加载中…
个人资料
投行实务与研究
投行实务与研究
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:4,738
  • 关注人气:341
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

证券法文献速递——对D规则的批评和反思,以及州证券法的不合理限制。

(2014-05-29 14:55:27)
标签:

财经

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1971200&download=yes

 

 

The Wreck of Regulation D: The Unintended (and Bad) Outcomes for the SEC's CrownJewel Exemptions


Rutheford B. Campbell Jr. 


University of Kentucky - College of Law 

August 1, 2011

The Business Lawyer, Vol. 66, p. 919, 2011 

Abstract:      
Regulation D is — or at least should be — the crown jewel of the Securities and Exchange Commission's regulatory exemptions from the registration requirements ofthe Securities Act of 1933. It offers businesses — especially businesses with relatively small capital requirements — fair and efficient access to vital, external capital.

In this article, I present data derived from deep samples of recent Form Ds filed with the Commission. The data show that Regulation D is not working in the way theCommission intended or in a way that benefits society. The data reveal that companies attempting to raise relatively small amounts of capital under Regulation D overwhelmingly forego the low transaction costs of offerings under Rule 504 and Rule 505 in favor of meeting the more onerous (and more expensive) requirementsof Rule 506. Additionally, these companies overwhelmingly limit their relatively small offerings to accredited investors, which dramatically reduces the pool ofpotential investors.

This unintended and bad outcome is the result of the burdens imposed by state blue sky laws and regulations, and this has to a large degree wrecked the sensibleand balanced approach of the Commission in Regulation D.

Reclaiming Regulation D requires the elimination of state authority over all Regulation D offerings. State regulators, however, have proven to be aggressive andeffective in protecting their turf. Although the Commission has the ability — and I believe the duty — to solve this problem for the benefit of the economy, it has a history of an unwillingness to take on state regulators, even in instances where state regulations essentially destroy the Commission's sensible and balanced regimefor capital formation. Congress also could solve the problem by expanding federal preemption to cover all offerings made under Regulation D.

 

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Regulation D, Securities Act of 1933, business, small capital requirement, Rule 504, Rule 505, Rule 506

Accepted Paper Series 

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有