Supporting role of Chinese film

标签:
杂谈 |
Published in China Daily 04/17/2012 page9
http://s8/middle/47384d2egbdd64075ad77&690role
At a time when all countries are paying attention to the
development of their soft power, the film industry is regarded as
an important cultural force.
A successful film can have a worldwide impact, and even shape
the image of a country. With this in mind, the Chinese government
has put forward the goal of "going out" for Chinese film
industry.
To achieve this, besides strengthening the film industry itself,
the government needs to provide appropriate support. Film
production and distribution is an industry with high investment and
high risks. The ability to gain sufficient funds will determine the
fate of a film project and the prosperity of the film market. In
this respect, China can learn from the tactics the US government
uses to support Hollywood. History shows that even Hollywood would
not be so powerful without the US government's support during its
global expansion process.
In the United States, since the 1980s, most of the film projects
are planned and produced by independent film companies, which
usually pre-sell a film's distribution rights to overseas
distribution corporations, and then use these distribution
agreements as collateral for acquiring loans form financial
institutions. But financial institutions usually are reluctant to
advance funding predicated on distribution agreements, especially
those signed in Asia or Latin America, partly due to concerns about
regional economic crises and political risks there, which might
generate defaults.
To solve this problem, in 2000 the Export-Import Bank of the
United States put forward a Film Production Guarantee Program to
provide guarantees to bank loans for independent film projects,
accounting for 60 to 90 percent of the loan
amount.
The US Small Business Administration also launched a support
program to help fund independent films. Guarantees from government
agencies enhanced the confidence of the financial sector in the
development of the independent film industry, thus contributing to
the prosperity of the film industry.
In China, with the encouragement of the government, the Bank of
Beijing, China Merchants Bank, Minsheng Bank and other financial
institutions began to provide loans for film projects. But in
consideration of potential risks, banks usually choose to fund
blockbusters, such as Assembly, Thirteen Beauties and Flying Swords
of Dragon Gate, while small and medium-sized film projects and
small film companies, even those with great potential, find it
difficult to obtain loans.
In view of this situation, the Chinese government may be able to
learn from the US experience and develop a loan guarantee scheme
for small film projects to obtain loans with distribution
agreements as collateral. This would not only be conducive to the
prosperity and diversification of the domestic film market and the
cultivation of film talents, but also the promotion of Chinese
films overseas as film companies will spare no efforts to gain
overseas distribution contracts in order to get
loans.
In order to give full play to the role of the Hollywood in
stimulating employment, promoting economic development and
spreading American culture and values to the world, the US
government has put forward many preferential policies to support
the industry.
Even more noteworthy, many US government agencies serve
Hollywood film projects hand and foot. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Department of
Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and many
other government agencies are equipped with officials in charge of
liaising with Hollywood and providing support such as script
consultation, equipment and personnel. Most local governments have
also set up film agencies to promote and support filming in their
areas.
These measures are undoubtedly of great benefit to film
production in the US, enhancing quality and improving its
competitiveness in the world market.
Compared with Hollywood, China's film industry has to bear a
heavier tax burden. Although the government provides certain
preferential tax policies, these only cover some State-owned
companies, newly-opened cinemas and rural film companies. Corporate
income tax for ordinary film companies is as high as 25 percent,
their box office earnings are taxed 3 percent and they have to pay
5 percent to the Film Fund.
China also lacks clear norms and guidelines for film production
companies to apply to use public facilities and
services.
The Chinese government should learn from the American experience
and use tax and services to promote the development of China's film
industry.
Film exports usually face many obstacles, such as quota systems
imposed to protect national film industries. In order to help the
overseas expansion of Hollywood films, the US government has been
employing various legal and diplomatic tactics and international
cooperation.
In concluding international trade treaties, the US often takes
advantage of its economic and technical strength to exert pressure
on other countries to import Hollywood movies trussed up with
capital and technology.
China has established diplomatic relations with 172 countries,
and has a broad consulate network, if these are given full play to
help Chinese film companies collect overseas market information and
organize film exchanges, they are bound to promote exports of
Chinese films.
If major domestic film companies can jointly set up an
organization similar to the Motion Picture Export Association of
America to help Chinese companies explore overseas markets and
cooperate with foreign governments to combat copyright violations,
it will be of great advantage to the "going out" of Chinese
film.