CHAPTER XXIV

　　The Solution to Present Spiritual Enigmas to Be Awaited in the Life of the World To Come  94.  And thus it will be that while the reprobated angels and men go on in their eternal punishment, the saints will go on learning more fully the blessings which grace has bestowed upon them.  Then, through the actual realities of their experience, they will see more clearly the meaning of what is written in The Psalms: "I will sing to thee of mercy and judgment, O Lord"[199]

　　-- since no one is set free save by unmerited mercy and no one is damned save by a merited condemnation.

　　95.  Then what is now hidden will not be hidden: when one of two infants is taken up by God's mercy and the other abandoned through God's judgment -- and when the chosen one knows what would have been his just deserts in judgment -- why was the one chosen rather than the other, when the condition of the two was the same?

　　Or again, why were miracles not wrought in the presence of certain people who would have repented in the face of miraculous works, while miracles were wrought in the presence of those who were not about to believe.  For our Lord saith most plainly: "Woe to you, Chorazin; woe to you, Bethsaida.  For if in Tyre and Sidon had been wrought the miracles done in your midst, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes."[200]  Now, obviously, God did not act unjustly in not willing their salvation, even though they could have been saved, if he willed it so.[201]

　　Then, in the clearest light of wisdom, will be seen what now the pious hold by faith, not yet grasping it in clear understanding -- how certain, immutable, and effectual is the will of God, how there are things he can do but doth not will to do, yet willeth nothing he cannot do, and how true is what is sung in the psalm: "But our God is above in heaven; in heaven and on earth he hath done all things whatsoever that he would."[202]  This obviously is not true, if there is anything that he willed to do and did not do, or, what were worse, if he did not do something because man's will prevented him, the Omnipotent, from doing what he willed.  Nothing, therefore, happens unless the Omnipotent wills it to happen.  He either allows it to happen or he actually causes it to happen.

　　96.  Nor should we doubt that God doth well, even when he alloweth whatever happens ill to happen.  For he alloweth it only through a just judgment -- and surely all that is just is good.

　　Therefore, although evil, in so far as it is evil, is not good, still it is a good thing that not only good things exist but evil as well.  For if it were not good that evil things exist, they would certainly not be allowed to exist by the Omnipotent Good, for whom it is undoubtedly as easy not to allow to exist what he does not will, as it is for him to do what he does will.

　　Unless we believe this, the very beginning of our Confession of Faith is imperiled -- the sentence in which we profess to believe in God the Father Almighty.  For he is called Almighty for no other reason than that he can do whatsoever he willeth and because the efficacy of his omnipotent will is not impeded by the will of any creature.

　　97.  Accordingly, we must now inquire about the meaning of what was said most truly by the apostle concerning God, "Who willeth that all men should be saved."[203]  For since not all --

　　not even a majority -- _are_ saved, it would indeed appear that the fact that what God willeth to happen does not happen is due to an embargo on God's will by the human will.

　　Now, when we ask for the reason why not all are saved, the customary answer is: "Because they themselves have not willed it."

　　But this cannot be said of infants, who have not yet come to the power of willing or not willing.  For, if we could attribute to their wills the infant squirmings they make at baptism, when they resist as hard as they can, we would then have to say that they were saved against their will.  But the Lord's language is clearer when, in the Gospel, he reproveth the unrighteous city: "How often," he saith, "would I have gathered your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks, and you would not."[204]  This sounds as if God's will had been overcome by human wills and as if the weakest, by not willing, impeded the Most Powerful so that he could not do what he willed.  And where is that omnipotence by which "whatsoever he willed in heaven and on earth, he has done,"

　　if he willed to gather the children of Jerusalem together, and did not do so?  Or, is it not rather the case that, although Jerusalem did not will that her children be gathered together by him, yet, despite her unwillingness, God did indeed gather together those children of hers whom he would?  It is not that "in heaven and on earth" he hath willed and done some things, and willed other things and not done them.  Instead, "all things whatsoever he willed, he hath done."

　　CHAPTER XXV

　　Predestination and the Justice of God  98.  Furthermore, who would be so impiously foolish as to say that God cannot turn the evil wills of men -- as he willeth, when he willeth, and where he willeth -- toward the good?  But, when he acteth, he acteth through mercy; when he doth not act, it is through justice.  For, "he hath mercy on whom he willeth; and whom he willeth, he hardeneth."[205]

　　Now when the apostle said this, he was commending grace, of which he had just spoken in connection with the twin children in Rebecca's womb: "Before they had yet been born, or had done anything good or bad, in order that the electing purpose of God might continue -- not through works but through the divine calling -- it was said of them, 'The elder shall serve the younger.'

　　"[206] Accordingly, he refers to another prophetic witness, where it is written, "Jacob I loved, but Esau have I hated."[207]  Then, realizing how what he said could disturb those whose understanding could not penetrate to this depth of grace, he adds: "What therefore shall we say to this?  Is there unrighteousness in God?

　　God forbid!"[208]  Yet it does seem unfair that, without any merit derived from good works or bad, God should love the one and hate the other.  Now, if the apostle had wished us to understand that there were future good deeds of the one, and evil deeds of the other -- which God, of course, foreknew -- he would never have said "not of good works" but rather "of _future_ works." Thus he would have solved the difficulty; or, rather, he would have left no difficulty to be solved.  As it is, however, when he went on to exclaim, "God forbid!" -- that is, "God forbid that there should be unfairness in God" -- he proceeds immediately to add (to prove that no unfairness in God is involved here), "For he says to Moses, 'I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will show pity to whom I will show pity.'"[209] Now, who but a fool would think God unfair either when he imposes penal judgment on the deserving or when he shows mercy to the undeserving?  Finally, the apostle concludes and says, "Therefore, it is not a question of him who wills nor of him who runs but of God's showing mercy."[210]

　　Thus, both the twins were "by nature children of wrath,"[211]

　　not because of any works of their own, but because they were both bound in the fetters of damnation originally forged by Adam.  But He who said, "I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy," loved Jacob in unmerited mercy, yet hated Esau with merited justice.

