Sayings.By.Chencius.Sino(4.Effectiveness.Is.Precisely.Scientificity.5.3)
(2024-06-07 15:31:44)分类: 医学通论.陈语集锦 |
Sayings By Chencius Sino
( 4. Effectiveness Is Precisely Scientificity
.5.3 )
50. Let me give
another example.
For the sake of
health, we must eat a small
amount of salt
every day.
If we lack salt
for a long time, it will
definitely harm our
health.
However, if
someone keeps pestering a problem:
"The
main component of table salt
is
sodium chloride, and sodium
ions are
indeed important to
the human body.
But where
did chloride ions go ?
Will so
many chloride ions
automatically
combine
into chlorine gas in our body ?
In fact,
there are not enough reasons
to
fully
prove that the probability of
two
chlorine
atoms synthesizing chlorine
molecules in the human body is
zero!”
So, he insists
on not eating any salt.
May I ask, is
it really good for him ?
From this, it
can be seen that we must
get knowledge
from facts by
analyzing
these facts in
both micro and macro way.
When we are
analyzing facts, what we
need is
objectivity and impartiality.
So, it is no
need to favor one over the
other, and only in this way, can
we avoid
self deception
and paradoxical remarks.
51. Obviously, when analyzing
problems,
we must grasp the granularity of the
analysis,
not the more microscopic the better, in
order
to avoid falling into misunderstandings.
For example,
when we study
organic
chemistry, we should keep top of
the
interactions between
multiple elements
such as
carbon, hydrogen, nitrogenand
oxygen,
without the need for unrestricted
analyzing the
microstructure of carbon
atoms.
Actually,
that gang of pseudo
scholars
who always want to ruin TCM
(Traditional
Chinese
Medicine) are more aware of
these
principles than we are.
However,
they only intentionally engage
in
academic fraud when they ruin TCM,
by
tempting everyone else to indulge in
the
micro world without considering the
actual
treatment effect.
So,It is truly
despicable !
52. For
example, the classic formulas of
traditional
Chinese medicine have always
emphasized the
principles of "Ruler,
minister,
assistant and envoy", which
are
the combination
of multiple traditional
Chinese
medicines, and only in this way
can diseases be
treated more effectively.
But some guys
don't understand the
principles of
"ruler, minister, assistant
and envoy", or
they deliberately pretend
not to
understand these principles, so
that they
endlessly analyze and test
traditional
Chinese medicine, but almost
all of their
results are all specious.
Even when faced
with a large number of
facts that
traditional Chinese medicine
can effectively
treat diseases, those
guys completely deny the
effectiveness
and scientificity
of traditional Chinese
medicine in
treating diseases !
Is their method
really reliable?
Actually, it's
not necessarily true.
In fact, their
excessive or improper analysis
is to
completely negate the effectiveness
and scientificity of
all traditional Chinese
medicine
treatments, without any
other
significance
.
53. In fact,
all of these are obvious, so it
is no need to discuss them
too much.
But we can make
up a joke to disgust
such foolish
behavior.
What Is A Book
============
Once upon a
time, there was a fool, he could
hardly learn
anything .
For example, it
is very hard for he to learn
English because
he could not remember any
words.
Specifically, almost
everyone knows that
the English
word "Book"
means "a copy
of a
written work or composition that has
been
published .”
But even such a
simple word is very difficult
for that poor
fool to remember.
And what is
even more ridiculous is that
whenever
someone told him what "Book"
means, he
always refuted with eloquence:
"How can book
means that?”
So, he made the
following analysis seriously:
53.1. The word "Book" has
four English
letters.
53.2. The first letter
"B" doesn't mean
that.
53.3. The second letter
"O" doesn't
mean that
.
53.4. The third letter
"O" doesn't mean
that yet
.
53.5. The fourth letter
"K" still doesn't
mean that
.
53.6. That is, all the
four English letters
constituting the
word "Book" don't
mean that.
Conclusion:
the English word "Book"
never means "a copy
of a written work or
composition that has been
Although almost
everyone knows what book
means , this
nous can not stand with this
specious analysis
!
Those guys know
very well that traditional
Chinese
medicine is formulated using the
principles of
"Ruler, minister,
assistant
and
envoy", but they insist on
studying
it with
a pretentious attitude !
It's like
endless analyzing each of the four
letters in the word of
"BOOK"
one by one,
it's
meaningless !
This kind of
confusion should have ended
long ago !