3. Whether a person has scientific literacy cannot rely 

onself-flaunting.

So , no one has the right to first claim his "Scientific 

Literacy ", and then scold all those who always discuss

questions according to facts and curative effects for

"No Scientific Literacy ".

And even more , it is not only No Scientific Literacy 

but also No Education  to ignore a large number of 

facts and to use  "Scientific Literacy " as a prop of

mischiefs.

4. A person who does not respect facts , especially 

a large number of facts , must have No Scientific 

Literacy .

Maybe he has rich professional knowledge and has 

made great achievements in his own profession. 

But all this expertise is just his tool , he can  use it to 

make a living and to get professional titles , which is 

also understandable.

Unfortunately, this kind of pseudo scholars often 

ignore the facts, talk nonsense, and they often 

intentionally mislead others.

5. A person who does not respect facts, especially a 

large number of facts certainly has no scientific literacy,

so he is not qualified to talk about scientific literacy

any more, let alone judge whether others have 

scientific literacy. 

Otherwise, it is the greatest pollution to scientific 

literacy.

Maybe Someone says that how can these pseudo 

scholars not have scientific literacy while they have 

made great achievements in their own fields ?

This is exactly the problem !

As we know :

            a person who knows a little professional

knowledge does not mean that he has scientific 

literacy !

------------  Written on December 22, 2022

------------  To be continued