuses for their
incompetence , laziness , paranoia
,
and shamelessness
!
That is to say , this
group of did
not
apply medical scientific
knowledge with goodwill and
rationality
.
FOURTH , perhaps the conditions that need
to be
met
will become stricter
that
article and pitifully want the to
agree to
let us talk about science , will they
really
agree
?
This may
not be the case , for the conditions can be
changed
by
For it ,
perhaps those will
for some
professional terms on the
internet
they
themselves maybe do not understand ,
and
then
article
.
So , this
kind of game should be forgotten
from
the very
beginning !
In fact ,
science does have its
professional
characteristics and profound aspects
.
But
science
universality
,
Simply
put , science is essentially a key to the
unknown
world ,
not a password for withdrawals from banks .
So ,
obviously , as long as you are interested in
science ,
you
can learn it , talk about it , use it , and even
study
it .
Because science has never been as private
and
exclusive
(
Excluding special majors , only universality will
be
discussed
here . )
furthermore , if a scholar is truly full of scientific
spirit ,
he will
never oppose the popularization of scientific
knowledge
, nor will he oppose anyone else discussing
science
.
So , if
some guys always take it granted that only they
themselves
others
careful
:
What he
is talking about may be not true science .
That is ,
either he may only have a little
understanding
of
into his
science !
Perhaps
someone wants to ask , since science is
professionalism and profundity , why
could
laymen
talk about science ?
In fact ,
this question is also very easy to answer :
When
ordinary persons talk about science ,
as
long as
they discuss science according to facts ,
achievements , logic and wisdom , there
will
be no
problems .
Now ,
let's discuss it from a different perspective :
If Tom
cannot drive , it may indeed be difficult
for
him to
judge others' driving skills , and
the
misjudgment at this point is
also
However ,
if Jack uses the accelerator as a brake
,
Tom still
claps and cheers , it is shameless and
even
too evil
!
Similarly , regarding
medicine , whether it is TCM
( Traditional Chinese
Medicine ) or Western medicine
,
we may not even have a
basic understanding , so
we medical science in detail .
However , our TCM can
effectively treat many diseases ,
which has being
proved by a large number of facts
and
reported by many TVs
.
If faced with a large
number of facts , there are
still
some guys who always
refuse to admit all of these
facts and their trainees
always cheer for such
behaviours
.
If that's not shameless ,
what's that ?
Perhaps we can compare
this denial of all facts with
the use of the accelerator
as a brake :
Using the accelerator as
the brake is mostly due to
the driver's momentary
negligence , but denying all
the facts is a long term
malicious behavior to
disregard for the pains of
patients !
----------------
Written in
2023
喜欢
0
赠金笔
前一篇：谈科学不必晒文凭！
后一篇：关于知识的知识（1.引言）