加载中…Unnecessary.Sophistry(16.The.Absoluteness.And.Relativity.Of.knowledge.1）
(2024-01-16 14:52:07)| 分类： 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Unnecessary Sophistry
( 16. The Absoluteness And
Relativity
Of Knowledge .1）
Among so many
guys who always want to ruin
TCM
(Traditional Chinese Medicine), the
most
harmful
is a gang of pseudo
scholars,
which
appear or
disappear now and then.
This kind
of
in diplomas or
professional titles, but they are
very
unethical.
Or, we can take
look at their frequent ugly
performances：
Faced with a
large number of facts about the
effective
treatment of diseases in TCM, those
pseudo
scholars either pretend to
understand
while they do
not understand at all or pretend
not to
understand while they have already
understood.
Anyway, for a
long time, they have been trying
to deny a large
number of facts.
They have long
disregarded a large number of
facts,
disregarded the pain and helplessness
of
similar
patients.
They have
wholeheartedly regarded
as
authority, shamelessness as courage,
and
Ignoring
lots of facts and telling lies for a
long
time as
their ability !
Such things,
isn't it considered immoral ?
Of course, such
guys have enough professional
terminologies
to disguise their scams and lure
patients into
wandering with such guys
aimlessly,
leaving the patients with no time to
consider the
effectiveness of treatment !
What is
more serious, in order to ruin TCM,
even
some guy
cross his profession to do such things.
For example,
about ten years ago, in order to
ruin
TCM, a
professor majoring in philosophy
openly
said at a
conference:
He
never understood "Huangdi Neijing"
and
arbitrarily stated that only pigs on
Earth
could
It's
really ridiculous to the point
of
shamelessness !
Then he boasted
about his knowledge again!
Actually, when
we discuss medicine, we should
adhere to the
first law of
namely
:
We should
dicuss science according to facts,
while
we
should dicuss medical
science
according to
fefficacy
.
So, when
discussing medical science, we must
base our
discussion on two factors: facts and
efficacy.
As for
what kinds of knowledge are needed
and
how to
apply the knowledge, there have long
been
good examples, such as the birth of
smallpox
penicillin.
These
examples all tell us:
Not every
problem must start with the
formation
In fact, this
person, as a professor of
philosophy,
in this way
is
knowledge
to
His purpose is
to use a kind of
some
sense
incorrectly, and attempt
to
fallacy
in this way:
"TCM is not
knowledge."
But in fact,
what we only need to do to expose
all such scams
is to think a little by ourselves.
Similarly, when
we are thirsty, we need to drink
some
water.
At this time,
we only need to pay attention to
whether the
water is hygienic enough.
But if someone
called "John" says,
"Anyone is only allowed to
drink water if
he
has
water.”
Then, John is a
scammer !
Let's
give another analogy:
According to
the current transportation
conditions, it
is very convenient to travel
from London to
Paris.
But if someone
called "Bill" starts to coax
and insists on
saying:
"From London to Paris, one
must pass
through
Pretoria, South Africa."
And Bill
himself has also traveled this way
many times,
which is not just a
double-blind
trials
!
Then, Bill is a
fraud or a fool !
So, now, we can
think again:
Is it necessary
for us, as patients or potential
patients, to
refer to the opinions of such
professor
Similarly, when
studying TCM, should we need
to waste time
aimlessly following such a
philosophy
professor ?
喜欢
0
赠金笔