How.About.Isolated.Evidence
(2023-02-05 14:52:35)How About Isolated Evidence
?
In one of my
blogs ,
I introduced
a special
case.
In
this case, a
p atient
with renal
failure has
got
effective treatment
with TCM
(Tranditional Chinese
Medicine). and on
November 23, 2019, a
TV station
broadcast
a program called
" Chinese Medicine
with
Miraculous Methods and Chinese
Herbs with Soulful
Feelings."
and
this case was
introduced in detail in
that
program.
But
what's absurd is that some pseudo scholars
who
always
want to ruin our TCM
are used
to saying
somethings like
" No fact and on
basis for TCM " .
As a matter of
fact,
a large number
of facts
have emerged on TV,
and these
facts show
us that
TCM
can effectively
treat many serious
diseases.
Even
if the credibility of these
cases is very low, is
it
ok to
say 1% at least
?
At the
same time, there are
so many cases
, even if only
one case is
credible, is
it an isolated evidence,
is it ok ?
Who can
say
the isolated evidence
means
no
academic value
?
Maybe
pigs ?
In
fact,
many isolated evidences
have high
academic
value,
for examples:
1. In
1928, Fleming accidentally
found that a kind of
green
mould could
dissolve staphylococcus.
At that
time of the very begaining, was this an
isolated
evidence
?
In
fact, it
was just
the isolated evidence that led
to
the
birth of penicillin for human
being !
2. In
1774, Scheele found that pyrolusite reacted with
hydrochloric acid and
then produced
a suffocating
yellow green gas, which was
named "hydrochloric acid
oxide".
At that
time of the very begaining, was this an
isolated
evidence
?
In
fact, it
was just
the isolated evidence that led to
the
realization and application of
chlorine for human
being !
3. In
1850, Alexander Parks
mistakely mixed
collodion
with camphor
, then
his such
a mistake operation
u nexpectedly produced
a bendable material
called
"paksin" .
At that
time of the very begaining, was this an
isolated
evidence
?
In
fact, it
was just
the isolated evidence that led
to
the
plastic industry for human being
!
4. In
1911, Onnes
found that
resistance of
mercury
jumped
down to zero
when mercury
was at helium
temperature, that
was superconducting.
At that
time of the very begaining, was this an
isolated
evidence
?
In
fact, it
was just the
isolated e vidence that led
to
the
understanding and application
of superconductivity
for
human being .
Actually, in the history
of the development of
science
and
technology, there
are many
examples such
as
promoting
breakthroughs of theories ,
of technologies
and of
applications by researching a
large number of
isolated evidences
r espectively !
There
are many facts saying our TCM
can cure many
serious
diseases.
However,
some pseudo scholars who always want
to
ruin
our TCM
never recognise any
of
these facts and
they
always ignore
the health needs and the
survival
desires
of many patients.
On the
contrary,
they
are unusually
calm to
abuse
medical terminology
to play word games and to
fool
the poor
patients.
So, they
have no professionalism at
all.
Even
if
it's a solitary
evidence
that the patient with
renal
failure has got
effective treatment
by our
TCM,
according to
the TV report
on November 23,
2019,
it
also
brings great hopes for many similar
patients!
Any doctor
with professionalism should
regard this case
as a
perfect start
and strive to develop
new therapeutic
methods,
which
are more
effective, more convenient
, safer and
cheaper .
It's no
necessary to nag all the time by saying something
like
"TCM is unscientific ", "Chinese medicine is
toxic".
All of
these remind me of an old Chinese
song.
In that
song, an old monk always likes to cheat
the young
one, by nugging
something like:
------------------- Written on
December 10, 2019

加载中…