加载中…
个人资料
彭晓辉
彭晓辉 新浪个人认证
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:5,357,093
  • 关注人气:4,541
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

网络女权圈子在建构敌意环境性骚扰 互联网对女性来说危险吗?(下集)

(2016-01-19 07:00:19)
标签:

杂谈

#晓辉性元谈# 【网络女权圈子在建构敌意环境性骚扰】网络女权圈子就是一个毒化的暴力环境。网络女权者对他人,甚至对其他的女权者的语言攻击可以是无休止的、恶毒的、涉及性方面的、暴力的。这就让我想到了性骚扰的一个类型,“敌意环境性骚扰”。这是女权们非常在意的社会问题,可是这个圈子却不断地将他们认为有男权思想的人称之为直男癌、渣屌!其所作所为不就是在建构敌意环境性骚扰吗?
网络女权圈子在建构敌意环境性骚扰 <wbr>互联网对女性来说危险吗?(下集) 部分解说词
Hi, I’m Caroline Kitchens, filling in for Christina Hoff Sommers. Christina will return for next week’s episode. Anyone who’s spent time on the internet can tell you it’s often not the best place for intelligent debate. There are a lot of trolls, and they seem to target --well, just about everyone. But recently, feminists and journalists have seized on some disturbing incidents and factoids to claim that there is a larger, patriarchal effort to silence women online. Amanda Hess says that the cyber harassment of women is the civil rights issue of our time. The conservative New York Times columnist Ross Douthat called Hess’ story, “a candidate for the most troubling magazine essay of 2014.” With the exception of a few skeptics, no one has checked the facts. There’s no question that women sometimes suffer severe harassment and abuse online. But when you look at the evidence, there is no indication that online harassment is either a) systematic or b) limited to women. Amanda Hess and other activist bloggers cite data from an anti-abuse advocacy group claiming that 72.5% of people who reported online harassment incidents were women. But, as libertarian writer/feminist Cathy Young showed in Reason magazine, that data was rigged from the start. First: it looked at REPORTED cases of harassment. But what if women are simply more likely to classify an incident as harassment and to report it than men might be? Second, and more importantly: there were only an average of 288 victims identified per year. That’s too many, but when you consider the hundreds of millions of women who use the internet, it hardly amounts to an “epidemic.” So let&#39;s look at a more serious study.  According to a Pew survey, 13% of women said they had been stalked or harassed online, but so did 11% of men. In the same study, 5% of women said something happened online that led them into physical danger, and so did 3% of men. These gaps are small and within the poll’s margin of error.
观后感: 在上一期视频里,事实派女权者揭了联合国报告将“一个小公益网站的二百多人调查中,73%的举报网络骚扰的人是女性”扭曲成了“73%的女性遭受网络骚扰”的错误。在这个视频里,事实派女权者进一步指出,即便是这二百多个举报者中73%是女性,也不能说明大部分网络骚扰的受害人是女性。因为有可能同样的遭遇下,女人比男人更倾向于把它定性为骚扰而求助于公益网站,而男人有可能更不愿意求助。一项更为严肃全面的皮尤调查发现,女人在网上遭到骚扰和跟踪,以及由于网上事件而影响到了现实中的人身安全的几率,各自比男人只高两个百分点,这种差异是在该调查的误差幅度之内的,也就是说不能证明女人在网上比男人遭受更多危险。上一期视频提到的研究证明,如果考虑所有的网络暴力类型的总和,是男人在网上遭受更多暴力。这一期视频也指出,在推特上,男政客遭到语言暴力凌虐的机会数倍于女政客。而且,也没有可靠的证据证明,在网络上施暴的人多数是男性。
视频中还提到,网络女权圈子就是一个毒化的暴力环境。网络女权者们对他人,甚至对其他的女权者的语言攻击可以是无休止的,恶毒的,涉及性方面的,暴力的。这就让我想到了性骚扰的一个类型,“敌意环境性骚扰”。敌意环境性骚扰的适用范围是指工作学习环境中。如果网络女权圈认为自己在网上不过是娱乐和发泄,并不算一种工作,那么网络暴力就不算敌意环境性骚扰。但是如果她们以做公益工作自居,那么网络女权圈就算不拿工资,也算是一个公益工作环境。那么在工作环境中对其他公益宣传者进行涉及性方面的攻击,这难道不是敌意环境性骚扰?敌意环境性骚扰的严重后果是导致受攻击的人无法继续工作,只好离开。在网络女权圈中这种被“挤兑走”的人其实并不少。在讨论别人的行为算不算敌意环境性骚扰之前,网络女权圈应该先反思一下自己圈子里的敌意环境性骚扰,以及对自己圈子里骚扰者的放纵和漠视。(这时候,猜都可以猜得到,有人会说,每个人都是独立的,别的女权者的行为我不负责,我没义务发声批评。这样的话,网络女权在大众中的名誉就别想正面,在负面形象的位置上呆着去吧,谁管你啊。)
视频中说的是英语国家的网络女权圈,不是说中国,但是主讲人仍然很自然的把她们的网络女权圈现象和中国的文革放在一起做比喻,结合西方网络女权圈那也不怎么好的公众形象,这说明了什么呢?

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有