外媒曾这样对比：Taiwan vs Normandy_滴血残阳

个人资料

微博

正文字体大小：大中小

外媒曾这样对比：Taiwan vs Normandy

(2006-08-17 09:43:16)

分类：应该了解

1944年6月盟军对诺曼底防线的攻击是在军史上最大的两栖作战。中国横跨台湾海峡攻击台湾就地形而言有着同诺曼底极其相似的地理范围，虽然力量对比与诺曼底大大不同。

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/images/e03-748.jpgvs Normandy" TITLE="外媒曾这样对比：Taiwan vs Normandy" />

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/images/d-day-map.gifvs Normandy" TITLE="外媒曾这样对比：Taiwan vs Normandy" />

Taiwan vs Normandy----极其相似的地理

	D-Day Normandy 06 June 1944	Taiwan 2000
Assault Force （突击力量）	176,000 amphibious troops （两栖部队） three airborne divisions （空降师） 10,000 aircraft （战机） 136 warships [BB, C, DD] （战舰） 3,000 landing craft （登陆艇） 2,000 other ships （其他船只）	15,000 amphibious troops three airborne divisions 3,300 combat aircraft 60 warships [DD, FF] ~300 landing craft
Defending Force （防御力量）	400 aircraft ~50,000 troops [six divisions] no naval presence	490 fighter aircraft 220,000-troops 40 warships [DD, FF]
Air Situation （空情）	Attacking force had air supremacy many months prior to amphibious assault.	Attacking force would have to obtain air supremacy prior to amphibious assault.
侦察能力	Luftwaffe flew no reconnaissance flights over the coastal regions of Great Britain during the early months of 1944. Germans mounted no air reconnaissance during the first five days of June, because of bad weather.	American intelligence satellites overfly the area a dozen times every day.

以台湾2000年综合战力与当年诺曼底对比，结果不言自明吧。

阅读┊ 收藏 ┊ 喜欢 ▼ ┊打印┊举报/Report