奥古斯汀《忏悔录》 英文原文(四)
(2012-01-01 12:01:23)
标签:
杂谈 |
CHAPTER XXXIII
49. The delights of the ear drew and held
me much more powerfully, but thou didst unbind and liberate me.
In those melodies which thy words inspire when
sung with a sweet and trained voice, I still find repose; yet not
so as to cling to them, but always so as to be able to free myself
as I wish. But it is because of the words which
are their life that they gain entry into me and strive for a place
of proper honor in my heart;
and I can hardly assign them a fitting one.
Sometimes, I seem to myself to give them more
respect than is fitting, when I see that our minds are more
devoutly and earnestly inflamed in piety by the holy words when
they are sung than when they are not. And I
recognize that all the diverse affections of our spirits
have their appropriate measures in the voice and song, to which
they are stimulated by I know not what secret correlation.
But the pleasures of my flesh -- to which the
mind ought never to be surrendered nor by them enervated -- often
beguile me while physical sense does not attend on reason, to
follow her patiently, but having once gained entry to help the
reason, it strives to run on before her and be her leader.
Thus in these things I sin unknowingly, but I
come to know it afterward.
50. On the other hand, when I avoid very
earnestly this kind of deception, I err out of too great austerity.
Sometimes I go to the point of wishing that all
the melodies of the pleasant songs to which David's Psalter is
adapted should be banished both from my ears and from those of the
Church itself. In this mood, the safer way seemed
to me the one I remember was once related to me concerning
Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, who required the readers of the
psalm to use so slight an inflection of the voice that it was more
like speaking than singing.
However, when I call to mind the tears I shed at the songs
of thy Church at the outset of my recovered faith, and how even now
I
am moved, not by the singing but by what is sung (when they
are sung with a clear and skillfully modulated voice), I then come
to acknowledge the great utility of this custom.
Thus I vacillate between dangerous pleasure and
healthful exercise. I am inclined -- though I
pronounce no irrevocable opinion on the subject -- to approve of
the use of singing in the church, so that by the delights of the
ear the weaker minds may be stimulated to a devotional mood.[371]
Yet when it happens that I am more moved by the
singing than by what is sung, I confess myself to have sinned
wickedly, and then I would rather not have heard the singing.
See now what a condition I am in!
Weep with me, and weep for me, those of you who
can so control your inward feelings that good results always come
forth. As for you who do not act this way at all,
such things do not concern you. But do thou, O
Lord, my God, give ear; look and see, and have mercy upon me; and
heal me --
thou, in whose sight I am become an enigma to myself; this
itself is my weakness.
CHAPTER XXXIV
51. There remain the delights of these
eyes of my flesh, about which I must make my confession in the
hearing of the ears of thy temple, brotherly and pious ears.
Thus I will finish the list of the temptations of
carnal appetite which still assail me -- groaning and desiring as I
am to be clothed upon with my house from heaven.[372]
The eyes delight in fair and varied forms, and bright and
pleasing colors. Let these not take possession of
my soul!
Rather let God possess it, he who didst make all these
things very good indeed. He is still my good, and
not these. The pleasures of sight affect me all
the time I am awake. There is no rest from them
given me, as there is from the voices of melody, which I can
occasionally find in silence. For daylight, that
queen of the colors, floods all that we look upon everywhere I go
during the day. It flits about me in manifold
forms and soothes me even when I am busy about other things, not
noticing it. And it presents itself so forcibly
that if it is suddenly withdrawn it is looked for with longing, and
if it is long absent the mind is saddened.
52. O Light, which Tobit saw even with his
eyes closed in blindness, when he taught his son the way of life --
and went before him himself in the steps of love and never went
astray[373]; or that Light which Isaac saw when his fleshly "eyes
were dim, so that he could not see"[374] because of old age, and it
was permitted him unknowingly to bless his sons, but in the
blessing of them to know them; or that Light which Jacob saw, when
he too, blind in old age yet with an enlightened heart, threw light
on the nation of men yet to come -- presignified in the persons of
his own sons -- and laid his hands mystically crossed upon his
grandchildren by Joseph (not as their father, who saw them from
without, but as though he were within them), and distinguished them
aright[375]: this is the true Light; it is one, and all are one who
see and love it.
But that corporeal light, of which I was speaking, seasons
the life of the world for her blind lovers with a tempting and
fatal sweetness. Those who know how to praise
thee for it, "O
God, Creator of Us All," take it up in thy hymn,[376] and
are not taken over by it in their sleep. Such a
man I desire to be. I
resist the seductions of my eyes, lest my feet be entangled
as I
go forward in thy way; and I raise my invisible eyes to
thee, that thou wouldst be pleased to "pluck my feet out of the
net."[377]
Thou dost continually pluck them out, for they are easily
ensnared. Thou ceasest not to pluck them out, but
I constantly remain fast in the snares set all around me.
However, thou who "keepest Israel shall neither
slumber nor sleep."[378]
53. What numberless things there are:
products of the various arts and manufactures in our clothes,
shoes, vessels, and all such things; besides such things as
pictures and statuary --
and all these far beyond the necessary and moderate use of
them or their significance for the life of piety -- which men have
added for the delight of the eye, copying the outward forms of the
things they make; but inwardly forsaking Him by whom they were made
and destroying what they themselves have been made to be!
And I, O my God and my Joy, I also raise a hymn to thee for
all these things, and offer a sacrifice of praise to my Sanctifier,
because those beautiful forms which pass through the medium of the
human soul into the artist's hands come from that beauty which is
above our minds, which my soul sighs for day and night.
But the craftsmen and devotees of these outward
beauties discover the norm by which they judge them from that
higher beauty, but not the measure of their use.
Still, even if they do not see it, it is there
nevertheless, to guard them from wandering astray, and to keep
their strength for thee, and not dissipate it in delights that pass
into boredom. And for myself, though I can see
and understand this, I am still entangled in my own course with
such beauty, but thou wilt rescue me, O Lord, thou wilt rescue me,
"for thy loving-kindness is before my eyes."[379]
For I am captivated in my weakness but thou in
thy mercy dost rescue me: sometimes without my knowing it, because
I had only lightly fallen; at other times, the rescue is painful
because I was stuck fast.
CHAPTER XXXV
54. Besides this there is yet another form
of temptation still more complex in its peril.
For in addition to the fleshly appetite which
strives for the gratification of all senses and pleasures -- in
which its slaves perish because they separate themselves from thee
-- there is also a certain vain and curious longing in the soul,
rooted in the same bodily senses, which is cloaked under the name
of knowledge and learning; not having pleasure in the flesh, but
striving for new experiences through the flesh.
This longing -- since its origin is our appetite
for learning, and since the sight is the chief of our senses in the
acquisition of knowledge -- is called in the divine language "the
lust of the eyes."[380] For seeing is a function
of the eyes; yet we also use this word for the other senses as
well, when we exercise them in the search for knowledge.
We do not say, "Listen how it glows," "Smell how
it glistens," "Taste how it shines," or "Feel how it flashes,"
since all of these are said to be _seen_.
And we do not simply say, "See how it shines," which only
the eyes can perceive; but we also say, "See how it sounds, see how
it smells, see how it tastes, see how hard it is." Thus, as we said
before, the whole round of sensory experience is called "the lust
of the eyes" because the function of seeing, in which the eyes have
the principal role, is applied by analogy to the other senses when
they are seeking after any kind of knowledge.
55. From this, then, one can the more
clearly distinguish whether it is pleasure or curiosity that is
being pursued by the senses. For pleasure pursues
objects that are beautiful, melodious, fragrant, savory, soft.
But curiosity, seeking new experiences, will even
seek out the contrary of these, not with the purpose of
experiencing the discomfort that often accompanies them, but out of
a passion for experimenting and knowledge.
For what pleasure is there in the sight of a lacerated
corpse, which makes you shudder? And yet if there
is one lying close by we flock to it, as if to be made sad and
pale. People fear lest they should see such a
thing even in sleep, just as they would if, when awake, someone
compelled them to go and see it or if some rumor of its beauty had
attracted them.
This is also the case with the other senses; it would be
tedious to pursue a complete analysis of it. This
malady of curiosity is the reason for all those strange sights
exhibited in the theater. It is also the reason
why we proceed to search out the secret powers of nature -- those
which have nothing to do with our destiny -- which do not profit us
to know about, and concerning which men desire to know only for the
sake of knowing.
And it is with this same motive of perverted curiosity for
knowledge that we consult the magical arts. Even
in religion itself, this prompting drives us to make trial of God
when signs and wonders are eagerly asked of him -- not desired for
any saving end, but only to make trial of him.
56. In such a wilderness so vast, crammed
with snares and dangers, behold how many of them I have lopped off
and cast from my heart, as thou, O God of my salvation, hast
enabled me to do.
And yet, when would I dare to say, since so many things of
this sort still buzz around our daily lives -- when would I dare to
say that no such motive prompts my seeing or creates a vain
curiosity in me? It is true that now the theaters
never attract me, nor do I now care to inquire about the courses of
the stars, and my soul has never sought answers from the departed
spirits. All sacrilegious oaths I abhor.
And yet, O Lord my God, to whom I owe all humble
and singlehearted service, with what subtle suggestion the enemy
still influences me to require some sign from thee!
But by our King, and by Jerusalem, our pure and
chaste homeland, I
beseech thee that where any consenting to such thoughts is
now far from me, so may it always be farther and farther.
And when I
entreat thee for the salvation of any man, the end I aim at
is something more than the entreating: let it be that as thou dost
what thou wilt, thou dost also give me the grace willingly to
follow thy lead.
57. Now, really, in how many of the most
minute and trivial things my curiosity is still daily tempted, and
who can keep the tally on how often I succumb?
How often, when people are telling idle tales, we
begin by tolerating them lest we should give offense to the
sensitive; and then gradually we come to listen willingly!
I do not nowadays go to the circus to see a dog
chase a rabbit, but if by chance I pass such a race in the fields,
it quite easily distracts me even from some serious thought and
draws me after it -- not that I turn aside with my horse, but with
the inclination of my mind. And unless, by
showing me my weakness, thou dost speedily warn me to rise above
such a sight to thee by a deliberate act of thought -- or else to
despise the whole thing and pass it by -- then I become absorbed in
the sight, vain creature that I am.
How is it that when I am sitting at home a lizard catching
flies, or a spider entangling them as they fly into her webs,
oftentimes arrests me? Is the feeling of
curiosity not the same just because these are such tiny creatures?
From them I proceed to praise thee, the wonderful
Creator and Disposer of all things;
but it is not this that first attracts my attention.
It is one thing to get up quickly and another
thing not to fall -- and of both such things my life is full and my
only hope is in thy exceeding great mercy. For
when this heart of ours is made the depot of such things and is
overrun by the throng of these abounding vanities, then our prayers
are often interrupted and disturbed by them. Even
while we are in thy presence and direct the voice of our hearts to
thy ears, such a great business as this is broken off by the
inroads of I know not what idle thoughts.
CHAPTER XXXVI
58. Shall we, then, also reckon this vain
curiosity among the things that are to be but lightly esteemed?
Shall anything restore us to hope except thy
complete mercy since thou hast begun to change us?
Thou knowest to what extent thou hast already
changed me, for first of all thou didst heal me of the lust for
vindicating myself, so that thou mightest then forgive all my
remaining iniquities and heal all my diseases, and "redeem my life
from corruption and crown me with loving-kindness and tender
mercies, and satisfy my desires with good things."[381]
It was thou who didst restrain my pride with thy
fear, and bowed my neck to thy "yoke."[382] And
now I bear the yoke and it is "light" to me, because thou didst
promise it to be so, and hast made it to be so.
And so in truth it was, though I knew it not when
I feared to take it up.
59. But, O Lord -- thou who alone reignest
without pride, because thou alone art the true Lord, who hast no
Lord -- has this third kind of temptation left me, or can it leave
me during this life: the desire to be feared and loved of men, with
no other view than that I may find in it a joy that is no joy?
It is, rather, a wretched life and an unseemly
ostentation. It is a special reason why we do not
love thee, nor devotedly fear thee. Therefore
"thou resistest the proud but givest grace to the humble."[383]
Thou thunderest down on the ambitious designs of
the world, and "the foundations of the hills" tremble.[384]
And yet certain offices in human society require the
officeholder to be loved and feared of men, and through this the
adversary of our true blessedness presses hard upon us, scattering
everywhere his snares of "well done, well done"; so that while we
are eagerly picking them up, we may be caught unawares and split
off our joy from thy truth and fix it on the deceits of men.
In this way we come to take pleasure in being
loved and feared, not for thy sake but in thy stead.
By such means as this, the adversary makes men
like himself, that he may have them as his own, not in the harmony
of love, but in the fellowship of punishment -- the one who aspired
to exalt his throne in the north,[385] that in the darkness and the
cold men might have to serve him, mimicking thee in perverse and
distorted ways.
But see, O Lord, we are thy little flock.
Possess us, stretch thy wings above us, and let
us take refuge under them. Be thou our glory; let
us be loved for thy sake, and let thy word be feared in us.
Those who desire to be commended by the men whom
thou condemnest will not be defended by men when thou judgest, nor
will they be delivered when thou dost condemn them.
But when --
not as a sinner is praised in the wicked desires of his soul
nor when the unrighteous man is blessed in his unrighteousness -- a
man is praised for some gift that thou hast given him, and he is
more gratified at the praise for himself than because he possesses
the gift for which he is praised, such a one is praised while thou
dost condemn him. In such a case the one who
praised is truly better than the one who was praised.
