加载中…
个人资料
刘洪波-学为贵
刘洪波-学为贵 新浪个人认证
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:1,409
  • 关注人气:1,200
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

2013年4月18日雅思考试写作15句模板高分范文

(2013-04-18 15:38:07)

这是一篇按15句逻辑模板写出来的范文。读完请回答:你认为这是模板作文吗?

《最简化雅思写作》原文

十五句逻辑模板范文之三

【经典考题-动物保护】

 

WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans. Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purposes.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

 

【刘洪波作品】

写作提纲

观点 : 人类合理利用动物是正当的

论据1:自然法则,natural law,  the law of the jungle

论据2:动物对人类文明贡献大,KFC,  MacDonald’s even pets

 

Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about animal protection and animal rights. However, whether we should utilize animals for the human purposes has caused a heated debate recently. In my view, it is acceptable to reasonably exploit animals for the benefit of mankind and impossible to completely cut down the human’s reliance on animals.

 

It is clear that human beings are standing at the top of the food chain of this planet. As big fishes eat small ones, mankind uses animals for its own benefits, which is consistent with natural law. So, it is hard to say that we are doing wrong by exploiting animals for our interests.

 

Moreover, it is unrealistic to ban using animals since the history of human civilization is entwined with the history of the ways we have learned to manipulate animal resources. We have raised cattle for food; the outcomes of animal experiments have saved many lives; people have even kept pets to satisfy their psychological needs. If using animals were prohibited, we would firstly close thousands of KFC’s and MacDonald’s franchises[n.连锁店] around the world, because they are slaughtering lovely chicken to make money! And everyone in this world would become a vegetarian[n.素食主义者].

This is not to say that it is always right for people to use animals for whatever purpose. Some people hunt wild animals just for fun; others kill rare animals for their expensive furs. Indeed, these behaviors are not only cruel and unnecessary, but actually against long-term interests of human race. Humans should shoulder their responsibilities of maintaining the diversity of wild animals and the balance of ecosystem.

 

In sum, using animals rationally for the benefit of humans is justified. Meanwhile, some behaviors that are harmful to both animals and humans have to be prohibited. By doing so, we can ensure that our next generation could also exploit the animal resource.

 

(298 words)

 

【参考译文】

 

 

http://s11/mw690/a4a07ae3gda9db983464a&690

现在越来越多的人关注动物保护和动物权益。但是,我们是否可以为了人类的利益使用动物导致了热议。我的观点是,为了人类的利益合理利用动物是可以接受的,并且完全杜绝人类对动物的依赖是不可能的。

显然,人类是站在这个星球食物链的最高端的。就像大鱼吃小鱼一样,人类为了自身的利益使用动物,这一点是和自然法则一致的。因此,很难说我们利用动物是错的。

而且,禁止使用动物是不现实的,因为人类文明的历史是和我们学会利用动物资源的历史伴生交织在一起的。[读写互通,剑723页阅读文章首句改写]我们饲养家畜作为食物;动物实验的成果拯救了很多人的生命;人们甚至饲养宠物满足他们的心理需求。如果利用动物被禁止,那么我们首先要关闭上万的肯德基和麦当劳的全世界连锁店,因为他们正在屠杀可爱的小鸡去挣钱![用虚拟语气表达反方观点的不现实]世界上的每个人将成为素食主义者。

这并不是说不论怎样利用动物都是对的。一些人捕猎取乐;另一些人猎杀珍稀动物为了它们昂贵的毛皮。事实上,这些行为不仅是残忍和没有必要的,而且也背离了人类的长期利益。[重点句型-not only…but also…]人类应该肩负起维护野生动物多样性和生态系统平衡的责任。

总之,为了我们自身利益而理性的使用动物是正当的。同时,一些对动物和人类都有害的行为应该被禁止。这么做,我们才能确保我们的下一代也能开发利用动物资源。[思想升华]

 

 雅思教父经典范文,真实考试碰到请勿全文一字不改背诵。当有多位考生作文完全一致时,有遭遇调查之风险。

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有