加载中…Unnecessary.Sophistry(17.Stability.Of.Knowledge)
(2024-07-18 10:53:39)| 分类： 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Unnecessary Sophistry
( 17. Stability Of
Knowledge）
A guy who has
studied biomolecules recently
posted many
videos online in order to defame
TCM
(Traditional Chinese Medicine).
For example, he
put forward three viewpoints
in his video,
but in fact , none of them are
worth
He
said:
“1. Why are there no
master level figures
in TCM like Zhang
Zhongjing, Hua Tuo, Sun
Simiao and Li Shizhen now
?
2. Why do we still use ancient
books such
as "Huangdi Neijing" to guide
TCM ?
3. Can traditional
Chinese medicine
decoction
Actually, all
of what he said are meaningless
word
games!
1. Regarding
the first question:
Doesn't he know
anything about the sufferings
of TCM over the
past one or two hundred years ?
In fact, all of
those sufferings are entirely
due
survival
of
In this
situation, it is very difficult to
develop
But actually,
for a long time, our scholars
studying
western medicine have just copied,
cloned or
imitated medical achievements
from others, so
that, in westen medical
science, few
things owned by our scholars
themselves can
be show off outside for a
long
time
So, it is no
need to let the pot call the
kettle
“Black”.
2. Regarding
the second question
The classic of
TCM can guide doctors to
effectively
treat many diseases, which
has
facts
television.
So, as long as
the treatment is indeed
effective,
is
indeed derived from classics, it can
still as a reference.
Because our
human body has not
undergone
significant changes compared
to thousands of
years ago, at least not
any subversive
changes.
Of course, if
someone believes that he
has already
undergone genetically
modified
mutations, or he is a monster
sent in by mail
from outer space, he
can no longer
refer to TCM to deal
with his health
problems.
It's an
exception, it's his own business
and has nothing
to do with any others.
In fact, for a
long time, many guys have
been using
people's psychology of liking
novelty and
disliking old to slander TCM.
Therefore, they
deliberately do not mention
another
important characteristic of
knowledge, it's
the stability of knowledge.
Many
important knowledge is very
stable
and not
constantly changing, and the
same
life
and
For
example:
2.1. The
sum of the interior angles
of
a
the
After 1000
years, this basic knowledge does
not
necessarily have to become 'The
sum
of
interior angles of a triangle is
1180
degrees'!
2.2.
People have to eat, which is
also
a
But after 1000
years, this basic knowledge
may not
necessarily become 'People
only
need to
drink the northwest wind'!
3. Regarding
the third question:
Nowadays, when
traditional Chinese
medicine
decoction pieces leave the
factory, the
packaging clearly indicates
whether they
are 24 or 36 months old.
It can be seen
that this guy deliberately
raised such
questions to create trouble
to belittle TCM
!
Nowdays,
the really serious problem
is
who
of
defame
So, I often
joke that:
Molecular
biology has been divided
into
One is
good molecular biology, and
the
For this,
now, we must understand what
'bad molecular
biology' is .
Definition of Bad
Molecular Biology
The
necessary and sufficient
conditions
for
bad
following
1. When
discussing biological
issues,
it
up
by
disregarding facts and consequences.
2. When
discussing biological
issues,
it
into thinking
incorrectly.
Actually, these two kinds of bad
customs
are cancerous tumors hidden in
various
academic discussions, which should
have
been eradicated from all
academic
discussions a long time ago
!
喜欢
0
赠金笔