加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

FDIC: 903 banks in trouble 联邦储蓄保险公司:903个问题银行

(2010-11-22 21:19:56)
标签:

杂谈

美国联邦储蓄保险公司最新的数据表明有903个银行或者金融机构属于问题银行,是两年前的10倍。这些问题银行的总资产达4196亿美金,是两年前的16倍。但问题是,这些数据只是冰山一角。历史表明,FDIC总是漏掉就要翻船的大型金融机构或者银行,就像一个瞎子摸不到房间里的庞然大物大象一样。而这些庞然大物,即使单个算,资产总额都比FDIC列出的问题银行的所有总资产还要大很多,比如2008年破产的IndyMac。美国银行业目前面临的潜在的巨大问题仍然是房屋止赎和房贷相关。(具体的数据可以参考文中的数据,美国大银行前列的JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America。总之,是令人吃惊的)。根据这些数据,这些大银行毫无争议的应该被划分为脆弱的银行,或者问题银行。这些银行还有止赎门,房贷回购等花费巨大的问题,但他们的块头实在是太大了,FDIC一定不能也不敢这样做。


如果有一个此列的重量级银行遇到雷曼兄弟的命运,可想而知,对全球资本市场的影响就如同地震。为什么美联储那里有商业银行过万亿的超额准备金,美联储还得给商业银行付利息,而这些商业银行不愿把这些钱注入美国经济。或者他们在未雨绸缪,因为他们知道雨一定会下。这有可能是美国真正的棘手问题。有关这类问题值得密切关注。


FDIC: 903 banks in trouble. What to do ...


 

http://s12/middle/69e715d2g95a4259debbb&690903 banks in trouble 联邦储蓄保险公司:903个问题银行" TITLE="FDIC: 903 banks in trouble 联邦储蓄保险公司:903个问题银行" />

>

Martin here with an urgent update on the next phase of the banking crisis.


Just this past Friday, the government released new data showing that the FDIC's list of "problem banks" now includes 903 institutions.


That's ten times the number of bad banks on the FDIC's list just two years ago.


The banks on the list have $419.6 billion in assets, or SIXTEEN times the amount of two years ago.


And yet, these bad banks are ...


Just the Tip of the Iceberg!

How do we know? 


Because the FDIC has consistently neglected to include the most endangered species on its list of problem institutions — the nation's megabanks that are among the shakiest of all.


The FDIC doesn't reveal the names of the banks on its list — just the number of institutions and the sum total of their assets.


Still, I can prove, without a shadow of doubt, that the FDIC's list of problem banks is grossly understated and inadequate.


Consider what happened on September 25, 2008, for example.


That's the day Washington Mutual filed for bankruptcy with total assets of $328 billion.


But just 30 days earlier, according to the FDIC's own press release, the aggregate assets held by the 117 banks on its "problem list" were only $78 billion.


In other words ...


Washington Mutual alone had over FOUR times the sum of ALL the assets of ALL the banks on the FDIC's list of problem banks!


Obviously, Washington Mutual was not on the FDIC's list.


Obviously, the FDIC missed it. Completely.


Also not on the FDIC's list: Citicorp and Bank of America, saved from bankruptcy with $95 billion in bailout funds from Congress. Just these two banks alone had over FORTY-SEVEN times more assets than all of those the FDIC had identified as "problem banks."


Some people in the banking industry seem to think the FDIC can be excused for missing the nation's largest bank failures for the same reason that blind men groping in the dark can't be blamed for missing an elephant in the room.


But the fact is that the FDIC even missed the failure of a relatively smaller bank: IndyMac Bank.


When IndyMac failed in July 2008, the 90 banks on FDIC's "problem list" had aggregate assets of $26.3 billion. But IndyMac alone had $32 billion in assets. Evidently, even IndyMac was not on the FDIC's radar screen.


This is ...


Easily One of the Greatest
Financial Scandals of Our Time

The FDIC's problem list is supposed to guide banking authorities in their efforts to protect the public from bank failures. If the FDIC is missing all the big failures, where does that leave you and me?


Heck — it's bad enough that they refuse to disclose the names of endangered banks. What's worse is that they're hiding the truth from their own eyes.


And with so many misses so evident, you'd think they would have changed their ways by now.


Not so.


Even as I write these words to you this morning, banking authorities are AGAIN failing to recognize, analyze, scrutinize, or tell the public about the real impact of the most intractable disaster of this era:


Major U.S. Banks Still Extremely
Vulnerable to the Foreclosure Crisis


Here are the facts ...

Fact #1. JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo Bank, and Bank of America each have more than $20 billion in single-family mortgages that are currently foreclosed or in the process of foreclosure.


Fact #2. Each bank has at least DOUBLE that amount in a pipeline of foreclosures in the making — $43 billion to $55 billion in delinquent mortgages (past due by 30 days or more).


Naturally, not all of the past-due loans will ultimately go into foreclosure. But these figures tell us that the biggest players are not only in deep, but could sink even deeper into the mortgage mayhem.


Fact #3. Combining the foreclosures and delinquent mortgages into a single category — "bad mortgages" — the sheer volume still on their books is staggering:

  • JPMorgan Chase (OH) has $65 billion in bad mortgages ...
  • Wells Fargo Bank (SD) has $68.6 billion, and ...
  • Bank of America (NC) has $74.9 billion.


Fact #4. The potential impact of these bad mortgages on the bank's earnings, capital — AND SOLVENCY — is dramatic. Compared to their "Tier 1" capital ...

  • SunTrust (GA) has 57.6 percent in bad mortgages ...
  • Bank of America has 66 percent in bad mortgages ...
  • JPMorgan Chase has 66.8 percent, and ...
  • Wells Fargo has 75.4 percent.


Tier 1 capital does not include their loan loss reserves. But even if you included them, the exposure is still huge.


Moreover, this data is based on the banks' midyear reports. Since then, we believe the situation has gotten worse.


And these numbers reflect strictly bad home mortgages! It does not include bad commercial mortgages, credit cards, construction loans, business loans, and more.


Here's the key: Based on their size alone, we KNOW that none of these giant institutions are on the FDIC's list of "problem banks."


Yet they are all definitely WEAK, according to our Weiss Ratings subsidiary, the source of this analysis on bad mortgages.


Moreover, "weak" means "VULNERABLE," according to the analysis of the Weiss ratings provided by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.


To help make sure your money is safe, I have four recommendations:


Recommendation #1. Don't keep 100 percent of your savings in banks. Also seriously consider Treasury bills — bought through a Treasury-only money market fund or directly from the Treasury Department.


Don't be put off by their low yield. The primary goal of this portion of your portfolio should not be the return on your money. It's the return OF your money.


Recommendation #2. The only real risk in holding U.S. Treasury bills is the likelihood of a falling U.S. dollar. But don't let that alone prompt you to run away from safe investments and rush into high-risk investments. Instead, stick with safety and protect yourself from a dollar decline SEPARATELY, with hedges against inflation, such as gold.


Recommendation #3. For checking accounts, money market accounts, and CDs that you have in a bank, be sure to keep your principal and accrued interest under the FDIC's insurance limit of $250,000.


Recommendation #4. Given the magnitude of the potential crisis ... given the limited resources of the FDIC ... and in light of the strong anti-bailout sentiment of the new Congressional leadership ... I feel you must not count exclusively on the FDIC or any government entity to guarantee your savings.


Instead, make sure you do business strictly with financial institutions that have what it takes to withstand adverse conditions on their own, even without a penny of government support.


 

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有