何为评估男性生育能力的最简单方法?
(2011-05-13 16:04:52)
标签:
保健男性生育能力评估方法健康 |
分类: 健康贴士 |
研究发现,男性肛门与外生殖器之间的距离(anogenital distance)之长短与男士们的生育能力的强弱有关。以往的动物实验表明,肛门与外生例殖器之间的距离较短之雄性往往伴有睾丸的发育和功能异常。随后亦有研究证实,该距离较短的男性往往精液中精子的数量较少、精子的质量较差和精子的活动能力较低,其结果当然是生育能力较差。最近,美国医生进一步比较了有生育能力和无生育能力的两组男性被试者之肛门至外生殖器之间的距离,发现有生育能力的男性之阴茎和肛门至外生死器之间的距离均较无生育能力者长。
上述数据提示,如此简单的一个测量足可评估男性的生殖能力,故请女士们(特别是正物色男友的女士们)多多注意啊!祝大家好运!更多资讯,请参阅原文:
Can Crotch Length Predict Infertility in Men?
Distance between scrotum and anus linked to reproductive ability, study suggests
WEDNESDAY, May 11 (HealthDay News) -- It may be possible to assess a man's fertility by checking his "anogenital distance," the gap between his scrotum and anus, a new study suggests.
Previous studies in animals have shown that anogenital distance is an important measure of genital development and may be shorter in males with abnormal development and dysfunction of the testicles, the Baylor College of Medicine researchers explained.
Furthermore, a study from the University of Rochester, published in March in Environmental Health Perspectives, found that men with shorter anogenital spans had lower sperm counts, poorer quality sperm, lower sperm concentrations and lower motility.
In the new study, the Baylor group investigated whether anogenital distance differed in fertile and infertile men. They measured the scrotum-anus distance as well as the penis length of 117 infertile and 56 fertile men visiting an andrology clinic.
The infertile men had a significantly shorter anogenital distance and penis length than the fertile men, the study found.
Dr. Michael Eisenberg, a male reproductive medicine and surgery fellow in the Baylor urology department and the study's lead author, said the study has two main implications. "First, this could represent a noninvasive way to test testicular function and reproductive potential in adult men," he said in a Baylor news release. "And second, it suggests that gestational exposures and development may impact adult testicular function."
Further research is needed to compare techniques for measuring anogenital distance and assess their accuracy, he and his colleagues said.
One expert who's done her own research in this area applauded the study.
"This is an important paper showing, once again, that anogenital distance is a strong predictor of semen quality," said Shanna H. Swan, vice chair for research in the department of preventive medicine at Mount Sinai Children's Environmental Health Center, New York City. "This paper also provides new data on infertile men, who have shorter (less masculine) anogenital distance."
Swan said that she and her colleagues published similar findings last month. "Together the two studies make a strong case that this simple measure (the anogenital distance) reflects early genital development and predicts semen quality and fertility," she said.
But one urologist said the the finding is too preliminary to introduce into clinical practice, however.
"We would all like a simple, noninvasive way to predict potential problems with fertility in men, but unfortunately, this one is not ready for prime time," said Dr. Elizabeth Kavaler, a urology specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "We have a long way to go before we can use anogenital distance as a determinant of future fertility in men." The study was published online May 11 in PLoS One.
SOURCES: Shanna H. Swan, PhD, vice chair for research, department of preventive medicine, Mount Sinai Childrens Environmental Health Center, New York City; Elizabeth Kavaler, M.D., urology specialist, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Baylor College of Medicine, news release, May 11, 2011