Medical Science Is Not A Sophistry

( 2.Toxicity And Effectiveness Of Medicine.1) 

One of the most proud skills of a gang of pseudo 

scholars who always want to ruin  our TCM

 (Traditional Chinese Medicine) is weaving various

 sophistry techniques to deceive and tease patients, 

and its essence is not responsible for the patients 

and the therapeutic effects.

 

Although the types of sophistry are diverse , actually , 

all of these sophistries are all produced by a standard

production process, which is:

Draw a conclusion first,

Find or forge reasons later,

Ignore any facts they dislike or don't understand,

And they never care about therapeutic effects as 

long as  they dislike !

 

For example, even now, there is still someone who 

said:   

The deceptive nature of TCM lies in its 

therapeutic effect

   For it, he gave a lot of plausible reasons in a way of pretending seriousness.

And this kind of sophistry itself is a specimen  from 

that production line by "drawing conclusions first, 

finding reasons later, disregarding buth facts and therapeutic effects". 

Specifically, they first determined that traditional 

Chinese medicine is unscientific and toxic.

Under this premise, they can freely slander our 

TCM

Now it's worth dissecting this kind of sophistry a 

bit, because only by studying flies can we better 

eliminate them.

 

That guy first highlights the toxicity of traditional 

Chinese medicine, while describing the toxicity of 

Western medicine as a side effect and defending 

its toxicity. he said that "the side effect of Western 

medicine is the price that must be paid in order to 

treat a disease under certain circumstances." 

So, does traditional Chinese medicine also have such

 rights? What reason is there to deprive traditional 

Chinese medicine of its such  rights

Actually,those guys are very clear that if traditional

Chinese medicine also obtains such rights, then they

 will have no opportunity to slander our traditional 

Chinese medicine any more

And more, this guy also said: "The toxic and side 

effects of traditional Chinese medicine are not yet

 clear, and there is no therapeutic effect"

But, is western medicine everything clear and no  

toxic and side effects  ? But why are there always

 accidents ?

When it comes to traditional Chinese medicine, 

they say that aristolochic acid and excessive heavy 

metals. But why not  talk about the wonderful use

 of Western medicine warfarin as a rodenticide ?

Moreover, excessive heavy metals are also common problems, such as cauliflower, lotus root, celery,

 lettuce, shepherd's purse, water chestnuts, etc., all 

contain heavy metals. Why use traditional Chinese

 medicine to scare patients only by possibly

 containing heavy metals?

 

In fact, Only an objective view of drug toxicity is the 

true scientific attitude, and malicious favoritism like

 him is playing with professional terminology, 

deceiving and teasing patients!

Essentially, it means not being responsible for the 

patient and not being responsible for the therapeutic 

effect.