加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

(2014-04-24 14:27:08)
标签:

文化

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】
【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

【(法)福西耶:斧子与誓言——中世纪的日常生活】

 
 In "The Axe and the Oath", one of the world's leading medieval historians presents a compelling picture of daily life in the Middle Ages as it was experienced by ordinary people. Writing for general readers, Robert Fossier vividly describes how these vulnerable people confronted life, from birth to death, including childhood, marriage, work, sex, food, illness, religion, and the natural world. While most histories of the period focus on the ideas and actions of the few who wielded power and stress how different medieval people were from us, Fossier concentrates on the other nine-tenths of humanity in the period and concludes that 'medieval man is us'. Drawing on a broad range of evidence, Fossier describes how medieval men and women encountered, coped with, and understood the basic material facts of their lives. We learn how people related to agriculture, animals, the weather, the forest, and the sea; how they used alcohol and drugs; and, how they buried their dead. But "The Axe and the Oath" is about much more than simply the material demands of life. We also learn how ordinary people experienced the social, cultural, intellectual, and spiritual aspects of medieval life, from memory and imagination to writing and the Church. The result is a sweeping new vision of the Middle Ages that will entertain and enlighten readers.

………………
In attempting to shake up “certitudes,” my hope is to lead the
eventual reader to raise questions about them, naturally leaving
open the possibility of returning to them if they prove the better
choice. I am aware that my proposed course has some weaknesses.
What is important is that the being that I will attempt to describe
in his body, his soul, his brain, and his environment has to be inserted
into a context, which is that of my sources, or at least those
that I can master. I cannot claim to describe the fellah of the age of
the pharaohs or the Tibetan monk any more than I can evoke the
courtier at Versailles or the miner in Germinal. It is only within
the Middle Ages that I feel myself somewhat at home, although my
profession has of course led me to frequent the Athenian hoplite
or the Reichshoffen cuirassier for a short time. As it happens, the
period of the “Middle Ages” has specific traits, as does any other
stage in the human adventure: I cannot hide them, thus calming
the posthumous anger of Lucien Febvre. What is more, we need
to agree about what was or were the “Middle Ages,” an expression
invented for the use of the university by Guizot or perhaps even by
Bossuet. Was this a segment of time in which the economy and society
had certain distinct traits—“feudalism,” as Marx would have
it? But, really, did people eat “feudally”? Was it a time of triumphant
militant and generalized Christianity? But can we say that
the epidemic known as the mal des ardents was an effect of the
Gospel according to Saint John? Enough of that. Such niggling
objections serve no purpose. My documentation and most of the
scholarly works that I intend to pillage or draw from concern the
period between Charlemagne and Francis I; like all other scholars
and with the same debatable arguments, I will even concentrate on
the period between the twelfth century and the fourteenth century,
the very period targeted by the “medieval” banquets and parades
that municipalities put on to raise money. Still worse: I will choose
most of my examples from France, northern France in particular,
because it is the area I know best.
I haven’t quite finished with my attempt to turn aside facile criticism:
the man about whom I will speak is neither a knight nor a
monk; he is not a bishop or a “great man,” neither is he a bourgeois,
a merchant, a lord, or a man of letters. He is a man worried about
the rain and the wolf, concerned about wine, his strongbox, the fetus,
fire, the axe, the neighbors, sworn oaths, salvation—all those
things that people speak to us about only occasionally or by preterition
and through the distorting prism of political institutions,
social hierarchies, juridical rules, or the precepts of faith. Thus no
economic exposé will be found here, no chart of technical achievements,
no class struggle: just a poor everyday man.
One last word: I have borrowed almost everything from others,
and I do not cite them. But, as is usually said in hastily prepared
acknowledgments, they will recognize themselves. Here and there
I have added a thought or two of my own, especially on the import
of what is “natural” and on the “misery” of man. I take responsibility
for these, as well as for everything summarized and all simplifications
and neglect of chronological or geographical nuances that are sure to set the “specialists’ ” teeth on edge. But that is the price of all pillage.

Have I clearly stated my goals? Now all I have to do is achievethem.

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有