加载中…Medical.Science.Is.Not.A.Sophistry(7.Blind.Or.Not.1)
(2023-12-11 16:17:59)| 分类： 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Medical Science Is Not A Sophistry
(
Now,
someone is still
“The
deceptive
therapeutic effect . ”
In order to
tout such a junk,
"Double-blind " Big Killer
scare
others, it's really
In fact,
just a little
kind
of junk this guy is touting
.
Or please think
about a
Since the
double-blind trials
and
sophisticated, it cannot be
done
for
there must be many
to
be
For
example:
1. The
treatment of rare
the
sample size is
to
gather enough cases
What should we
do at this
2. The
sudden outbreak of
There
was no
blind
trial, not even enough
all
the
What should we
do at this
3.
Although there are many
distribution
In space,
the
of time,
it may take
few
cases, so that it is almost
effectively.
What should we
do at this
4. The
condition is
The condition
is
any
treatment is no longer
getting
a clear
going
What should we
do at this
…
…
In
short, can't treatment be
conducting
a
To leave
the patients to their own
But it is worth
noting that in
double-blind
introduced the first
effective
of Ebola
virus
In 2014, the
Ebola virus
resulting in a
mortality rate
patients,
At that time,
two American
were
treatment
upon
they
recovered and
This successful
case is good
But this guy
used this case
used by
TCM
none of
which were
double-blind
But in fact,
the effective
patients in
2014 was completed
double-blind
also
sternly warned
1. Double blind
trials are
not
a
the
absence of
prevent
effective
2. The use of
treatment
undergone double-blind
trails
the
self-healing nature of
diseases or
comforting effects
of
are
After all,
medical science
diseases
medical
science cannot
analysis
of
3. Western
medicine adopts
that
have
experiments to
achieve
Even
if
comforting effects,
it
that
if
have not
undergone
achieve
be all
self-healing and
As we know, the
essence of
is that
some
professional terms such
as
trial to
mislead
喜欢
0
赠金笔