加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Scientific.Illiteracy.2

(2023-03-14 10:51:38)

Scientific Illiteracy ?

 ------ 2

 

Maybe some pseudo scholars will say that even the 

increase or decrease of International Standards is not

related to our TCM ( Traditional Chinese Medicine ).

 

Then thank them for reminding !

 

With the strict blowing our TCM by so many Yu Yunxiu ,

how can TCM enter the International Standards ?

 

Perhaps on the one hand , those pseudo scholars 

just want their own things to enter the International 

Standards , or at least to seek the relationship to the

International Standards , but at the same time , they 

never allow our TCM get any chance to connect with 

the International Standards !

 

On the other hand , they use International Standards 

to slander our TCM .

 

What a watertight rogue logic !


Is it fun?

 

2. When those pseudo scholars  feel that it is very

difficult to completely deny all of the facts that our 

TCM have been treating many diseases effectively , 

those guys simply describe all of the facts as 

"Individual Cases" , "Anecdotes" or  "Personal

Experience.

 

And even more , those pseudo scholars  assert that

all of these facts are meaningless to prove the curative

effect , and all facts are "Efficacy Hallucinations ".


But at the same time , the cases of their own treatment

is not "Individual Cases", not "Anecdotes", not 

"Personal Experience", nor  "Efficacy Hallucinations"!


How can it be so coincidence that good things are all 

their own , and dirty water is poured out to others  ?


Is this cheating by a liar or a ghost ?


-------------   To be continued

------ Written on August 23, 2021

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有