2.Toxicity.And.Effectiveness.Of.Medicine
(2025-08-28 15:38:59)分类: 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
(
2. Toxicity And Effectiveness Of
Medicine)
One of the most proud
skills of a gang of
scholars
( Traditional Chinese
Medicine ) is weaving various
sophistry techniques to
deceive and tease patients,
and its essence is not
responsible to the patients
and the therapeutic effects.
Although the types of such sophistries are
diverse,
actually, all of such sophistries are all
produced by
a standard production process, which is:
Draw a
conclusion first,
Find or forge
reasons later,
Ignore any
facts they dislike or don't
understand,
And they
never care about therapeutic
effects
as
For example, even now, there is still a guy who
said
"The deceptive nature of
TCM
lies in
its
For it, he gave a lot of reasons seeming
plausible
in a way of pretending seriousness.
And this kind of sophistry itself is a
specimen
from that production line of
"drawing
conclusions first, finding reasons
later,
disregarding buth facts and
therapeutic
effects".
Specifically, they first determined
that
traditional Chinese medicine is
unscientific
and toxic.
Under this premise, they can freely
slander
our
Now it's worth dissecting this kind of
sophistry
a bit, because only by studying flies can
we
better eliminate them.
That guy first highlights the toxicity of
traditional
Chinese medicine, while describing the
toxicity
of Western medicine as a side effect
and
defending its
toxicity.
He said :
the
price that must be paid
treat a disease under certain
circumstances
Then, does traditional Chinese medicine
also
have such rights
?
Or, what reason is to deprive traditional
Chinese
medicine of its such rights after all ?
Actually, those guys are very clear that
if
traditional Chinese medicine also
obtains
such rights, then they may have no
opportunity
to slander our traditional Chinese
medicine
any more !
And more, this guy also said:
Chinese medicine are not yet clear,
and
there is no therapeutic effect"
But, is western medicine everything clear
and
no
Then, why are there always accidents till now ?
When it comes to traditional Chinese
medicine,
they always mention aristolochic acid
and
excessive heavy
metals.
But why not talk about the wonderful use
of
Western medicine warfarin as a rodenticide ?
Moreover, excessive heavy metals are
also
common problems, such as cauliflower,
lotus
root, celery, lettuce, shepherd's purse,
water
chestnuts,
Why use the heavy metals
in traditional Chinese
medicine to scare
patients ?
In fact, only an objective view of drug
toxicity
is the true scientific attitude .
But malicious favoritism like him is
playing
with professional terminology,
deceiving
and teasing patients !
Essentially, it means being irresponsible
to
the patient and irresponsible to
the
therapeutic effect.
For a long time, when the gang
of
scholars
they used two standards.
The first standard is for their western
medicine,
according to this standard, only medicine's
side
effects can be discussed, but toxicity cannot
be
mentioned.
The second standard is for our traditional
Chinese
medicine, according to this standard,
only
can be discussed, but side effects cannot
be
mentioned, let alone therapeutic effects.
This is a typical sophistry !
Are they discussing medical science ?
Why can't we talk about therapeutic
effects
when discussing
Why can't we talk about therapeutic
effects
when discussing
Are they the business representatives
from
crematorium ?
They often say that traditional Chinese
medicine
is not only little toxic, but also very toxic.
But,
used as rodenticide, isn't
this
And western medicine often uses
nitroglycerin
tablets for emergency treatment of heart
disease,
but nitroglycerin can also be used as
something
else.
What can those guys say for it
?
In fact, both western medicine and
traditional
Chinese medicine have some toxicity and
side
effects.
So, we cannot talk about western medicine
by
just using side effects to cover its toxicity.
At the same time, we cannot discuss
traditional
Chinese medicine without talking about
its
efficacy, by saying that
"Traditional Chinese
medicine has high
toxicity
patients in this way.
All these deceptions are irresponsible
to
patients and efficacy !
Because when it comes to medicine,
whether
traditional Chinese medicine or
Western
medicine, we should talk about its
efficacy,
its side effects and even its toxicity.
This is the scientific attitude and this is
the
responsibility to patients and efficacy.
Till now, we can see that the saying
of
deception !
Because no medicine has the right to
be
exempt from toxicity testing, even
western
medicine strives for its efficacy while
strictly
controlling its toxicity or other side effects.
It is very shameless to advocate for
those
double standards on this issue !
So, we must adhere to the First Law
of
Medical Science
!
that is:
We should discuss science according
to
objective facts, and meanwhile
,we
should discuss medical science
according
to curative effects .
And from it, we can see that when
discussing
medication, we should focus on its efficacy
As doctors, patients or potential patients,
we
should pay attention to the efficacy of medicine.
Namely, any kind of medicine, whether
traditional
Chinese medicine or western medicine, as
long
as the treatment is is indeed effective, even if
it
is only effective for part patients, it is
worth
referring to use.
And if used, it's important to control its
toxicity
or side effects.
After all, the only mission of
effectively treat diseases, and we don't
have
to notice any sophistry.
So, when we see this kind of sophistry,
just
push it into a dustbin .
Never be confused
by it,
or may be conquered by it !
------ On September 14, 2023