加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Sayings.By.Chencius.Sino(4.Effectiveness.Is.Precisely.Scientificity.2.2)

(2024-04-29 14:57:45)
分类: 医学通论.陈语集锦
Sayings By Chencius Sino
( 4. Effectiveness Is Precisely Scientificity .2.2 )




12. Now, let's broaden our thinking. 

What would be the result if we apply the foolish 
idea of the AMVP ( to Abolish a Medical Science 
but Validate its Prescriptions) to other fields ?


For examples:


12.1. If people are only allowed to watch TV and 
not allowed to study the circuit principles of any 
TV,  the current TV is still  14 inch electronic tube 
TVs at best ! 

12.2. If people are only allowed to eat and are 
not allowed to learn any knowledge about crop 
growth mechanisms, then current agriculture 
will at best remain at the stage of relying on 
natural harvests !

12.3. When Mr. Zhao is learning English, if he 
is only allowed to remember English words and 
not allowed to study English grammar or any
other related English knowledge, he is at best 
just a walking English vocabulary, and he will 
never learn English !

12.4. When Mr. Qian was studying as a chef, 
if he was only allowed to memorize recipes 
without studying the specific cooking 
process of all dishes, he would not be able 
to become a qualified chef

12.5. When Mr. Song is studying geometry, 
if he is only allowed to remember geometric 
theorems and not allowed to study any 
derivation processes related to geometric 
theorems, he will never understand geometry



13. Now, we can see that it is the right way 
to Validate Both Medical science and its 
Prescriptions ( VBMP ) but it is a deceptive
trick to Abolish a Medical science and 
Validate its Prescriptions (AMVP ) .

But in fact, it is so easy to deal with such 
deceptive trick as long as we adhere to 
the first law of medical science .

Namely, we should dicuss science according 
to facts, while we should discus medical 
science according to efficacy.

So, we should adhere to validate both a 
medical science and its priscriptions and 
clarify the following principles :


13.1. The doctors of western medicine must 
write prescriptions based on the principles 
of western medical science and then verify 
the therapeutic effect .

13.2. The doctors of TCM must write 
prescriptions based on the principles 
of TCM and then verify the therapeutic 
effect .

13.3. We must not take it for granted 
to verify the therapeutic effect of our 
TCM based on the principles of western 
medicine, as if we cannot use English 
grammar to check our Chinese 
sentences .



14. Absolute comparison is sufficient 
to prove scientificity

In the battle against COVID-19, TCM has made 
great achievements, which is universally 
recognized.

Others doubt the scientificity of TCM treatment 
as long as they see the report of effective 
treatment of COVID-19 by TCM, and think that 
it is invalid without the comparison group test. 

This view is really too subjective

In fact, comparative experiments cannot be
interpreted arbitrarily. 

Firstly, it should be clear that comparative 
tests can be divided into the following two 
categories: 
 
Absolute comparative test
Relative comparative test 


And the significance of these two types of test 
is completely different .

Therefore, we should strictly identify absolute 
comparison and relative comparison , and 
accurately understand and grasp the differences 
between the two .


14.1. Absolute Comparison

Absolute comparison of an option is the 
comparison between using and not using 
this option.

It cannot be ignored that the conclusions 
produced by this absolute comparative test 
must have absolute authority , which is 
manifested in two aspects :

14.1.1 Deny inappropriate options with 
absolute authority .

1.2 Absolutely and authoritatively affirm 
the scientific, rational and practical 
nature of an option, and cannot be 
easily denied .


2. Relative comparison

Relative comparison refers to re-conducting 
comparative analysis of several options 
validated by absolute comparative tests 
under the same or different conditions .

So, there is only relative authority in relative 
comparison tests, and this relative authority 
is also manifested in two aspects :

14.2.1 Relative comparison has no veto 
power

The relative comparative test has no right 
to deny the scientific, rational and practical 
nature of each valid option determined by 
the absolute comparative tests .


14.2.2 Relative comparison is essentially 
comparative analysis of the advantages 
among various valid options .

The results of this relative comparative analysis 
of advantages can be used to guide us on how 
to choose the optimal solution under different 
conditions, rather than using relative comparative 
tests to select only one optimal option and veto 
all other options, unless the system can always 
only use one option.



15. For example, the relationship between eating 
Chinese food and eating Western food


15.1. Comparison between eating and not eating 
Chinese food

This is an absolute comparative test about eating 
Chinese food .

So, in this absolute comparative test, it is enough 
to prove the scientific, rational and practical 
nature of eating Chinese food as long as it can 
be proven that eating Chinese food can ensure 
sufficient nutrition for the human body .

And at the same time, it also proves that the 
scientific, rational and practical nature of eating 
Chinese food should not be arbitrarily denied .


15.2. Comparison between eating Chinese 
food and Western food

This is a comparative test between eating 
Chinese food and Western food .

So, obviously, this test only compares the 
various characteristics of eating Chinese 
food with eating Western food . 

Even if this comparative test does prove that 
some Western food has more nutritional value, 
it cannot deny the scientific, rational and 
practical nature of eating Chinese food. 

So, it's just for people to make different choices 
based on different situations .


In fact, the relationship between our TCM 
and Western medicine is very similar to the 
relationship between Chinese and Western 
food . 

And in this battle against COVID-19, the active 
participation of TCM has made positive 
contributions to the overall victory, such as 
improving the resistance of patients, reducing 
the proportion of mild to severe diseases, 
shortening the length of hospital stay, 
promoting rapid recovery of patients and 
reducing the death rate, all of which are 
supported by a large number of specific 
data .

All of this proves that a comparative test 
between participation and non-participation 
of our TCM have been completed, which is 
an absolute comparative test . 

And this absolute comparative test has 
already proved the scientific, rational and 
practical nature of our TCM, and this effective 
proof should not be denied by any relative
comparative test !


Unfortunately, a gang of pseudo scholars 
who always want to ruin our TCM are very 
skillful at replacing absolute comparison 
with relative comparison, in order to deceive 
patients, which is truly wrong !



16. But as is known to all of us, there is indeed 
a rule , that is :

Absolute comparative tests 
 are sufficient to prove the 
   scientific nature of the 
    object being tested !


Actually, the fact that our TCM can continue 
to now has already proved that everyone has 
long assumed this rule, but it has not been 
explicitly stated until today .


0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有