转载-“未来几年”人工智能可能取代80%的工作
(2023-05-13 10:23:50)
标签:
杂谈人工智能 |
美国人工智能(AI)权威戈策尔(Ben Goertzel)表示,人工智能可能在未来几年内取代80%的人类工作。
他上周在里约热内卢(Rio de Janeiro)举行的网络高峰会(Web
Summit)接受法新社采访时表示,如果我们希望机器真的能像人一样聪明,且在面临未知状况时具备同样的灵活度,就必须在训练和编程外取得重大进步。戈策尔说,“我们还没达到这个目标,但我认为,有理由相信我们距离这个目标只剩下几年、而非数十年时间。”
AI could replace 80% of jobs in few years
By AFPPublished : May 10, 2023
RIO DE JANEIRO -- Artificial intelligence could replace 80
percent of human jobs in the coming years -- but that's a good
thing, says US-Brazilian researcher Ben Goertzel, a leading AI
guru.
Mathematician, cognitive scientist and famed robot-creator
Goertzel, 56, is founder and chief executive of SingularityNET, a
research group he launched to create "Artificial General
Intelligence," or AGI -- artificial intelligence with human
cognitive abilities.
With his long hair and leopard-print cowboy hat, Goertzel was
in provocateur mode last week at Web Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the
world's biggest annual technology conference, where he told Agence
France-Presse in an interview that AGI is just years away and spoke
out against recent efforts to curb artificial intelligence
research.
Q: How far are we from artificial intelligence with human
cognitive abilities?
"If we want machines to really be as smart as people and to be
as agile in dealing with the unknown, then they need to be able to
take big leaps beyond their training and programming. And we're not
there yet. But I think there's reason to believe we're years rather
than decades from getting there."
Q: What do you think of the debate around AI such as ChatGPT
and its risks? Should there be a six-month research pause, as some
people are advocating?
"I don't think we should pause it because it's like a
dangerous superhuman AI... These are very interesting AI systems,
but they're not capable of becoming like human-level general
intelligences, because they can't do complex multistage reasoning
-- like you need to do science. They can't invent wild new things
outside the scope of their training data.
"They can also spread misinformation, and people are saying we
should pause them because of this. That's very weird to me. Why
haven't we banned the internet? The internet does exactly this. It
gives you way more information at your fingertips. And it spreads
bullshit and misinformation.
"I think we should have a free society. And just like the
internet shouldn't be banned, we shouldn't ban this."
Q: Isn't their potential to replace people's jobs a
threat?
"You could probably (make) obsolete maybe 80 percent of jobs
that people do, without having an AGI, by my guess. Not with
ChatGPT exactly as a product. But with systems of that nature,
which are going to follow in the next few years.
"I don't think it's a threat. I think it's a benefit. People
can find better things to do with their life than work for a
living... Pretty much every job involving paperwork should be
automatable.
"The problem I see is in the interim period, when AIs are
(making) obsolete one human job after another ... I don't know how
(to) solve all the social issues."
Q: What can robots do for society today, and what will they be
able to do in the future, if AGI is achieved?
"You can do a lot of good with AI.
"Like Grace, (a robot nurse) we showcased at Web Summit Rio.
In the US, a lot of elderly people are sitting lonely in old folks'
homes. And they're not bad in terms of physical condition -- you
have medical care and food and big-screen TV -- but they're bad in
terms of emotional and social support. So if you inject humanoid
robots into it, that will answer your questions, listen to your
stories, help you place a call with your kids or order something
online, then you're improving people's lives. Once you get to an
AGI, they'll be even better companions.
前一篇:转载——粮食自给率比较