近期看到的一个观点，摘抄下来。

John J. O'Neill, Science Editor, the New York Herald Tribune in a latter dated July 8, 1951, stated:"The hypothesis of the astrologers that forces are transmitted to the earth without attenuation with increasing distance, and do not vary with respect to the difference in masses of the sun, moon and planets on which they originate, was totally inconsistent with the old style Newtonian mechanics: but today is in complete accord with the much more recent Einstein photo-electric theory, which demonstrates that the effect of a photon does not diminish with distance, and which has been univerally adopted by scientists to supplant the Newtonian mechanics in that field.

上面如是说：占星不适用于牛顿力学里的天体力受距离的变化而变化，但与爱因斯坦理论中光电理论相符，质子间力不受距离变长而减小。现实中爱因斯坦理论在很大领域上被做为牛顿理论的替代品，证实了占星的理论成立性。

看到这段立即来劲，因为多少学过些这两种理论，但又很懊恼当年对物理的复杂而放弃了深究的机会。当然这个言论只能代表小众，一个科学版编辑并没有泰斗的话来的权威，再者在天体物理中究竟适用哪种理论不得而知。不过给了占星一个接近科学的机会，这在占星被科学界不断批评的历史实在不易。:)