为德国《时代周报》撰写的文章,谢绝转载
By the end of the first quarter of 2011, Chinese foreign exchange
reserve reached USD 3 trillion. As the scale of Chinese foreign
exchange reserve has already surpassed the optimal level, the costs
and risks of holding such a huge reserve pool are becoming more and
more prominent. The inflation in United States and the debasement
of US dollar tend to be the major risks.
According to our estimation, almost two thirds of Chinese foreign
exchange reserve is investing in US dollar denominating assets, and
Chinese central bank now holds over USD 1.3-1.5 trillion U.S.
government bonds. China is the largest overseas creditor to U.S.
government.
After the burst of U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, the Fed adopted a
very loose monetary policy. First, from August 2007 to December
2008, the federal fund rate had been cut down from 5.25% to
0-0.25%. Second, when there is no further space to decrease
interest rate, the Fed took two rounds of quantitative easing (QE)
policies, which meant the Fed kept injecting money into the market
through the purchase of government bonds, MBSs and ABSs.
The QE had effectively improved the liquidity shortage in US’s
financial market, therefore it helped US government to stabilize
financial market and stimulate real economy. However, the QE buried
new risks. As the result of two QE, the total liability of the Fed
expanded nearly 3 times to reach USD 2 trillion. That means, if the
Fed could not execute a perfect exiting strategy in the future to
withdraw the liquidity from the market, there will be unavoidable
high inflation and significant depreciation of US dollar. Both the
inflation and the US dollar deprecation will definitely hurt the
interest of U.S. government’s creditors. The real value of U.S.
government bonds will shrink significantly and Chinese government
will suffer a huge capital loss.
Besides the monetary policy, U.S. government also took a very loose
fiscal policy since 2008. As the result, the federal fiscal deficit
to GDP ratio in United States will be nearly 10% in 2011, and the
government debt to GDP ratio will be over 90%. The healthy of U.S.
fiscal position is not better even if you compare it with Greece,
Ireland or Portugal. No wonder the Standard &
Poor’s tuned down the prospect of U.S. sovereign debts to negative
in April, the first time in the past 60 years.
As for U.S. government, there is a strong incentive for it to
decrease the real burden of its liabilities. There are several ways
to achieve that objective. One way is creating an inflation to eat
up the real value of government bonds, which will hurt both
domestic and overseas creditors. Another way is pushing down the
exchange rate of US dollar intentionally, which will made overseas
creditors suffer from it. Although President Obama and Fed Governor
Bernanke emphasized once and again that U.S. government will push
for a strong US dollar, the incentive to reduce the real debt
burden through US dollar depreciation is too strong to
resist.
Therefore, as a major form of Chinese national wealth, China’s
foreign exchange reserve is in real danger now. For example, If US
dollar depreciated again RMB for 20%, Chinese central bank will
suffer a USD 390 billion capital loss, almost 8% of China’s GDP in
2010.
What should Chinese government do to mitigate the above negative
impacts? First, Chinese government should further diversify its
investment portfolios of foreign exchange reserve. In currency
composition, the weights of US dollar denominating assets should
decline, and more reserve should be invested in euro or JPY
denominating assets. In asset composition, Chinese government
should purchase more gold, energy, commodities, equities and
corporate bonds, decreasing the over reliance on government
bonds.
Second, Chinese government should take a comprehensive set of
structural adjustment measures to change the twin surplus in its
balance of payment, which could restrict or even stop the further
accumulation of foreign exchange reserve. The most important
measures include liberalizing the interest rate and commodity
prices, decreasing or even stopping the official intervention on
the foreign exchange market, abolishing the distorting preferential
policies to stimulate export or attract foreign direct investment,
etc.
(The author is the deputy director of Department of International
Finance, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy
of Social Science)
加载中,请稍候......