Medical.Science.Is.Not.A.Sophistry(4.Therapeutic.Effect.First.2)
(2023-10-15 10:03:56)分类: 医学通论.医学绝不是诡辩 |
Medical Science Is Not A Sophistry
( 4. Therapeutic
Effect First.2 )
4. He also said that science, statistics and
logic
never acknowledge the
persuasiveness of
individual cases, and that it
may also be
self-healing, placebo effects, and so on.
However, there is a key point
that he dare not
mention, that is:
Those who truly
possess
never easily give up
the
cases,and it is
precisely
humans will have significant
medical
achievements like smallpox vaccines!
Now, let's take a look at the
first cured Ebola virus
in 2014 :
If double-blind trials must
be persisted before
treatment can be given, so
are there any cases
that have been successfully cured like this case?
If double-blind trials is necessary before treatment
is allowed, and people do not
have enough
experience with such
diseases, but still adhere to
double-blind trials, then our
medical science will
enter a dead end !
Also, why can western medicine be exceptional in
completing treatment without
double-blind trials,
while our TCM must wait for
the results of
double-blind trials ?
And this example of the first
cure for the Ebola
virus is just the thing they are proud of !
So, obviously they are using the two standards !
The first
standard
medicine,so they can continue
treatment without
the toy called "Double-blind trials"
The second
standard
can only wait for the results
of "Double-blind trials"
before any treatment !
And even more, even if
western medicine does not
have any double-blind trials,
it can still boast of its
effective treatment, while
the effectiveness of our
TCM will never be
acknowledged without
double-blind trials !
From it, we can see that the
double-blind trials is
nothing but a prop used by that gang
of
scholars
goals:
The first
are.
But in fact, medical science
is about pursuing
therapeutic effects.
Any medical professional
knowledge that has
nothing to do with
therapeutic effects should all
be
thrown into the toilet and
not allowed to wander
around to interfere with treatment !
The second
goal
That gang of guys have gotten
three tricks when
using double-blind trials to ruin our TCM:
The first trick is to utilizing the relationship
beween individual cases and large-scale cases
For a long time, that gang of
guys have
denied
the facts that our
TCM
many diseases, to the extent that treatments of our
TCM
something called "Double-blind trials".
The second trick is to
utilize the
relationship
between clinical treatment and scientific research
Clinical practice requires
timeliness, while scientific
research has a cycle, which cannot meet the timeliness
requirements of clinical
treatment in a timely manner.
Because double-blind trials are essentially just scientific
research methods, not clinical experience !
So, they use scientific
research requirements to
prevent our TCM clinical
practice, this is indeed a
deeply hidden trick !
The third trick is to
utilize the
relationship
between qualitative and
quantitative analysis
Some issues may only have
qualitative conclusions,
for it is too difficult to get quantitative conclusions.
But this does not mean that
qualitative conclusions
are of no value.
In fact, in many cases,
qualitative analysis is more
important than quantitative analysis.
Because using the wrong
method, no matter how
precise it is, it is always
wrong !
More importantly, as long as
the treatmment is
effective, it can be adhered
to.
As for quantitative analysis,
it can be put aside,
after all, medical science is about treating diseases
and saving patients, not just experimental analysis !
So, it is not difficult to
find that all of their tricks
hide a deep logical trap:
On the one hand, they
vigorously promote that all
medical plans must undergo
double-blind trials
On the other hand, they
completely negate all
effective treatment plans of our TCM
Just a slight analysis of
their tactics shows that
these guys have dug a
bottomless hole for our
TCM
And in this way, the
double-blind trials naturally
become
the
gang,
and
So, in the face of the
double-blind trials, a
so-called
a rational
Double-blind trials are
ultimately just a
scientific
method, and essentially have
their instrumental
side.
That is, if double-blind
trials are applied in
good
faith, then double-blind
trials are beneficial
for
the
treatments
However, if double-blind
trials are maliciously
abused, then double-blind
trials are nothing
but
We don't
Otherwise, we will be
conquered by it !
As a matter of fact, the
doctors at that time did
not adhere to the
clich é s of double-blind trials
,
but instead persisted in
effective treatment and
ultimately cured the first
two patients infected
with the Ebola virus. This fact reminds us:
1、
Double-blind trials are just a
scientific
research tool, and
double-blind trials
themselves have no right to
prevent
effective treatment of patients.
2.The core principles of medical science is :
Medical science must be based
on facts
,
by therapeutic effects and
must
focus as guide and
treating
duty .
That is “Therapeutic Effect First”!
So, if someone says today:
"The deceptive nature of TCM
lies in its
therapeutic
effect
but he says tomorrow :
”The deceptive nature of western
medicine
lies in
its
he is likely the business
representative from the
H.e.l.l.
Therefore, everyone should stay away from him !
--------