加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Post on new Nobel Prize winners from Edmund Phelps

(2012-10-16 10:51:37)
标签:

杂谈

"About the prize this year: Roth's work is relatively recent and I have not caught up with it. Shapley's work was done in the early 1950s. The "Shapley value" was considered basic at the time. But game theory has had rather little use in macroeconomics, labor economic and public economics. It is good to see the prize awarded for conceptual and theoretical advances. The problem is that the prevailing concepts and theories are still oriented toward rational expectations, economic equilibrium and economic efficiency. These concepts and theories are not meeting the need for a foundation suited to the dynamism and consequent originality and indeterminacy of the modern world. It is worrying that our most influential educational institutions are not nurturing and promoting modern thinking."

参考翻译:

罗斯的工作我还没有机会细看。沙普利的研究工作基本在50年代已完成。“沙普利值”在当时被认为是基础理论。但是博弈论在宏观经济学、劳动经济学和公共经济学中的应用相对较少。我很高兴看到诺奖授予了在概念性和理论性的先锋之士。

  但当时的概念和理论是在朝着理性预期、经济均衡和经济效率的方向。这些概念和理论并不与当今的研究趋势、随后的研究独创性和不确定性等研究基础相适应。我对我们最富有影响力的教育机构并未在培育和提倡现代思维而感到担忧。

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有