Pseudo.Scholar.Means.Nothing(4.Instrumentality.Of.Knowledge---3)
(2022-11-02 20:19:43)Pseudo Scholar Means Nothing
(4.
Now, let's give another example to illustrate what is
the malicious use of knowledge.
As
something about the process of food digestion, and it is
good and beyond reproach to explain the knowledge of
food digestion publicly.
However
,
especially
while others are
eating, and even more
he
broadcast such process on the huge screen of the dining
room, it is typical malicious use of knowledge.
Of course
,
really hidden deeply , so that few can recognize it.
So, perhap we have
to
Also as we know, it
is
as soon as a baby is hungry.
But it will deliberately turn a good thing into a bad one
if feeding so much that the baby vomits, and still forcing
the baby to drink deliberately.
Unfortunately,
scholars have done till now. If we decompose each action
of their tricks
,
no fault . For example
,
professional knowledge.
However
,
difficult for us to find
what their issues mean:
what these pseudo scholars only want to do is to show off
their professional knowledge without paying any attention
to the actual problems ,
let
solving
others to deviate from
the main topic , and make others
unconsciously become these pseudo scholars' own
flatterers.
All these are enough to prove that pseudo scholars only
care about their own views, and do not pay any attention
to facts they dislike ,
and do not
effects , and
patients.
Therefore, they have no goodwill at all !
So far, we can elaborate
the first discrimination
theorem
for identifying pseudo scholars.
The first necessary and sufficient condition for a person to be a pseudo scholar is:
This person does not apply
knowledge correctly, kindly, or rationally.
knowledge, to blindly demonstrate his views in a circular
way, to neglect all objective facts he dislikes, and all the
actual effects of solving problems, and even all the other
relevant academic arguments he dislikes.
(This paper written on September 30, 2022)