One Month Crimson (Part
One)
1. One Month
I
still remember the emotions I had the moment I set my foot on this
unfamiliar land. Opposite to my parents’ concern, I wasn’t afraid
nervous at all. It was more of curious and excited, and of course,
exhausted.
It
was raining when I arrived at Harvard campus. It was a typical New
England morning, chilly enough to make me, a southerner from China,
put on the long-sleeve jacket I brought from home and still
trembling while stepping my feet.
That Saturday was long and confusing; but fortunately, I met a girl
in Harvard Hall in which we were getting our keys. She’s also
assigned to Thayer, and we decided to do the rest of the
registration together.
Defne, that’s her name. We met another boy Coco when we were having
lunch in Au Bou Pain in Harvard Square. Both of them remained to be
my really good friends, though due to a lot of reasons we were not
able to hang out often.
I
moved into Thayer, quickly cleaned my luggage, and was reading to
live in the suite I was assigned to for the rest of the summer.
The
room was better than I expected. I shared it with my only roommate,
Virginia, who didn’t show up until Saturday afternoon. We have a
common room, which is as big as my parents’ bedroom back home, and
we have one bedroom with two beds and two drawers. Each of us has a
closet, a lamp, a desk and a bookshelf. Although Thayer is one of
the oldest freshman dorms in the Yard, it has been renovated;
that’s why it’s generally newer in comparison to other dorms. It’s
also the biggest and most populated dorms in the Yard; the entire
floor shares a bathroom (it’s what I hate about Thayer most). Its
appearance is not as stylish as other dorms. It’s a very stubborn
and boring building from the outside, at the same time simple and
organized from the inside.
That evening our entrée had dinner together. There were only girls
in our entrée way, about ten to fifteen in total. Right from that
dinner, I decided that I wasn’t going to hang out with these
people. No offense, but I really think they are immature and not
smart. That evening I went to the first floor to visit a friend,
Bianca, I’d known on Facebook. Since then, she and her roommates
became really close with me.
The next day I decided to buy a sim card. However the t-mobile shop
in Harvard Square didn’t open until noon, so I decided to go to the
AT&T store with another friend I met in Facebook
Thayer group, Brandon. We trusted google map and went all the way
to Alewife. It took us two wrong turns and several stops to get
there. Eventually we got there, and guess what, it didn’t open
until noon as well; it was eleven when we were standing in front of
the AT&T store, laughing bitterly.
The weekends passed quickly, and my first week in Harvard Summer
school officially began.
2. Courses
I
consulted my foreign teacher Jon when I was registering courses
online. Eventually I decided to take The Essay and a summer
seminar, The Meaning of Madness. The latter was a psychology
course, and it clearly indicated that it’s not recommended for high
school students. Still, I would like
to give myself a shot. However, the first class was somehow very
frustrating, for we had fifteen students in our class, only three
of them (including me) were high school students. Nearly all of
them had some basic knowledge in psychology, there was even one
Harvard undergraduate who majored in it. Though I could understand
the class quite well, it’s still hard for me to involve in the
class discussion, which was a very dangerous thing for a class that
small.
I
was quite sure at first that I wasn’t going to drop it, and I
forgot all the frustration by the next day. Tuesday morning, I
experienced the most inspiring and lively class I’d even taken in
my entire life.
It
was an expository writing course; the professor was Jill McDonough.
I only got to know that she teaches in Boston University from the
website, but I didn’t expect that she also teaches in Harvard and
in the state prison. She’s a woman full of energy and inspiration.
She can come up with sentences with accurate structure and precise
words as she speaks them out loud; she doesn’t need time to think,
all those sentences just jump out of her mouth and they are already
quite perfect. She forces us to express our ideas precisely; no
vagueness can be accepted. When we are expressing our ideas, she
usually squeezes more and more out of them; at last we are all
surprised with our capacity of deep thinking and processing
information, and she’s the one who helps us achieve that.
The
first class was amazing. We were first asked to remember
everybody’s name, and then we wrote something about ourselves for
twenty minutes. I was really nervous at first, since everybody
else’s essays all started with “my name is…” and went on to talk
about some details about their lives, but mine was more about how I
grew up in the most crowded country in the world and managed to
survive in the competitive environment and all that. I didn’t
manage to finish my essay, since I threw away my first draft and
started all over again after ten minutes. Surprisingly, Jill high
praised my way of depicting the environment in which I was raised
instead of writing like everybody else. I was a little overwhelmed
by her compliment, and from then I started to be active in the
class discussion because of the confidence I gained.