For the gift of God in man was pleasing to the
one, while the other was better pleased with the gift of man than
with the gift of God.
CHAPTER XXXVII
60. By these temptations we are daily
tried, O Lord; we are tried unceasingly. Our
daily "furnace" is the human tongue.[386]
And also in this respect thou commandest us to be continent.
Give what thou commandest and command what thou
wilt. In this matter, thou knowest the groans of
my heart and the rivers of my eyes, for I am not able to know for
certain how far I am clean of this plague; and I stand in great
fear of my "secret faults,"[387]
which thy eyes perceive, though mine do not.
For in respect of the pleasures of my flesh and
of idle curiosity, I see how far I
have been able to hold my mind in check when I abstain from
them either by voluntary act of the will or because they simply are
not at hand; for then I can inquire of myself how much more or less
frustrating it is to me not to have them. This is
also true about riches, which are sought for in order that they may
minister to one of these three "lusts," or two, or the whole
complex of them.
The mind is able to see clearly if, when it has them, it
despises them so that they may be cast aside and it may prove
itself.
But if we desire to test our power of doing without praise,
must we then live wickedly or lead a life so atrocious and
abandoned that everyone who knows us will detest us?
What greater madness than this can be either said
or conceived? And yet if praise, both by custom
and right, is the companion of a good life and of good works, we
should as little forgo its companionship as the good life itself.
But unless a thing is absent I do not know
whether I should be contented or troubled at having to do without
it.
61. What is it, then, that I am confessing
to thee, O Lord, concerning this sort of temptation?
What else, than that I am delighted with praise,
but more with the truth itself than with praise.
For if I were to have any choice whether, if I
were mad or utterly in the wrong, I would prefer to be praised by
all men or, if I were steadily and fully confident in the truth,
would prefer to be blamed by all, I see which I should choose.
Yet I
wish I were unwilling that the approval of others should add
anything to my joy for any good I have. Yet I
admit that it does increase it; and, more than that, dispraise
diminishes it. Then, when I am disturbed over
this wretchedness of mine, an excuse presents itself to me, the
value of which thou knowest, O God, for it renders me uncertain.
For since it is not only continence that thou
hast enjoined on us -- that is, what things to hold back our love
from -- but righteousness as well -- that is, what to bestow our
love upon -- and hast wished us to love not only thee, but also our
neighbor, it often turns out that when I am gratified by
intelligent praise I seem to myself to be gratified by the
competence or insight of my neighbor; or, on the other hand, I am
sorry for the defect in him when I hear him dispraise either what
he does not understand or what is good. For I am
sometimes grieved at the praise I get, either when those things
that displease me in myself are praised in me, or when lesser and
trifling goods are valued more highly than they should be.
But, again, how do I know whether I feel this way
because I am unwilling that he who praises me should differ from me
concerning myself not because I am moved with any consideration for
him, but because the good things that please me in myself are more
pleasing to me when they also please another? For
in a way, I am not praised when my judgment of myself is not
praised, since either those things which are displeasing to me are
praised, or those things which are less pleasing to me are more
praised. Am I not, then, quite uncertain of
myself in this respect?
62. Behold, O Truth, it is in thee that I
see that I ought not to be moved at my own praises for my own sake,
but for the sake of my neighbor's good. And
whether this is actually my way, I truly do not know.
On this score I know less of myself than thou
dost. I beseech thee now, O my God, to reveal
myself to me also, that I may confess to my brethren, who are to
pray for me in those matters where I find myself weak.
Let me once again examine myself the more diligently.
If, in my own praise, I am moved with concern for
my neighbor, why am I
less moved if some other man is unjustly dispraised than
when it happens to me? Why am I more irritated at
that reproach which is cast on me than at one which is, with equal
injustice, cast upon another in my presence? Am I
ignorant of this also? Or is it still true that I
am deceiving myself, and do not keep the truth before thee in my
heart and tongue? Put such madness far from me, O
Lord, lest my mouth be to me "the oil of sinners, to anoint my
head."[388]
CHAPTER XXXVIII
63. "I am needy and poor."[389]
Still, I am better when in secret groanings I
displease myself and seek thy mercy until what is lacking in me is
renewed and made complete for that peace which the eye of the proud
does not know. The reports that come from the
mouth and from actions known to men have in them a most perilous
temptation to the love of praise. This love
builds up a certain complacency in one's own excellency, and then
goes around collecting solicited compliments. It
tempts me, even when I
inwardly reprove myself for it, and this precisely because
it is reproved. For a man may often glory vainly
in the very scorn of vainglory -- and in this case it is not any
longer the scorn of vainglory in which he glories, for he does not
truly despise it when he inwardly glories in it.
CHAPTER XXXIX
64. Within us there is yet another evil
arising from the same sort of temptation. By it
they become empty who please themselves in themselves, although
they do not please or displease or aim at pleasing others.
But in pleasing themselves they displease thee
very much, not merely taking pleasure in things that are not good
as if they were good, but taking pleasure in thy good things as if
they were their own; or even as if they were thine but still as if
they had received them through their own merit; or even as if they
had them through thy grace, still without this grace with their
friends, but as if they envied that grace to others.
In all these and similar perils and labors, thou
perceivest the agitation of my heart, and I would rather feel my
wounds being cured by thee than not inflicted by me on
myself.
CHAPTER XL
65. Where hast thou not accompanied me, O
Truth, teaching me both what to avoid and what to desire, when I
have submitted to thee what I could understand about matters here
below, and have sought thy counsel about them?
With my external senses I have viewed the world as I was
able and have noticed the life which my body derives from me and
from these senses of mine. From that stage I
advanced inwardly into the recesses of my memory -- the manifold
chambers of my mind, marvelously full of unmeasured wealth.
And I reflected on this and was afraid, and could
understand none of these things without thee and found thee to be
none of them. Nor did I myself discover these
things -- I who went over them all and labored to distinguish and
to value everything according to its dignity, accepting some things
upon the report of my senses and questioning about others which I
thought to be related to my inner self, distinguishing and
numbering the reporters themselves; and in that vast storehouse of
my memory, investigating some things, depositing other things,
taking out still others. Neither was I
myself when I did this -- that is, that ability of mine by
which I
did it -- nor was it thou, for thou art that never-failing
light from which I took counsel about them all; whether they were
what they were, and what was their real value. In
all this I heard thee teaching and commanding me.
And this I often do -- and this is a delight to
me -- and as far as I can get relief from my necessary duties, I
resort to this kind of pleasure. But in all these
things which I review when I consult thee, I still do not find a
secure place for my soul save in thee, in whom my scattered members
may be gathered together and nothing of me escape from thee.
And sometimes thou introducest me to a most rare
and inward feeling, an inexplicable sweetness. If
this were to come to perfection in me I do not know to what point
life might not then arrive. But still, by these
wretched weights of mine, I relapse into these common things, and
am sucked in by my old customs and am held. I
sorrow much, yet I am still closely held. To this
extent, then, the burden of habit presses us down.
I can exist in this fashion but I do not wish to
do so. In that other way I wish I were, but
cannot be -- in both ways I am wretched.
CHAPTER XLI
66. And now I have thus considered the
infirmities of my sins, under the headings of the three major
"lusts," and I have called thy right hand to my aid.
For with a wounded heart I have seen thy
brightness, and having been beaten back I cried: "Who can attain to
it? I am cut off from before thy eyes."[390]
Thou art the Truth, who presidest over all
things, but I, because of my greed, did not wish to lose thee.
But still, along with thee, I
wished also to possess a lie -- just as no one wishes to lie
in such a way as to be ignorant of what is true.
By this I lost thee, for thou wilt not condescend
to be enjoyed along with a lie.
CHAPTER XLII
67. Whom could I find to reconcile me to
thee? Should I
have approached the angels? What kind of
prayer? What kind of rites?
Many who were striving to return to thee and were
not able of themselves have, I am told, tried this and have fallen
into a longing for curious visions and deserved to be deceived.
Being exalted, they sought thee in their pride of
learning, and they thrust themselves forward rather than beating
their breasts.[391]
And so by a likeness of heart, they drew to themselves the
princes of the air,[392] their conspirators and companions in
pride, by whom they were deceived by the power of magic.
Thus they sought a mediator by whom they might be
cleansed, but there was none. For the mediator
they sought was the devil, disguising himself as an angel of
light.[393] And he allured their proud flesh the
more because he had no fleshly body.
They were mortal and sinful, but thou, O Lord, to whom they
arrogantly sought to be reconciled, art immortal and sinless.
But a mediator between God and man ought to have
something in him like God and something in him like man, lest in
being like man he should be far from God, or if only like God he
should be far from man, and so should not be a mediator.
That deceitful mediator, then, by whom, by thy
secret judgment, human pride deserves to be deceived, had one thing
in common with man, that is, his sin. In another
respect, he would seem to have something in common with God, for
not being clothed with the mortality of the flesh, he could boast
that he was immortal. But since "the wages of sin
is death,"[394] what he really has in common with men is that,
together with them, he is condemned to death.
CHAPTER XLIII
68. But the true Mediator, whom thou in
thy secret mercy hast revealed to the humble, and hast sent to them
so that through his example they also might learn the same humility
-- that "Mediator between God and man, the man Christ
Jesus,"[395]
appeared between mortal sinners and the immortal Just One.
He was mortal as men are mortal; he was righteous
as God is righteous;
and because the reward of righteousness is life and peace,
he could, through his righteousness united with God, cancel the
death of justified sinners, which he was willing to have in common
with them. Hence he was manifested to holy men of
old, to the end that they might be saved through faith in his
Passion to come, even as we through faith in his Passion which is
past. As man he was Mediator, but as the Word he
was not something in between the two;
because he was equal to God, and God with God, and, with the
Holy Spirit, one God.
69. How hast thou loved us, O good Father,
who didst not spare thy only Son, but didst deliver him up for us
wicked ones![396] How hast thou loved us, for
whom he who did not count it robbery to be equal with thee "became
obedient unto death, even the death of the cross"[397]!
He alone was "free among the dead."[398]
He alone had power to lay down his life and power
to take it up again, and for us he became to thee both Victor and
Victim; and Victor because he was the Victim. For
us, he was to thee both Priest and Sacrifice, and Priest because he
was the Sacrifice. Out of slaves, he maketh us
thy sons, because he was born of thee and did serve us.
Rightly, then, is my hope fixed strongly on him,
that thou wilt "heal all my diseases"[399]
through him, who sitteth at thy right hand and maketh
intercession for us.[400] Otherwise I should
utterly despair. For my infirmities are many and
great; indeed, they are very many and very great.
But thy medicine is still greater.
Otherwise, we might think that thy word was
removed from union with man, and despair of ourselves, if it had
not been that he was "made flesh and dwelt among us."[401]
70. Terrified by my sins and the load of
my misery, I had resolved in my heart and considered flight into
the wilderness.
But thou didst forbid me, and thou didst strengthen me,
saying that "since Christ died for all, they who live should not
henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him who died for
them."[402] Behold, O Lord, I cast all my care on
thee, that I
may live and "behold wondrous things out of thy law."[403]
Thou knowest my incompetence and my infirmities;
teach me and heal me.
Thy only Son -- he "in whom are hid all the treasures of
wisdom and knowledge"[404] -- hath redeemed me with his blood.
Let not the proud speak evil of me, because I
keep my ransom before my mind, and eat and drink and share my food
and drink. For, being poor, I desire to be
satisfied from him, together with those who eat and are satisfied:
"and they shall praise the Lord that seek Him."[405]
BOOK ELEVEN
The eternal Creator and the Creation in time.
Augustine ties together his memory of his past
life, his present experience, and his ardent desire to comprehend
the mystery of creation. This leads him to the
questions of the mode and time of creation. He
ponders the mode of creation and shows that it was
de nihilo and involved no alteration in the being
of God. He then considers the question of the
beginning of the world and time and shows that time and creation
are cotemporal. But what is time?
To this Augustine devotes a brilliant analysis of
the subjectivity of time and the relation of all temporal process
to the abiding eternity of God. From this, he
prepares to turn to a detailed interpretation of Gen. 1:1, 2.
CHAPTER I
1. Is it possible, O Lord, that, since
thou art in eternity, thou art ignorant of what I am saying to
thee? Or, dost thou see in time an event at the
time it occurs? If not, then why am I
recounting such a tale of things to thee?
Certainly not in order to acquaint thee with them
through me; but, instead, that through them I may stir up my own
love and the love of my readers toward thee, so that all may say,
"Great is the Lord and greatly to be praised." I have said this
before[406] and will say it again: "For love of thy love I do it."
So also we pray -- and yet Truth tells us, "Your Father knoweth
what things you need before you ask him."[407]
Consequently, we lay bare our feelings before
thee, that, through our confessing to thee our plight and thy
mercies toward us, thou mayest go on to free us altogether, as thou
hast already begun; and that we may cease to be wretched in
ourselves and blessed in thee -- since thou hast called us to be
poor in spirit, meek, mourners, hungering and athirst for
righteousness, merciful and pure in heart.[408]
Thus I have told thee many things, as I could
find ability and will to do so, since it was thy will in the first
place that I should confess to thee, O Lord my God -- for "Thou art
good and thy mercy endureth forever."[409]
CHAPTER II
2. But how long would it take for the
voice of my pen to tell enough of thy exhortations and of all thy
terrors and comforts and leadings by which thou didst bring me to
preach thy Word and to administer thy sacraments to thy people?