　　Since this judgment [of wrath] was due them both, the former learned from what happened to the other that the fact that he had not, with equal merit, incurred the same penalty gave him no ground to boast of his own distinctive merits -- but, instead, that he should glory in the abundance of divine grace, because "it is not a question of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God's showing mercy."[212]  And, indeed, the whole visage of Scripture and, if I may speak so, the lineaments of its countenance, are found to exhibit a mystery, most profound and salutary, to admonish all who carefully look thereupon "that he who glories, should glory in the Lord."[213]

　　99.  Now, after the apostle had commended God's mercy in saying, "So then, there is no question of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God's showing mercy," next in order he intends to speak also of his judgment -- for where his mercy is not shown, it is not unfairness but justice.  For with God there is no injustice.  Thus, he immediately added, "For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, 'For this very purpose I raised you up, that I may show through you my power, and that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth."[214]  Then, having said this, he draws a conclusion that looks both ways, that is, toward mercy and toward judgment:

　　"Therefore," he says, "he hath mercy on whom he willeth, and whom he willeth he hardeneth." He showeth mercy out of his great goodness; he hardeneth out of no unfairness at all.  In this way, neither does he who is saved have a basis for glorying in any merit of his own; nor does the man who is damned have a basis for complaining of anything except what he has fully merited.  For grace alone separates the redeemed from the lost, all having been mingled together in the one mass of perdition, arising from a common cause which leads back to their common origin.  But if any man hears this in such a way as to say: "Why then does he find fault?  For who resists his will?"[215] -- as if to make it seem that man should not therefore be blamed for being evil _because_

　　God "hath mercy on whom he willeth and whom he willeth he hardeneth" -- God forbid that we should be ashamed to give the same reply as we see the apostle giving: "O man, who are you to reply to God?  Does the molded object say to the molder, 'Why have you made me like this?'  Or is not the potter master of his clay, to make from the same mass one vessel for honorable, another for ignoble, use?"[216]

　　There are some stupid men who think that in this part of the argument the apostle had no answer to give; and, for lack of a reasonable rejoinder, simply rebuked the audacity of his gainsayer.  But what he said -- "O man, who are you?" -- has actually great weight and in an argument like this recalls man, in a single word, to consider the limits of his capacity and, at the same time, supplies an important explanation.

　　For if one does not understand these matters, who is he to talk back to God?  And if one does understand, he finds no better ground even then for talking back.  For if he understands, he sees that the whole human race was condemned in its apostate head by a divine judgment so just that not even if a single member of the race were ever saved from it, no one could rail against God's justice.  And he also sees that those who are saved had to be saved on such terms that it would show -- by contrast with the greater number of those not saved but simply abandoned to their wholly just damnation -- what the whole mass deserved and to what end God's merited judgment would have brought them, had not his undeserved mercy interposed.  Thus every mouth of those disposed to glory in their own merits should be stopped, so that "he that glories may glory in the Lord."[217]

　CHAPTER XXVI

　　The Triumph of God's Sovereign Good Will  100.  These are "the great works of the Lord, well-considered in all his acts of will"[218] -- and so wisely well-considered that when his angelic and human creation sinned (that is, did not do what he willed, but what it willed) he could still accomplish what he himself had willed and this through the same creaturely will by which the first act contrary to the Creator's will had been done.  As the Supreme Good, he made good use of evil deeds, for the damnation of those whom he had justly predestined to punishment and for the salvation of those whom he had mercifully predestined to grace.

　　For, as far as they were concerned, they did what God did not will that they do, but as far as God's omnipotence is concerned, they were quite unable to achieve their purpose.  In their very act of going against his will, his will was thereby accomplished.

　　This is the meaning of the statement, "The works of the Lord are great, well-considered in all his acts of will" -- that in a strange and ineffable fashion even that which is done against his will is not done without his will.  For it would not be done without his allowing it -- and surely his permission is not unwilling but willing -- nor would he who is good allow the evil to be done, unless in his omnipotence he could bring good even out of evil.

　　101.  Sometimes, however, a man of good will wills something that God doth not will, even though God's will is much more, and much more certainly, good -- for under no circumstances can it ever be evil.  For example, it is a good son's will that his father live, whereas it is God's good will that he should die.

　　Or, again, it can happen that a man of evil will can will something that God also willeth with a good will -- as, for example, a bad son wills that his father die and this is also God's will.  Of course, the former wills what God doth not will, whereas the latter does will what God willeth.  Yet the piety of the one, though he wills not what God willeth, is more consonant with God's will than is the impiety of the other, who wills the same thing that God willeth.  There is a very great difference between what is fitting for man to will and what is fitting for God -- and also between the ends to which a man directs his will -- and this difference determines whether an act of will is to be approved or disapproved.  Actually, God achieveth some of his purposes -- which are, of course, all good -- through the evil wills of bad men.  For example, it was through the ill will of the Jews that, by the good will of the Father, Christ was slain for us -- a deed so good that when the apostle Peter would have nullified it he was called "Satan" by him who had come in order to be slain.[219]  How good seemed the purposes of the pious faithful who were unwilling that the apostle Paul should go to Jerusalem, lest there he should suffer the things that the prophet Agabus had predicted![220]  And yet God had willed that he should suffer these things for the sake of the preaching of Christ, and for the training of a martyr for Christ.  And this good purpose of his he achieved, not through the good will of the Christians, but through the ill will of the Jews.  Yet they were more fully his who did not will what he willed than were those who were willing instruments of his purpose -- for while he and the latter did the very same thing, he worked through them with a good will, whereas they did his good will with their ill will.

　　102.  But, however strong the wills either of angels or of men, whether good or evil, whether they will what God willeth or will something else, the will of the Omnipotent is always undefeated.  And this will can never be evil, because even when it inflicts evils, it is still just; and obviously what is just is not evil.  Therefore, whether through pity "he hath mercy on whom he willeth," or in justice "whom he willeth, he hardeneth," the omnipotent God never doth anything except what he doth will, and doth everything that he willeth.

　　CHAPTER XXVII

　　Limits of God's Plan for Human Salvation  103.  Accordingly, when we hear and read in sacred Scripture that God "willeth that all men should be saved,"[221] although we know well enough that not all men are saved, we are not on that account to underrate the fully omnipotent will of God.  Rather, we must understand the Scripture, "Who will have all men to be saved," as meaning that no man is saved unless God willeth his salvation: not that there is no man whose salvation he doth not will, but that no one is saved unless He willeth it.  Moreover, his will should be sought in prayer, because if he willeth, then what he willeth must necessarily be.  And, indeed, it was of prayer to God that the apostle was speaking when he made that statement.  Thus, we are also to understand what is written in the Gospel about Him "who enlighteneth every man."[222]  This means that there is no man who is enlightened except by God.

　　In any case, the word concerning God, "who will have all men to be saved," does not mean that there is no one whose salvation he doth not will -- he who was unwilling to work miracles among those who, he said, would have repented if he had wrought them --

　　but by "all men" we are to understand the whole of mankind, in every single group into which it can be divided: kings and subjects; nobility and plebeians; the high and the low; the learned and unlearned; the healthy and the sick; the bright, the dull, and the stupid; the rich, the poor, and the middle class;

　　males, females, infants, children, the adolescent, young adults and middle-aged and very old; of every tongue and fashion, of all the arts, of all professions, with the countless variety of wills and minds and all the other things that differentiate people.  For from which of these groups doth not God will that some men from every nation should be saved through his only begotten Son our Lord?  Therefore, he doth save them since the Omnipotent cannot will in vain, whatsoever he willeth.