We
debate a lot during classes. In the first class we discussed what’s
failure and what’s success, and I gave an example to suggest the
subjectivity of these two terms. A successful murder, I said, was a
success to the offender himself, but overall it was a social
failure to the society. Jill teaches in the prison, I guess that’s
why she loves this idea. Since then she constantly jokes about this
murder example, and I’m the target of every topic relating to
murder, massacre and violence. In other classes, we argued what’s
beauty, what’s art, and does something beautiful need to have an
intrinsic virtue. Throughout these discussions, we all start to
understand that simply give an idea or an opinion is not idea; you
have to dig into your own thoughts and support your claim
explicitly.
Discussion is not enough for an expository writing course; our
focus, for sure, is on writing. At first we have to write response
paper to every article we read; we need to outline the arguments,
the counterarguments and the summary of main ideas in the articles.
We learn to apply the elements (thesis statement, claim, evidence,
analysis, counterargument) to our own essays.
The
first unit is about education, and our first formal paper is to
find a thesis statement, supporting or countering an argument in
the articles, and to write a four to five pages about that thesis.
In each paragraph, all five elements should be included, and we
need to have an extra page of citation.
The
process was somehow, contrary to most people’s opinion towards
writing a paper, not painful at all. It was a process of looking
for information, pinning down the sources, organizing ideas, and
repeating revising the paper.
At
last I came out with a piece of writing that I thought was explicit
and rich, and at the end of my meeting with Jill, she said that
after some small corrections of grammatical errors and improper
structures, I could get an A.
That’s where complacency filled up in me and tragedy began to
happen.
When Jill handed out our midterm papers, I found out I only god a
B+. Though to many other students it was a cheerful result, to me,
since Jill clearly told me that I could get an A, the result was
disappointing and painful. Going back to the text and reading my
own paper, I found out the problems were all about spelling or
punctuation, which should not exist at all after so many times of
revision. I felt disappointed, but there’s no way I could alter the
situation. The only chance I get to prove myself is the final
paper.
The
second unit is about art, which is a very challenging topic to all
of us. I haven’t received much serious education on art, and every
time when Jill starts to talk about some pieces of work, my
knowledge about them are a total blank. That’s why I’m so eager to
go to the art museums she recommends to us; there’s few chances in
China to visit museums and carefully inspect works of art.
On
Thursday (tomorrow) we’re supposed to have another three hour
session, but Jill decides to give us a day off for us to visit the
museums and find evidence to support the thesis statement we’re
going to use in our final paper. To most of my friends, it’s a
piece of news that arouses jealousy and sometimes even contempt;
for example, Jenny despises my choice of registering in this
course, she thinks I can learn nothing from it, and writing it what
she does everyday at school. I have to remind her every time that I
don’t go to school in the best private high school in Vancouver, I
go to a very Chinese Chinese high school. I don’t have the chance
to observe, explore, and write everyday. I believe that’s the
reason why I’m taking two humanity courses this summer: I need to
use this opportunity to experience something I’ve never done before
and would never have the chance to do in my own country.
Another course I’m currently taking is Law and Psychology. After
the first class of The Meaning of Madness, I tried two other
courses: Biomedical Ethics and The Economic and Political
development of Russia and China. The former one is taught by an old
professor, who speaks so softly that I couldn’t hear him at all
when I was trying the course for the first time with Jenny and
Bianca. They decided to stay, while I left an hour after the class
started. On Tuesday night I tried the other course. Again, it was
because of the professor that I didn’t stay, though I met some very
amazing classmates.
At
the same time, nearly all of my friends were taking Law and
Psychology and were complaining about the large amount of reading
they had to do for the second class. They needed to finish a
four-hundred-page book in a day and a half, which was about serial
killers and criminal profiling. As I was still hesitating about
whether I should change my course or not, Bianca and Jenny decided
for me that I should go to Law and Psychology with them. They
talked about the amazing professor and the intriguing focus of the
course. Without another second of consideration, I boldly decided
that I was going to drop the seminar and join them.
But
the homework was a huge problem: I only got four hours to finish
that book; in fact, I hadn’t had the textbooks at all. So I spent
sixty dollars that morning to buy the textbooks from Harvard Coop,
and spent the entirely morning devouring Mindhunter.
The
first class I had for Law and Psychology was a great experience. It
was Wednesday so we had sessions and discussions (usually on Monday
we have big lectures). Since I didn’t get the chance to finish the
entire book or to do close reading on the chapter that we were
going to talk about, I wasn’t active in the discussion at all.
