加载中…Medical.Science.Is.Never.A.Sophistry(7.Blind.Or.Not)
(2025-09-04 14:47:14)| 分类： 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Medical Science
Is
Never A Sophistry
(
Till
now, some guy is still professing
that
“The
deceptive nature of
TCM
lies in its therapeutic effect
. ”
In order
to tout such a junk, he even
used
"Double-blind trials" as
a " Big
Killer
scare
others, it's really pitiful and ridiculous !
In fact,
just a little analysis can reveal
what
kind
of junk this guy is touting .
Or please
think about a question:
Since the
double-blind trials are so
important
and
sophisticated, it cannot be done
casually,
for there
must be many conditions that
need
to be
met in advance , right ?
For
example:
1.
The treatment of rare diseases
the
sample size is too small for it's
too
difficult
What
should doctors do at this time
?
Shouldn't
such patients receive any treatment ?
2.
The sudden outbreak of the epidemic
There was
no time to conduct any
double-blind
trial,
not even enough time to gather all
the
necessary
materials.
What
should doctors do at this time
?
Shouldn't
such patients receive any treatment ?
3.
Although there are many cases,
the
discrete
In
space, the cases distribute widely, and
in
terms
discover
a few
impossible to
analyze
What
should doctors do at this time ?
Shouldn't
such patients receive any treatment ?
4.
The condition is progressing rapidly
The
condition is progressing rapidly, so
that
any
getting
a
on.
What
should doctors do at this time?
…
…
In short,
can't treatment be achieved
before
conducting a double-blind trials
?
To leave
the patients to their own fate ?
But it is
worth noting that in order to
preach
the
double-blind trial, this guy also
specially
introduced the first effective treatment
case
of Ebola
virus happened in 2014.
In 2014,
the Ebola virus suddenly
ravaged
Africa,
resulting in a mortality rate of
over
50% for
patients, which was indeed
very
dangerous.
At that
time, two American healthcare
workers
were
unfortunately infected and after
careful
treatment
upon returning to their home
country,
they
recovered and were
discharged.
Afterall,
this successful case is good
news
for
But this
guy used this case to mock
the
methods
used by TCM ( Traditional
Chinese
Medicine
), only for none of TCM were
conducted
through double-blind trails,
which is
really indefinable !
But in
fact, the effective treatment of
Ebola
virus
patients in 2014 was completed
without
any
double-blind trial, and this
successful
treatment
also sternly warned us:
1. Double
blind trials are just a
research
method,
not a clinical norm: no one has
the
right to
use the absence of double
blind
trials
treatment !
2. The
use of treatment methods that
have
not
undergone double-blind trails
cannot
exclude
the self-healing nature of
diseases
or the
comforting effects of drugs, but
as
long as
such treatment methods are
effective,
it is
good enough and
understandable.
After
all, medical science should
prioritize
treating
diseases and saving lives, and
in
any case,
medical science cannot be
just
a report
analysis of double-blind trials
!
3. For
highly contagious and
dangerous
diseases,
any effective treatment
method
is
extremely valuable in the absence
of
any
precedent, and the lack of
double-blind
trials
should not be used as an excuse
to
prevent
the treatment of patients.
4.
Whether it is traditional Chinese
medicine
or
Western medicine, if effective
treatment
is
achieved through treatment methods
that
have not
undergone double-blind trials,
even
if there
are some self-healing and
comforting
effects,
their actual therapeutic
effects
cannot
So, if
traditional Chinese medicine
uses
treatment
methods that have not
undergone
double-blind trials to achieve
effective
treatment, we cannot arbitrarily say
that
such
and
therapeutic
As we
know, the essence of such problems
is
that
some guys intentionally use
professional
terms
such as double-blind trial to
mislead
patients
!
So, in
order to completely solve such
problems
and stop
those pseudo scholars from
being
unreasonably attack on TCM
（Traditional
Chinese
Medicine）for a long time, we
should
return to
the original intention of
medical
science
as soon as possible !
FIRST,
let's think about what medical
science
is.
What is
medical science ?
According
to " Chencius ShuoWen Jiezi " ,
we
know that
Medical Science is the science
to
study
effective methods to cure diseases
for
patients.
So,
medical science is not just a poor
analysis
tool only
for double-blind trials !
According
to this definition of medical
science,
any
treatment plan, as long as it is
truly
effective,
or
whether it
trials,
naturally
of
medical
SECOND,
we should also adhere to the
first
law
we
of
Specifically, first to adhere to the
first
law
of
should
objective facts,
and
should discuss
medical science
according to curative
effects.
Then to
adhere to the core principles
of
medical
must be
based
therapeutic effects and
must
patients focus as
guide and treating
diseases as its first duty
.
As long
as we adhere to all of these
principles
consistently, all scams are to be swept out,
and
even
double-blind trials cannot become a
wall
to
prevent effective treatment !
Therefore, in order to completely eliminate
such
shameless
interference to TCM, based on
the
original
intention and these principls of
medical
sciences,
we can easily draw the
following
conclusions:
Any
medical plan must have clear factual
basis
and clear
therapeutic effects, which can
be
proven by
a large number of facts,
patients,
or
perhaps double-blind trials, but
not
necessarily limited to double-blind
trials.
--- ---
This is the principle of double
clearness
in
medical science !
From the
perspective of the
development
history
"The principle of
double clearness in
medical science is
more important,
feasible, and
scientific than
double-blind trials
!
For
example, the immune method
for
smallpox
was developed according to
this
principle and not be limited
to
double-blind trials at its very
beginning.
The same
was true for the effective
treatment
of two
patients infected with Ebola virus
in
2014.
It can be
seen that the double-blind trial
is
only a
later stage research work of a
medical
plan.
As long
as the treatment is indeed
effective,
even
without undergoing double-blind
trials,
there is
nothing remarkable !
Now, we
can see, if someone is
particularly
good at
playing with professional
terminology,
intentionally avoiding the core principles
of
medical
science, intentionally evading
the
responsibility of treating and saving
patients,
insisting
on using double-blind trails to
deceive
patients,
and even by this way, he insist
on
preventing effective treatments in TCM,
then
he is a
professional fraud, and we don't need
to
care
about any of his word games.
喜欢
0
赠金笔