垃圾分类贵在坚持
(2012-07-20 22:10:18)
标签:
香港垃圾分类南华早报彭澎杂谈 |
问政风暴(12-80):垃圾分类贵在坚持
彭澎接受香港《南华早报》采访
广州尝试垃圾分类处理
2012年7月15日
ENVIRONMENT
Guangzhou tries to sort out its rubbish problem
Pilot schemes seen as long-term solution to tackling
waste, but previous projects have had little success
......................................................
Sally Wang
sally.wang@scmp.com
Three pilot rubbish-sorting schemes
kicked off in Guangzhou last week,
with officials and the media going all
out to promote them as a long-term
solution to mountains of waste
engulfing the city.
But following strong opposition
to government plans to build five
incinerators in the city, the launch of
the pilot schemes has met with a
mixed response.
Civil servants, housewives, students
and volunteers are being
mobilised to lead a campaign to
make sure everyone knows about the
new policy, with several communities
involved in the pilot schemes, all
based on a Taiwanese experience.
The government has also vowed
to spend more on sorting and transport
of rubbish and set up a public
committee to monitor its expenditure.
It spent 2.2 billion yuan
(HK$2.67 billion) on handling garbage
last year.
By the end of this year, all the
communities on more than 130
streets will be part of garbage-sorting
trial schemes. The Guangzhou Daily
reported that the city plans to fully
adopt rubbish sorting by 2015.
Many people have said that
sorting garbage to separate out recyclable
items is much better than just
burning everything in incinerators.
However, while most support the
idea, some have concerns about how
the sorting will actually work and
have doubts about the government’s
commitment.
One of the pilot schemes features
“volume-based fees”. Each family
will receive 60 bags a month – 30 for
kitchen waste and 30 for other rubbish
– designed to hold 3kg a day.
Residents will be charged more if
they need more bags.
Some are concerned that costs
could increase – each household now
pays a garbage fee of 15 yuan a month
– and others have complained that
the scheme is unfair to large families.
The Information Times says the
scheme is designed to reduce the
average amount of household waste
to 1kg per person each day.
People have also raised concerns
about who will profit from the mandatory
use of special bags. “I want to
know where the extra bag fee will go
and which company produces the
garbage bags,” said Wang Xin ,a
Haizhu district resident.
Under another scheme, people
will have to sort their rubbish at home
into three bags, and trucks will arrive
at specified times to collect it. If they
miss the collecting time, residents
will have to wait until the following
day. People worry about the inconvenience,
with those who do not work
regular hours likely to often miss
waste collection times.
Privacy concerns have been
raised over the third scheme, under
which special identification marks
will be attached to each bag so that
the origin of the waste can be determined,
allowing the authorities to
discover who is not sorting their rubbish
properly and impose fines.
Yu Shangfeng ,head of the
garbage-sorting division at the city’s
urban management committee, was
quoted by the Southern Metropolis
Daily as saying that the government
would decide after the pilot programmes
whether to combine the
three schemes into one or whether to
adopt different schemes in different
communities.
One woman taking part in a pilot
scheme said history showed that the
city government had problems carrying
out such schemes.
“Guangzhou has had campaigns
to control cigarettes and plastic bags,
but they both went nowhere,” she
said. “Maybe this is just another
show.”
She said she had previously asked
the sanitation department how she
should dispose of used batteries and
had been told that even if they were
handed in separately the department
would still put them back with other
garbage.
An online survey found that about
40 per cent of respondents were worried
that even if they sorted their rubbish,
the waste would still not be processed
properly.
Some have asked whether the
government will put in the necessary
effort to educate residents, and especially
the elderly, about garbage
sorting.
“No one has taught us how to do it
and I really have no idea, not to mention
my parents,” said Zhang Bo
, another Haizhu district resident
in her 30s.
Ma Tian , a Panyu district
resident, said he noticed that another
rubbish bin of a different colour was
placed in front of his building about a
month ago, but he had no idea what it
was for.
“We just put garbage in whichever
bin is not full,” he said, adding that he
had noticed that the garbage collectors
just piled the rubbish into one
truck anyway.
It is not the first time the city has
attempted to introduce garbage
sorting. It introduced bins for sorted
rubbish more than 10 years ago, with
little impact, and then ran a pilot programme
in its Yuexiu district two
years ago, again without much
success.
Peng Peng , deputy director
of the Guangdong Society of Economic
Reform, attributed the previous
failures to a lack of accompanying
measures and publicity.
“Although residents sorted their
garbage, the waste was still mixed
together in the process of collecting
and transporting,” he said.
“The garbage sorting was practically
meaningless.”