And even if I could do this sufficiently, the
drops of time[410] are very precious to me and I have for a long
time been burning with the desire to meditate on thy law, and to
confess in thy presence my knowledge and ignorance of it -- from
the first streaks of thy light in my mind and the remaining
darkness, until my weakness shall be swallowed up in thy strength.
And I do not wish to see those hours drained into
anything else which I can find free from the necessary care of the
body, the exercise of the mind, and the service we owe to our
fellow men -- and what we give even if we do not owe it.
3. O Lord my God, hear my prayer and let
thy mercy attend my longing. It does not burn for
itself alone but longs as well to serve the cause of fraternal
love. Thou seest in my heart that this is so.
Let me offer the service of my mind and my tongue
--
and give me what I may in turn offer back to thee.
For "I am needy and poor"; thou art rich to all
who call upon thee -- thou who, in thy freedom from care, carest
for us. Trim away from my lips, inwardly and
outwardly, all rashness and lying. Let thy
Scriptures be my chaste delight. Let me not be
deceived in them, nor deceive others from them. O
Lord, hear and pity! O Lord my God, light of the
blind, strength of the weak -- and also the light of those who see
and the strength of the strong -- hearken to my soul and hear it
crying from the depths.[411] Unless thy ears
attend us even in the depths, where should we go?
To whom should we cry?
"Thine is the day and the night is thine as well."[412]
At thy bidding the moments fly by.
Grant me in them, then, an interval for my
meditations on the hidden things of thy law, nor close the door of
thy law against us who knock. Thou hast not
willed that the deep secrets of all those pages should have been
written in vain. Those forests are not without
their stags which keep retired within them, ranging and walking and
feeding, lying down and ruminating.[413] Perfect
me, O Lord, and reveal their secrets to me.
Behold, thy voice is my joy; thy voice surpasses
in abundance of delights. Give me what I love,
for I do love it.
And this too is thy gift. Abandon not thy
gifts and despise not thy "grass" which thirsts for thee.[414]
Let me confess to thee everything that I shall
have found in thy books and "let me hear the voice of thy
praise."[415] Let me drink from thee and
"consider the wondrous things out of thy law"[416] -- from the very
beginning, when thou madest heaven and earth, and thenceforward to
the everlasting reign of thy Holy City with thee.
4. O Lord, have mercy on me and hear my
petition. For my prayer is not for earthly
things, neither gold nor silver and precious stones, nor gorgeous
apparel, nor honors and power, nor fleshly pleasures, nor of bodily
necessities in this life of our pilgrimage: all of these things are
"added" to those who seek thy Kingdom and thy
righteousness.[417]
Observe, O God, from whence comes my desire.
The unrighteous have told me of delights but not
such as those in thy law, O Lord.
Behold, this is the spring of my desire.
See, O Father, look and see -- and approve!
Let it be pleasing in thy mercy's sight that I
should find favor with thee -- that the secret things of thy Word
may be opened to me when I knock. I beg this of
thee by our Lord Jesus Christ, thy Son, the Man of thy right hand,
the Son of Man; whom thou madest strong for thy purpose as Mediator
between thee and us; through whom thou didst seek us when we were
not seeking thee, but didst seek us so that we might seek thee; thy
Word, through whom thou madest all things, and me among them; thy
only Son, through whom thou hast called thy faithful people to
adoption, and me among them. I beseech it of thee
through him who sitteth at thy right hand and maketh intercession
for us, "in whom are hid all treasures of wisdom and
knowledge."[418] It is he I
seek in thy books. Moses wrote of him.
He tells us so himself;
the Truth tells us so.
CHAPTER III
5. Let me hear and understand how in the
beginning thou madest heaven and earth.[419]
Moses wrote of this; he wrote and passed on --
moving from thee to thee -- and he is now no longer before me.
If he were, I would lay hold on him and ask him
and entreat him solemnly that in thy name he would open out these
things to me, and I would lend my bodily ears to the sounds that
came forth out of his mouth. If, however, he
spoke in the Hebrew language, the sounds would beat on my senses in
vain, and nothing would touch my mind; but if he spoke in Latin, I
would understand what he said. But how should I
then know whether what he said was true? If I
knew even this much, would it be that I knew it from him?
Indeed, within me, deep inside the chambers of my
thought, Truth itself -- neither Hebrew, nor Greek, nor Latin, nor
barbarian, without any organs of voice and tongue, without the
sound of syllables -- would say, "He speaks the truth," and I
should be assured by this. Then I would
confidently say to that man of thine, "You speak the truth."[420]
However, since I cannot inquire of Moses, I
beseech thee, O Truth, from whose fullness he spoke truth; I
beseech thee, my God, forgive my sins, and as thou gavest thy
servant the gift to speak these things, grant me also the gift to
understand them.
CHAPTER IV
6. Look around; there are the heaven and
the earth. They cry aloud that they were made,
for they change and vary. Whatever there is that
has not been made, and yet has being, has nothing in it that was
not there before. This having something not
already existent is what it means to be changed and varied.
Heaven and earth thus speak plainly that they did
not make themselves: "We are, because we have been made; we did not
exist before we came to be so that we could have made ourselves!"
And the voice with which they speak is simply
their visible presence. It was thou, O
Lord, who madest these things. Thou art
beautiful; thus they are beautiful. Thou art
good, thus they are good. Thou art; thus they
are. But they are not as beautiful, nor as good,
nor as truly real as thou their Creator art.
Compared with thee, they are neither beautiful
nor good, nor do they even exist. These things we
know, thanks be to thee. Yet our knowledge is
ignorance when it is compared with thy knowledge.
CHAPTER V
7. But _how_ didst thou make the heaven
and the earth, and what was the tool of such a mighty work as
thine? For it was not like a human worker
fashioning body from body, according to the fancy of his mind, able
somehow or other to impose on it a form which the mind perceived in
itself by its inner eye (yet how should even he be able to do this,
if thou hadst not made that mind?). He imposes
the form on something already existing and having some sort of
being, such as clay, or stone or wood or gold or such like (and
where would these things come from if thou hadst not furnished
them?). For thou madest his body for the artisan,
and thou madest the mind which directs the limbs; thou madest the
matter from which he makes anything; thou didst create the capacity
by which he understands his art and sees within his mind what he
may do with the things before him; thou gavest him his bodily sense
by which, as if he had an interpreter, he may communicate from mind
to matter what he proposes to do and report back to his mind what
has been done, that the mind may consult with the Truth which
presideth over it as to whether what is done is well done.
All these things praise thee, the Creator of them all.
But how didst thou make them?
How, O God, didst thou make the heaven and earth?
For truly, neither in heaven nor on earth didst
thou make heaven and earth -- nor in the air nor in the waters,
since all of these also belong to the heaven and the earth.
Nowhere in the whole world didst thou make the
whole world, because there was no place where it could be made
before it was made. And thou didst not hold
anything in thy hand from which to fashion the heaven and the
earth,[421] for where couldst thou have gotten what thou hadst not
made in order to make something with it? Is
there, indeed, anything at all except because thou art?
Thus thou didst speak and they were made,[422]
and by thy Word thou didst make them all.
CHAPTER VI
8. But how didst thou speak?
Was it in the same manner in which the voice came
from the cloud saying, "This is my beloved Son"[423]?
For that voice sounded forth and died away; it
began and ended. The syllables sounded and passed
away, the second after the first, the third after the second, and
thence in order, till the very last after all the rest; and silence
after the last.
From this it is clear and plain that it was the action of a
creature, itself in time, which sounded that voice, obeying thy
eternal will. And what these words were which
were formed at that time the outer ear conveyed to the conscious
mind, whose inner ear lay attentively open to thy eternal Word.
But it compared those words which sounded in time
with thy eternal word sounding in silence and said: "This is
different; quite different! These words are far
below me; they are not even real, for they fly away and pass, but
the Word of my God remains above me forever." If, then, in words
that sound and fade away thou didst say that heaven and earth
should be made, and thus _madest_ heaven and earth, then there was
already some kind of corporeal creature _before_ heaven and earth
by whose motions in time that voice might have had its occurrence
in time. But there was nothing corporeal before
the heaven and the earth; or if there was, then it is certain that
already, without a time-bound voice, thou hadst created whatever it
was out of which thou didst make the time-bound voice by which thou
didst say, "Let the heaven and the earth be made!"
For whatever it was out of which such a voice was
made simply did not exist at all until it was made by thee.
Was it decreed by thy Word that a body might be
made from which such words might come?
CHAPTER VII
9. Thou dost call us, then, to understand
the Word -- the God who is God with thee -- which is spoken
eternally and by which all things are spoken eternally.
For what was first spoken was not finished, and
then something else spoken until the whole series was spoken; but
all things, at the same time and forever.
For, otherwise, we should have time and change and not a
true eternity, nor a true immortality.
This I know, O my God, and I give thanks.
I know, I confess to thee, O Lord, and whoever is
not ungrateful for certain truths knows and blesses thee along with
me. We know, O Lord, this much we know: that in
the same proportion as anything is not what it was, and is what it
was not, in that very same proportion it passes away or comes to
be. But there is nothing in thy Word that passes
away or returns to its place; for it is truly immortal and eternal.
And, therefore, unto the Word coeternal with
thee, at the same time and always thou sayest all that thou sayest.
And whatever thou sayest shall be made is made,
and thou makest nothing otherwise than by speaking.
Still, not all the things that thou dost make by
speaking are made at the same time and always.
CHAPTER VIII
10. Why is this, I ask of thee, O Lord my
God? I see it after a fashion, but I do not know
how to express it, unless I say that everything that begins to be
and then ceases to be begins and ceases when it is known in thy
eternal Reason that it ought to begin or cease -- in thy eternal
Reason where nothing begins or ceases. And this
is thy Word, which is also "the Beginning,"
because it also speaks to us.[424] Thus,
in the gospel, he spoke through the flesh; and this sounded in the
outward ears of men so that it might be believed and sought for
within, and so that it might be found in the eternal Truth, in
which the good and only Master teacheth all his disciples.[425]
There, O Lord, I hear thy voice, the voice of one
speaking to me, since he who teacheth us speaketh to us.
But he that doth not teach us doth not really
speak to us even when he speaketh. Yet who is it
that teacheth us unless it be the Truth immutable?
For even when we are instructed by means of the
mutable creation, we are thereby led to the Truth immutable.
There we learn truly as we stand and hear him,
and we rejoice greatly "because of the bridegroom's
voice,"[426]
restoring us to the source whence our being comes.
And therefore, unless the Beginning remained
immutable, there would then not be a place to which we might return
when we had wandered away. But when we return
from error, it is through our gaining knowledge that we return.
In order for us to gain knowledge he teacheth us,
since he is the Beginning, and speaketh to us.
CHAPTER IX
11. In this Beginning, O God, thou hast
made heaven and earth -- through thy Word, thy Son, thy Power, thy
Wisdom, thy Truth: all wondrously speaking and wondrously creating.
Who shall comprehend such things and who shall
tell of it? What is it that shineth through me
and striketh my heart without injury, so that I
both shudder and burn? I shudder because I
am unlike it; I burn because I am like it. It is
Wisdom itself that shineth through me, clearing away my fog, which
so readily overwhelms me so that I
faint in it, in the darkness and burden of my punishment.
For my strength is brought down in neediness, so
that I cannot endure even my blessings until thou, O Lord, who hast
been gracious to all my iniquities, also healest all my infirmities
-- for it is thou who "shalt redeem my life from corruption, and
crown me with loving-kindness and tender mercy, and shalt satisfy
my desire with good things so that my youth shall be renewed like
the eagle's."[427] For by this hope we are saved,
and through patience we await thy promises. Let
him that is able hear thee speaking to his inner mind.
I will cry out with confidence because of thy own
oracle, "How wonderful are thy works, O Lord;
in wisdom thou hast made them all."[428]
And this Wisdom is the Beginning, and in that
Beginning thou hast made heaven and earth.
CHAPTER X
12. Now, are not those still full of their
old carnal nature[429] who ask us: "What was God doing _before_ he
made heaven and earth? For if he was idle," they
say, "and doing nothing, then why did he not continue in that state
forever --
doing nothing, as he had always done? If
any new motion has arisen in God, and a new will to form a
creature, which he had never before formed, how can that be a true
eternity in which an act of will occurs that was not there before?
For the will of God is not a created thing, but
comes before the creation -- and this is true because nothing could
be created unless the will of the Creator came before it.
The will of God, therefore, pertains to his very
Essence. Yet if anything has arisen in the
Essence of God that was not there before, then that Essence cannot
truly be called eternal. But if it was the
eternal will of God that the creation should come to be, why, then,
is not the creation itself also from eternity?"[430]
CHAPTER XI
13. Those who say these things do not yet
understand thee, O
Wisdom of God, O Light of souls. They do
not yet understand how the things are made that are made by and in
thee. They endeavor to comprehend eternal things,
but their heart still flies about in the past and future motions of
created things, and is still unstable. Who shall
hold it and fix it so that it may come to rest for a little; and
then, by degrees, glimpse the glory of that eternity which abides
forever; and then, comparing eternity with the temporal process in
which nothing abides, they may see that they are incommensurable?
They would see that a long time does not become
long, except from the many separate events that occur in its
passage, which cannot be simultaneous. In the
Eternal, on the other hand, nothing passes away, but the whole is
simultaneously present. But no temporal process
is wholly simultaneous. Therefore, let it[431]
see that all time past is forced to move on by the incoming future;
that all the future follows from the past; and that all, past and
future, is created and issues out of that which is forever present.
Who will hold the heart of man that it may stand
still and see how the eternity which always stands still is itself
neither future nor past but expresses itself in the times that are
future and past? Can my hand do this, or can the
hand of my mouth bring about so difficult a thing even by
persuasion?
