笔译30人，口译12人。
育明教育咨询师分析认为，华中师范大学翻译硕士难度中等水平，适合跨专业报考。百科侧重西方文学知识以及时政的考察，大家可以根据育明教育课程学习。

参考书：

1.《英译中国现代散文选》，张培基（三册中至少一册），上海外语教育出版社，2007

2.《高级翻译理论与实践》，叶子南，圣才电子书出版，2019

3.《中国文化读本》，叶朗 、朱良志，外语教学与研究，2016

4.《汉语写作与百科知识》，李国正，首都师范大学出版社，2019

真题分享：

〖JZ〗〖WT12.H1〗Passage One〖WTXFZ〗

Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home morns aren’t S.U.V driving, daily yoga-doing, latte-drinking, upper-middle-class women who choose to leave their high-power careers to answer the call to motherhood. Instead, they are disproportionately low-income, non-college educated, young and Hispanic or foreign-born; in other words, they are women whose horizons are greatly limited and for whom the cost of child care, very often, makes work not a workable choice at all.

These findings, drawn from a new report by the Census Bureau, really ought to lead us to reframe our public conversations about who mothers are and why they do what they do. It should lead us away from all the moralistic bombast about mothers’ “choices” and “priorities”. It should get us thinking less about choice, in fact, and make us focus more on contingencies — the objective conditions that drive women’s lives. And they should propel us to think about the choices that we as a society must make to guarantee that the best possible opportunities are available for all families.

The basic finding of this latest report — that the more choices mothers have, the more likely they are to work has been known, to anyone who’s taken the time to seriously look into the issue. Ever since 2003, when Lisa Belkin’s article in The Times magazine about highly privileged and ultra-high-achieving morns — “The Opt-Out Revolution”—was generalized by the news media to claim that mothers overall were choosing to leave the work force in droves, researchers have been revisiting the state of mothers’ employment and reaching very similar conclusions.

In 2007, the sociologists David Cotter, Paula England and Joan Hermsen looked carefully at four decades of employment data and found that women with choices — those with college educations — were overwhelmingly choosing to stay in the work force. The only women “opting out” in any significant numbers were the very richest those with husbands earning more than $125, 000 a year — and the very poorest — those with husbands earning less than $23, 4000 a year. You might say that the movement of the richest women out of the workforce proves thatwomen will, in the best of all possible worlds, go home. But these women often have husbands who, in order toearn those top salaries, work 70 or 80 hours a week and travel extensively; someone had to be home. Many left high-powered careers that made similar demands on their time.

The alternative narrative — of constricted horizons, not choice — that might have emerged from recentresearch has never really made it into the mainstream. It just can’t, it seems, find a foothold.

“The reason we keep getting this narrative is that there is this deep cultural ambivalence about mothers’employment,” England told me this week. “On the one hand, people believe women should have equal opportunities, but on the other hand, we don’t envision men taking on more child care and housework and, unlike Europe, wedon’t seem to be able to envision family-friendly work policies. ”

Why this matters — and why opening this topic up for discussion is important — is very clear〖WW(〗:〖WW)〗because our public policy continues to rest upon a fictitious idea, eternally recycled in the media, of mothers’ free choices, and not upon the constraints that truly drive their behavior〖H点〗 “If journalism repeatedly frames the wrong problem, then the folks who make public policy may very well deliver the wrong solution,”is how-E. J. Graft. the associate director and senior researcher at Brandeis University’s Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism once put it in the Columbia Journalism Review, “If women are happily choosing to stay home with their babies, that’s private decision. But it’s a public policy issue if schools, jobs and other American institutions are structured in ways that make it frustratingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, for parents to manage both their jobs and family responsibilities.”〖KH-*2〗

1〖H点〗〖ZK(〗What is the significance of the report run by the Census Bureau?

A〖H点〗It changes the images of what mothers are.

B〖H点〗The society should notice the importance of mothers’choices.

C〖H点〗We need talk about what mothers should do rather than the choices they have.

D〖H点〗More attention should be paid to opportunities offered to change women’s current lives. 〖ZK)〗

2〖H点〗〖ZK(〗The phrase“in droves” in Paragraph 3 means

A〖H点〗under stimulation

B〖H点〗in groups

C〖H点〗driven by conditions

D〖H点〗none of the above〖ZK)〗

3〖H点〗〖ZK(〗The fourth paragraph claims that

A〖H点〗the very richest prefer to opt out for the wealth they own

B〖H点〗demands on time are the only reason for the poorest at home

C〖H点〗financial affluence leads to the women’s “opting out”

D〖H点〗family responsibility forces women to stay at home〖ZK)〗

4〖H点〗〖ZK(〗According to the passage, 〖CD#5〗is the root cause of women staying at home.

A〖H点〗the media〓〓〓〓B〖H点〗their own choice〓C〖H点〗the public policy〓D〖H点〗school structure〖ZK)〗

5〖H点〗〖ZK(〗What is the best title for the passage?

A〖H点〗The Choice of Non-Working Women

B〖H点〗The Opt-Out Revolution of Women

C〖H点〗The Objective Condition of Women

D〖H点〗Women in Employment Market〖ZK)〗

答题技巧：

简答题

1）名师解析：

简答题一般来说位于试题的第二部分，基本考察对某些重要问题的掌握程度。难度中等偏低。这就要求考生在复习的时候要把课本重要问题梳理清楚，要比较扎实的记忆。一般来说书本看到5遍以上可以达到记忆的效果。当然，记忆也要讲究方法。

（2）育明考研答题攻略：简答题定义框架答题法

定义——〉框架 ——〉总结

第一，先把简答题题干中涉及的最重要的1-2个名词进行阐述，类似于“名词解释”。很多人省略了这一点，无意中丢失了很多的分数。

第二，按照要求，搭建框架进行回答。回答要点一般3-5条，每条150-200字。

第三，进行简单的总结。

（3）温馨提示

第一，在回答简答题的时候，一定要有头有尾，换言之，必须要进行核心名词含义的阐释。

第二，在回答的时候字数一般在800-1000为佳，时间为15-20分钟。