Some pseudo scholars caught this mistake and cut  

capers excitedly, and even more ,  they want to take

this mistake as a reason to completely deny our 

“Huangdi Nei Jing”.

It's really too picky !

Actually,"Huangdi Nei Jing " was written more than 

2000 years ago, so it is inevitable that some statistical 

data are biased, and we should not be too strict with 

the ancients .

 Moreover, the value of  "Huangdi Nei Jing"  is to

explain the principles of TCM (Traditional Chinese

Medicine), not specific statistical data.

Therefore, there is no reason to completely deny the 

main principles of our TCM in "Huangdi Nei Jing " 

just because a statistic is biased .

So, it is malicious that they do such things in this way.

Because in their minds, these pseudo scholars never 

admit our own original things , and as long as they 

get any opportunity, they will vent and fire at our TCM

heartily , and they have never been rational nor kind to

our TCM.   

Or please think a moment:

 Are those pseudo scholars' own things 100% accurate ?

--------------- Written on September 27, 2022

--------------- To be continued