加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Sayings.By.Chencius.Sino(4.Effectiveness.Is.Precisely.Scientificity.5.3)

(2024-06-07 15:31:44)
分类: 医学通论.陈语集锦
Sayings By Chencius Sino
( 4. Effectiveness Is Precisely Scientificity .5.3 )




50. Let me give another example. 

For the sake of health, we must eat a small 
amount of salt every day. 

If we lack salt for a long time, it will 
definitely harm our health.

However, if someone keeps pestering a problem:

"The main component of table salt is 
sodium chloride, and sodium ions are 
indeed important to the human body. 

But where did chloride ions go ? 

Will so many chloride ions automatically 
combine into chlorine gas in our body ?

In fact, there are not enough reasons to 
fully prove that the probability of two 
chlorine atoms synthesizing chlorine 
molecules in the human body is zero!


So, he insists on not eating any salt. 

May I ask, is it really good for him ?

From this, it can be seen that we must 
get knowledge from  facts by analyzing 
these facts in both micro and macro way. 

When we are analyzing facts, what we 
need is objectivity and impartiality.

So, it is no need to favor one over the 
other, and only in this way, can we avoid 
self deception and paradoxical remarks.



51. Obviously, when analyzing problems, 

we must grasp the granularity of the analysis, 

not the more microscopic the better, in order 

to avoid falling into misunderstandings.


For example, when we  study organic 
chemistry, we should keep top of the 
interactions between multiple elements 
such as carbon, hydrogen, nitrogenand 
oxygen, without the need for unrestricted 
analyzing the microstructure of carbon 
atoms.

Actually, that gang of pseudo scholars 
who always want to ruin TCM (Traditional 
Chinese Medicine) are more aware of 
these principles than we are. 

However, they only intentionally engage 
in academic fraud when they ruin TCM, 
by tempting everyone else to indulge in 
the micro world without considering the 
actual treatment effect. 

So,It is truly despicable !



52. For example, the classic formulas of 
traditional Chinese medicine have always 
emphasized the principles of "Ruler, 
minister, assistant and envoy", which are 
the combination of multiple traditional 
Chinese medicines, and only in this way 
can diseases be treated more effectively.

But some guys don't understand the 
principles of "ruler, minister, assistant 
and envoy", or they deliberately pretend 
not to understand these principles, so 
that they endlessly analyze and test 
traditional Chinese medicine, but almost 
all of their results are all specious. 

Even when faced with a large number of 
facts that traditional Chinese medicine 
can effectively treat diseases, those 
guys completely deny the effectiveness 
and scientificity of traditional Chinese 
medicine in treating diseases !

Is their method really reliable? 

Actually, it's not necessarily true.


In fact, their excessive or improper analysis 
is to completely negate the effectiveness 
and scientificity of all traditional Chinese 
medicine treatments, without any other 
significance .



53. In fact, all of these are obvious, so it 
is no need to discuss them too much. 

But we can make up a joke to disgust 
such foolish behavior. 



What Is A Book
============


Once upon a time, there was a fool, he could 
hardly learn anything .

For example, it is very hard for he to learn 
English because he could not remember any 
words.

Specifically, almost everyone knows that 
the English word "Book" means "a copy 
of a written work or composition that has 
been published .”

But even such a simple word is very difficult 
for that poor fool to remember.

And what is even more ridiculous is that 
whenever someone told him what "Book" 
means, he always refuted with eloquence: 

"How can book means that?”

So, he made the following analysis seriously:

53.1. The word "Book" has four English 
letters.

53.2. The first letter "B" doesn't mean 
that.

53.3. The second letter "O" doesn't 
mean that .

53.4. The third letter "O" doesn't mean 
that yet .

53.5. The fourth letter "K" still doesn't 
mean that .

53.6. That is, all the four English letters 
constituting the word  "Book" don't 
mean that.


Conclusion: 

the English word "Book" never means "a copy 
of a written work or composition that has been
 published .”  


Although almost everyone knows what book 
means , this nous can not stand with this 
specious analysis !

Those guys know very well that traditional 
Chinese medicine is formulated using the 
principles of "Ruler, minister, assistant 
and envoy", but they insist on studying 
it with a pretentious attitude !

It's like endless analyzing each of the four 
letters in the word of "BOOK" one by one, 
it's meaningless !

This kind of confusion should have ended 
long ago !



0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有