美国东部时间 2024 年 6 月 25 日下午 5：00

作者：尤利安·德涅斯特兰

最近有很多关于特斯拉从一家汽车公司（尽管是一家专注于技术的公司）转变为一家人工智能公司的讨论。讨论的很大一部分是所谓的Cybercab的推出，它将使用与目前量产特斯拉电动汽车上提供的“全自动驾驶”高级驾驶辅助套件基本相同的技术。

该公司的负责人埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）多次暗示，特斯拉车队中的现代汽车有朝一日将能够自动驾驶，甚至通过在停机时充当机器人出租车为车主赚取利润。但是，今天的FSD系统运行得如何？好吧，让我们看看。

充满电

FSD 已经 8 岁了

特斯拉的“全自动驾驶”功能早在2016年就被推出，作为所谓的“自动驾驶仪”的升级，承诺汽车可以在没有人为干预的情况下将驾驶员和乘客运送到几乎任何地方。这还没有发生。

上周晚些时候，著名的FSD测试人员AI DRIVR在YouTube上发布的一段视频显示了特斯拉最近尝试使其汽车具有自动驾驶能力的好与坏。然而，虽然 12.4.1 版本在某些方面比 12.3 分支更好，但它也需要驾驶员的更多干预——至少在用于测试软件的 Model 3 的情况下。

以下是特斯拉的 FSD 12 如何处理曼哈顿交通

首先，最新版本的特斯拉监督设置似乎无法处理其他人类驾驶员在车辆前方切入的罕见情况。正如测试人员在本页顶部嵌入的视频中所说的那样，它也“缺乏信心”，即使有足够的空间，它也会犹豫是否要改变车道。

在一个例子中，汽车错过了一个转弯，然后无论如何都试图转弯，导致系统脱离。在其他几起案件中，消防处需要人工干预才能通过部分阻塞车道的汽车或进入十字路口，因为它误解了交通信号灯。

评论者继续说，以前的版本 12.3 在反应上更像人类，而 12.4 似乎更加犹豫。随着软件开发人员找到巧妙的方法来处理越来越多的情况，情况可能会有所改善，但就目前而言，使用当前软件不太可能将无人驾驶机器人出租车部署在道路上。

此外，值得注意的是，特斯拉所谓的“全自动驾驶”仍然需要方向盘后面的人不断监督，并且它在 SAE 图表上被视为 2 级系统，这意味着驾驶员对汽车在路上的行为负责。

将最佳新闻、评论、专栏等直接发送到您的收件箱。

登记有关更多信息，请阅读我们的
隐私政策和使用条款。

热门评论

汤姆992024年6月26日 上午11：51

首先，最新版本的特斯拉监督设置似乎无法处理其他人类驾驶员在车辆前方切入的罕见情况。
 

这在哪个世界是罕见的？司机在其他车辆前面插队是很常见的事件。
 

咕木2024年6月26日 下午12：35

我不认为尤利安看过视频。消防处多次很好地处理了切入的驱动程序。

索拉曼22024年6月26日 上午5：44

一个仍在显示人类的“干预”，FSD（S）可能是先进的ADAS，但无论如何都不是尽职尽责的FSD。到目前为止，特斯拉没有达到目标，并采取了干预措施。这是通向技术的途径，而不是生存技能。

咕木2024年6月26日 下午12：34

这是进步的途径。没有干预，它就不会学习。不学习，它不会变得更好。
 

加入对话5

原文阅读

Here’s How Tesla’s Latest FSD Version Works In The Real World

The so-called “Full Self-Driving” version 12.4.1 does a lot of things right, but it’s still far from perfect.

Jun 25, 2024 at 5:00pm ET

By: Iulian Dnistran

There’s been a lot of talk recently about Tesla transitioning from a car company (albeit a tech-focused one) to an AI company. A big part of that discussion is the supposed launch of a so-called Cybercab that will use basically the same tech as the current “Full Self-Driving” advanced driving assistance suite that’s available on series production Tesla EVs.

The company’s head honcho, Elon Musk, alluded several times that the modern cars in the Tesla fleet will one day be capable of driving themselves around and even make a profit for their owners by acting as robotaxis in their downtime. But how well does today’s FSD system work? Well, let’s see.

Get Fully Charged

FSD is 8 years old

Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" feature was introduced back in 2016 as an upgrade to the so-called "Autopilot," promising a world where the car would ferry its driver and passengers pretty much anywhere without human intervention. That still hasn't happened yet.

A video posted late last week on YouTube by prominent FSD tester AI DRIVR shows the good and the bad with Tesla’s latest attempt at making its cars potentially capable of self-driving. However, while version 12.4.1 is better in some respects compared to the 12.3 branch, it also needed more interventions from the driver–at least in the case of the Model 3 that was used to test the software.

Here's How Tesla's FSD 12 Handles Manhattan Traffic

For starters, the latest version of Tesla’s supervised setup seems incapable of dealing with rare instances where other human drivers cut in front of the vehicle. It also “lacks confidence,” as the tester put it in the video embedded at the top of this page, hesitating to change lanes even though there was more than enough room.

In one instance, the car missed a turn and then tried to make the turn anyway, leading to a disengagement of the system. In several other cases, FSD needed human intervention to pass cars that were partially blocking the lane or to proceed into an intersection because it misinterpreted the traffic lights.

The reviewer goes on to say that the previous version, 12.3, was much more human-like in its reactions, whereas 12.4 seems much more hesitant. Things could improve as software developers find clever ways to deal with more and more situations, but as it stands now, it’s unlikely that a driverless robotaxi would be deployed on the road using the current software.

Also, it’s worth noting that Tesla’s so-called “Full Self-Driving” still needs to be constantly supervised by the person behind the steering wheel and that it’s considered a Level 2 system on the SAE chart, meaning that the driver is responsible for what the car does on the road.

Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox.

SIGN UPFor more information, read our
Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

TOP COMMENTS

Tom99Jun 26, 2024, 11:51 AM

For starters, the latest version of Tesla’s supervised setup seems incapable of dealing with rare instances where other human drivers cut in front of the vehicle.
 

In what world is that a rare occurrence? Drivers cutting in front of other vehicles is a pretty common event.
 

GookiJun 26, 2024, 12:35 PM

I don't think Iulian watched the video. FSD handled drivers cutting in perfectly well on multiple occasions.
 

Solarman2Jun 26, 2024, 5:44 AM

One is still showing human "interventions" and FSD(S) is perhaps advanced ADAS but is not conscientious FSD by any stretch of the imagination. So far, TESLA is missing the mark and creates interventions. This is the pathway to technicide and is not a survival skill.

GookiJun 26, 2024, 12:34 PM

It's the pathway to progress. Without interventions it wont learn. Without learning it won't get better.
 

JOIN THE CONVERSATION5