CHAPTER XII
14. How, then, shall I respond to him who
asks, "What was God doing _before_ he made heaven and earth?"
I do not answer, as a certain one is reported to
have done facetiously (shrugging off the force of the question).
"He was preparing hell," he said, "for those who
pry too deep." It is one thing to see the answer;
it is another to laugh at the questioner -- and for myself I
do not answer these things thus. More willingly
would I have answered, "I do not know what I do not know," than
cause one who asked a deep question to be ridiculed -- and by such
tactics gain praise for a worthless answer.
Rather, I say that thou, our God, art the Creator of every
creature. And if in the term "heaven and earth"
every creature is included, I make bold to say further: "Before God
made heaven and earth, he did not make anything at all.
For if he did, what did he make unless it were a
creature?" I do indeed wish that I knew all that
I desire to know to my profit as surely as I know that no creature
was made before any creature was made.
CHAPTER XIII
15. But if the roving thought of someone
should wander over the images of past time, and wonder that thou,
the Almighty God, the All-creating and All-sustaining, the
Architect of heaven and earth, didst for ages unnumbered abstain
from so great a work before thou didst actually do it, let him
awake and consider that he wonders at illusions.
For in what temporal medium could the unnumbered
ages that thou didst not make pass by, since thou art the Author
and Creator of all the ages? Or what periods of
time would those be that were not made by thee?
Or how could they have already passed away if
they had not already been? Since, therefore, thou
art the Creator of all times, if there was any time _before_ thou
madest heaven and earth, why is it said that thou wast abstaining
from working? For thou madest that very time
itself, and periods could not pass by _before_ thou madest the
whole temporal procession. But if there was no
time _before_
heaven and earth, how, then, can it be asked, "What wast
thou doing then?" For there was no "then" when
there was no time.
16. Nor dost thou precede any given period
of time by another period of time. Else thou
wouldst not precede all periods of time. In the
eminence of thy ever-present eternity, thou precedest all times
past, and extendest beyond all future times, for they are still to
come -- and when they have come, they will be past.
But "Thou art always the Selfsame and thy years
shall have no end."[432] Thy years neither go nor
come; but ours both go and come in order that all separate moments
may come to pass.
All thy years stand together as one, since they are abiding.
Nor do thy years past exclude the years to come
because thy years do not pass away. All these
years of ours shall be with thee, when all of them shall have
ceased to be. Thy years are but a day, and thy
day is not recurrent, but always today. Thy
"today" yields not to tomorrow and does not follow yesterday.
Thy "today" is eternity.
Therefore, thou didst generate the Coeternal, to
whom thou didst say, "This day I have begotten thee."[433]
Thou madest all time and before all times thou
art, and there was never a time when there was no time.
CHAPTER XIV
17. There was no time, therefore, when
thou hadst not made anything, because thou hadst made time itself.
And there are no times that are coeternal with
thee, because thou dost abide forever; but if times should abide,
they would not be times.
For what is time? Who can easily and
briefly explain it?
Who can even comprehend it in thought or put the answer into
words? Yet is it not true that in conversation we
refer to nothing more familiarly or knowingly than time?
And surely we understand it when we speak of it;
we understand it also when we hear another speak of it.
What, then, is time? If no one asks me, I
know what it is.
If I wish to explain it to him who asks me, I do not know.
Yet I
say with confidence that I know that if nothing passed away,
there would be no past time; and if nothing were still coming,
there would be no future time; and if there were nothing at all,
there would be no present time.
But, then, how is it that there are the two times, past and
future, when even the past is now no longer and the future is now
not yet? But if the present were always present,
and did not pass into past time, it obviously would not be time but
eternity. If, then, time present -- if it be time
-- comes into existence only because it passes into time past, how
can we say that even this is, since the cause of its being is that
it will cease to be?
Thus, can we not truly say that time _is_ only as it tends
toward nonbeing?
CHAPTER XV
18. And yet we speak of a long time and a
short time; but never speak this way except of time past and
future. We call a hundred years ago, for example,
a long time past. In like manner, we should call
a hundred years hence a long time to come. But we
call ten days ago a short time past; and ten days hence a short
time to come. But in what sense is something long
or short that is nonexistent? For the past is not
now, and the future is not yet. Therefore, let us
not say, "It _is_ long"; instead, let us say of the past, "It _was_
long," and of the future, "It _will be_
long." And yet, O Lord, my Light, shall not thy truth make
mockery of man even here? For that long time
past: was it long when it was already past, or when it was still
present? For it might have been long when there
was a period that could be long, but when it was past, it no longer
was. In that case, that which was not at all
could not be long. Let us not, therefore, say,
"Time past was long," for we shall not discover what it was that
was long because, since it is past, it no longer exists.
Rather, let us say that "time _present_ was long,
because when it was present it _was_ long." For then it had not yet
passed on so as not to be, and therefore it still was in a state
that could be called long.
But after it passed, it ceased to be long simply because it
ceased to be.
19. Let us, therefore, O human soul, see
whether present time can be long, for it has been given you to feel
and measure the periods of time. How, then, will
you answer me?
Is a hundred years when present a long time?
But, first, see whether a hundred years can be
present at once. For if the first year in the
century is current, then it is present time, and the other ninety
and nine are still future. Therefore, they are
not yet. But, then, if the second year is
current, one year is already past, the second present, and all the
rest are future.
And thus, if we fix on any middle year of this century as
present, those before it are past, those after it are future.
Therefore, a hundred years cannot be present all
at once.
Let us see, then, whether the year that is now current can
be present. For if its first month is current,
then the rest are future; if the second, the first is already past,
and the remainder are not yet. Therefore, the
current year is not present all at once. And if
it is not present as a whole, then the year is not present.
For it takes twelve months to make the year, from
which each individual month which is current is itself present one
at a time, but the rest are either past or future.
20. Thus it comes out that time present,
which we found was the only time that could be called "long," has
been cut down to the space of scarcely a single day.
But let us examine even that, for one day is
never present as a whole. For it is made up of
twenty-four hours, divided between night and day.
The first of these hours has the rest of them as
future, and the last of them has the rest as past; but any of those
between has those that preceded it as past and those that succeed
it as future. And that one hour itself passes
away in fleeting fractions. The part of it that
has fled is past; what remains is still future.
If any fraction of time be conceived that cannot
now be divided even into the most minute momentary point, this
alone is what we may call time present. But this
flies so rapidly from future to past that it cannot be extended by
any delay. For if it is extended, it is then
divided into past and future. But the present has
no extension[434] whatever.
Where, therefore, is that time which we may call "long"?
Is it future? Actually we do
not say of the future, "It is long,"
for it has not yet come to be, so as to be long.
Instead, we say, "It will be long." _When_ will
it be? For since it is future, it will not be
long, for what may be long is not yet. It will be
long only when it passes from the future which is not as yet, and
will have begun to be present, so that there can be something that
may be long. But in that case, time present cries
aloud, in the words we have already heard, that it cannot be
"long."
CHAPTER XVI
21. And yet, O Lord, we do perceive
intervals of time, and we compare them with each other, and we say
that some are longer and others are shorter. We
even measure how much longer or shorter this time may be than that
time. And we say that this time is twice as long,
or three times as long, while this other time is only just as long
as that other. But we measure the passage of time
when we measure the intervals of perception. But
who can measure times past which now are no longer, or times future
which are not yet -- unless perhaps someone will dare to say that
what does not exist can be measured? Therefore,
while time is passing, it can be perceived and measured; but when
it is past, it cannot, since it is not.
CHAPTER XVII
22. I am seeking the truth, O Father; I am
not affirming it.
O my God, direct and rule me.
Who is there who will tell me that there are not three times
-- as we learned when boys and as we have also taught boys -- time
past, time present, and time future? Who can say
that there is only time present because the other two do not exist?
Or do they also exist; but when, from the future,
time becomes present, it proceeds from some secret place; and when,
from times present, it becomes past, it recedes into some secret
place? For where have those men who have foretold
the future seen the things foretold, if then they were not yet
existing? For what does not exist cannot be seen.
And those who tell of things past could not speak
of them as if they were true, if they did not see them in their
minds. These things could in no way be discerned
if they did not exist. There are therefore times
present and times past.
CHAPTER XVIII
23. Give me leave, O Lord, to seek still
further. O my Hope, let not my purpose be
confounded. For if there are times past and
future, I wish to know where they are. But if I
have not yet succeeded in this, I still know that wherever they
are, they are not there as future or past, but as present.
For if they are there as future, they are there
as "not yet"; if they are there as past, they are there as "no
longer." Wherever they are and whatever they are they exist
therefore only as present. Although we tell of
past things as true, they are drawn out of the memory -- not the
things themselves, which have already passed, but words constructed
from the images of the perceptions which were formed in the mind,
like footprints in their passage through the senses.
My childhood, for instance, which is no longer, still exists
in time past, which does not now exist. But when
I call to mind its image and speak of it, I see it in the present
because it is still in my memory. Whether there
is a similar explanation for the foretelling of future events --
that is, of the images of things which are not yet seen as if they
were already existing -- I
confess, O my God, I do not know. But this
I certainly do know:
that we generally think ahead about our future actions, and
this premeditation is in time present; but that the action which we
premeditate is not yet, because it is still future.
When we shall have started the action and have
begun to do what we were premeditating, then that action will be in
time present, because then it is no longer in time future.
24. Whatever may be the manner of this
secret foreseeing of future things, nothing can be seen except what
exists. But what exists now is not future, but
present. When, therefore, they say that future
events are seen, it is not the events themselves, for they do not
exist as yet (that is, they are still in time future), but perhaps,
instead, their causes and their signs are seen, which already do
exist. Therefore, to those already beholding
these causes and signs, they are not future, but present, and from
them future things are predicted because they are conceived in the
mind. These conceptions, however, exist _now_,
and those who predict those things see these conceptions before
them in time present.
Let me take an example from the vast multitude and variety
of such things. I see the dawn; I predict that
the sun is about to rise. What I see is in time
present, what I predict is in time future -- not that the sun is
future, for it already exists; but its rising is future, because it
is not yet. Yet I could not predict even its
rising, unless I had an image of it in my mind;
as, indeed, I do even now as I speak. But
that dawn which I see in the sky is not the rising of the sun
(though it does precede it), nor is it a conception in my mind.
These two[435] are seen in time present, in order
that the event which is in time future may be predicted.
Future events, therefore, are not yet. And
if they are not yet, they do not exist. And if
they do not exist, they cannot be seen at all, but they can be
predicted from things present, which now are and are seen.
CHAPTER XIX
25. Now, therefore, O Ruler of thy
creatures, what is the mode by which thou teachest souls those
things which are still future? For thou hast
taught thy prophets. How dost thou, to whom
nothing is future, teach future things -- or rather teach things
present from the signs of things future? For what
does not exist certainly cannot be taught. This
way of thine is too far from my sight; it is too great for me, I
cannot attain to it.[436]
But I shall be enabled by thee, when thou wilt grant it, O
sweet Light of my secret eyes.
CHAPTER XX
26. But even now it is manifest and clear
that there are neither times future nor times past.
Thus it is not properly said that there are three
times, past, present, and future. Perhaps it
might be said rightly that there are three times: a time present of
things past; a time present of things present; and a time present
of things future. For these three do coexist
somehow in the soul, for otherwise I could not see them.
The time present of things past is memory; the
time present of things present is direct experience; the time
present of things future is expectation.[437] If
we are allowed to speak of these things so, I see three times, and
I grant that there are three. Let it still be
said, then, as our misapplied custom has it: "There are three
times, past, present, and future." I shall not be troubled by it,
nor argue, nor object -- always provided that what is said is
understood, so that neither the future nor the past is said to
exist now. There are but few things about which
we speak properly -- and many more about which we speak improperly
-- though we understand one another's meaning.
CHAPTER XXI
27. I have said, then, that we measure
periods of time as they pass so that we can say that this time is
twice as long as that one or that this is just as long as that, and
so on for the other fractions of time which we can count by
measuring.
So, then, as I was saying, we measure periods of time as
they pass. And if anyone asks me, "How do you
know this?", I can answer: "I know because we measure.
We could not measure things that do not exist,
and things past and future do not exist." But how do we measure
present time since it has no extension? It is
measured while it passes, but when it has passed it is not
measured; for then there is nothing that could be measured.
But whence, and how, and whither does it pass
while it is being measured? Whence, but from the
future? Which way, save through the present?
Whither, but into the past?
Therefore, from what is not yet, through what has
no length, it passes into what is now no longer.
But what do we measure, unless it is a time of
some length? For we cannot speak of single, and
double, and triple, and equal, and all the other ways in which we
speak of time, except in terms of the length of the periods of
time. But in what "length," then, do we measure
passing time? Is it in the future, from which it
passes over? But what does not yet exist cannot
be measured. Or, is it in the present, through
which it passes? But what has no length we cannot
measure. Or is it in the past into which it
passes? But what is no longer we cannot
measure.
CHAPTER XXII
28. My soul burns ardently to understand
this most intricate enigma. O Lord my God, O good
Father, I beseech thee through Christ, do not close off these
things, both the familiar and the obscure, from my desire.
Do not bar it from entering into them;
but let their light dawn by thy enlightening mercy, O Lord.
Of whom shall I inquire about these things?
And to whom shall I
confess my ignorance of them with greater profit than to
thee, to whom these studies of mine (ardently longing to understand
thy Scriptures) are not a bore? Give me what I
love, for I do love it; and this thou hast given me.
