加载中…对话美国华南美国商会会长哈利·赛亚丁-中国制造低成本的竞争优势不再
(2012-09-11 01:16:00)
标签：
艾诚经济中国中央电视台美国商会杂谈 |
http://s9/middle/62608692gc95c21a38b58&690
对话问题手记如下，具体请参考节目（链接）：
1.今年2月，哈利先生发布一份报告称，2012年贵会会员在华
In this February, you indicated in a report that the chamber members’ investment in China had increased 16 percent on a year-on-year basis. However, what we have learned over time from newspaper is that NIKE and ADIDAS have closed their factory in China, MOTOROLA had a massive layoff, as well as Nestle have suspended its retail business in east China. Therefore, I am wondering, where did the 16% increase come from?
2.耐克2009年关闭苏州工厂，雀巢2011年底暂停华东业务
NIKE closed its factory in Suzhou in 2009, and Nestle suspended its retail business in east China in 2011. Although all these actions were taken in the past, it still reflects a trend; do you think it is a signal of US investment’s restructure in China?
3.经过近几十年的发展，中国的成本优势正在逐渐丧失，曾经针对
After decades of development, labor cost gap between China and the United States grows smaller and smaller over time. At the same time, preferential policies for foreign invested enterprises have been reduced gradually as well. Under all these backgrounds, and with China’s obvious slow down from this year, what do you think keeps China competitive to attract the US investment?
4.投资结构从代加工向重化工转移？（想办法问出正在发生的变化
Does it mean that the investment structure is shifting from the OEM( Original Equipment Manufacturer ) to the heavy industry?
5.哈利先生今年2月的调查报告指出，对于外资企业来说，面临的
In this February, you indicated in a report that the biggest challenge for foreign enterprises is still the uncertainty of China’s laws and regulations. I notice that, the conclusion appeared to be the same on the report 8 years ago. Do you think the environment of laws and regulations in China made no progress in the past decade?
6.但是与此同时，部分美国企业对中国法律不够尊重的问题也一再
At the same time, we spot some American enterprises’ disrespect of China’s law and regulations, for example, the overuse of iodine in Nestle milk powder and Apple’s overlord's clause against the right of customers etc.Mr. Harry, who do you think
should be blamed for, the Chinese laws and regulations or the
American enterprises?
In this February, you indicated in a report that the chamber members’ investment in China had increased 16 percent on a year-on-year basis. However, what we have learned over time from newspaper is that NIKE and ADIDAS have closed their factory in China, MOTOROLA had a massive layoff, as well as Nestle have suspended its retail business in east China. Therefore, I am wondering, where did the 16% increase come from?
2.耐克2009年关闭苏州工厂，雀巢2011年底暂停华东业务
NIKE closed its factory in Suzhou in 2009, and Nestle suspended its retail business in east China in 2011. Although all these actions were taken in the past, it still reflects a trend; do you think it is a signal of US investment’s restructure in China?
3.经过近几十年的发展，中国的成本优势正在逐渐丧失，曾经针对
After decades of development, labor cost gap between China and the United States grows smaller and smaller over time. At the same time, preferential policies for foreign invested enterprises have been reduced gradually as well. Under all these backgrounds, and with China’s obvious slow down from this year, what do you think keeps China competitive to attract the US investment?
4.投资结构从代加工向重化工转移？（想办法问出正在发生的变化
Does it mean that the investment structure is shifting from the OEM( Original Equipment Manufacturer ) to the heavy industry?
5.哈利先生今年2月的调查报告指出，对于外资企业来说，面临的
In this February, you indicated in a report that the biggest challenge for foreign enterprises is still the uncertainty of China’s laws and regulations. I notice that, the conclusion appeared to be the same on the report 8 years ago. Do you think the environment of laws and regulations in China made no progress in the past decade?
6.但是与此同时，部分美国企业对中国法律不够尊重的问题也一再
At the same time, we spot some American enterprises’ disrespect of China’s law and regulations, for example, the overuse of iodine in Nestle milk powder and Apple’s overlord's clause against the right of customers etc.
喜欢
0
赠金笔