Today is probably the
gloomiest Friday I've experienced since I came here. The sky is
gray and lifeless, the air is thick and humid. I stayed the entire
morning in the computer lab in science center, reviewing the class
material of Law and Psychology. I asked a friend I met on facebook
to lunch, and it was a very quiet lunch with loud people from the
fourth floor in Thayer. After lunch, I decided to walk around and
let my body digest food before I go to somewhere to sit down and
study. So I walked aimlessly out of the gate next to the Lamont
Library, and then found myself on the track on which I ran this
morning.
The streets and roads are
straight and neatly organized; I wasn't too afraid of being lost.
After several unconscious turns, I found the in-constructing Fogg
museum in front of me. Vaguely remembering the fact that there was
another anthropology museum right next to the Fogg, I looked around
and found a modern glass museum. Without further consideration, I
walked towards the building and crossed the beautiful mini park in
front of it. The red words on the top of the gate became more
clear, it wasn't until then that I found out it was Cambridge
Public library.
I walked into the
library, and was immediately attracted by how the entire library
was organized. Warm yellow nights shining from the above, the
wooden shelves and chairs conveyed a sense of softness, and there
were big boards hung from the ceiling indicating the different
sections of the library. Huge glass window allowed natural light to
shine through; though it was cloudy and dark outside, the inside of
the library was warm and bright.
The entire library was
carpeted, and there were balconies on the wings of the library to
let people rest and relax. The computer room and other reading
areas were just as quiet as the libraries in
Harvard.
I instantly felt in love
with this library. Comparing to the old Boston public library, this
one was bigger and more renovated. It doesn't mean that Boston
public library is lousy, since comparing to the public library in
Guangzhou, it's much more well-preserved and provides better
service than the one in my city.
It then makes me wonder
why in a city that has nearly ten million people, with a GDP among
the highest in the world, cannot provide its citizens with public
libraries and museums as rich and modern as that provided in a much
smaller city? New skyscrapers have been erected on the already
crowded land of Guangzhou, but the three-floor library has never
caught the attention of government official, and it has remained to
be a dark and out-dated place. All kinds of modern technologies
have been applied to the construction of new buildings, but nobody
cares about changing the atmosphere in the public libraries. As far
as I could remember, the public library I used to go to has no
elevator or carpet, and the building itself has no personality at
all. Though the number of books they have is acceptable, yet the
feeling it gives to whoever walks into that place is not pleasant
at all. The entire building is dark, no matter how bright the
outside could be; reading area or computer labs also cannot give
readers a sense of richness as they can receive from libraries here
in Cambridge. The library is in the middle of the old city center
of Guangzhou, there are always all kinds of renovation and
construction around, making uncomfortable noise. Readers sometimes
lack the basic politeness and manner, making all kinds of noise
chatting with friends or simply eating and
drinking.
Public museums, on the
other way, do better in maintaining both the outside and inside
appearances. Some of them have been the symbol of the city, with
their grand and splendid looks from the outside, and the amazing
amount of collections they have inside. From this perspective, it
seems to be necessary to compliment the efforts of Guangzhou's
government in providing its citizens with such amazing public
museums; it might even be one of the implications of the
improvement of public service provided by the government. However,
the service stops there. Once the construction is finished and the
collections are moved in, the museums no longer interest the
government's investment. Collections have been displayed, but there
are seldom people who actually go there and seriously get to know
the works. That's the difference I mean when talking to my mom one
day.
Here in America, all the
public museums have all kinds of programs aiming at improving the
general public's understanding of arts, science, history and etc.,
depending on the theme of the museums. There are all kinds of tours
going on in the museum, and there are certain programs provided to
children, teens and student visitors. Group and family visit also
enjoy the special treatments, and the service provided inside the
library allows you to truly know the collections displayed. I've
seen mothers take their babies to the museums, walking around and
telling them stories about the paintings or the artists, while the
babies might not even be old enough to understand human language;
I've seen teachers take their students to carefully inspect a
painting drawn by Jackson Pollock, one of the most famous abstract
expressionists in America; I've seen students sitting in front of a
drawing, scattering their hand-outs all around them, writing down
their thoughts about the paintings in their notebooks, being
absorbed in their own interpretation and understanding of the
works.
I went to the Fine Arts
Museum yesterday with a group of classmates in The Essay class. We
chose to go to the contemporary arts section, since it was the most
helpful source for our homework this week and our final essay as
well. After walking around and writing down the names of the works
on which we would like to do some further research, we went down to
the Chihuly exhibition, "Through The Looking
Glass".
Going down to the
basement of the museum, I entered a world created by glass. The
feeling was ineffable, or it's because of the limitation of my
usage of English, I simply couldn't express what I saw and what I
felt: it was too amazing to be described and depicted. I heard
people use adjectives like "cool", "amazing" or even "sick", but
few of them used the word "beautiful". This piece of anecdote could
be used in my essay for this week's homework: why do people avoid
using "beautiful" to describe art? Do they simply think the works
are not beautiful? Or is it because they are afraid to make a
commitment to beauty? Or are there other reasons for them to do
so?
I, myself, would use the
word "beautiful", or even "extraordinarily beautiful" to describe
the entire exhibition. I was stunned and amazed by the effects
those simple glasses could create when molded together into a piece
of art. Seldom was I so interested in art exhibition, not in
Guangzhou at least.
The Guangzhou government
is rich and able enough to provide service and exhibitions much
better than the one I saw in the fine arts museum in Boston,
however they are reluctant to use money to develop the current
public libraries and museums. To them, "pretty" is what they are
asking for. It indicates a social disadvantage prevailing in the
entire country: the surface is all people are asking for, but the
real and deep inside has always been neglected. All the objects,
including the citizens themselves, are empty with pretty outside
appearances. If that means development and modernization, I'd
rather live in a society much out-dated than this one, with plain
appearance and real rich contexts from the
inside.
There are still a lot
more in Boston and Cambridge waiting for me to explore. Tomorrow
I'm going to visit the contemporary art museum in Boston, and if I
have extra time, I would like to revisit the fine arts museum and
the Chihuly exhibition.
The sense of gladness
generated by visiting all these museums is not available back in
Guangzhou, or at least I haven't found a place that could provide
this feeling in the city I live in. Under the surface of all those
giant buildings, all I could see is the severe unconfidence of the
government and the society as a whole.