O Father, who truly knowest how to give good
gifts to thy children, give this to me. Grant it,
since I have undertaken to understand it, and hard labor is my lot
until thou openest it. I beseech thee, through
Christ and in his name, the Holy of Holies, let no man interrupt
me. "For I have believed, and therefore do I
speak."[438] This is my hope; for this I live:
that I may contemplate the joys of my Lord.[439]
Behold, thou hast made my days grow old, and they pass away
-- and how I do not know.
We speak of this time and that time, and these times and
those times: "How long ago since he said this?"
"How long ago since he did this?"
"How long ago since I saw that?"
"This syllable is twice as long as that single
short syllable." These words we say and hear, and we are understood
and we understand.
They are quite commonplace and ordinary, and still the
meaning of these very same things lies deeply hid and its discovery
is still to come.
CHAPTER XXIII
29. I once heard a learned man say that
the motions of the sun, moon, and stars constituted time; and I did
not agree. For why should not the motions of all
bodies constitute time? What if the lights of
heaven should cease, and a potter's wheel still turn round: would
there be no time by which we might measure those rotations and say
either that it turned at equal intervals, or, if it moved now more
slowly and now more quickly, that some rotations were longer and
others shorter? And while we were saying this,
would we not also be speaking in time? Or would
there not be in our words some syllables that were long and others
short, because the first took a longer time to sound, and the
others a shorter time? O God, grant men to see in
a small thing the notions that are common[440] to all things, both
great and small. Both the stars and the lights of
heaven are "for signs and seasons, and for days and years."[441]
This is doubtless the case, but just as I
should not say that the circuit of that wooden wheel was a
day, neither would that learned man say that there was, therefore,
no time.
30. I thirst to know the power and the
nature of time, by which we measure the motions of bodies, and say,
for example, that this motion is twice as long as that.
For I ask, since the word "day" refers not only
to the length of time that the sun is above the earth (which
separates day from night), but also refers to the sun's entire
circuit from east all the way around to east -- on account of which
we can say, "So many days have passed" (the nights being included
when we say, "So many days," and their lengths not counted
separately) -- since, then, the day is ended by the motion of the
sun and by his passage from east to east, I
ask whether the motion itself is the day, or whether the day
is the period in which that motion is completed; or both?
For if the sun's passage is the day, then there
would be a day even if the sun should finish his course in as short
a period as an hour. If the motion itself is the
day, then it would not be a day if from one sunrise to another
there were a period no longer than an hour.
But the sun would have to go round twenty-four times to make
just one day. If it is both, then that could not
be called a day if the sun ran his entire course in the period of
an hour; nor would it be a day if, while the sun stood still, as
much time passed as the sun usually covered during his whole
course, from morning to morning. I shall,
therefore, not ask any more what it is that is called a day, but
rather what time is, for it is by time that we measure the circuit
of the sun, and would be able to say that it was finished in half
the period of time that it customarily takes if it were completed
in a period of only twelve hours. If, then, we
compare these periods, we could call one of them a single and the
other a double period, as if the sun might run his course from east
to east sometimes in a single period and sometimes in a double
period.
Let no man tell me, therefore, that the motions of the
heavenly bodies constitute time. For when the sun
stood still at the prayer of a certain man in order that he might
gain his victory in battle, the sun stood still but time went on.
For in as long a span of time as was sufficient
the battle was fought and ended.[442]
I see, then, that time is a certain kind of extension.
But do I see it, or do I only seem to?
Thou, O Light and Truth, wilt show me.
CHAPTER XXIV
31. Dost thou command that I should agree
if anyone says that time is "the motion of a body"?
Thou dost not so command.
For I hear that no body is moved but in time; this thou
tellest me. But that the motion of a body itself
is time I do not hear;
thou dost not say so. For when a body is
moved, I measure by time how long it was moving from the time when
it began to be moved until it stopped. And if I
did not see when it began to be moved, and if it continued to move
so that I could not see when it stopped, I could not measure the
movement, except from the time when I began to see it until I
stopped. But if I look at it for a long time, I
can affirm only that the time is long but not how long it may be.
This is because when we say, "How long?", we are
speaking comparatively as: "This is as long as that," or, "This is
twice as long as that"; or other such similar ratios.
But if we were able to observe the point in space
where and from which the body, which is moved, comes and the point
to which it is moved; or if we can observe its parts moving as in a
wheel, we can say how long the movement of the body took or the
movement of its parts from this place to that.
Since, therefore, the motion of a body is one
thing, and the norm by which we measure how long it takes is
another thing, we cannot see which of these two is to be called
time. For, although a body is sometimes moved and
sometimes stands still, we measure not only its motion but also its
rest as well; and both by time! Thus we say, "It
stood still as long as it moved," or, "It stood still twice or
three times as long as it moved" -- or any other ratio which our
measuring has either determined or imagined, either roughly or
precisely, according to our custom. Therefore,
time is not the motion of a body.
CHAPTER XXV
32. And I confess to thee, O Lord, that I
am still ignorant as to what time is. And again I
confess to thee, O Lord, that I
know that I am speaking all these things in time, and that I
have already spoken of time a long time, and that "very long" is
not long except when measured by the duration of time.
How, then, do I know this, when I do not know
what time is? Or, is it possible that I do not
know how I can express what I do know? Alas for
me!
I do not even know the extent of my own ignorance.
Behold, O my God, in thy presence I do not lie.
As my heart is, so I speak.
Thou shalt light my candle; thou, O Lord my God, wilt
enlighten my darkness.[443]
CHAPTER XXVI
33. Does not my soul most truly confess to
thee that I do measure intervals of time? But
what is it that I thus measure, O
my God, and how is it that I do not know what I measure?
I
measure the motion of a body by time, but the time itself I
do not measure. But, truly, could I measure the
motion of a body -- how long it takes, how long it is in motion
from this place to that --
unless I could measure the time in which it is moving?
How, then, do I measure this time itself?
Do we measure a longer time by a shorter time, as
we measure the length of a crossbeam in terms of cubits?[444]
Thus, we can say that the length of a long
syllable is measured by the length of a short syllable and thus say
that the long syllable is double. So also we
measure the length of poems by the length of the lines, and the
length of the line by the length of the feet, and the length of the
feet by the length of the syllable, and the length of the long
syllables by the length of the short ones. We do
not measure by pages -- for in that way we would measure space
rather than time -- but when we speak the words as they pass by we
say: "It is a long stanza, because it is made up of so many verses;
they are long verses because they consist of so many feet; they are
long feet because they extend over so many syllables; this is a
long syllable because it is twice the length of a short one."
But no certain measure of time is obtained this way; since
it is possible that if a shorter verse is pronounced slowly, it may
take up more time than a longer one if it is pronounced
hurriedly.
The same would hold for a stanza, or a foot, or a syllable.
From this it appears to me that time is nothing
other than extendedness;[445] but extendedness of what I do not
know. This is a marvel to me.
The extendedness may be of the mind itself.
For what is it I measure, I ask thee, O my God, when I say
either, roughly, "This time is longer than that," or, more
precisely, "This is _twice_ as long as that." I know that I am
measuring time. But I am not measuring the
future, for it is not yet; and I
am not measuring the present because it is extended by no
length;
and I am not measuring the past because it no longer is.
What is it, therefore, that I am measuring?
Is it time in its passage, but not time past
[praetereuntia tempora, non praeterita]? This is
what I have been saying.
CHAPTER XXVII
34. Press on, O my mind, and attend with
all your power.
God is our Helper: "it is he that hath made us and not we
ourselves."[446] Give heed where the truth begins
to dawn.[447]
Suppose now that a bodily voice begins to sound, and
continues to sound -- on and on -- and then ceases.
Now there is silence. The voice
is past, and there is no longer a sound. It was
future before it sounded, and could not be measured because it was
not yet; and now it cannot be measured because it is no
longer.
Therefore, while it was sounding, it might have been
measured because then there was something that could be measured.
But even then it did not stand still, for it was
in motion and was passing away. Could it, on that
account, be any more readily measured?
For while it was passing away, it was being extended into
some interval of time in which it might be measured, since the
present has no length. Supposing, though, that it
might have been measured -- then also suppose that another voice
had begun to sound and is still sounding without any interruption
to break its continued flow. We can measure it
only while it is sounding, for when it has ceased to sound it will
be already past and there will not be anything there that can be
measured. Let us measure it exactly; and let us
say how much it is. But while it is sounding, it
cannot be measured except from the instant when it began to sound,
down to the final moment when it left off. For we
measure the time interval itself from some beginning point to some
end.
This is why a voice that has not yet ended cannot be
measured, so that one could say how long or how briefly it will
continue. Nor can it be said to be equal to
another voice or single or double in comparison to it or anything
like this. But when it is ended, it is no longer.
How, therefore, may it be measured?
And yet we measure times; not those which are not
yet, nor those which no longer are, nor those which are stretched
out by some delay, nor those which have no limit.
Therefore, we measure neither times future nor
times past, nor times present, nor times passing by;
and yet we do measure times.
35. Deus Creator omnium[448]: this verse
of eight syllables alternates between short and long syllables.
The four short ones -- that is, the first, third,
fifth, and seventh -- are single in relation to the four long ones
-- that is, the second, fourth, sixth, and eighth.
Each of the long ones is double the length of
each of the short ones. I affirm this and report
it, and common sense perceives that this indeed is the case.
By common sense, then, I measure a long syllable
by a short one, and I find that it is twice as long.
But when one sounds after another, if the first
be short and the latter long, how can I hold the short one and how
can I apply it to the long one as a measure, so that I can discover
that the long one is twice as long, when, in fact, the long one
does not begin to sound until the short one leaves off sounding?
That same long syllable I do not measure as
present, since I cannot measure it until it is ended; but its
ending is its passing away.
What is it, then, that I can measure?
Where is the short syllable by which I measure?
Where is the long one that I am measuring?
Both have sounded, have flown away, have passed
on, and are no longer. And still I measure, and I
confidently answer -- as far as a trained ear can be trusted --
that this syllable is single and that syllable double.
And I could not do this unless they both had
passed and were ended. Therefore I do not measure
them, for they do not exist any more. But I
measure something in my memory which remains fixed.
36. It is in you, O mind of mine, that I
measure the periods of time. Do not shout me down
that it exists [objectively]; do not overwhelm yourself with the
turbulent flood of your impressions. In you, as I
have said, I measure the periods of time. I
measure as time present the impression that things make on you as
they pass by and what remains after they have passed by -- I do not
measure the things themselves which have passed by and left their
impression on you. This is what I measure when
I
measure periods of time. Either, then,
these are the periods of time or else I do not measure time at
all.
What are we doing when we measure silence, and say that this
silence has lasted as long as that voice lasts?
Do we not project our thought to the measure of a
sound, as if it were then sounding, so that we can say something
concerning the intervals of silence in a given span of time?
For, even when both the voice and the tongue are
still, we review -- in thought -- poems and verses, and discourse
of various kinds or various measures of motions, and we specify
their time spans -- how long this is in relation to that -- just as
if we were speaking them aloud. If anyone wishes
to utter a prolonged sound, and if, in forethought, he has decided
how long it should be, that man has already in silence gone through
a span of time, and committed his sound to memory.
Thus he begins to speak and his voice sounds
until it reaches the predetermined end. It has
truly sounded and will go on sounding. But what
is already finished has already sounded and what remains will still
sound. Thus it passes on, until the present
intention carries the future over into the past.
The past increases by the diminution of the
future until by the consumption of all the future all is
past.[449]
CHAPTER XXVIII
37. But how is the future diminished or
consumed when it does not yet exist? Or how does
the past, which exists no longer, increase, unless it is that in
the mind in which all this happens there are three functions?
For the mind expects, it attends, and it
remembers; so that what it expects passes into what it remembers by
way of what it attends to. Who denies that future
things do not exist as yet? But still there is
already in the mind the expectation of things still future.
And who denies that past things now exist no
longer? Still there is in the mind the memory of
things past. Who denies that time present has no
length, since it passes away in a moment? Yet,
our attention has a continuity and it is through this that what is
present may proceed to become absent. Therefore,
future time, which is nonexistent, is not long; but "a long future"
is "a long expectation of the future." Nor is time past, which is
now no longer, long; a "long past" is "a long memory of the
past."
38. I am about to repeat a psalm that I
know. Before I
begin, my attention encompasses the whole, but once I have
begun, as much of it as becomes past while I speak is still
stretched out in my memory. The span of my action
is divided between my memory, which contains what I have repeated,
and my expectation, which contains what I am about to repeat.
Yet my attention is continually present with me,
and through it what was future is carried over so that it becomes
past. The more this is done and repeated, the
more the memory is enlarged -- and expectation is shortened --
until the whole expectation is exhausted. Then
the whole action is ended and passed into memory.
And what takes place in the entire psalm takes
place also in each individual part of it and in each individual
syllable. This also holds in the even longer
action of which that psalm is only a portion. The
same holds in the whole life of man, of which all the actions of
men are parts. The same holds in the whole age of
the sons of men, of which all the lives of men are parts.
CHAPTER XXIX
39. But "since thy loving-kindness is
better than life itself,"[450] observe how my life is but a
stretching out, and how thy right hand has upheld me in my Lord,
the Son of Man, the Mediator between thee, the One, and us, the
many -- in so many ways and by so many means.
Thus through him I may lay hold upon him in whom
I am also laid hold upon; and I may be gathered up from my old way
of life to follow that One and to forget that which is behind, no
longer stretched out but now pulled together again -- stretching
forth not to what shall be and shall pass away but to those things
that _are_ before me. Not distractedly now, but
intently, I follow on for the prize of my heavenly calling,[451]
where I may hear the sound of thy praise and contemplate thy
delights, which neither come to be nor pass away.
