加载中…
个人资料
陈子博文
陈子博文
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:310,910
  • 关注人气:1,701
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

How.About.Isolated.Evidence.1

(2023-04-10 09:02:06)
How About Isolated Evidence ? 
------  1



In  one of my    blogs ,    introduced  special case .  

In  this case , a patient   with  renal  failure    has   got 
effective treatment with TCM ( Tranditional  Chinese
Medicine ) . and on November 23, 2019 , a TV station 
broadcast a program called "Chinese Medicine with 
Miraculous Methods and Chinese Herbs with 
Soulful Feelings ." and  this  case  was introduced in detail in that program .

But what's absurd is that some pseudo scholars  who 
always want to ruin our TCM are used to saying 
somethings like  "No fact and on basis for TCM  " .

As  a matter of fact ,   a large number of  facts     have
emerged on TV , and these facts  show  us  that our
TCM can effectively treat many serious diseases .   

Even if  the credibility of these cases  is very low ,  is it 
ok to say 1% at least ?  

At the same time , there are so many cases , even if 
only one case is credible ,  is it an isolated  evidence ,
is it ok ?

But who can  say the  isolated  evidence means    no 
academic value ?  

Maybe pigs ?

In fact , many isolated evidence have  high academic 
value ,  for examples :

1.  In 1928 ,  Fleming  accidentally found that a kind of 
green mould  could  dissolve  staphylococcus .

At that time of the very begaining , was this an isolated 
evidence ? 

In fact ,  it  was  just  the isolated evidence that  led  to 
the birth of penicillin for human being  !




-------------------  Written on December 10, 2019

------------------- To be continued.

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有