不招收同等学力和跨专业考生。

参考书：

1.《高级英语》(修订本)第1、2册，张汉熙，外语教学与研究出版社，1995
2.《现代大学英语基础写作》（上、下），徐克荣，外语教学与研究出版社，2004
3.《英汉新闻翻译》，刘其中，清华大学出版社，2009
4.《实用翻译教程(修订版)》，刘季春，中山大学出版社，2007
5.《中国文化读本》，叶朗，外语教学与研究出版社，2008
6.《汉语写作与百科知识》，李国正，首都师范大学出版社，2019

报录比：1：6

真题分享：

〖JZ〗〖WT12.H1〗Passage Two〖WTXFZ〗

You don’t have to be Julian Assange, the man behind WikiLeaks, to think that governments have a nasty habit of abusing their powers of secrecy. Or that, whether governments are corrupt and malign or merely negligent and incompetent, then sunlight is often the best disinfectant. One of the jobs of journalism is to make a grubby nuisance of itself by ferreting out the establishment’s half-truths and embarrassments. And one of the jobs of the courts is to police the press by protecting whistle-blowers while also punishing libel and treachery.

But the most recent WikiLeaks dump of diplomatic cables has overturned that order in two ways. First by its sheer volume. When you have not just a handful of documents to release, but more than 250, 000 emails seemingly touching on every file in the State Department, however dusty, you discredit not just one government official or one policy, but an entire way of going about diplomacy.

It is too soon to know what effect the leak’s revelations will have. The newspapers have so far published the e-mails piece meal, and a lot more are to come. Foreign-policy experts are right when they say they have learned little that is radically new revelations about the tireless night life of Italy’s aging prime minister will surprise no one. Given that hundreds of thousands of people had access to the cables, the sensitive stuff will already be in the hands of many a spy service.

But the experts also miss a larger point〖WW(〗:〖WW)〗they themselves are part of the elite inner-circle that WikiLeaks wants to break open so that every man can judge for himself perhaps shattering all those taboos might do some good. The public airing of Arab leaders’ fears of an Iranian bomb might shake others’ complacency about the issue.

But any gains will come at a high cost. In a world of WikiLeaks, diplomacy would no longer be possible. The secrecy that WikiLeaks despises is vital to all organizations, including government -- and especially in the realm of international relations. Those who pass information to American diplomats, out of self-interest, conviction or goodwill, will be less open now. Some of them, like the Iranian businessman fingered as a friend of America, could face reprisals.

In the past, the rights and wrongs of all this could have been determined by public debate, the passage of some legislation and the courts. Not any longer. The second way in which WikiLeaks has overturned the old order is by being beyond jurisdiction. America can and will try to use its laws to protect its secrets. But even if it locks up Bradley Manning, the 23-year-old serviceman thought to be behind the leaks, and even if it captures Mr. Assange, the information is out, on a network of computers somewhere in cyberspace.

In any case, there will be the other Mannings and other Assanges. You cannot uninvent the technology for copying a State Department’s worth of cables and carting them pretty much anywhere. The only remedy is to manage secrets better. The damage that America’s diplomatic service has suffered is partly the result of sloppy practices. It has now tightened access to the e-mails and the scope to copy them. Sensitive information will have to receive a higher classification.

On reading diplomats’ dissembling, people may be tempted to sneer. In fact diplomacy’s never-ending private conversation ultimately helps see off war and strife. That conversation will continue. Too many people have too much to gain for it to stop. But it will be less rich, less clear and therefore probably less useful. WikiLeaks claims to want to make the world a better place. It will probably do the reverse. 〖KH-*2〗

6〖H点〗〖ZK(〗Which of the following statements can NOT be learned from the first paragraph?

A〖H点〗Few people think governments tend to abuse their powers of secrecy.

B〖H点〗Ordinary people generally approve of the transparency in the media.

C〖H点〗The journalism has the responsibility to make known the hidden troth.

D〖H点〗The judicature has the duty to maintain the security of the press. 〖ZK)〗

7〖H点〗〖ZK(〗According to the passage, which is NOT the viewpoint of the author?

A〖H点〗WikiLeaks has released much more information than imagined.

B〖H点〗WikiLeaks has overstepped jurisdiction.

C〖H点〗WikiLeaks has changed the practice of diplomacy in the world.

D〖H点〗WikiLeaks has ushered in a new era in the press. 〖ZK)〗

8〖H点〗〖ZK(〗Why did the author say in Paragraph 3 that “Italy’s aging prime minister will surprise no one”?

A〖H点〗No one is interested in leaders’affairs.

B〖H点〗There have been too many such revelations.

C〖H点〗People have already known the stuff.

D〖H点〗No one believes in the truth of this revelation. 〖ZK)〗

9〖H点〗〖ZK(〗What is the way to prevent the leak of top secrets?

A〖H点〗To ban WikiLeaks.

B〖H点〗To raise the safety of secrets.

C〖H点〗To change the working environment and practice.

D〖H点〗To remind governments of the threat from WikiLeaks. 〖ZK)〗

10〖H点〗〖ZK(〗What is the author’s attitude towards WikiLeaks?

A〖H点〗Positive〓〓〓〓B〖H点〗Disapproval〓〓〓〓C〖H点〗Objective〓〓〓〓D〖H点〗Cynical〖ZK)〗

答题技巧：

名词解释

（1）名词解释一般答100字左右，在A4纸上约3行，每行30-40字。

（2）名词解释三段论答题法:

定义——〉背景、特征、概念类比——〉总结/评价。

第一，回答出名词本身的含义。一般都可以在书本找到。

第二，从名词的提出的背景、它的特征、相似概念比较等方面进行简述。

第三，总结，可以做一下简短的个人评价。

（3）温馨提示:

第一，名词解释一般位于试卷的第一部分，很多考上刚上考场非常的兴奋，一兴奋就容易下笔如流水，一不小心就把名词解释当成了简答题。结果后面的题目答题时间非常紧张。

第二，育明考研咨询师提醒大家，在回答名词解释的时候以150-200字为佳。按照每个人写字的速度，一般需要5分钟左右。

育明教育，成立于2006年，到现在已经有十年的时间，在我们育明教育，每年都有成功学员积累的一些经验可供各位考生参考。育明教育整合利用历届育明优秀学员的成功经验与高分资料，为每一位学员构建考研成功的基础保障。

了解更多复试信息请咨询马老师电话133-7014-2852（同微）关注公众号研究生巴士了解更多信息 总部咨询电话400-6998-626