But now my years are spent in mourning.[452]
And thou, O
Lord, art my comfort, my eternal Father.
But I have been torn between the times, the order
of which I do not know, and my thoughts, even the inmost and
deepest places of my soul, are mangled by various commotions until
I shall flow together into thee, purged and molten in the fire of
thy love.
CHAPTER XXX
40. And I will be immovable and fixed in
thee, and thy truth will be my mold. And I shall
not have to endure the questions of those men who, as if in a
morbid disease, thirst for more than they can hold and say, "What
did God make before he made heaven and earth?"
or, "How did it come into his mind to make
something when he had never before made anything?"
Grant them, O Lord, to consider well what they
are saying; and grant them to see that where there is no time they
cannot say "never." When, therefore, he is said "never to have
made" something -- what is this but to say that it was made in no
time at all? Let them therefore see that there
could be no time without a created world, and let them cease to
speak vanity of this kind. Let them also be
stretched out to those things which are before them, and understand
that thou, the eternal Creator of all times, art before all times
and that no times are coeternal with thee; nor is any creature,
even if there is a creature "above time."
CHAPTER XXXI
41. O Lord my God, what a chasm there is
in thy deep secret!
How far short of it have the consequences of my sins cast
me?
Heal my eyes, that I may enjoy thy light.
Surely, if there is a mind that so greatly
abounds in knowledge and foreknowledge, to which all things past
and future are as well known as one psalm is well known to me, that
mind would be an exceeding marvel and altogether astonishing.
For whatever is past and whatever is yet to come
would be no more concealed from him than the past and future of
that psalm were hidden from me when I was chanting it:
how much of it had been sung from the beginning and what and
how much still remained till the end. But far be
it from thee, O
Creator of the universe, and Creator of our souls and bodies
--
far be it from thee that thou shouldst merely know all
things past and future. Far, far more
wonderfully, and far more mysteriously thou knowest them.
For it is not as the feelings of one singing
familiar songs, or hearing a familiar song in which, because of his
expectation of words still to come and his remembrance of those
that are past, his feelings are varied and his senses are divided.
This is not the way that anything happens to
thee, who art unchangeably eternal, that is, the truly eternal
Creator of minds. As in the beginning thou
knewest both the heaven and the earth without any change in thy
knowledge, so thou didst make heaven and earth in their beginnings
without any division in thy action.[453] Let him
who understands this confess to thee; and let him who does not
understand also confess to thee! Oh, exalted as
thou art, still the humble in heart are thy dwelling place!
For thou liftest them who are cast down and they fall not
for whom thou art the Most High.[454]
BOOK TWELVE
The mode of creation and the truth of Scripture.
Augustine explores the relation of the visible
and formed matter of heaven and earth to the prior matrix from
which it was formed. This leads to an intricate
analysis of "unformed matter" and the primal "possibility" from
which God created, itself created de
nihilo.
He finds a reference to this in the misconstrued Scriptural
phrase "the heaven of heavens." Realizing that his interpretation
of Gen.
1:1, 2, is not self-evidently the only possibility,
Augustine turns to an elaborate discussion of the multiplicity of
perspectives in hermeneutics and, in the course of this, reviews
the various possibilities of true interpretation of his Scripture
text. He emphasizes the importance of tolerance
where there are plural options, and confidence where basic
Christian faith is concerned.
CHAPTER I
1. My heart is deeply stirred, O Lord,
when in this poor life of mine the words of thy Holy Scripture
strike upon it. This is why the poverty of the
human intellect expresses itself in an abundance of language.
Inquiry is more loquacious than discovery.
Demanding takes longer than obtaining; and the hand that
knocks is more active than the hand that receives.
But we have the promise, and who shall break it?
"If God be for us, who can be against us?"[455]
"Ask, and you shall receive; seek, and you shall
find;
knock, and it shall be opened unto you; for everyone that
asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him that knocks, it
shall be opened."[456] These are thy own
promises, and who need fear to be deceived when truth
promises?
CHAPTER II
2. In lowliness my tongue confesses to thy
exaltation, for thou madest heaven and earth.
This heaven which I see, and this earth on which
I walk -- from which came this "earth" that I carry about me --
thou didst make.
But where is that heaven of heavens, O Lord, of which we
hear in the words of the psalm, "The heaven of heavens is the
Lord's, but the earth he hath given to the children of men"?[457]
Where is the heaven that we cannot see, in
relation to which all that we can see is earth?
For this whole corporeal creation has been
beautifully formed -- though not everywhere in its entirety -- and
our earth is the lowest of these levels. Still,
compared with that heaven of heavens, even the heaven of our own
earth is only earth. Indeed, it is not absurd to
call each of those two great bodies[458] "earth" in comparison with
that ineffable heaven which is the Lord's, and not for the sons of
men.
CHAPTER III
3. And truly this earth was invisible and
unformed,[459] and there was an inexpressibly profound abyss[460]
above which there was no light since it had no form.
Thou didst command it written that "darkness was
on the face of the deep."[461] What else is
darkness except the absence of light? For if
there had been light, where would it have been except by being over
all, showing itself rising aloft and giving light?
Therefore, where there was no light as yet, why
was it that darkness was present, unless it was that light was
absent? Darkness, then, was heavy upon it,
because the light from above was absent; just as there is silence
where there is no sound. And what is it to have
silence anywhere but simply not to have sound?
Hast thou not, O Lord, taught this soul which
confesses to thee? Hast thou not thus taught me,
O
Lord, that before thou didst form and separate this formless
matter there was _nothing_: neither color, nor figure, nor body,
nor spirit? Yet it was not absolutely nothing; it
was a certain formlessness without any shape.
CHAPTER IV
4. What, then, should that formlessness be
called so that somehow it might be indicated to those of sluggish
mind, unless we use some word in common speech?
But what can be found anywhere in the world
nearer to a total formlessness than the earth and the abyss?
Because of their being on the lowest level, they
are less beautiful than are the other and higher parts, all
translucent and shining. Therefore, why may I not
consider the formlessness of matter -- which thou didst create
without shapely form, from which to make this shapely world -- as
fittingly indicated to men by the phrase, "The earth invisible and
unformed"?
CHAPTER V
5. When our thought seeks something for
our sense to fasten to [in this concept of unformed matter], and
when it says to itself, "It is not an intelligible form, such as
life or justice, since it is the material for bodies; and it is not
a former perception, for there is nothing in the invisible and
unformed which can be seen and felt" -- while human thought says
such things to itself, it may be attempting either to know by being
ignorant or by knowing how not to know.
CHAPTER VI
6. But if, O Lord, I am to confess to
thee, by my mouth and my pen, the whole of what thou hast taught me
concerning this unformed matter, I must say first of all that when
I first heard of such matter and did not understand it -- and those
who told me of it could not understand it either -- I conceived of
it as having countless and varied forms. Thus, I
did not think about it rightly. My mind in its
agitation used to turn up all sorts of foul and horrible "forms";
but still they were "forms." And still I called it formless, not
because it was unformed, but because it had what seemed to me a
kind of form that my mind turned away from, as bizarre and
incongruous, before which my human weakness was confused.
And even what I did conceive of as unformed was
so, not because it was deprived of all form, but only as it
compared with more beautiful forms. Right reason,
then, persuaded me that I ought to remove altogether all vestiges
of form whatever if I
wished to conceive matter that was wholly unformed; and this
I
could not do. For I could more readily
imagine that what was deprived of all form simply did not exist
than I could conceive of anything between form and nothing --
something which was neither formed nor nothing, something that was
unformed and nearly nothing.
Thus my mind ceased to question my spirit -- filled as it
was with the images of formed bodies, changing and varying them
according to its will. And so I applied myself to
the bodies themselves and looked more deeply into their mutability,
by which they cease to be what they had been and begin to be what
they were not. This transition from form to form
I had regarded as involving something like a formless condition,
though not actual nothingness.[462]
But I desired to know, not to guess. And,
if my voice and my pen were to confess to thee all the various
knots thou hast untied for me about this question, who among my
readers could endure to grasp the whole of the account?
Still, despite this, my heart will not cease to
give honor to thee or to sing thy praises concerning those things
which it is not able to express.[463]
For the mutability of mutable things carries with it the
possibility of all those forms into which mutable things can be
changed. But this mutability -- what is it?
Is it soul? Is it body?
Is it the external appearance of soul or body?
Could it be said, "Nothing was something," and
"That which is, is not"? If this were possible, I
would say that this was it, and in some such manner it must have
been in order to receive these visible and composite
forms.[464]
CHAPTER VII
7. Whence and how was this, unless it came
from thee, from whom all things are, in so far as they are?
But the farther something is from thee, the more
unlike thee it is -- and this is not a matter of distance or
place.
Thus it was that thou, O Lord, who art not one thing in one
place and another thing in another place but the Selfsame, and the
Selfsame, and the Selfsame -- "Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God
Almighty"[465] -- thus it was that in the beginning, and through
thy Wisdom which is from thee and born of thy substance, thou didst
create something and that out of nothing.[466]
For thou didst create the heaven and the earth --
not out of thyself, for then they would be equal to thy only Son
and thereby to thee. And there is no sense in
which it would be right that anything should be equal to thee that
was not of thee. But what else besides thee was
there out of which thou mightest create these things, O God, one
Trinity, and trine Unity?[467] And, therefore, it
was out of nothing at all that thou didst create the heaven and
earth --
something great and something small -- for thou art Almighty
and Good, and able to make all things good: even the great heaven
and the small earth. Thou wast, and there was
nothing else from which thou didst create heaven and earth: these
two things, one near thee, the other near to nothing; the one to
which only thou art superior, the other to which nothing else is
inferior.
CHAPTER VIII
8. That heaven of heavens was thine, O
Lord, but the earth which thou didst give to the sons of men to be
seen and touched was not then in the same form as that in which we
now see it and touch it. For then it was
invisible and unformed and there was an abyss over which there was
no light. The darkness was truly _over_ the
abyss, that is, more than just _in_ the abyss.
For this abyss of waters which now is visible has
even in its depths a certain light appropriate to its nature,
perceptible in some fashion to fishes and the things that creep
about on the bottom of it. But then the entire
abyss was almost nothing, since it was still altogether unformed.
Yet even there, there was something that had the
possibility of being formed. For thou, O Lord,
hadst made the world out of unformed matter, and this thou didst
make out of nothing and didst make it into almost nothing.
From it thou hast then made these great things
which we, the sons of men, marvel at. For this
corporeal heaven is truly marvelous, this firmament between the
water and the waters which thou didst make on the second day after
the creation of light, saying, "Let it be done," and it was
done.[468] This firmament thou didst call heaven,
that is, the heaven of this earth and sea which thou madest on the
third day, giving a visible shape to the unformed matter which thou
hadst made before all the days. For even before
any day thou hadst already made a heaven, but that was the heaven
of this heaven: for in the beginning thou hadst made heaven and
earth.
But this earth itself which thou hadst made was unformed
matter; it was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the
abyss. Out of this invisible and unformed earth,
out of this formlessness which is almost nothing, thou didst then
make all these things of which the changeable world consists -- and
yet does not fully consist in itself[469] -- for its very
changeableness appears in this, that its times and seasons can be
observed and numbered. The periods of time are
measured by the changes of things, while the forms, whose matter is
the invisible earth of which we have spoken, are varied and
altered.
CHAPTER IX
9. And therefore the Spirit, the Teacher
of thy servant,[470] when he mentions that "in the beginning thou
madest heaven and earth," says nothing about times and is silent as
to the days. For, clearly, that heaven of heavens
which thou didst create in the beginning is in some way an
intellectual creature, although in no way coeternal with thee, O
Trinity. Yet it is nonetheless a partaker in thy
eternity. Because of the sweetness of its most
happy contemplation of thee, it is greatly restrained in its own
mutability and cleaves to thee without any lapse from the time in
which it was created, surpassing all the rolling change of time.
But this shapelessness -- this earth invisible
and unformed -- was not numbered among the days itself.
For where there is no shape or order there is
nothing that either comes or goes, and where this does not occur
there certainly are no days, nor any vicissitude of duration.
CHAPTER X
10. O Truth, O Light of my heart, let not
my own darkness speak to me! I had fallen into
that darkness and was darkened thereby. But in
it, even in its depths, I came to love thee.
I
went astray and still I remembered thee. I
heard thy voice behind me, bidding me return, though I could
scarcely hear it for the tumults of my boisterous passions.
And now, behold, I am returning, burning and
thirsting after thy fountain. Let no one hinder
me; here will I drink and so have life. Let me
not be my own life; for of myself I have lived badly.
I was death to myself; in thee I have revived.
Speak to me; converse with me.
I
have believed thy books, and their words are very
deep.
CHAPTER XI
11. Thou hast told me already, O Lord,
with a strong voice in my inner ear, that thou art eternal and
alone hast immortality.
Thou art not changed by any shape or motion, and thy will is
not altered by temporal process, because no will that changes is
immortal. This is clear to me, in thy sight; let
it become clearer and clearer, I beseech thee. In
that light let me abide soberly under thy wings.
Thou hast also told me, O Lord, with a strong voice in my
inner ear, that thou hast created all natures and all substances,
which are not what thou art thyself; and yet they do exist.
Only that which is nothing at all is not from
thee, and that motion of the will away from thee, who art, toward
something that exists only in a lesser degree -- such a motion is
an offense and a sin.
