加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Medical.Science.Is.Not.A.Sophistry(10.Absoluteness.And.Relativity.Of.Standards.2)

(2023-12-19 21:50:48)
分类: 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩

Medical Science Is Not A Sophistry

( 10. Absoluteness And Relativity 
Of Standards .2 )




Actually, whether as doctors, patients or 
potential patients, we should have the 
following understanding of medical 
standards:


Medical standards actually have two categories: 
Absolute medical standards and Relative medical 
standards.


1. Absolute Medical Standard

The absolute medical standard is the gather of a 
large number of effective treatment facts, which 
is composed of only two elements: 

Facts and Efficacy



2. Relative Medical Standards

The relative medical standards are some 
explanations or rules summarized from some 
cases.

From these two standars, we can see the the 
following two inferences.

1. Absolute medical standards have universality 
and objectivity, but due to our limited knowledge 
at present, the relationships contained in these 
absolute medical standards may exhibit discrete
distributions in space, or in time, so that these 
relationships appear or hide now and then .

As we know, these absolute medical standards 
always automatically play a magic role and have 
a subtle and important impact on our health.

For example, many effective treatment methods 
or health preservation methods have become 
popular before undergoing any double-blind 
trial.


2. Relative medical standards are some norms 
formed only when experience accumulates to 
a certain extent. 

Relative medical  standards have both 
instrumental and timeliness, and require human
intervention to function effectively. 

In addition, relative medical standards must be 
continuously revised and improved based on 
absolute standards


Now, we should reflect on why there are always 
pseudo scholars maliciously using professional 
terms such as double-blind trials to interfere 
with the development of medical science, which 
includes TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) and 
western medicine?

The reason for this is precisely because those guys 
use relative medical standards to impersonate 
absolute medical standards, which is ridiculous !

So, despite facing a large number of facts, that 
gang of pseudo scholars still dare to pretend 
to understand anything, be unreasonable, self 
righteous, and make trouble for TCM without 
any reason. 

Those guys only do repetitive technical work 
around their known theories or existing standards, 
but they never want to dig out valuable treatment 
methods from a large number of facts for the sake 
of patients, and even they oppose others doing 
such research work !    


Moreover, those pseudo scholars also use 
double-blind trials as an excuse to hinder 
the development of medical science, which 
includes both TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) 
and western medicine, and in this way, they are 
also covering up their own ignorance, incompetence,
heartlessness, laziness and paranoia. 


By this way, they often succeed in making troubles 
for TCM, which is inexplicable !
 
It's really pitiful and despicable !


In fact, the fact that TCM has been able to 
continue to this day is due to a significant 
and important role playing automatically  
by the absolute medical standards 
constructed by the only two elements :

Fact and Efficacy 


Regarding this, for those pseudo scholars 
who always want to ruin TCM, they will never
understand and they are always helpless ! 

The reason why they can never understand is 
because they never understand the following:


It is precisely because the constituent 
elements of the two absolute medical 
standards, facts and efficacy, can 
resonate with the conscience of doctors 
and the call of patients, continuously 
playing the strongest voice of human 
life. 

All of these together construct the 
internal driving force for 
the development of medical science !

And this has always been like this, 
it will never change !

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有