Some Pseudo Scholars  caught this mistake and cut  

capers excitedly , and even more ,  they want to take

this mistake as a reason to completely deny our 

“Huangdi Nei Jing ”!

It's really too picky !

Actually , "Huangdi Nei Jing "  was written more than 

2000 years ago , so it is inevitable that some statistical 

data are biased , and we should not be too strict with 

the ancients .

 Moreover , the value of  "Huangdi Nei Jing"  is to

explain the principles of our TCM , not specific 

statistical data .

Therefore , there is no reason to completely deny 

the main principles of our TCM in "Huangdi Nei 

Jing "  just because a statistic is biased .

So , it is malicious that those  Pseudo Scholars  

do such things in this way  !

Because in their minds , those  Pseudo Scholars  

never admit our own original things , and as long 

as they get any opportunity , those   Pseudo 

Scholars  will vent and fire at our TCM heartily , 

and they have never been rational nor kind to

our TCM .   

Or please think a moment :

       Are those  Pseudo Scholars ' own things 100% 

accurate ?

--------------- Written on September 27, 2022

--------------- To be continued