　　Now, the apostle had enjoined that prayers should be offered "for all men"[223] and especially "for kings and all those of exalted station,"[224] whose worldly pomp and pride could be supposed to be a sufficient cause for them to despise the humility of the Christian faith.  Then, continuing his argument, "for this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour"[225]--

　　that is, to pray even for such as these [kings] -- the apostle, to remove any warrant for despair, added, "Who willeth that all men be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth."[226]  Truly, then, God hath judged it good that through the prayers of the lowly he would deign to grant salvation to the exalted -- a paradox we have already seen exemplified.  Our Lord also useth the same manner of speech in the Gospel, where he saith to the Pharisees, "You tithe mint and rue and every herb."[227]

　　Obviously, the Pharisees did not tithe what belonged to others, nor all the herbs of all the people of other lands.  Therefore, just as we should interpret "every herb" to mean "every kind of herb," so also we can interpret "all men" to mean "all kinds of men." We could interpret it in any other fashion, as long as we are not compelled to believe that the Omnipotent hath willed anything to be done which was not done.  "He hath done all things in heaven and earth, whatsoever he willed,"[228] as Truth sings of him, and surely he hath not willed to do anything that he hath not done.  There must be no equivocation on this point.

　CHAPTER XXVIII

　　The Destiny of Man  104.  Consequently, God would have willed to preserve even the first man in that state of salvation in which he was created and would have brought him in due season, after the begetting of children, to a better state without the intervention of death --

　　where he not only would have been unable to sin, but would not have had even the will to sin -- if he had foreknown that man would have had a steadfast will to continue without sin, as he had been created to do.  But since he did foreknow that man would make bad use of his free will -- that is, that he would sin -- God prearranged his own purpose so that he could do good to man, even in man's doing evil, and so that the good will of the Omnipotent should be nullified by the bad will of men, but should nonetheless be fulfilled.

　　105.  Thus it was fitting that man should be created, in the first place, so that he could will both good and evil -- not without reward, if he willed the good; not without punishment, if he willed the evil.  But in the future life he will not have the power to will evil; and yet this will not thereby restrict his free will.  Indeed, his will will be much freer, because he will then have no power whatever to serve sin.  For we surely ought not to find fault with such a will, nor say it is no will, or that it is not rightly called free, when we so desire happiness that we not only are unwilling to be miserable, but have no power whatsoever to will it.

　　And, just as in our present state, our soul is unable to will unhappiness for ourselves, so then it will be forever unable to will iniquity.  But the ordered course of God's plan was not to be passed by, wherein he willed to show how good the rational creature is that is able not to sin, although one unable to sin is better.[229]  So, too, it was an inferior order of immortality --

　　but yet it was immortality -- in which man was capable of not dying, even if the higher order which is to be is one in which man will be incapable of dying.[230]

　　106.  Human nature lost the former kind of immortality through the misuse of free will.  It is to receive the latter through grace -- though it was to have obtained it through merit, if it had not sinned.  Not even then, however, could there have been any merit without grace.  For although sin had its origin in free will alone, still free will would not have been sufficient to maintain justice, save as divine aid had been afforded man, in the gift of participation in the immutable good.  Thus, for example, the power to die when he wills it is in a man's own hands -- since there is no one who could not kill himself by not eating (not to mention other means).  But the bare will is not sufficient for maintaining life, if the aids of food and other means of preservation are lacking.

　　Similarly, man in paradise was capable of self-destruction by abandoning justice by an act of will; yet if the life of justice was to be maintained, his will alone would not have sufficed, unless He who made him had given him aid.  But, after the Fall, God's mercy was even more abundant, for then the will itself had to be freed from the bondage in which sin and death are the masters.  There is no way at all by which it can be freed by itself, but only through God's grace, which is made effectual in the faith of Christ.  Thus, as it is written, even the will by which "the will itself is prepared by the Lord"[231] so that we may receive the other gifts of God through which we come to the Gift eternal -- this too comes from God.

　　107.  Accordingly, even the life eternal, which is surely the wages of good works, is called a _gift_ of God by the apostle.

　　"For the wages of sin," he says, "is death; but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."[232]  Now, wages for military service are paid as a just debit, not as a gift.  Hence, he said "the wages of sin is death," to show that death was not an unmerited pun ishment for sin but a just debit.  But a gift, unless it be gratuitous, is not grace.  We are, therefore, to understand that even man's merited goods are gifts from God, and when life eternal is given through them, what else do we have but "grace upon grace returned"[233]?

　　Man was, therefore, made upright, and in such a fashion that he could either continue in that uprightness -- though not without divine aid -- or become perverted by his own choice.  Whichever of these two man had chosen, God's will would be done, either by man or at least _concerning_ him.  Wherefore, since man chose to do his own will instead of God's, God's will _concerning_ him was done; for, from the same mass of perdition that flowed out of that common source, God maketh "one vessel for honorable, another for ignoble use"[234]; the ones for honorable use through his mercy, the ones for ignoble use through his judgment; lest anyone glory in man, or -- what is the same thing -- in himself.

　　108.  Now, we could not be redeemed, even through "the one Mediator between God and man, Man himself, Christ Jesus,"[235] if he were not also God.  For when Adam was made -- being made an upright man -- there was no need for a mediator.  Once sin, however, had widely separated the human race from God, it was necessary for a mediator, who alone was born, lived, and was put to death without sin, to reconcile us to God, and provide even for our bodies a resurrection to life eternal -- and all this in order that man's pride might be exposed and healed through God's humility.  Thus it might be shown man how far he had departed from God, when by the incarnate God he is recalled to God; that man in his contumacy might be furnished an example of obedience by the God-Man; that the fount of grace might be opened up; that even the resurrection of the body -- itself promised to the redeemed --

　　might be previewed in the resurrection of the Redeemer himself;

　　that the devil might be vanquished by that very nature he was rejoicing over having deceived -- all this, however, without giving man ground for glory in himself, lest pride spring up anew.

　　And if there are other advantages accruing from so great a mystery of the Mediator, which those who profit from them can see or testify -- even if they cannot be described -- let them be added to this list.

　　

CHAPTER XXIX

　　"The Last Things"

　　109.  Now, for the time that intervenes between man's death and the final resurrection, there is a secret shelter for his soul, as each is worthy of rest or affliction according to what it has merited while it lived in the body.

　　110.  There is no denying that the souls of the dead are benefited by the piety of their living friends, when the sacrifice of the Mediator is offered for the dead, or alms are given in the church. But these means benefit only those who, when they were living, have merited that such services could be of help to them.

　　For there is a mode of life that is neither so good as not to need such helps after death nor so bad as not to gain benefit from them after death.  There is, however, a good mode of life that does not need such helps, and, again, one so thoroughly bad that, when such a man departs this life, such helps avail him nothing.  It is here, then, in this life, that all merit or demerit is acquired whereby a man's condition in the life hereafter is improved or worsened.  Therefore, let no one hope to obtain any merit with God after he is dead that he has neglected to obtain here in this life.

