加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

罗亚蒙答《环球时报》英文版记者问:城市入户看学历,无耻!

(2014-03-18 13:43:01)
标签:

杂谈

分类: 城市化
http://s4/mw690/001UaWo9zy6Hp14C6PN53&690

罗亚蒙:考量学历的“积分落户”政策充满歧视性,是很无耻的。城市落户,只应有一个标准,那就是相对稳定的住所和工作,不分性别、学历、年龄、籍贯、民族、信仰。如果做不到这一点,“新型城镇化”就毫无“新”意可言。


《环球时报》英文版网址:http://epaper.globaltimes.cn/2014-03-18/47888.htm



Global Times (2014-03-18 P04)
By Jiang Jie

Some 100 million migrant workers and other permanent urban residents can expect to be registered as urbanites by 2020, as China vows a people-centered and environmentally friendly path to urbanization.  

The ratio of permanent urban residents to total population should reach 60 percent, while residents with an urban household registration, or hukou, should make up 45 percent of the total population, according to the National Newtype Urbanization Plan (2014-2020) released on Sunday by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council. 

Figures from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) show that China's proportion of permanent urban residents stood at 53.7 percent and those with urban hukouaccounted for 35.7 percent of total population by the end of 2013. 

The number of rural migrant workers rose to 268.94 million in 2013, 19.76 percent of the total population, according to the NBS.

"We have the capacity to achieve the goal as long as authorities show enough determination. The key is to guarantee the stability of migrant workers coming to cities and that means assuring job opportunities and social welfare attached to thehukou," said Xiao Mingzheng, a professor with the School of Government at Peking University. 

Helping migrant workers into a stable job will also ease the government's financial burden, he noted.

Controls over settling in towns and small cities will be lifted. Restrictions on access to medium-size cities will also be relaxed in an orderly manner, requiring big cities to house 3 to 5 million people which will have clear and reasonable criteria for hukouapplication. 

However, megacities will be able to regulate and control newcomers through a points system.

Shanghai, Guangzhou and Tianjin have already implemented such a system, which usually judges applicants on points gained from aspects including educational background and social security records. Beijing has yet to implement the system, and this may be because it is the capital and therefore its situation as regards workers is different, said Xiao.

He noted that a scoring system could prevent people from flooding into megacities blindly under a coordinated and unified acceptance standard as well as providing quotas according to what kind of skilled migrants are in demand.  

While a points system for a hukou for a city like Beijing is still flawed, it may be the best method available, but it should reduce its population first, said Luo Yameng, an urbanization expert in Beijing. 

"The scoring system is shameful and unfair, as it judges people on their education, and migrant workers might lag behind others," he said.


Beijing recently decided to relocate a clothing wholesale market to "upgrade" the city's industries, ease the population and traffic pressure and replace low-end industries with "high-end" ones. 

Sheng Guangyao, an associate research fellow with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said that many megacities are focused on development of high-end industries. 

Many migrant workers involved in low-end industries will find it easier to find a job in small- and medium-size cities, Sheng noted.

答问原稿

 

1. 新型城镇化规划》释放了一个怎样的政治导向信号? 

罗亚蒙:《新型城镇化规划》的出台,是我国总体改革顶层制度设计的一个组成部分。它标志我国从30多年来的被动城镇化开始转向主动城镇化。在中国未来城镇化发展过程中,我国将更多关注风险的提前预测与矛盾的提前化解,这实际上也是执政党治理国家方式的一次转变。

 

2. 据资料显示,北上广等特大城市中,唯独北京尚未出台积分落户政策,请问有哪些原因导致了北京的“滞后”?

罗亚蒙:特大城市“积分落户”虽然是一种落后的计划经济思维模式,但也是计划经济体制下相对公平的模式。北京没有推行“积分落户”,最关键的原因还是首都特性所决定,国家所需要的人才必须无条件优先保证落户;其次,北京人口已经严重超载,不堪重负,当前体制下主要矛盾是解决如何疏散人口,而不是考虑接纳人口。

 

 3. 请问您认为北京是否可以按《规划》采取积分制?

罗亚蒙:我赞成北京实行“积分落户”,这在目前体制下也是可行的唯一较好方式,比现在暗箱操作要好得多。总会给一部分人带来利好和希望。

 

4. 对于解决北京等特大城市的人口与资源问题,仅依靠积分制落户政策是否有效?还需要哪些方面的政策进行配合?

罗亚蒙:解决北京人口与资源环境尖锐矛盾,“积分落户”肯定是不行的,也不会有什么积极效果。根本上还是要肃清“王朝地理”思想流毒,废除户籍,区域平等,公民平等,自由迁徙,使大量人口自愿离开北京,消除首都“城市黑洞”效应,实现城市人口有机疏散和区域可持续发展。

 

5. 资料显示,一般积分考量申请人的学历和缴纳社保医保年限等,这是否会限制农民工落户。以上就是我的问题,谢谢罗老师!

罗亚蒙:考量学历的“积分落户”政策充满歧视性,是很无耻的。城市落户,只应有一个标准,那就是相对稳定的住所和工作,不分性别、学历、年龄、籍贯、民族、信仰。如果做不到这一点,“新型城镇化”就毫无“新”意可言。

 



0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有