加载中…
个人资料
美国驻华大使馆
美国驻华大使馆 新浪机构认证
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:29,102
  • 关注人气:17,734
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

水土流失的危险

(2011-12-14 10:37:38)
标签:

杂谈

分类: 环境与能源
http://photos.state.gov/libraries/america/441486/2011_Week_2/07122011_AP08043006827_300.jpg

梯田耕种是防止土壤侵蚀以及坡地表土流失的有效方法,图为印度尼西亚的梯田。


——控制农耕的影响

国际水资源管理研究所

“降雨前不要用尽罐中的水。”

——菲律宾谚语

 

农业活动对水质有两方面的影响。其一,不可持续的山区耕作方法导致水土流失。在雨天,泥土顺流而下,导致下游湖泊、河流及其他水域泥沙淤积,可能造成洪水泛滥,水坝失效。长期下去则会造成土壤养分枯竭,山地土壤结构被破坏。

 

于是形成一种恶性循环:土地的生产力降低,更多土壤流失。如果这种侵蚀继续下去,土壤将无法再用。随着世界山地不断被开发,用于大量耕作,问题的严重性与日俱增。由于人口压力,政府政策,市场需求以及土地退化不断加剧等原因,农民不得不向更高山地发展。

 

农业耕作对水质第二个方面的影响来自化肥和农药的使用。这些化学物质随着雨水冲刷进入河流,最后汇入湖泊和海洋。在非洲,化肥的使用相对少,有时外来的养分使下游农民受益。但是,在亚洲,由于对农药的补贴,河流会含有过多的化学物质。这就可能导致水的富营养化:水藻或其他植物大量繁殖,破坏生态,消耗氧分,造成鱼类死亡。如果化肥和农药进入饮水所用的地下水源,人类健康就会受到影响。

 

成立于上世纪90年代的土壤流失管理联合会(Management of Soil Erosion Consortium)致力于解决整个东南亚地区贮水资料不足的问题,并从事相关研究。联合会成员有印度尼西亚、老挝、菲律宾、泰国和越南以及国际水资源管理研究所(International Water Management Institute)和法国发展研究所(French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement)。在一个为期五年的项目中,该联合会就这五个国家的耕种方式导致的水土流失和沉积对27个贮水处(集水盆地)和亚贮水处的影响进行了评估。结果显示,采用可持续的土地使用方式能够帮助防止对下游社区的不利影响。

 

科学措施

有关分析表明,迅速改变土地的用途会对贮水处产生影响。例如,当印尼一贮水处的农民为增加收入,在红毛丹种植园中间种木薯时,沉积物由每年每公顷2.9公吨增至13.1公吨。

 

科学家判断出导致土壤流失的耕作方式(如高密度种植玉米而非大米),而后明确了那些有助于防止流失的耕作方式,如沿耕地外缘种植果树或种植本地草种的边缘草带。

 

科学家发现,当农民采取某些保护性的耕作方法时,沉积会明显减少。例如,上述印尼间种木薯的红毛丹种植园,在后来改为间种牲口草料以后,年沉积量由每年每公顷13.1公吨减至2.7公吨。同样,老挝农民利用延长土地恢复期的休耕制。使年沉积量由每年每公顷5.9公吨减至0.1公吨。

 

奖励改变

 

从全球范围来看,农民在采取减少土壤流失的技术措施方面往往行动缓慢。国际水资源管理研究所的科学家认为,这是因为农民缺乏采取行动的足够动力。科学家们正在评估一项方案,以使高地农民与那些使用下游水坝的水电公司分摊利益。具体设想是,为了使农民尽量减少土壤流失,水电公司可向农民支付一定的费用,而维持水库无泥沙沉积符合发电公司的既得利益。

 

国际水资源管理研究所负责水质、卫生及环境事务的项目主任帕伊•德雷克塞尔(Pay Drechsel)表示:“该地区地势很高,经济的迅速增长需要电力。有数百个水坝正在筹划中。”

 

利用鼓励政策帮助减少化肥和农药带来的污染,并不意味着要向农民付费,而是要使补贴有更确切的针对性。例如,如果发现某一地区含磷量达到危险水平,就可以取消对含磷化学物的补贴,或提高其价格,从而鼓励农民减少使用。

 

国际水资源管理研究所(International Water Management Institute)是非营利性的科学组织,是由国际农业研究咨询组织(Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)支持的15个研究中心之一。国际水资源管理研究所的使命是“改善土地和水资源的管理,以增加粮食生产、改善民生和保护环境”。该研究所正与海外合作伙伴共同寻找途径,减少土地使用不当所导致的不良影响并改善水质和民生。



Read more: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/chinese/publication/2011/12/20111213130406x0.1963269.html#ixzz1gTNDlLdB

 

Downstream Dangers

Managing the impact of farming

18 July 2011
http://photos.state.gov/libraries/america/441486/2011_Week_2/07122011_AP08043006827_300.jpg

Terracing, the practice of farming on graduated steps, is an effective method to prevent soil erosion and surface runoff on sloped terrain, such as these fields in Indonesia.

