美国国家航空航天局漫游车发现火星环境曾适宜生存的迹象
标签:
杂谈 |
分类: 科学与技术 |
Charlene Porter | Staff Writer | 2013.03.13
“好奇号”的着陆点经过精心挑选,在着陆点附近的钻探点发现的迹象说明曾存在一度适宜生存的环境。
华盛顿——在“好奇号”(Curiosity)漫游车登陆火星七个月后,科学家们于3月12日宣布他们已经找到了他们需要探测的情况:一个可能曾支持微生物生存的环境。
分析发现,漫游车在着陆点盖尔陨石坑(Gale Crater)对沉积岩进行钻探取出的粉末说明,这块区域或者曾是一条远古河流的一部分,或者曾是偶尔潮湿的湖床,能够维持某些形式的微生物生命。
“好奇号”项目科学家约翰·戈洛辛格(John Grotzinger)在3月12日举行的简报会上说,“我们发现了一个适宜生存的环境。”他形容该环境在当时是“良性并且可维持生命”。
加州理工大学(California Institute of Technology)的科学家们说,在通过分析岩石样本揭示的环境条件下,“微生物能够生存,甚至有可能大量繁殖”。
岩石取样显示硫、氮、氢、氧、磷和碳的痕迹——这些是生命需要的一些关键化学元素。第一次对火星取样进行如此深度的分析显示,过去火星上有足以支持简单生命形式的水分,而且没有过多酸性的痕迹。分析还显示出存在矿物质的痕迹,这些矿物质能提供电子流。地球某些微生物生命就依靠这些电子流得到维持。
美国航空航天局火星探测计划(Mars Exploration Program)首席科学家迈克尔·迈耶(Michael Meyer)说,“这真是太奇妙了。”以前轨道飞行器和漫游车进行的长达几十年的火星探测为这项使命的成功作出了贡献,因为正是在“好奇号”着陆地点发现了科学家们试图找寻的所有元素,可证明这颗红色星球一度存在适宜生存的环境。
戈洛辛格说,随着适宜生存的问题得到解答,现在的使命是专注探寻碳的迹象,因为碳是人类所知的所有生命形式的基础。
“好奇号”使命既然这么早就获得了成功,能否由此继续探寻生命的迹象呢?戈洛辛格指出,“好奇号”的设计和装备都不适于探测生命。
戈洛辛格说,“如果火星上曾有微生物新陈代谢存在,我们确实没有能力进行测量。”
“好奇号”依然能够并且将要去做的是在火星表面继续运行,前往其他有意义的目的地,发现更多类型的岩石和矿物质,了解其他有关火星的不同情况。
负责火星调查样本分析的首席调查员保罗·马哈菲(Paul Mahaffy)说,“我们的团队感到很高兴,每天早晨一醒来就能看到在这颗不同的星球上正在发生的事情,的确令人万分激动。”
戈洛辛格说,数百名科学家为“好奇号”的发现做出了贡献,正是一代又一代的工程和技术突破为“好奇号”成功奠定了基石。
Read more: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/chinese/article/2013/03/20130313144065.html#ixzz2NxVMlVNN
NASA Rover Finds Traces of Habitable Environment on Mars
By Charlene Porter | Staff Writer | 12 March 2013
Curiosity’s landing site was carefully chosen, close to a drilling site that has revealed a once-habitable environment.
Washington — Seven months after the rover Curiosity landed on Mars, scientists announced March 12 that they’ve found what they were looking for: an environment that could have supported microbial life.
Analysis of powdered material drilled out of a sedimentary rock in the Gale Crater landing site shows the territory was part of an ancient river system or an occasionally wet lake bed that was capable of sustaining certain forms of microbial life.
“We have found a habitable environment,” said John Grotzinger, Curiosity project scientist, at a March 12 briefing. He described an environment that was, in its day, “benign and supportive of life.”
The California Institute of Technology scientist said that “a microbe could have lived in, and maybe even prospered in” the environmental conditions revealed through analysis of the rock sample.
The rock sample showed traces of sulfur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and carbon — some of the key chemical ingredients for life. The sample — the first from Mars to ever undergo this degree of analysis — showed past signs of moisture sufficient to support simple life forms and no sign of excessive acidity. The analysis also revealed traces of minerals that could have provided an electron flow, which sustains certain microbial life on Earth.
“This is fantastic,” said Michael Meyer, lead scientist for NASA’s Mars Exploration Program. Decades of Mars exploration by previous orbiters and rovers have contributed to the mission’s success in landing the craft at a site where the rover found all the elements scientists sought as evidence of a once-habitable environment on the red planet.
With the habitability question answered, Grotzinger said, the mission will now proceed in a deliberate way to search out signs of carbon, the basis for all life forms as we know them.
With success achieved so early in the Curiosity mission, will the craft be able to move forward to find a sign of life? Grotzinger pointed out that Curiosity is neither designed nor equipped as a life-detection mission.
“If there was microbial metabolism going on, we really wouldn’t have the ability to measure that,” Grotzinger said.
What Curiosity still can and will do is travel farther across the Martian surface to other interesting targets that could reveal more types of rocks and minerals that tell other, different stories about Mars.
“The team is just delighted to be waking up every morning and looking at what’s happening on this different planet,” said Paul Mahaffy, principal investigator for the sample analysis component of the Mars investigation. “It’s just tremendously exciting.”
Hundreds of scientists have contributed to Curiosity’s findings, Grotzinger said, building on the engineering and technological breakthroughs of earlier generations.
Read more: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/article/2013/03/20130312144002.html#ixzz2NxVVL2R5

加载中…