　　So, then, those means which the Church constantly uses in interceding for the dead are not opposed to that statement of the apostle when he said, "For all of us shall stand before the tribunal of Christ, so that each may receive according to what he has done in the body, whether good or evil."[236]  For each man has for himself while living in the body earned the merit whereby these means can benefit him [after death].  For they do not benefit all.  And yet why should they not benefit all, unless it be because of the different kinds of lives men lead in the body?

　　Accordingly, when sacrifices, whether of the altar or of alms, are offered for the baptized dead, they are thank offerings for the very good, propitiations for the not-so-very-bad [non valde malis], and, as for the very bad -- even if they are of no help to the dead -- they are at least a sort of consolation to the living.

　　Where they are of value, their benefit consists either in obtaining a full forgiveness or, at least, in making damnation more tolerable.

　　111.  After the resurrection, however, when the general judgment has been held and finished, the boundary lines will be set for the two cities: the one of Christ, the other of the devil;

　　one for the good, the other for the bad -- both including angels and men.  In the one group, there will be no will to sin, in the other, no power to sin, nor any further possibility of dying.  The citizens of the first commonwealth will go on living truly and happily in life eternal.  The second will go on, miserable in death eternal, with no power to die to it.  The condition of both societies will then be fixed and endless.  But in the first city, some will outrank others in bliss, and in the second, some will have a more tolerable burden of misery than others.

　　112.  It is quite in vain, then, that some -- indeed very many -- yield to merely human feelings and deplore the notion of the eternal punishment of the damned and their interminable and perpetual misery.  They do not believe that such things will be.

　　Not that they would go counter to divine Scripture -- but, yielding to their own human feelings, they soften what seems harsh and give a milder emphasis to statements they believe are meant more to terrify than to express the literal truth.  "God will not forget," they say, "to show mercy, nor in his anger will he shut up his mercy." This is, in fact, the text of a holy psalm.[237]

　　But there is no doubt that it is to be interpreted to refer to those who are called "vessels of mercy,"[238] those who are freed from misery not by their own merits but through God's mercy.  Even so, if they suppose that the text applies to all men, there is no ground for them further to suppose that there can be an end for those of whom it is said, "Thus these shall go into everlasting punishment."[239]  Otherwise, it can as well be thought that there will also be an end to the happiness of those of whom the antithesis was said: "But the righteous into life eternal."

　　But let them suppose, if it pleases them, that, for certain intervals of time, the punishments of the damned are somewhat mitigated.  Even so, the wrath of God must be understood as still resting on them.  And this is damnation -- for this anger, which is not a violent passion in the divine mind, is called "wrath" in God.  Yet even in his wrath -- his wrath resting on them -- he does not "shut up his mercy." This is not to put an end to their eternal afflictions, but rather to apply or interpose some little respite in their torments.  For the psalm does not say, "To put an end to his wrath," or, "_After_ his wrath," but, "_In_ his wrath."

　　Now, if this wrath were all there is [in man's damnation], and even if it were present only in the slightest degree conceivable -- still, to be lost out of the Kingdom of God, to be an exile from the City of God, to be estranged from the life of God, to suffer loss of the great abundance of God's blessings which he has hidden for those who fear him and prepared for those who hope in him[240] -- this would be a punishment so great that, if it be eternal, no torments that we know could be compared to it, no matter how many ages they continued.

　　113.  The eternal death of the damned -- that is, their estrangement from the life of God -- will therefore abide without end, and it will be common to them all, no matter what some people, moved by their human feelings, may wish to think about gradations of punishment, or the relief or intermission of their misery.  In the same way, the eternal life of the saints will abide forever, and also be common to all of them no matter how different the grades of rank and honor in which they shine forth in their effulgent harmony.

　CHAPTER XXX

　　The Principles of Christian Living: Faith and Hope  114.  Thus, from our confession of _faith_, briefly summarized in the Creed (which is milk for babes when pondered at the carnal level but food for strong men when it is considered and studied spiritually), there is born the good _hope_ of the faithful, accompanied by a holy _love_.[241]  But of these affirmations, all of which ought _faithfully_ to be believed, only those which have to do with _hope_ are contained in the Lord's Prayer.  For "cursed is everyone," as the divine eloquence testified, "who rests his hope in man."[242]  Thus, he who rests his hope in himself is bound by the bond of this curse.

　　Therefore, we should seek from none other than the Lord God whatever it is that we hope to do well, or hope to obtain as reward for our good works.

　　115.  Accordingly, in the Evangelist Matthew, the Lord's Prayer may be seen to contain seven petitions: three of them ask for eternal goods, the other four for temporal goods, which are, however, necessary for obtaining the eternal goods.

　　For when we say: "Hallowed be thy name.  Thy Kingdom come.

　　Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven"[243] -- this last being wrongly interpreted by some as meaning "in body and spirit"

　　-- these blessings will be retained forever.  They begin in this life, of course; they are increased in us as we make progress, but in their perfection -- which is to be hoped for in the other life -- they will be possessed forever!  But when we say: "Give us this day our daily bread.  And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.  And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil,"[244] who does not see that all these pertain to our needs in the present life?  In that life eternal -- where we all hope to be -- the hallowing of God's name, his Kingdom, and his will, in our spirit and body will abide perfectly and immortally.  But in this life we ask for "daily bread" because it is necessary, in the measure required by soul and body, whether we take the term in a spiritual or bodily sense, or both.  And here too it is that we petition for forgiveness, where the sins are committed; here too are the temptations that allure and drive us to sinning; here, finally, the evil from which we wish to be freed.  But in that other world none of these things will be found.

　　116.  However, the Evangelist Luke, in his version of the Lord's Prayer, has brought together, not seven, but five petitions.  Yet, obviously, there is no discrepancy here, but rather, in his brief way, the Evangelist has shown us how the seven petitions should be understood.  Actually, God's name is even now hallowed in the spirit, but the Kingdom of God is yet to come in the resurrection of the body.  Therefore, Luke was seeking to show that the third petition ["Thy will be done"] is a repetition of the first two, and makes this better understood by omitting it.  He then adds three other petitions, concerning daily bread, forgiveness of sins, and avoidance of temptation.[245]

　　However, what Matthew puts in the last place, "But deliver us from evil," Luke leaves out, in order that we might understand that it was included in what was previously said about temptation.  This is, indeed, why Matthew said, "_But_ deliver us," instead of, "_And_ deliver us," as if to indicate that there is only one petition -- "Will not this, but that" -- so that anyone would realize that he is being delivered from evil in that he is not being led into temptation.

