Maybe some persons do not
understand why it is
malicious for pseudo
scholars to
show off their
expertise .
In fact, it is just this
question that make us allow
those pseudo scholars to
lurk around us for a
long time
and perform freely
!
And indeed, few men can
distinguish such pseudo
scholars from
other scholars, or have no time to
consider
these problems hidden
deeply, and while
other men
may know that
those pseudo
scholars
are
fooling around, but
they are at a loss what
to
do after all .
It should be recognized
that all those pseudo
scholars are indeed game masters of
all kinds
of
knowledge, for
they are especially skillful
at
showing
off their professional knowledge,
and
such deceptions really provide
the most
effective protection
for their dishonesties,
impure motivations
and bad intentions, which
has already
been satisfying
such pseudo
scholars till now .
Actually, the main errors
of those pseudo
scholars are their attitudes
towards knowledge .
In fact, we should have
exposed the deceptions
of those pseudo scholars long
ago, so that
the
popularization
and
application
of knowledge
and technology
can quickly return to the track
of rationality
and health .
In order to identify
those pseudo scholars
effectively, we must
first master the
knowledge
about
knowledge, such as
the instrumentality
of knowledge, the
relevance of knowledge, and
the limitation of
personal knowledge .
And in a word, if we
understand and master these
knowledge about knowledge,
we can timely identify
all the tactics used
by those pseudo scholars ,
whether
these deceptions are scripts,
deception or
sophistry .
So, this article will
briefly talk about the
instrumentality of
knowledge .
1. Instrumentality Of
Knowledge
As a tool, it is
unknown whether the
knowledge
itself is
good or evil, and only when
knowledge
is used kindly, correctly
and rationally can it
produce
positive effects, otherwise,
it may be
counterproductive.
------ This is
the instrumentality of
knowledge
For
those pseudo
scholars, a
major issue is
pseudo academic
behavior,
namely:
Once those pseudo
scholars discover facts
or
opinions they dislike, those guys will use
a large
amount of specialized knowledge fragments
to
induce others to think incorrectly and
deviate
from the main point so that they could
make
others get far away from
the subject .
So,
those pseudo
scholars never
care about the
actual effects
of solving problems, and they
just
keep
on showing off their
own poor
professional
knowledge and
defend their own views.
And for
it, those pseudo
scholars never
hesitate
to make
many circular
arguments, even if
they
are getting
far away from the subject
.
In fact, this kind of
deceptions are indeed hidden
deeply, so that few persons
can recognize these
deceptions,
let alone
get rid of
the temptation
of
this kind
of deceptions .
For example:
There are a lot of facts
that have been proving
our TCM (Traditional
Chinese Medicine)
can
treat
many diseases effectively ,
and it is also a
fact that
traditional Chinese medicine
has certain
toxicity .
So, for we patients or we
potential patients,
there
are three important issues
:
1.1 Why can TCM cure
diseases ?
1.2 How can we
effectively treat diseases
with
TCM on the
premise of avoiding the
toxicity
of traditional Chinese
medicine ?
1.3 Can we find
some TCM treatments
which
are more effective,
more convenient, safer
and cheaper
?
However,
those pseudo
scholars are
never
interested in
these issues, so they
never
consider such issues
.
And what is important for
those pseudo
scholars is
to draw conclusions
first,
and then to find
or even forge reasons,
or at last to play rascal to
deny all the
facts they
dislike .
Therefore, for a long
time, these pseudo
scholars always try to peddle some craps
such as "TCM is unscientific", "Traditional
Chinese medicine
is toxic ", and so on .
And
then, they use evilly a lot of
fragments
of knowledge
to demonstrate circularly
.
Of course, they will not
mention the knowledge
that is
unfavorable to their views, or sometimes
they
will just skim
over such knowledge .
As the such craps
by pseudo scholars are
all
piled up with
professional terms, it is difficult
to
refute shuch words,
and also it really
makes
many
persons feel helpless
.
But as a matter of fact,
the way to crack
such
deceptions
is very simple,
that
is to insist on
the First Law
of Medical Science
:
We
should discuss science according to facts
,
and meanwhile
we should discuss medical
science according to
curative effects .
Because any medical
science never has right
not
to talk about
the truth , the
facts ,
or
curative effect
!
Actually, the reason
why pseudo
scholars'
craps
are so difficult to refute is
precisely
because
they used the instrumentality
of
knowledge maliciously to beautify their
much-needed deceptions,
so as to achieve
the goal
of long-term confusing patients
or
potential patients .
Thus, we can see that only
when knowledge
is
used kindly, correctly and
rationally, can it
produce
positive effects
.
Now, let's give another
example to illustrate
what
is the malicious use of
knowledge .
As we know, most of us
certainly have understood
something about the
process of food digestion ,
and it
is good and beyond reproach
to explain the
knowledge
of food digestion publicly
.
However, someone
explains the food digestion
process, especially
the specific digestion process
in the
rectum while others are
eating, and
even
more,
he wants to
live broadcast such
process
on the
huge screen of the dining room, it
is
typical malicious
use of knowledge !
Of course, the issue to
use knowledge maliciously
is really hidden deeply, so
that few can recognize
it .
So , perhap we have to
take another example for
it .
Also as we know, it
is good to for a baby to feed
it with milk as
soon as the baby is hungry .
But it will deliberately
turn a good thing into a bad
one if feeding so much that
the baby vomits, and
still
forcing the baby to drink
deliberately .
The malicious use of
knowledge is nothing more
than so .
Unfortunately, this is just a
very serious issue
that
the pseudo scholars have
been doing till
now !
If we
decompose each
action of their
behavior,
we find it
almost beyond reproach,
and no
fault.
For example, they
repeatedly nag about
professional knowledge
.
However, once we check the
actual effect, it is
not difficult
for us to find what their issues mean
:
What
those pseudo scholars only
want to do is
to show
off their professional
knowledge without
paying any
attention to the actual problems,
let
alone the actual
effect of solving the
problems .
And they just blindly and
maliciously induce others
to deviate from the main
topic, and make others
unconsciously become
those pseudo scholars '
own flatterers
.
All these are enough to
prove that pseudo scholars
only care about their own
views, and do not pay any
attention to
facts they dislike, and do not care
about
curative effects,
and patients .
Therefore , they have no
goodwill at all !
So far, we can elaborate
the first discrimination
theorem for
identifying pseudo scholars.
The First Discriminant
Law
Of pseudo scholar
The first necessary
and sufficient condition
for
a person to be
a pseudo scholars is
:
This person does not
apply knowledge
correctly,
kindly, or
rationally, so that he only wants
to
show off
his professional knowledge,
to blindly
demonstrate
his views in a
circular way,
to
neglect all the
objective facts he dislikes,
and
all the actual
effects of solving problems,
and
even all the
other relevant
academic arguments
he
dislikes.
-------------
Written on September 30,
2022
加载中…
喜欢