However, in another session in which we were learning about mental
illness and DSM, I got the chance the answer a lot of the
questions, since I already learned a lot of the things about DSM in
the first class of The Meaning of Madness, and the reading
assignment for that session was also the pre-reading of the
seminar. In the other session (we have three sessions in total), I
wasn’t allowed to talk because I wasn’t registered. It sounded very
arbitrary but the professor was really funny, so nobody took that
as an offense.
The
first thing I did after the class was over was to go to the
registrar to change my course.
The
following experience in Law and Psychology was interesting and
fruitful. I know my mom wouldn’t want me to take this course at
all, since it has so many things to do with crimes, killers and
abnormal mental state, but it’s also something I would never get
the chance to experience back in China. Also, I fancy the amount of
reading we need to do for every class. It’s pretty intense at the
beginning, but then we started to get less reading, but the reading
becomes more serious as well. Mindhunter is more like a
detective novel; No Crueler
Tyrannies was accounts of several major miscarriages of justice
in the conviction of child abuses; the two Thinking About books
were like A Hundred Thousand
of Whys: in each paragraph, there’s a question and there’s the
answer. There are also several major cases we need to focus on,
most of them concerning insanity defense.
The
midterms came pretty soon, and I was really freaked out because of
it. It consisted of a take-home essay, two in-class close-book
essays (half an hour for each) and half an hour of short answers.
The take-home essay question is ambiguous: it asks us to rank the
importance of four lessons in criminal/racial/ethical profiling.
What exactly does “lesson” mean? I struggled for a while and
decided that it meant four elements of criminal profiling, so I
chose race, personality, familiarity of the area, and age. It
wasn’t like the essay I wrote in The Essay class; I generally
supported my claims with cases from the books, and I expressed why
the rank worked that way.
The
night before I handed in my essay, I started to become so unsure of
myself, since all the other people I knew didn’t interpret the
question in the way I did. They listed something like “behavior
reflects personality” and “don’t rush to conclusion” and things
like that. I was anxious and depressed, so I called Christopher and
asked for consolation. He said I could email him the question and
my essay, and he would give me his opinions. I asked Bianca and
Jenny if this was a type of cheating, since we were supposed to
finish the entire thing on our own. But Christopher said he would
only tell me if he though my interpretation was the same as his or
otherwise different, but he wouldn’t tell me how exactly he thought
the question was suggesting. Also, he’s not in the course, so
there’s no possibility of him knowing the things I wrote about.
Jenny and Bianca didn’t suggest me doing so; Bianca said it was
cheating (but she herself wanted to read my essay). I was super
unsure but at last it turned to a joke: I did e-mail the question
and the essay, but Christopher didn’t receive them. The next day
when he told me this, I no longer wanted other people’s agreement
or approval. I didn’t touch my essay at all, and I turned it in as
soon as I walked into the exam room.
The
rest of the midterms went on smoothly. The two other essays were
not difficult, and the short answers were not as hard as I thought.
However, it wasn’t until the exam result came out that I felt
greatly relieved. Though I believe I did my best in the exam, I
still felt like I was going to fail the exam (for no reason). While
other classmates were so eager to know the result, I remained
calmly in my seat and waited until other people had got their exam
paper and left. The professor piled all the exam material and
handed them out. As I got my pile, I was so nervous as well as
excited. I struggled between reading them and waiting until I was
in my room to open it. I held the pile facing down, and all out of
sudden I saw the letter on the last page of the pile. It was an
A.
Up
to now, it still shocked me that I, in fact, got an A in a class
that was consisted of many native English-speaking high school, or
even undergraduate students. As I read my review on the three
essays for the exam, I got every aspect of the essay right. It
might be indication of the effectiveness of taking The Essay.
I
really enjoy the experience learning here in Harvard. It’s not only
the courses, but also all of the professors and the students and
the environment in which I study. I like going to Widener’s Philips
reading room, sitting there quietly, absorbing every detail I’m
reading. I like going to the computer lab, sitting in front of a
giant Mac and enjoying the 786 MB/s Internet speed. I like
wandering through shelves after shelves in Lamont, smelling the
scent of books that are hundred years old.
Harvard is a great place to study; and I’ll miss so much about the
academic environment it provides to its students after the summer
ends. And more ambitiously, before the fall returns.
(To be continued...)
加载中,请稍候......