　　

CHAPTER XXXI

　　Love  117.  And now regarding _love_, which the apostle says is greater than the other two -- that is, faith and hope -- for the more richly it dwells in a man, the better the man in whom it dwells.  For when we ask whether someone is a good man, we are not asking what he believes, or hopes, but what he loves.  Now, beyond all doubt, he who loves aright believes and hopes rightly.

　　Likewise, he who does not love believes in vain, even if what he believes is true; he hopes in vain, even if what he hopes for is generally agreed to pertain to true happiness, unless he believes and hopes for this: that he may through prayer obtain the gift of love.  For, although it is true that he cannot hope without love, it may be that there is something without which, if he does not love it, he cannot realize the object of his hopes.  An example of this would be if a man hopes for life eternal -- and who is there who does not love that? -- and yet does not love _righteousness_, without which no one comes to it.

　　Now this is the true faith of Christ which the apostle commends: faith that works through love.  And what it yet lacks in love it asks that it may receive, it seeks that it may find, and knocks that it may be opened unto it.[246]  For faith achieves what the law commands [fides namque impetrat quod lex imperat].

　　And, without the gift of God -- that is, without the Holy Spirit, through whom love is shed abroad in our hearts -- the law may bid but it cannot aid [jubere lex poterit, non juvare].  Moreover, it can make of man a transgressor, who cannot then excuse himself by pleading ignorance.  For appetite reigns where the love of God does not.[247]

　　118.  When, in the deepest shadows of ignorance, he lives according to the flesh with no restraint of reason -- this is the primal state of man.[248]  Afterward, when "through the law the knowledge of sin"[249] has come to man, and the Holy Spirit has not yet come to his aid -- so that even if he wishes to live according to the law, he is vanquished -- man sins knowingly and is brought under the spell and made the slave of sin, "for by whatever a man is vanquished, of this master he is the slave"[250].  The effect of the knowledge of the law is that sin works in man the whole round of concupiscence, which adds to the guilt of the first transgression.  And thus it is that what was written is fulfilled: "The law entered in, that the offense might abound."[251]  This is the _second_ state of man.[252]

　　But if God regards a man with solicitude so that he then believes in God's help in fulfilling His commands, and if a man begins to be led by the Spirit of God, then the mightier power of love struggles against the power of the flesh.[253]  And although there is still in man a power that fights against him -- his infirmity being not yet fully healed -- yet he [the righteous man]

　　lives by faith and lives righteously in so far as he does not yield to evil desires, conquering them by his love of righteousness.  This is the _third_ stage of the man of good hope.

　　A final peace is in store for him who continues to go forward in this course toward perfection through steadfast piety.  This will be perfected beyond this life in the repose of the spirit, and, at the last, in the resurrection of the body.

　　Of these four different stages of man, the first is before the law, the second is under the law, the third is under grace, and the fourth is in full and perfect peace.  Thus, also, the history of God's people has been ordered by successive temporal epochs, as it pleased God, who "ordered all things in measure and number and weight."[254]  The first period was before the law; the second under the law, which was given through Moses; the next, under grace which was revealed through the first Advent of the Mediator."[255]  This grace was not previously absent from those to whom it was to be imparted, although, in conformity to the temporal dispensations, it was veiled and hidden.  For none of the righteous men of antiquity could find salvation apart from the faith of Christ.  And, unless Christ had also been known to them, he could not have been prophesied to us -- sometimes openly and sometimes obscurely -- through their ministry.

　　119.  Now, in whichever of these four "ages" -- if one can call them that -- the grace of regeneration finds a man, then and there all his past sins are forgiven him and the guilt he contracted in being born is removed by his being reborn.  And so true is it that "the Spirit breatheth where he willeth"[256] that some men have never known the second "age" of slavery under the law, but begin to have divine aid directly under the new commandment.

　　120.  Yet, before a man can receive the commandment, he must, of course, live according to the flesh.  But, once he has been imbued with the sacrament of rebirth, no harm will come to him even if he then immediately depart this life -- "Wherefore on this account Christ died and rose again, that he might be the Lord of both the living and the dead."'[257] Nor will the kingdom of death have dominion over him for whom He, who was "free among the dead,"[258] died.

　　

CHAPTER XXXII

　　The End of All the Law  121.  All the divine precepts are, therefore, referred back to _love_, of which the apostle says, "Now the end of the commandment is love, out of a pure heart, and a good conscience and a faith unfeigned."[259]  Thus every commandment harks back to love.  For whatever one does either in fear of punishment or from some carnal impulse, so that it does not measure up to the standard of love which the Holy Spirit sheds abroad in our hearts -- whatever it is, it is not yet done as it should be, although it may seem to be.  Love, in this context, of course includes both the love of God and the love of our neighbor and, indeed, "on these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets"[260] --

　　and, we may add, the gospel and the apostles, for from nowhere else comes the voice, "The end of the commandment is love,"[261]

　　and, "God is love."[262]

　　Therefore, whatsoever things God commands (and one of these is, "Thou shalt not commit adultery"[263]) and whatsoever things are not positively ordered but are strongly advised as good spiritual counsel (and one of these is, "It is a good thing for a man not to touch a woman"[264]) -- all of these imperatives are rightly obeyed only when they are measured by the standard of our love of God and our love of our neighbor in God [propter Deum].

　　This applies both in the present age and in the world to come.

　　Now we love God in faith; then, at sight.  For, though mortal men ourselves, we do not know the hearts of mortal men.  But then "the Lord will illuminate the hidden things in the darkness and will make manifest the cogitations of the heart; and then shall each one have his praise from God"[265] -- for what will be praised and loved in a neighbor by his neighbor is just that which, lest it remain hidden, God himself will bring to light.  Moreover, passion decreases as love increases[266] until love comes at last to that fullness which cannot be surpassed, "for greater love than this no one has, that a man lay down his life for his friends."[267]  Who, then, can explain how great the power of love will be, when there will be no passion [cupiditas] for it to restrain or overcome?

　　For, then, the supreme state of true health [summa sanitas] will have been reached, when the struggle with death shall be no more.

　　CHAPTER XXXIII

　　Conclusion  122.  But somewhere this book must have an end.  You can see for yourself whether you should call it an Enchiridion, or use it as one.  But since I have judged that your zeal in Christ ought not to be spurned and since I believe and hope for good things for you through the help of our Redeemer, and since I love you greatly as one of the members of his body, I have written this book for you -- may its usefulness match its prolixity! -- on Faith, Hope, and Love.

　　NOTES

　　[1] 1 Cor. 1:20.

　　[2] Wis. 6:26 (Vulgate).

　　[3] Rom. 16:19.

　　[4] A later interpolation, not found in the best MSS., adds, "As no one can exist from himself, so also no one can be wise in himself save only as he is enlightened by Him of whom it is written, 'All wisdom is from God' [Ecclus. 1:1]."

　　[5] Job 28:28.

