加载中…SAP对物料帐常见的未分配、不包括差异的解释（转）
(2011-09-02 00:09:07)
标签：
it |
分类： SAPCO |
Note 908776 - Not included/not allocated and not
distributed
Summary
Symptom
You would like to have further details about possible reasons which
cause 'Not distributed' and 'Not included' variances.
Other terms
ACTCONS CNACT 'Not distributed' 'Not allocated' 'Not
included'
Reason and Prerequisites
The 'Not distributed' differences are variances posted to the material during periodic transactions which are not carried to line 'cumulative inventory' and therefore not considered to calculate Periodic Unit Price.
In transaction CKM3 they are shown in an own line above 'cumulative inventory' line.
The 'Not included' or 'Not allocated' variances are variances rolled from 'cumulative inventory' line to category 'consumption' which are not rolled further to the single-level or multi-level consumption alternatives.
In transaction CKM3 these differences appear in an own line below category 'consumption' line.
Solution
**'Not distributed' price differences can be due to four reasons:
A) System applied a 'Price limiter' logic (stock coverage
check).
You can analyse this case using the value flow monitor transaction:
-
for release 4.7 , transaction CKMVFM
-
for
release 4.6C, program
SAPRCKM_VERIFY_PRICE_DET (note 324754
is required).
-
for
release <
4.6C: Program ZVERIFY_PRICE_DET (included in
the note
324754) Or directly
checking the field
CKMLPP-PBPOPO manually.
In this case the value CKMLPP-PBPOPO is bigger than cumulative inventory.
If you still want these price differences to be distributed , you can switch off price limiter logic. Then all price differences are posted to stock, and the price difference account is cleared. You shoulddecide for each
material if you want to switch off price limiter logic or not. So
you can achieve a compromise between realistic prices and clearing
the balance of the price different account.
Price limiter logic can be switched off in the following way:
*
Resetting the price limiter quantity:
In
release 4.7 this is done using transaction CKMVFM.
In
release <= 46C using the program
ZREMOVE_PRICE_LIMITER (see
note 325406).
*
Note 855387: Application
of this note will create an
additional selection
parameter for step 'Single Level
Price Determination'
to switch on/off price limiter logic.
This
option is the better way, as it simplifies the process
and provides
more flexibility (see the note for more information).
You can analyse this case using the value flow monitor transaction:
In this case the value CKMLPP-PBPOPO is bigger than cumulative inventory.
If you still want these price differences to be distributed , you can switch off price limiter logic. Then all price differences are posted to stock, and the price difference account is cleared. You should
Price limiter logic can be switched off in the following way:
B) System applie*llback strategy during price determination (see note 579216) to avoid a negative periodic unit price (PUP).
Please check the attached
The PUP is calculated with these priorities:
1. 'Cumulative Inventory' line (no fallback)
2. Receipts ('ZU') line (Info message C+ 135 in the log)
3. Beginning inventory ('AB') line
4. PUP-price of previous period (Info message C+ 136 in the log)
5. S-price (Info message C+ 137 in the log).
The fallback strategy is active by default for Single-Level price determination.
For multilevel price determination it must be activated with parameter 'Negative price: automatic error management'.
As a solution, you might check the postings of these materials if
they really need to have such big negative price differences or if
there is some kind of error in the posting or the production
structure
If you find such errors, you might reverse the corresponding
postings and post them in a correct way.
Or, you might use transaction MR22 (debit/credit material) in order to post an appropriate positive amount of differences to the concerned materials so that the resulting actual price would no longer be negative. This allows to perform the period closing regularly. In the next period, you might remove this manual posted value from the materials (again with MR22) in order to correct the overall stock values back to their original amounts.
Or, you might use transaction MR22 (debit/credit material) in order to post an appropriate positive amount of differences to the concerned materials so that the resulting actual price would no longer be negative. This allows to perform the period closing regularly. In the next period, you might remove this manual posted value from the materials (again with MR22) in order to correct the overall stock values back to their original amounts.
C) Execution of transaction CKMM.
The above situation may be produced because transaction CKMM wa*ecuted during the corresponding period.
When transaction CKMM is processed the system deletes the price differences for the material in the period and these differences are not longer in the period record tables.
See note 384553 for further details.
The fact is that the price differences are still visible in CKM3 (as not distributed). This is due to the missing reset of summarization records (MLCD).
This error is just a problem of CKM3 display, because the differences shown as 'not distributed' do not exist in the periodic records. The PUPof the material is calculated correctly.
The error is solved with note 838989:
(Hotpackage
D) A subsequent price change (LTPC).
In transaction CKM3 when a subsequent price change (LTPC) is carried out, the preliminary valuation and all differences are rescaled at category level. Additionally, the corresponding lines for price change documents are sorted and flagged with the text "Subsequent price change".
If
Therefore transaction CKM3 will show a "Not distributed line" although the PRDs are rescaled correctly. This is then a display side-effect in CKM3.
**'Not included' or 'Not allocated' price differences:
A) The material has multilevel consumption alternatives
(processes).
- Multilevel price
determination was not carried out yet.
- Not all subsequent
materials were processed by multilevel
price determination.
If multilevel step has not been carried out
(or resulted
in an error etc.) the price differences remain on
the input
material in the 'not allocated' line.
You
can verify the Actual BOM for all consumption processes to
find all
output materials. You should check the status for multilevel
in all
output materials
- the multi level
document of one subsequent material is
obsolet, because
it is older than the single level or multi level document
of the input
material.
You
can check this by comparing the time stamps in the
documents' header
data.
This
situation occurs when the input material was reprocessed
by single
level and/or multi level price determination, but not
all depending
subsequent materials were reprocessed.
To
avoid such error SAP recommends to run multi level
price determination
generally with the
option: 'materials
already processed:
process again'.
- For some consumption
processes there was no goods receipt of
the output
material in the period. In this case the price
differences can
not be rolled up by multi level price determination.
They remain
as 'not included' ('not allocated') at the input
material.
- For some consumption
processes, that have different
output materials
(joint production) for one of the joint products
(the materials
that receive costs according to the
apportionment structure) the
goods receipt has not been posted yet. In this
case the
differences to be allocated to this joint product remain
as 'not
included' ('not allocated') at the input material
- One output was
calculated with reduced BOM. Typically this
happens if
input and output material are part of a cycle, and this
cycle was
cut off because it didn't converge. In this case the
price differences
of the input were not rolled-up along the
cycle connections
and therefore remain on the input material. To
verify if
this case applies check the multi level document of the
output material.
There must be a red light in the item line of the
input material
to indicate that no price differences have been rolled
up. In
the header data of the multi level document you can see
the cycle
number. Furthermore in the log of multi-level
price determination
there may be a message 'Cycle * cut off after
*
B) Material has Single level consumption alternatives
- For release 4.7 or
higher, the step 'Revaluation of
consumption' was
not carried out. (This step is only available with
Financials Extensions).
- For
releases < = 4.6C.
The
variances for single level consumption alternatives
remain always
as 'Not included'. In the standard there is no
functionality to
revaluate Single level consumption movements.
Program ZSAPRCKML_COGS
revaluates single level consumption movements but
it does
not create a Material Ledger document,therefore its
postings are
invisible in CKM3. So even after execution of
program 'Not
Included' in CKM3. Please see the note 722076 for
more information.
C)
喜欢
0
赠金笔