No one's sin either hurts thee or disturbs the order of thy
rule, either first or last. All this, in thy
sight, is clear to me.
Let it become clearer and clearer, I beseech thee, and in
that light let me abide soberly under thy wings.
12. Likewise, thou hast told me, with a
strong voice in my inner ear, that this creation -- whose delight
thou alone art --
is not coeternal with thee. With a most
persevering purity it draws its support from thee and nowhere and
never betrays its own mutability, for thou art ever present with
it; and it cleaves to thee with its entire affection, having no
future to expect and no past that it remembers; it is varied by no
change and is extended by no time.
O blessed one -- if such there be -- clinging to thy
blessedness! It is blest in thee, its everlasting
Inhabitant and its Light. I cannot find a term
that I would judge more fitting for "the heaven of the heavens of
the Lord" than "Thy house" --
which contemplates thy delights without any declination
toward anything else and which, with a pure mind in most harmonious
stability, joins all together in the peace of those saintly spirits
who are citizens of thy city in those heavens that are above this
visible heaven.
13. From this let the soul that has
wandered far away from thee understand -- if now it thirsts for
thee; if now its tears have become its bread, while daily they say
to it, "Where is your God?"[471]; if now it requests of thee just
one thing and seeks after this: that it may dwell in thy house all
the days of its life (and what is its life but thee?
And what are thy days but thy eternity, like thy
years which do not fail, since thou art the Selfsame?) -- from
this, I say, let the soul understand (as far as it can) how far
above all times thou art in thy eternity; and how thy house has
never wandered away from thee; and, although it is not coeternal
with thee, it continually and unfailingly clings to thee and
suffers no vicissitudes of time. This, in thy
sight, is clear to me; may it become clearer and clearer to me, I
beseech thee, and in this light may I abide soberly under thy
wings.
14. Now I do not know what kind of
formlessness there is in these mutations of these last and lowest
creatures. Yet who will tell me, unless it is
someone who, in the emptiness of his own heart, wanders about and
begins to be dizzy in his own fancies?
Who except such a one would tell me whether, if all form
were diminished and consumed, formlessness alone would remain,
through which a thing was changed and turned from one species into
another, so that sheer formlessness would then be characterized by
temporal change? And surely this could not be,
because without motion there is no time, and where there is no form
there is no change.
CHAPTER XII
15. These things I have considered as thou
hast given me ability, O my God, as thou hast excited me to knock,
and as thou hast opened to me when I knock. Two
things I find which thou hast made, not within intervals of time,
although neither is coeternal with thee. One of
them is so formed that, without any wavering in its contemplation,
without any interval of change -- mutable but not changed -- it may
fully enjoy thy eternity and immutability.
The other is so formless that it could not change from one
form to another (either of motion or of rest), and so time has no
hold upon it. But thou didst not leave this
formless, for, before any "day" in the beginning, thou didst create
heaven and earth --
these are the two things of which I spoke.
But "the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was
over the abyss." By these words its formlessness is indicated to us
-- so that by degrees they may be led forward who cannot wholly
conceive of the privation of all form without arriving at
nothing.
From this formlessness a second heaven might be created and
a second earth -- visible and well formed, with the ordered beauty
of the waters, and whatever else is recorded as created (though not
without days) in the formation of this world. And
all this because such things are so ordered that in them the
changes of time may take place through the ordered processes of
motion and form.
CHAPTER XIII
16. Meanwhile this is what I understand, O
my God, when I
hear thy Scripture saying, "In the beginning God made the
heaven and the earth, but the earth was invisible and unformed, and
darkness was over the abyss." It does not say on what day thou
didst create these things. Thus, for the time
being I understand that "heaven of heavens" to mean the
intelligible heaven, where to understand is to know all at once --
not "in part," not "darkly,"
not "through a glass" -- but as a simultaneous whole, in
full sight, "face to face."[472] It is not this
thing now and then another thing, but (as we said) knowledge all at
once without any temporal change. And by the
invisible and unformed earth, I
understand that which suffers no temporal vicissitude.
Temporal change customarily means having one
thing now and another later;
but where there is no form there can be no distinction
between this or that. It is, then, by means of
these two -- one thing well formed in the beginning and another
thing wholly unformed, the one heaven (that is, the heaven of
heavens) and the other one earth (but the earth invisible and
unformed) -- it is by means of these two notions that I am able to
understand why thy Scripture said, without mention of days, "In the
beginning God created the heaven and the earth." For it immediately
indicated which earth it was speaking about.
When, on the second day, the firmament is
recorded as having been created and called heaven, this suggests to
us which heaven it was that he was speaking about earlier, without
specifying a day.
CHAPTER XIV
17. Marvelous is the depth of thy oracles.
Their surface is before us, inviting the little
ones; and yet wonderful is their depth, O my God, marvelous is
their depth! It is a fearful thing to look into
them: an awe of honor and a tremor of love. Their
enemies I hate vehemently. Oh, if thou wouldst
slay them with thy two-edged sword, so that they should not be
enemies! For I would prefer that they should be
slain to themselves, that they might live to thee.
But see, there are others who are not critics but
praisers of the book of Genesis; they say: "The Spirit of God who
wrote these things by his servant Moses did not wish these words to
be understood like this. He did not wish to have
it understood as you say, but as we say." To them, O God of us all,
thyself being the judge, I give answer.
CHAPTER XV
18. "Will you say that these things are
false which Truth tells me, with a loud voice in my inner ear,
about the very eternity of the Creator: that his essence is changed
in no respect by time and that his will is not distinct from his
essence? Thus, he doth not will one thing now and
another thing later, but he willeth once and for all everything
that he willeth -- not again and again; and not now this and now
that. Nor does he will afterward what he did not
will before, nor does he cease to will what he had willed before.
Such a will would be mutable and no mutable thing
is eternal. But our God is eternal.
"Again, he tells me in my inner ear that the expectation of
future things is turned to sight when they have come to pass.
And this same sight is turned into memory when
they have passed.
Moreover, all thought that varies thus is mutable, and
nothing mutable is eternal. But our God is
eternal." These things I sum up and put together, and I conclude
that my God, the eternal God, hath not made any creature by any new
will, and his knowledge does not admit anything transitory.
19. "What, then, will you say to this, you
objectors? Are these things false?"
"No," they say. "What then?
Is it false that every entity already formed and
all matter capable of receiving form is from him alone who is
supremely good, because he is supreme?" "We do
not deny this, either," they say. "What then?
Do you deny this: that there is a certain sublime
created order which cleaves with such a chaste love to the true and
truly eternal God that, although it is not coeternal with him, yet
it does not separate itself from him, and does not flow away into
any mutation of change or process but abides in true contemplation
of him alone?" If thou, O God, dost show thyself
to him who loves thee as thou hast commanded -- and art sufficient
for him -- then, such a one will neither turn himself away from
thee nor turn away toward himself. This is "the
house of God." It is not an earthly house and it is not made from
any celestial matter; but it is a spiritual house, and it partakes
in thy eternity because it is without blemish forever.
For thou hast made it steadfast forever and ever;
thou hast given it a law which will not be removed.
Still, it is not coeternal with thee, O God, since it is not
without beginning -- it was created.
20. For, although we can find no time
before it (for wisdom was created before all things),[473] this is
certainly not that Wisdom which is absolutely coeternal and equal
with thee, our God, its Father, the Wisdom through whom all things
were created and in whom, in the beginning, thou didst create the
heaven and earth.
This is truly the created Wisdom, namely, the intelligible
nature which, in its contemplation of light, is light.
For this is also called wisdom, even if it is a
created wisdom. But the difference between the
Light that lightens and that which is enlightened is as great as is
the difference between the Wisdom that creates and that which is
created. So also is the difference between the
Righteousness that justifies and the righteousness that is made by
justification. For we also are called thy
righteousness, for a certain servant of thine says, "That we might
be made the righteousness of God in him."[474]
Therefore, there is a certain created wisdom that
was created before all things: the rational and intelligible mind
of that chaste city of thine. It is our mother
which is above and is free[475] and "eternal in the heavens"[476]
-- but in what heavens except those which praise thee, the "heaven
of heavens"? This also is the "heaven of heavens"
which is the Lord's -- although we find no time before it, since
what has been created before all things also precedes the creation
of time. Still, the eternity of the Creator
himself is before it, from whom it took its beginning as created,
though not in time (since time as yet was not), even though time
belongs to its created nature.
21. Thus it is that the intelligible
heaven came to be from thee, our God, but in such a way that it is
quite another being than thou art; it is not the Selfsame.
Yet we find that time is not only not _before_
it, but not even _in_ it, thus making it able to behold thy face
forever and not ever be turned aside.
Thus, it is varied by no change at all.
But there is still in it that mutability in
virtue of which it could become dark and cold, if it did not, by
cleaving to thee with a supernal love, shine and glow from thee
like a perpetual noon. O house full of light and
splendor! "I have loved your beauty and the place
of the habitation of the glory of my Lord,"[477] your builder and
possessor. In my wandering let me sigh for you;
this I ask of him who made you, that he should also possess me in
you, seeing that he hath also made me. "I have
gone astray like a lost sheep[478];
yet upon the shoulders of my Shepherd, who is your builder,
I have hoped that I may be brought back to you."[479]
22. "What will you say to me now, you
objectors to whom I
spoke, who still believe that Moses was the holy servant of
God, and that his books were the oracles of the Holy Spirit?
Is it not in this 'house of God' -- not coeternal
with God, yet in its own mode 'eternal in the heavens' -- that you
vainly seek for temporal change? You will not
find it there. It rises above all extension and
every revolving temporal period, and it rises to what is forever
good and cleaves fast to God."
"It is so," they reply. "What, then, about
those things which my heart cried out to my God, when it heard,
within, the voice of his praise? What, then, do
you contend is false in them?
Is it because matter was unformed, and since there was no
form there was no order? But where there was no
order there could have been no temporal change.
Yet even this 'almost nothing,' since it was not
altogether nothing, was truly from him from whom everything that
exists is in whatever state it is." "This also,"
they say, "we do not deny."
CHAPTER XVI
23. Now, I would like to discuss a little
further, in thy presence, O my God, with those who admit that all
these things are true that thy Truth has indicated to my mind.
Let those who deny these things bark and drown
their own voices with as much clamor as they please.
I will endeavor to persuade them to be quiet and
to permit thy word to reach them. But if they are
unwilling, and if they repel me, I ask of thee, O my God, that thou
shouldst not be silent to me.[480] Speak truly in
my heart; if only thou wouldst speak thus, I would send them away,
blowing up the dust and raising it in their own eyes.
As for myself I will enter into my closet[481]
and there sing to thee the songs of love, groaning with groanings
that are unutterable now in my pilgrimage,[482] and remembering
Jerusalem with my heart uplifted to Jerusalem my country, Jerusalem
my mother[483]; and to thee thyself, the Ruler of the source of
Light, its Father, Guardian, Husband; its chaste and strong
delight, its solid joy and all its goods ineffable --
and all of this at the same time, since thou art the one
supreme and true Good! And I will not be turned
away until thou hast brought back together all that I am from this
dispersion and deformity to the peace of that dearest mother, where
the first fruits of my spirit are to be found and from which all
these things are promised me which thou dost conform and confirm
forever, O my God, my Mercy. But as for those who
do not say that all these things which are true are false, who
still honor thy Scripture set before us by the holy Moses, who join
us in placing it on the summit of authority for us to follow, and
yet who oppose us in some particulars, I say this: "Be thou, O God,
the judge between my confessions and their gainsaying."
CHAPTER XVII
24. For they say: "Even if these things
are true, still Moses did not refer to these two things when he
said, by divine revelation, 'In the beginning God created the
heaven and the earth.' By the term 'heaven' he did not mean that
spiritual or intelligible created order which always beholds the
face of God.
And by the term 'earth' he was not referring to unformed
matter."
"What then do these terms mean?"
They reply, "That man [Moses] meant what we mean; this is
what he was saying in those terms." "What is that?"
"By the terms of heaven and earth," they say, "he wished
first to indicate universally and briefly this whole visible world;
then after this, by an enumeration of the days, he could point out,
one by one, all the things that it has pleased the Holy Spirit to
reveal in this way. For the people to whom he
spoke were rude and carnal, so that he judged it prudent that only
those works of God which were visible should be mentioned to
them."
But they do agree that the phrases, "The earth was invisible
and unformed," and "The darkened abyss," may not inappropriately be
understood to refer to this unformed matter -- and that out of
this, as it is subsequently related, all the visible things which
are known to all were made and set in order during those specified
"days."
25. But now, what if another one should
say, "This same formlessness and chaos of matter was first
mentioned by the name of heaven and earth because, out of it, this
visible world -- with all its entities which clearly appear in it
and which we are accustomed to be called by the name of heaven and
earth -- was created and perfected"? And what if
still another should say:
"The invisible and visible nature is quite fittingly called
heaven and earth. Thus, the whole creation which
God has made in his wisdom -- that is, in the beginning -- was
included under these two terms. Yet, since all
things have been made, not from the essence of God, but from
nothing; and because they are not the same reality that God is; and
because there is in them all a certain mutability, whether they
abide as the eternal house of God abides or whether they are
changed as the soul and body of man are changed -- then the common
matter of all things invisible and visible (still formless but
capable of receiving form) from which heaven and earth were to be
created (that is, the creature already fashioned, invisible as well
as visible) -- all this was spoken of in the same terms by which
the invisible and unformed earth and the darkness over the abyss
would be called. There was this difference,
however: that the invisible and unformed earth is to be understood
as having corporeal matter before it had any manner of form; but
the darkness over the abyss was _spiritual_ matter, before its
unlimited fluidity was harnessed, and before it was enlightened by
Wisdom."