　　[6] A transliteration of the Greek, literally, a handbook or manual.

　　[7] Cf. Gal. 5:6.

　　[8] Cf. 1 Cor. 13:10, 11.

　　[9] 1 Cor. 3:11.

　　[10] Already, very early in his ministry (397), Augustine had written De agone Christiano, in which he had reviewed and refuted a full score of heresies threatening the orthodox faith.

　　[11] The Apostles' Creed.  Cf. Augustine's early essay On Faith and the Creed.

　　[12] Joel 2:32.

　　[13] Rom. 10:14.

　　[14] Lucan, Pharsalia, II, 15.

　　[15] Virgil, Aeneid, IV, 419.  The context of this quotation is Dido's lament over Aeneas' prospective abandonment of her.  She is saying that if she could have foreseen such a disaster, she would have been able to bear it.  Augustine's criticism here is a literalistic quibble.

　　[16] Heb. 11:1.

　　[17] Sacra eloquia -- a favorite phrase of Augustine's for the Bible.

　　[18] Rom. 8:24, 25 (Old Latin).

　　[19] James 2:19.

　　[20] One of the standard titles of early Greek philosophical treatises would translate into Latin as De rerum natura.  This is, in fact, the title of Lucretius' famous poem, the greatest philosophical work written in classical Latin.

　　[21] This basic motif appears everywhere in Augustine's thought as the very foundation of his whole system.

　　[22] This section (Chs. III and IV) is the most explicit statement of a major motif which pervades the whole of Augustinian metaphysics.  We see it in his earliest writings, Soliloquies, 1, 2, and De ordine, II, 7.  It is obviously a part of the Neoplatonic heritage which Augustine appropriated for his Christian philosophy.  The good is positive, constructive, essential; evil is privative, destructive, parasitic on the good.

　　It has its origin, not in nature, but in the will.  Cf.

　　Confessions, Bk. VII, Chs. III, V, XII-XVI; On Continence, 14-16;

　　On the Gospel of John, Tractate XCVIII, 7; City of God, XI, 17;

　　XII, 7-9.

　　[23] Isa. 5:20.

　　[24] Matt. 12:35.

　　[25] This refers to Aristotle's well-known principle of "the excluded middle."

　　[26] Matt. 7:18.

　　[27] Cf. Matt. 12:33.

　　[28] Virgil, Georgios, II, 490.

　　[29] Ibid., 479.

　　[30] Sed in via pedum, non in via morum.

　　[31] Virgil, Eclogue, VIII, 42.  The context of the passage is Damon's complaint over his faithless Nyssa; he is here remembering the first time he ever saw her -- when he was twelve!  Cf.

　　Theocritus, II, 82.

　　[32] Cf. Matt. 5:37.

　　[33] Cf. Confessions, Bk. X, Ch. XXIII.

　　[34] Ad consentium contra mendacium, CSEL (J. Zycha, ed.), Vol.

　　41, pp. 469-528; also Migne, PL, 40, c. 517-548; English translation by H.B. Jaffee in Deferrari, St. Augustine: Treatises on Various Subjects (The Fathers of the Church, New York, 1952), pp. 113-179.  This had been written about a year earlier than the Enchiridion.  Augustine had also written another treatise On Lying much earlier, c. 395; see De mendacio in CSEL (J. Zycha, ed.), Vol. 41, pp. 413-466; Migne, PL, 40, c. 487-518; English translation by M.S. Muldowney in Deferrari, op. cit., pp. 47-109.

　　This summary of his position here represents no change of view whatever on this question.

　　[35] Sallust, The War with Catiline, X, 6-7.

　　[36] Cf. Acts 12:9.

　　[37] Virgil, Aeneid, X, 392.

　　[38] This refers to one of the first of the Cassiciacum dialogues, Contra Academicos.  The gist of Augustine's refutation of skepticism is in III, 23ff.  Throughout his whole career he continued to maintain this position: that certain knowledge begins with self-knowledge.  Cf. Confessions, Bk. V, Ch. X, 19; see also City of God, XI, xxvii.

　　[39] Hab. 2:4; Rom. 1:17.

　　[40] A direct contrast between suspensus assenso -- the watchword of the Academics -- and assensio, the badge of Christian certitude.

　　[41] See above, VII, 90.

　　[42] Matt. 5:37.

　　[43] Matt. 6:12.

　　[44] Rom. 5:12.

　　[45] Cf. Luke 20:36.

　　[46] Rom. 4:17.

　　[47] Wis. 11:20.

　　[48] 2 Peter 2:19.

　　[49] John 8:36.

　　[50] Eph. 2:8.

　　[51] 1 Cor. 7:25.

　　[52] Eph. 2:8, 9.

　　[53] Eph. 2:10.

　　[54] Cf. Gal. 6:15; I1 Cor. 5:17.

　　[55] Ps. 51:10.

　　[56] Phil. 2:13.

　　[57] Rom. 9:16.

　　[58] Prov. 8:35 (LXX).

　　[59] From the days at Cassiciacum till the very end, Augustine toiled with the mystery of the primacy of God's grace and the reality of human freedom.  Of two things he was unwaveringly sure, even though they involved him in a paradox and the appearance of confusion.  The first is that God's grace is not only primary but also sufficient as the ground and source of human willing.  And against the Pelagians and other detractors from grace, he did not hesitate to insist that grace is irresistible and inviolable.  Cf.

　　On Grace and Free Will, 99, 41-43; On the Predestination of the Saints, 19:10; On the Gift of Perseverance, 41; On the Soul and Its Origin, 16; and even the Enchiridion, XXIV, 97.

　　But he never drew from this deterministic emphasis the conclusion that man is unfree and everywhere roundly rejects the not illogical corollary of his theonomism, that man's will counts for little or nothing except as passive agent of God's will.  He insists on responsibility on man's part in responding to the initiatives of grace.  For this emphasis, which is characteristically directed to the faithful themselves, see On the Psalms, LXVIII, 7-8; On the Gospel of John, Tractate, 53:6-8; and even his severest anti-Pelagian tracts: On Grace and Free Will, 6-

　　8, 10, 31 and On Admonition and Grace, 2-8.

　　[60] Ps. 58:11 (Vulgate).

　　[61] Ps. 23:6.

　　[62] Cf. Matt. 5:44.

　　[63] The theme that he had explored in Confessions, Bks. I-IX.

　　See especially Bk. V, Chs. X, XIII; Bk. VII, Ch. VIII; Bk. IX, Ch.

　　I.

　　[64] Cf. Ps. 90:9.

　　[65] Job 14:1.

　　[66] John 3:36.

　　[67] Eph. 2:3.

　　[68] Rom. 5:9, 10.

　　[69] Rom. 8:14.

　　[70] John 1:14.

　　[71] Rom. 3:20.

