加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

Pseudo.scholar.Means.Nothing(1.Introduction)

(2022-10-29 16:02:12)

Pseudo scholar Means Nothing

(1. Introduction)


Recently ,  I happened to  watch a video   in which      the 
speaker talked about the toxicity of our TCM ( Traditional
Chinese Medicine) interminably . but in fact , what he had
said is nothing but pretentious verbiage. 

And  it is clearly malicious   that   this guy  focused on the toxicity of  TCM and made a big fuss .   And even more  it seems that   it will not be enjoyable  for him  if his talking
lasted for less than few centuries.

In fact ,  What he had done is not necessary .   And there 
are at lease three reasons for it:

1. Our TCM has always been very frank about the drug toxicity   so  that  we often say :
      “ Each medicine has something poisonous .”
So our TCM has never dodged the toxicity of medicine
and moreover, the toxicity of  TCM has also included the
bias of TCM , and in this way , our standard is more extensive and demanding than that of western medicine.

2、Our TCM use the toxicity or bias of medicine to  treat diseases  effectively and meanwhile taking medicine  is temporary. Therefore, the toxicity of TCM is both knowable
and controllable, and also there is no serious problem now that science and technology are so developed.

3、In fact, western medicine  also has toxicity.

But in this video , the speaker spant a lot of time to show
the ways  to cover up  the toxicity of   western medicine , 
such as double blind trials , and even more he wanted to
make us believe that western medicine will  be almost no toxic if it had passed the double blind test ,  and   TMC is
useless before such test ,     for the double blind test    is something  called " International Standard".

In fact, this is a real prejudice , although many persons 
take it for granted   for such prejudice is not worth to 
be trusted. 

As we know , we take medicine in order to treat diseases
effectively , not  only  to be subject to something  called 
" International Standard ",  and after all ,  "International Standard"  is only for reference.    

In fact , there are at lease the following reasons for what I had said:

3.1 Compared with the dynamic development of science
and technology, International Standards are always lagging
behind.    Moreover , International Standards   are   also
dynamic, and will be increased or decreased by referencing 
to many successful or failed cases.

3.2 When  we have taken a certain medicine, if it is really effective, we  needn't  to care whether we have referred to
"International Standards" ,  of course, a nerd never thinks
so.

3.3 When   we   take a  certain  medicine     according to "International Standards" , but the medicine has no effect , We  needn't to show off these to show how normative we are, of course, a nerd never thinks so yet.

In fact, after watching such video , I felt very sick , just like
swallowing a fly !  And if we recall  the history of our TCM
which has been rudely shamed for more than 100 years , 
will vaguely feel that there is indeed a terrible group of
Pseudo Scholars lurking  around us.

So, what are these Pseudo Scholars ?



0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有