加载中…Unnecessary.Sophistry(21.10%.Is.Also.Okay)
(2024-08-29 15:06:31)| 分类： 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Unnecessary
Sophistry
( 21. 10% Is Also Okay
)
In fact,
the guys who always want to ruin TCM
(
Traditional Chinese Medicine ) can no
longer
find any
reasons for their purpose.
Faced with a
large number of facts that TCM
can effectively
treat diseases, those guys
eitherdo not want to see su ch
objective facts,
do
not
understand
Therefore, they
simply deny all of such
objective
in
theory.
For example,
one guy recently said:
"Only 10% of TCM is
essence,
and the rest is
dross."
Actually, this
is just nonsense!
In fact, no one
knows how he got this 10%,
it's fabricated
randomly
Or, the reason
for the emergence of
10%
may
The first
concern is that if he gives a rate
below
by a
large
The second
concern is that if he
rate
by
all always
want to
ruin
TCM.
It can be seen
that he is indeed very pitiful.
Objectively speaking, the development
of
all
disciplines has the process
of
absorbing
There is
no exception in TCM, western
medicine,
And the
elimination ratio is also more
or
less,
there
can
For example,
the bloodletting therapy used
by
1799
western
bloodletting
Some
traditional Chinese medicine
treatment
methods have
also been eliminated.
In fact, all of
these are the natural ecology
of
no
need
This is
something like human growth:
No one
needs to laugh at the
history
of
never
Even if the
essence of TCM is only 10%, it
does not
necessarily mean that TCM must
be
eliminated.
If someone says
that 10% is too low, it would
be enough to
ruin TCM, he is actually quite
ridiculous
!
In history,
there had been many things
in
western
medicine, and not all of them have
been preserved,
the elimination rate of
western
medicine is also very high.
If you don't
believe it, you can search for
"Obsolete
western medicine techniques"
or "Obsolete western
medicine" on the
internet, you
will understand it at once.
There's no need
for me to list them one by
one.
In fact, I
don't want to discuss such
historical
garbages
either.
More over, if
we were to eliminate all things
with an
effective utilization rate below 10%
according to
this guy's 10% standard, the
result would be
very ridiculous.
Let's consider
the problem from a different
perspective.
When a person
grows up from infancy to
the age of 20,
his weight is generally less
than 75 kg, but
at this time, the accumulated
food he has
consumed often exceeds 7300 kg.
If we only
consider from a biological
perspective,
age of
20, his effective
food is
only slightly higher
If according to
this guy's requirement, the
effective
utilization rate of food must be
higher than
10%,
boy and
a 20-year-old girl
over 730
kilograms !
What a
huge
Considering
that he may be over 70 years old,
even
already
at this
time.
At this point,
if we only consider from a biological perspective, his effective
utilization rate of food
is
If according to
this guy's requirements, the
effective
10%,
then a
should
exceed
Isn't this a
joke ?
From this, it
can be seen that the so-called 10%
is just his
casual nonsense !
And the biggest
problem with such a nonsense
as he said
is:
Maliciously fabricating correct nonsense
to
lure
At the same
time, we should also recognize that
the
characteristics of such a correct
nonsense
are:
Such a
correct nonsense sounds
reasonable
but
The current
issue is:
There is always
some guys who are anti-TCM
addicts.
They often use
such correct nonsenses
to
deceive
patients, which is extremely
despicable
!
So, strict
precautions must be taken !
喜欢
0
赠金笔