　　[72] Epistle CXXXVII, written in 412 in reply to a list of queries sent to Augustine by the proconsul of Africa.

　　[73] John 1:1.

　　[74] Phil. 2:6, 7.

　　[75] These metaphors for contrasting the "two natures" of Jesus Christ were favorite figures of speech in Augustine's Christological thought.  Cf. On the Gospel of John, Tractate 78;

　　On the Trinity, I, 7; II, 2; IV, 19-20; VII, 3; New Testament Sermons, 76, 14.

　　[76] Luke 1:28-30.

　　[77] John 1:14.

　　[78] Luke 1:35.

　　[79] Matt. 1:20.

　　[80] Rom. 1:3.

　　[81] Rom. 8:3.

　　[82] Cf. Hos. 4:8.

　　[83] I1 Cor. 5:20, 21.

　　[84] Virgil, Aeneid, II, 1, 20.

　　[85] Num. 21:7 (LXX).

　　[86] Matt. 2:20.

　　[87] Ex. 32:4.

　　[88] Rom. 5:12.

　　[89] Deut. 5:9.

　　[90] Ezek. 18:2.

　　[91] Ps. 51:5.

　　[92] 1 Tim. 2:5.

　　[93] Matt. 3:13.

　　[94] Luke 3:4; Isa. 40:3.

　　[95] Ps. 2:7; Heb. 5:5; cf. Mark 1:9-11.

　　[96] Rom. 5:16.

　　[97] Rom. 5:18.

　　[98] Rom. 6:1.

　　[99] Rom. 5:20.

　　[100] Rom. 6:2.

　　[101] Rom. 6:3.

　　[102] Rom. 6:4-11.

　　[103] Gal. 5:24.

　　[104] Col. 3:1-3.

　　[105] Col. 3:4.

　　[106] John 5:29.

　　[107] Ps. 54:1.

　　[108] Cf. Matt. 25:32, 33.

　　[109] Ps. 43:1.

　　[110] Reading the classical Latin form poscebat (as in Scheel and PL) for the late form poxebat (as in Riviere and many old MSS.).

　　[111] Cf. Ps. 113:3.

　　[112] Here reading unum deum (with Riviere and PL) against deum (in Scheel).

　　[113] A hyperbolic expression referring to "the saints."

　　Augustine's Scriptural backing for such an unusual phrase is Ps.

　　82:6 and John 10:34f.  But note the firm distinction between ex diis quos facit and non factus Deus.

　　[114] 1 Cor. 6:19.

　　[115] 1 Cor. 6:15.

　　[116] Col. 1:18.

　　[117] John 2:19.

　　[118] 2 Peter 2:4 (Old Latin).

　　[119] Heb. 1:13.

　　[120] Ps. 148:2 (LXX).

　　[121] Col. 1:16.

　　[122] Zech. 1:9.

　　[123] Matt. 1:20.

　　[124] Gen. 18:4; 19:2.

　　[125] Gen. 32:24.

　　[126] Rom. 8:31, 32.

　　[127] Cf. Eph. 1:10.

　　[128] Col. 1:19, 20.

　　[129] Cf. 1 Cor. 13:9, 12

　　[130] Cf. Luke 20:36.

　　[131] 1 Cor. 13:12.

　　[132] Cf. Luke 15:24.

　　[133] Rom. 8:14.

　　[134] 1 John 1:8.

　　[135] In actione poenitentiae; cf. Luther's similar conception of poenitentiam agite in the 95 Theses and in De poenitentia.

　　[136] Ps. 51:17.

　　[137] Ps. 38:9.

　　[138] I1 Cor. 1:22.

　　[139] Ecclus. 40:1 (Vulgate).

　　[140] 1 Cor. 11:31, 32.

　　[141] This chapter supplies an important clue to the date of the Enchiridion and an interesting side light on Augustine's inclination to re-use "good material." In his treatise on The Eight Questions of Dulcitius (De octo Dulcitii quaestionibus), 1:

　　10-13, Augustine quotes this entire chapter as a part of his answer to the question whether those who sin after baptism are ever delivered from hell.  The date of the De octo is 422 or, possibly, 423; thus we have a terminus ad quem for the date of the Enchiridion.  Still the best text of De octo is Migne, PL, 40, c.

　　147-170, and the best English translation is in Deferrari, St.

　　Augustine: Treatises on Various Subjects (The Fathers of the Church, New York, 1952), pp. 427-466.

　　[142] A short treatise, written in 413, in which Augustine seeks to combine the Pauline and Jacobite emphases by analyzing what kind of faith and what kind of works are _both_ essential to salvation. The best text is that of Joseph Zycha in CSEL, Vol. 41, pp. 35-97; but see also Migne, PL, 40, c. 197-230.  There is an English translation by C.L. Cornish in A Library of Fathers of the Holy Catholic Church; Seventeen Short Treatises, pp. 37-84.

　　[143] Gal. 5:6.

　　[144] James 2:17.

　　[145] James 2:14.

　　[146] 1 Cor. 3:15.

　　[147] 1 Cor. 6:9, 10.

　　[148] 1 Cor. 3:11, 12.

　　[149] 1 Cor. 3:11-15.

　　[150] Ecclus. 27:5.

　　[151] Cf. 1 Cor. 7:32, 33

　　[152] See above, XVIII, 67.

　　[153] Matt. 25:34, 41.

　　[154] Ecclus. 15:20.

　　[155] John 3:5.

　　[156] Matt. 6:9-12.

　　[157] Cf. Luke 11 :41.

　　[158] This is a close approximation of the medieval lists of "The Seven Works of Mercy." Cf. J.T. McNeill, A History of the Cure of Souls, pp. 155, 161.  (Harper & Brothers, 1951, New York.)

　　[159] Matt. 5:44.

　　[160] John 14:6.

　　[161] Matt. 6:14, 15.

　　[162] Luke 11:37-41.

　　[163] Acts 15:9.

　　[164] Titus 1:15.

　　[165] Ecclus. 30:24 (Vulgate).

　　[166] Rom. 5:16.

　　[167] Rom. 5:8.

　　[168] Luke 10:27.

　　[169] Luke 11:42.

　　[170] Matt. 23:26.

　　[171] Ps. 10:6 (Vulgate).

　　[172] Ps. 58:11 (Vulgate); cf. Ps. 59:10 (R.S.V.).

　　[173] 1 Cor. 7:5 (mixed text).

　　[174] 1 Cor. 6:1.

　　[175] 1 Cor. 6:4-6.

　　[176] 1 Cor. 6:7a.

　　[177] 1 Cor. 6:7b.

　　[178] Matt. 5:40.

　　[179] Luke 6:30.

　　[180] James 3:2 (Vulgate).

　　[181] Matt. 5:22, 23.

　　[182] Gal. 4:11 (Vulgate).

　　[183] Ps. 10:3 (Vulgate).