 

 

International Water Management Institute

 

“Don’t empty the water jar until the rain falls.”

 


Philippine proverb

 

Agricultural activities influence water quality in two ways. First, unsustainable farming practices in upland areas cause soil erosion. Particles wash downstream when it rains, causing downstream lakes, rivers and other bodies of water to fill with silt. This can cause flooding and prevent dams from working. Over time, nutrients become depleted and the upland soil structure damaged.

 

In a vicious cycle, the land becomes less productive and more soil washes away. If the erosion continues, the soil becomes unusable. This problem is growing as the world’s uplands are being cleared and intensively farmed. Population pressures, government policies, market demands and the spiral of land degradation are forcing farmers to move to ever higher lands.

 

The second impact of farming on water quality is from the use of fertilizers and pesticides. These chemicals can run off with rainwater and flow downstream via rivers into lakes and oceans. In Africa, where fertilizer is less often used, the additional nutrients are sometimes beneficial to farmers downstream. In Asia, however, where agrochemicals are subsidized, rivers can become overloaded with chemicals. This can lead to eutrophication: Algae or other plants grow excessively and disrupt ecosystems, depleting oxygen and killing fish. If fertilizers and pesticides enter groundwater used for drinking, human health problems can result.

 

The Management of Soil Erosion Consortium (MSEC), founded in the 1990s to address the lack of river catchment data across Southeast Asia, conducts research in this area. The consortium includes Indonesia, Laos, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam, along with the IWMI and the French Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD). During a five-year project, MSEC assessed runoff and sediment from farming practices in 27 catchments (drainage basins) and subcatchments in the five countries. Findings show that sustainable land use practices can help prevent negative impacts on downstream communities.

 

Scientific Solutions

 

The analysis demonstrated that rapid land use changes were having an impact on catchments. For example, when farmers sought to increase earnings by intercropping rambutan plantations with cassava in one Indonesian catchment, the sediment increased from 2.9 megagrams (Mg) per hectare per year to 13.1 Mg.

 

The scientists identified farming practices that were causing erosion (for example, higher cropping intensity of growing maize instead of rice). They then identified practices that could help prevent erosion, such as planting fruit trees or sowing strips of native grass along land contours of the cultivated land.

 

Notable improvements in sediment amounts were seen when farmers adopted certain conservation practices. For example, when the Indonesian rambutan plantation that had been intercropped with cassava was replaced with grass for livestock, the annual sediment dropped from 13.1 Mg per hectare per year to 2.7 Mg. Similarly, farmers in Laos reduced sediment from 5.9 Mg per hectare per year to 0.1 Mg using a fallow system that increased the land’s recovery time.

 

Incentive to Change

 

Globally, farmers have been slow to adopt erosion reduction techniques. IWMI scientists believe farmers lack sufficient incentive. Scientists are assessing a plan to apportion benefits between upland farmers and hydropower companies operating downstream dams. The idea is that hydropower companies, which have a vested interest in maintaining silt-free reservoirs, would pay farmers to minimize soil erosion.

 

“This region has very high topography and, given the economic boom, they need power,” says Pay Drechsel, theme leader for water quality, health and environment at IWMI. “Many hundreds of dams are being planned.”

 

Using incentives to help reduce pollution from fertilizers and pesticides does not mean paying farmers to use fewer agrochemicals; it requires targeting subsidies more precisely. For example, if dangerous levels of phosphorus were found in an area, it would make sense to remove subsidies on phosphorus-containing chemicals or make them expensive, encouraging farmers to use them sparingly.

 

The International Water Management Institute is a nonprofit scientific organization and one of 15 research centers supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). IWMI’s mission is “improving the management of land and water resources for food, livelihoods and the environment.” The Institute is working with overseas partners to help find ways to reduce the negative impacts of inappropriate land use and enhance water quality and livelihoods.



Read more: http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/publication/2011/07/20110718114509yeldnahc0.9687398.html#ixzz1gTNFDHD3

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有