加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Unnecessary.Sophistry(19.Autonomy.In.Formulating.TCMs.Standards.1)

(2024-07-20 09:39:48)
分类: 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩
Unnecessary Sophistry
( 19. Autonomy In Formulating 
TCM's Standards .1)




TCM ( Traditional Chinese Medicine ) can 
effectively treat many diseases, which has 
been proven by numerous facts and is 
constantly being reported on television.

It is strange that those who always want 
to ruin TCM often use international 
standards to discredit TCM, such as 
double-blind experiments.


It should be acknowledged that such traps 
are indeed very deep, to the point where 
many people have been helpless even till 
now.


The root cause is that we have all been 
misled by the medical technology of 
western medicine !


Objectively speaking, double-blind 
experiments are indeed an effective 
method for verifying the effectiveness 
of western medicine.

But drug effectiveness verification 
methods are by no means unique, 
and double-blind experiments are 
just one of them.

At the same time, we should also 
consider the following facts:

Any treatment plan TCM should be 
changed according to patients, time 
factors and local conditions, and 
based on the patient's symptoms for 
syndrome differentiation and treatment. 

This effective treatment method has been 
proven by a large number of actual cases.


In fact, this effective treatment method 
has put forward stricter requirements 
for double-blind experiments. 


Unfortunately, so far, this effective 
treatment method is almost incompatible 
with the technical specifications of 
double-blind experiments, to the extent 
that double-blind experiments are not 
suitable for examining the effectiveness 
of TCM in treating diseases !

So, on the one hand, the effectiveness 
of traditional Chinese medicine in treating 
diseases objectively exists, but on the 
other hand, double-blind experiments 
cannot verify or explain this large number 
of objective facts. 

This alone is enough to prove that 
double-blind experiments are not perfect:

Double blind experiments cannot reflect 
all objective facts in the objective world 
at all !

thus it can be seen:

The effectiveness of traditional Chinese 
medicine in treating diseases does not 
need to be limited to double-blind 
experiments !

Therefore, we must re-examine medical 
standards:

What should be the basis for medical 
standards ?

Obviously, any medical standard must 
be based on facts and validity, not 
on something like double-blind 
experiments !


Double blind experiments are only one 
method for verifying the effectiveness 
of drug treatment. 

This method may not be able to discover 
statistical characteristics of certain 
treatment methods

But this does not mean that double-blind 
experiments have the right to deny a 
large number of objective facts for a 
long time.

Namely, it does not mean that double-blind 
experiments have the right to deny a large 
number of objective facts about the 
effective treatment of diseases by TCM for
a long time.


Even if we look back at the history of 
technological development, we can 
understand it better.

In the history of technological development, 
there are often precedents like this:

If an experimental method cannot verify 
certain facts that appear in large quantities, 
then the experimental conditions can be 
changed, or simply a different experimental 
method can be used.

But the invalid experimental method must 
not order a large amount of facts to make 
way to ensure its authority for a long time.

In fact, in the face of a large number of 
objective facts that traditional Chinese 
medicine can effectively treat diseases, 
the double-blind experiments of western 
medicine have enjoyed this authority for
too long so that such an authority has 
long hindered the development of 
medical science.

A careful review of the long-term sufferings
of TCM will help to understand this point.

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有