　　[184] Isa. 5:7 (LXX).

　　[185] Gen. 18:20 (Vulgate with one change).

　　[186] For example, Contra Faust., XXII, 78; De pecc. meritis et remissione, I, xxxix, 70; ibid., II, xxii, 26; Quaest. in Heptateuch, 4:24; De libero arbitrio, 3:18, 55; De div. quaest., 83:26; De natura et gratia, 67:81; Contra duas ep. Pelag., I:3, 7;

　　I:13:27.

　　[187] Ps. 27:1.

　　[188] 2 Tim. 2:25 (mixed text).

　　[189] Cf. Luke 22:61.

　　[190] Cf. John 20:22, 23.

　　[191] This libellus is included in Augustine's Sermons (LXXI, PL, 38, col. 445-467), to which Possidius gave the title De blasphemia in Spiritum Sanctum.  English translation in N-PNF, 1st Series, Vol. VI, Sermon XXI, pp. 318-332.

　　[192] Sicut semina quae concepta non fuerint.

　　[193] Jerome, Epistle to Vitalis, Ep. LXXII, 2; PL, 22, 674.

　　Augustine also refers to similar phenomena in The City of God, XVI. viii, 2.

　　[194] Gal. 5:17.

　　[195] 1 Cor. 15:40.

　　[196] 1 Cor. 15:50.

　　[197] 1 Cor. 15:44.

　　[198] Rev. 2:11; 20:6, 14.

　　[199] Ps. 100:1 (Vulgate); cf. Ps. 101:1 (R.S.V.).

　　[200] Matt. 11:21.

　　[201] This is one of the rare instances in which a textual variant in Augustine's text affects a basic issue in the interpretation of his doctrine.  All but one of the major old editions, up to and including Migne, here read: Nec utique deus injuste noluit salvos fiere eum possent salvi esse SI VELLENT (if _they_ willed it).

　　This would mean the attribution of a decisive role in human salvation to the human will and would thus stand out in bold relief from his general stress in the rest of the Enchiridion and elsewhere on the primacy and even irresistibility of grace.  The Jansenist edition of Augustine, by Arnauld in 1648, read SI VELLET

　　(if _He_ willed it) and the reading became the subject of acrimonious controversy between the Jansenists and the Molinists.

　　The Maurist edition reads si vellet, on the strength of much additional MS. evidence that had not been available up to that time.  In modern times, the si vellet reading has come to have the overwhelming support of the critical editors, although Riviere still reads si vellent.  Cf. Scheel, 76-77 (See Bibl.); Riviere, 402-403; J.G. Krabinger, S. Aurelii Augustini Enchiridion (Tubingen, 1861 ), p. 116; Faure-Passaglia, S. Aurelii Augustini Enchiridion (Naples, 1847), p. 178; and H. Hurter, Sanctorum Patrum opuscula selecta (Innsbruck, 1895), p. 123.

　　[202] Cf. Ps. 113:11 (a mixed text; composed inexactly from Ps.

　　115:3 and Ps. 135:6; an interesting instance of Augustine's sense of liberty with the texts of Scripture.  Here he is doubtless quoting from memory).

　　[203] 1 Tim. 2:4.

　　[204] Matt. 23:37.

　　[205] Rom. 9:18.

　　[206] Rom. 9:11, 12.

　　[207] Cf. Mal. 1:2, 3 and Rom. 9:13.

　　[208] Rom. 9:14.

　　[209] Rom. 9:15.

　　[210] Rom. 9:15; see above, IX, 32.

　　[211] Eph. 2:3.

　　[212] Rom. 9:16.

　　[213] 1 Cor. 1 :31; cf. Jer. 9:24.  The _religious_ intention of Augustine's emphasis upon divine sovereignty and predestination is never so much to account for the doom of the wicked as to underscore the sheer and wonderful gratuity of salvation.

　　[214] Rom. 9:17; cf. Ex. 9:16.

　　[215] Rom. 9:19.

　　[216] Rom. 9:20, 21.

　　[217] 1 Cor. 1:31.

　　[218] Ps. 110:2 (Vulgate).

　　[219] Matt. 16:23.

　　[220] Acts 21:10-12.

　　[221] 1 Tim. 2:4.

　　[222] John 1:9.

　　[223] 1 Tim. 2:1.

　　[224] 1 Tim. 2:2.

　　[225] 1 Tim. 2:3.

　　[226] 1 Tim. 2:4.

　　[227] Luke 11:42.

　　[228] Ps. 135:6.

　　[229] Another example of Augustine's wordplay.  Man's original capacities included both the power not to sin and the power to sin (posse non peccare et posse peccare).  In Adam's original sin, man lost the posse non peccare (the power not to sin) and retained the posse peccare (the power to sin) -- which he continues to exercise.  In the fulfillment of grace, man will have the posse peccare taken away and receive the highest of all, the power not to be able to sin, non posse peccare.  Cf. On Correction and Grace XXXIII.

　　[230] Again, a wordplay between posset non mori and non possit mori.

　　[231] Prov. 8:35 (LXX).

　　[232] Rom. 6:23.

　　[233] Cf. John 1:16.

　　[234] Rom. 9:21.

　　[235] 1 Tim. 2:5 (mixed text).

　　[236] Rom. 14:10; I1 Cor. 5:10.

　　[237] Cf. Ps. 77:9.

　　[238] Rom. 9:23.

　　[239] Matt. 25:46.

　　[240] Cf. Ps. 31:19.

　　[241] Note the artificial return to the triadic scheme of the treatise: faith, hope, and love.

　　[242] Jer. 17:5.

　　[243] Matt. 6:9, 10.

　　[244] Matt. 6:11-13.

　　[245] Luke 11:2-4.

　　[246] Matt. 7:7.

　　[247] Another wordplay on cupiditas and caritas.

　　[248] An interesting resemblance here to Freud's description of the Id, the primal core of our unconscious life.

　　[249] Rom. 3:20.

[250] 2 Peter 2:19.

　　[251] Rom. 5:20.

　　[252] Compare the psychological notion of the effect of external moral pressures and their power to arouse guilt feelings, as in Freud's notion of "superego."

　　[253] Gal. 5:17.

　　[254] Wis. 11:21 (Vulgate).

　　[255] Cf. John 1:17.

　　[256] John 3:8.

　　[257] Rom. 14:9.

　　[258] Cf. Ps. 88:5.

　　[259] 1 Tim. 1:5.

　　[260] Matt. 22:40.

　　[261] 1 Tim. 1:5.

　　[262] 1 John 4:16.

　　[263] Ex. 20:14; Matt. 5:27; etc.

　　[264] 1 Cor. 7:1.

　　[265] 1 Cor. 4:5.

　　[266] Minuitur autem cupiditas caritate crescente.

　　[267] John 15:23.

　　The End