美国长期双标信誉正严重下滑
最近一项阿拉伯民调显示,美国信誉正在严重下滑,美国因奉行“双标”获得中东人如此评判。长期以来,美国的政策与公开宣称的价值观之间存在差异。印尼前驻美大使迪诺·帕蒂·贾拉尔认为,全球南方国家对西方国家的不满情绪更为普遍,这加剧了国际社会对美国可信度的疑虑,“人们认为西方在气候行动和责任、贸易、侵犯人权行为的问责等议题上奉行双重标准。西方国家鼓吹自由贸易,却越来越多地采取贸易保护主义。”
日益极化的国内政治使美国在责任担当上更加固化“双标”形象。提高信誉对于美西方国家来说本可以很简单,如结束关塔那摩监狱侵犯被囚人员基本权利和自由的行为、兑现向发展中国家提供1000亿美元气候融资的承诺等。但美国领导层似乎并未意识到信誉在当今世界的重要性,外界对美国承担责任的期望充其量只是一厢情愿。
The US lacks credibility,
but all is not lost
James M. Dorsey
A recent poll of Arab public opinion suggests US credibility
has taken a hit, but all is not lost.
That is if the United States realizes that Middle Easterners
judge the US on glaring inconsistencies in its domestic and foreign
policies rather than on its cultural, technological, and economic
attributes.
The discrepancy between US policies and professed values has
always existed. However, it’s become more evident and relevant and
more of a liability in the past 22 years as a result of the War on
Terror, rising Islamophobia, the war in Iraq, US reluctance to
confront Israel head-on, and most recently the war in
Ukraine.
In addition, China loomed less large in the past in the
competition for influence in the Middle East. Arab nations were on
the defensive in the years after the 11 September 2001 Al Qaeda
attacks on New York and Washington.
The United States’ credibility problem is compounded by what
former Indonesian ambassador in Washington Dino Patti Djalal and
Michael Sheldrick, co-founder of Global Witness, see as more broad
resentment in the Global South against the West.
“The West is perceived to perpetuate double standards on
issues ranging from climate action and responsibility to trade and
accountability for human rights violations… They called for global
solidarity during the pandemic while instead often pursuing vaccine
nationalism. Western nations preach free trade but increasingly
engage in protectionism,” Messrs. Djalal and Sheldrick said in an
op-ed.
“While Westerners may see public criticism as a regular
diplomatic practice, it is seen by many (in the Global South) as
false righteousness, devoid of genuine partnership,” they
added.
Against that backdrop, the latest Arab Youth Survey conducted
by public relations agency Asda’a BCW indicates the credibility
problem the Biden administration needs to address to narrow the
gap.
A healthy 72 per cent of the survey’s respondents identified
the United States as an ally. Even so, the US ranked seventh as an
ally behind Turkey, China, Britain, Germany, France, and
India.
That does not mean that the US is perceived to have lost
influence in the region. Thirty-three per cent named the US as the
most influential power in the Arab world, followed in second place
by 11 per cent pointing to the United Arab Emirates.
It also means that only some youths want the US to retain its
influence. Sixty-one per cent of respondents said they would
support US disengagement, even if more than 60 per cent believe the
US will be a more important ally than Russia or China in the next
five years.
Similarly, the US ranks at 19 per cent second, behind the
UAE’s 24 per cent as the country Arab youth prefer to live in. The
same is true for which country youth would like their country to
emulate.
In other words, often unexplained contradictions in policy are
catching up with the United States, but it retains sufficient
ground to bridge the gap if officials recognise that credibility
has become far more critical in a world of competing powers.
“Perceptions of Western hypocrisy in the Global South,
compounded by bitter memories of past interventions, have made our
divided world even more polarized and have pushed old friends and
partners to turn to new sources of development finance that come
with less baggage and fewer strings attached, at least in theory,”
Messrs. Djalal and Sheldrick said.
Moreover, the lack of credibility turns public criticism of
human rights abuse and other illiberal and autocratic policies and
actions into a liability rather than an effective policy
tool.
Ideally, the United States and other Western nations would
align their policies with their professed values. Of course, that
would require an ideal world. The demands of realpolitik and
increasingly polarised domestic politics ensure it is, at best,
wishful thinking.
But there are things the United States and others can do, at
home and abroad, some of which are low hanging fruit.
The Biden administration could take heed of this week’s United
Nations recommendations to end in Guantanamo Bay prison “cruel,
inhuman, and degrading” violations of detainees’ fundamental rights
and freedoms, including constant surveillance, grueling isolation,
and limited family access.
Guantanamo, home to the last 30 men detained as military
combatants in the War on Terror since the 2001 Al Qaeda attacks,
long symbolised to many the perceived hypocrisy of US advocacy to
adherence to human rights.
Fionnuala Ni Aolain, the UN’s special rapporteur on the
Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
while Countering Terrorism, made her recommendations following the
first visit to the prison by UN experts in more than two
decades.
In addition, the United States together with its Western
allies could enhance its credibility by living up to promises like
the pledge to provide $100 billion in climate financing to
developing nations and ensuring that countries from the Global
South have a seat at the table.
Western leaders have begun to acknowledge that the ball is in
their court. French President Emmanuel Macron told the Munich
Security Conference in February that he was “shocked by how much
credibility we are losing in the Global South.”
Joseph Borrel, the European Union’s foreign policy chief,
echoed Mr. Macron at the same event.
“We cannot think about European security without looking at
the global scene and engaging with other partners. I see how
powerful the Russian narrative is, its accusations of double
standards. We have to dismantle that narrative, cooperate with
other countries, accept that the UN structure must be adapted,” Mr.
Borrel said, referring to demands that the Global South has a
permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.
The United States’ key allies, the EU and Japan, appear to
have taken the lead in attempting to regain credibility and trust.
So far, they have taken small steps, but, by and large, they have
yet to put their mouth where their mouth is.
For the effort to gain momentum and for the United States to
benefit, it needs to not only get on board with what Messrs. Djalal
and Sheldrick describe as “a thousand-mile journey” but get in the
driver’s seat.
It takes only a glance at the Arab Youth survey to conclude
that the stakes are high in the Middle East and across the globe.
Credibility matters, perhaps more than ever since World War
Two.

加载中…