26. And if anyone wished, he might also
say, "The entities already perfected and formed, invisible and
visible, are not signified by the terms 'heaven and earth,' when it
reads, 'In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth';
instead, the unformed beginning of things, the matter capable of
receiving form and being made was called by these terms -- because
the chaos was contained in it and was not yet distinguished by
qualities and forms, which have now been arranged in their own
orders and are called heaven and earth: the former a spiritual
creation, the latter a physical creation."
CHAPTER XVIII
27. When all these things have been said
and considered, I
am unwilling to contend about words, for such contention is
profitable for nothing but the subverting of the hearer.[484]
But the law is profitable for edification if a
man use it lawfully:
for the end of the law "is love out of a pure heart, and a
good conscience, and faith unfeigned."[485] And
our Master knew it well, for it was on these two commandments that
he hung all the Law and the Prophets. And how
would it harm me, O my God, thou Light of my eyes in secret, if
while I am ardently confessing these things -- since many different
things may be understood from these words, all of which may be true
-- what harm would be done if I should interpret the meaning of the
sacred writer differently from the way some other man interprets?
Indeed, all of us who read are trying to trace
out and understand what our author wished to convey; and since we
believe that he speaks truly we dare not suppose that he has spoken
anything that we either know or suppose to be false.
Therefore, since every person tries to understand
in the Holy Scripture what the writer understood, what harm is done
if a man understands what thou, the Light of all truth-speaking
minds, showest him to be true, although the author he reads did not
understand this aspect of the truth even though he did understand
the truth in a different meaning?[486]
CHAPTER XIX[487]
28. For it is certainly true, O Lord, that
thou didst create the heaven and the earth. It is
also true that "the beginning" is thy wisdom in which thou didst
create all things. It is likewise true that this
visible world has its own great division (the heaven and the earth)
and these two terms include all entities that have been made and
created. It is further true that everything
mutable confronts our minds with a certain lack of form, whereby it
receives form, or whereby it is capable of taking form.
It is true, yet again, that what cleaves to the
changeless form so closely that even though it is mutable it is not
changed is not subject to temporal process. It is
true that the formlessness which is almost nothing cannot have
temporal change in it. It is true that that from
which something is made can, in a manner of speaking, be called by
the same name as the thing that is made from it.
Thus that formlessness of which heaven and earth
were made might be called "heaven and earth." It is true that of
all things having form nothing is nearer to the unformed than the
earth and the abyss. It is true that not only
every created and formed thing but also everything capable of
creation and of form were created by Thee, from whom all things
are.[488] It is true, finally, that everything
that is formed from what is formless was formless before it was
formed.
CHAPTER XX
29. From all these truths, which are not
doubted by those to whom thou hast granted insight in such things
in their inner eye and who believe unshakably that thy servant
Moses spoke in the spirit of truth -- from all these truths, then,
one man takes the sense of "In the beginning God created the heaven
and the earth"
to mean, "In his Word, coeternal with himself, God made both
the intelligible and the tangible, the spiritual and the corporeal
creation." Another takes it in a different sense, that "In the
beginning God created the heaven and the earth" means, "In his
Word, coeternal with himself, God made the universal mass of this
corporeal world, with all the observable and known entities that it
contains." Still another finds a different meaning, that "In the
beginning God created the heaven and the earth" means, "In his
Word, coeternal with himself, God made the unformed matter of the
spiritual and corporeal creation." Another can take the sense that
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" means, "In
his Word, coeternal with himself, God made the unformed matter of
the physical creation, in which heaven and earth were as yet
indistinguished; but now that they have come to be separated and
formed, we can now perceive them both in the mighty mass of this
world."[489] Another takes still a further
meaning, that "In the beginning God created heaven and earth"
means, "In the very beginning of creating and working, God made
that unformed matter which contained, undifferentiated, heaven and
earth, from which both of them were formed, and both now stand out
and are observable with all the things that are in them."
CHAPTER XXI
30. Again, regarding the interpretation of
the following words, one man selects for himself, from all the
various truths, the interpretation that "the earth was invisible
and unformed and darkness was over the abyss" means, "That
corporeal entity which God made was as yet the formless matter of
physical things without order and without light." Another takes it
in a different sense, that "But the earth was invisible and
unformed, and darkness was over the abyss" means, "This totality
called heaven and earth was as yet unformed and lightless matter,
out of which the corporeal heaven and the corporeal earth were to
be made, with all the things in them that are known to our physical
senses." Another takes it still differently and says that "But the
earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness was over the abyss"
means, "This totality called heaven and earth was as yet an
unformed and lightless matter, from which were to be made that
intelligible heaven (which is also called 'the heaven of heavens')
and the earth (which refers to the whole physical entity, under
which term may be included this corporeal heaven) -- that is, He
made the intelligible heaven from which every invisible and visible
creature would be created." He takes it in yet another sense who
says that "But the earth was invisible and unformed, and darkness
was over the abyss" means, "The Scripture does not refer to that
formlessness by the term 'heaven and earth'; that formlessness
itself already existed. This it called the
invisible 'earth' and the unformed and lightless 'abyss,' from
which -- as it had said before -- God made the heaven and the earth
(namely, the spiritual and the corporeal creation)." Still another
says that "But the earth was invisible and formless, and darkness
was over the abyss"
means, "There was already an unformed matter from which, as
the Scripture had already said, God made heaven and earth, namely,
the entire corporeal mass of the world, divided into two very great
parts, one superior, the other inferior, with all those familiar
and known creatures that are in them."
CHAPTER XXII
31. Now suppose that someone tried to
argue against these last two opinions as follows: "If you will not
admit that this formlessness of matter appears to be called by the
term 'heaven and earth,' then there was something that God had not
made out of which he did make heaven and earth.
And Scripture has not told us that God made
_this_ matter, unless we understand that it is implied in the term
'heaven and earth' (or the term 'earth' alone)
when it is said, 'In the beginning God created the heaven
and earth.' Thus, in what follows -- 'the earth was invisible and
unformed' -- even though it pleased Moses thus to refer to unformed
matter, yet we can only understand by it that which God himself
hath made, as it stands written in the previous verse, 'God made
heaven and earth.'" Those who maintain either one or the other of
these two opinions which we have set out above will answer to such
objections: "We do not deny at all that this unformed matter was
created by God, from whom all things are, and are very good --
because we hold that what is created and endowed with form is a
higher good; and we also hold that what is made capable of being
created and endowed with form, though it is a lesser good, is still
a good. But the Scripture has not said
specifically that God made this formlessness -- any more than it
has said it specifically of many other things, such as the orders
of 'cherubim' and 'seraphim' and those others of which the apostle
distinctly speaks: 'thrones,' 'dominions,' 'principalities,'
'powers'[490] -- yet it is clear that God made all of these.
If in the phrase 'He made heaven and earth' all
things are included, what are we to say about the waters upon which
the Spirit of God moved? For if they are
understood as included in the term 'earth,' then how can unformed
matter be meant by the term 'earth'
when we see the waters so beautifully formed?
Or, if it be taken thus, why, then, is it written
that out of the same formlessness the firmament was made and called
heaven, and yet is it not specifically written that the waters were
made? For these waters, which we perceive flowing
in so beautiful a fashion, are not formless and invisible.
But if they received that beauty at the time God
said of them, 'Let the waters which are under the firmament be
gathered together,'[491] thus indicating that their gathering
together was the same thing as their reception of form, what, then,
is to be said about the waters that are _above_ the firmament?
Because if they are unformed, they do not deserve
to have a seat so honorable, and yet it is not written by what
specific word they were formed. If, then, Genesis
is silent about anything that God hath made, which neither sound
faith nor unerring understanding doubts that God hath made, let not
any sober teaching dare to say that these waters were coeternal
with God because we find them mentioned in the book of Genesis and
do not find it mentioned when they were created.
If Truth instructs us, why may we not interpret
that unformed matter which the Scripture calls the earth --
invisible and unformed -- and the lightless abyss as having been
made by God from nothing; and thus understand that they are not
coeternal with him, although the narrative fails to tell us
precisely when they were made?"
CHAPTER XXIII
32. I have heard and considered these
theories as well as my weak apprehension allows, and I confess my
weakness to Thee, O
Lord, though already thou knowest it. Thus
I see that two sorts of disagreements may arise when anything is
related by signs, even by trustworthy reporters.
There is one disagreement about the truth of the
things involved; the other concerns the meaning of the one who
reports them. It is one thing to inquire as to
what is true about the formation of the Creation.
It is another thing, however, to ask what that
excellent servant of thy faith, Moses, would have wished for the
reader and hearer to understand from these words.
As for the first question, let all those depart
from me who imagine that Moses spoke things that are false.
But let me be united with them in thee, O Lord,
and delight myself in thee with those who feed on thy truth in the
bond of love. Let us approach together the words
of thy book and make diligent inquiry in them for thy meaning
through the meaning of thy servant by whose pen thou hast given
them to us.
CHAPTER XXIV
33. But in the midst of so many truths
which occur to the interpreters of these words (understood as they
can be in different ways), which one of us can discover that single
interpretation which warrants our saying confidently that Moses
thought _thus_ and that in this narrative he wishes _this_ to be
understood, as confidently as he would say that _this_ is true,
whether Moses thought the one or the other. For
see, O my God, I
am thy servant, and I have vowed in this book an offering of
confession to thee,[492] and I beseech thee that by thy mercy
I
may pay my vow to thee. Now, see, could I
assert that Moses meant nothing else than _this_ [i.e., my
interpretation] when he wrote, "In the beginning God created the
heaven and the earth," as confidently as I can assert that thou in
thy immutable Word hast created all things, invisible and visible?
No, I cannot do this because it is not as clear
to me that _this_ was in his mind when he wrote these things, as I
see it to be certain in thy truth.
For his thoughts might be set upon the very beginning of the
creation when he said, "In the beginning"; and he might have wished
it understood that, in this passage, "heaven and earth"
refers to no formed and perfect entity, whether spiritual or
corporeal, but each of them only newly begun and still
formless.
Whichever of these possibilities has been mentioned I can
see that it might have been said truly. But which
of them he did actually intend to express in these words I do not
clearly see. However, whether it was one of these
or some other meaning which I have not mentioned that this great
man saw in his mind when he used these words I have no doubt
whatever that he saw it truly and expressed it suitably.
CHAPTER XXV
34. Let no man fret me now by saying,
"Moses did not mean what _you_ say, but what _I_ say." Now if he
asks me, "How do you know that Moses meant what you deduce from his
words?", I ought to respond calmly and reply as I have already
done, or even more fully if he happens to be untrained.
But when he says, "Moses did not mean what _you_
say, but what _I_ say," and then does not deny what either of us
says but allows that _both_ are true -- then, O
my God, life of the poor, in whose breast there is no
contradiction, pour thy soothing balm into my heart that I may
patiently bear with people who talk like this! It
is not because they are godly men and have seen in the heart of thy
servant what they say, but rather they are proud men and have not
considered Moses' meaning, but only love their own -- not because
it is true but because it is their own. Otherwise
they could equally love another true opinion, as I love what they
say when what they speak is true -- not because it is theirs but
because it is true, and therefore not theirs but true.
And if they love an opinion because it is true,
it becomes both theirs and mine, since it is the common property of
all lovers of the truth.[493] But I
neither accept nor approve of it when they contend that
Moses did not mean what I say but what they say -- and this
because, even if it were so, such rashness is born not of
knowledge, but of impudence. It comes not from
vision but from vanity.
And therefore, O Lord, thy judgments should be held in awe,
because thy truth is neither mine nor his nor anyone else's; but it
belongs to all of us whom thou hast openly called to have it in
common; and thou hast warned us not to hold on to it as our own
special property, for if we do we lose it. For if
anyone arrogates to himself what thou hast bestowed on all to
enjoy, and if he desires something for his own that belongs to all,
he is forced away from what is common to all to what is, indeed,
his very own -- that is, from truth to falsehood.
For he who tells a lie speaks of his own
thought.[494]
35. Hear, O God, best judge of all!
O Truth itself, hear what I say to this
disputant. Hear it, because I say it in thy
presence and before my brethren who use the law rightly to the end
of love. Hear and give heed to what I shall say
to him, if it pleases thee.
For I would return this brotherly and peaceful word to
him:
"If we both see that what you say is true, and if we both
say that what I say is true, where is it, I ask you, that we see
this?
Certainly, I do not see it in you, and you do not see it in
me, but both of us see it in the unchangeable truth itself, which
is above our minds."[495] If, then, we do not
disagree about the true light of the Lord our God, why do we
disagree about the thoughts of our neighbor, which we cannot see as
clearly as the immutable Truth is seen? If Moses
himself had appeared to us and said, "This is what I meant," it
would not be in order that we should see it but that we should
believe him. Let us not, then, "go beyond what is
written and be puffed up for the one against the other."[496]
Let us, instead, "love the Lord our God with all
our heart, with all our soul, and with all our mind, and our
neighbor as ourself."[497] Unless we believe that
whatever Moses meant in these books he meant to be ordered by these
two precepts of love, we shall make God a liar, if we judge of the
soul of his servant in any other way than as he has taught us.
See now, how foolish it is, in the face of so
great an abundance of true opinions which can be elicited from
these words, rashly to affirm that Moses especially intended only
one of these interpretations;
and then, with destructive contention, to violate love
itself, on behalf of which he had said all the things we are
endeavoring to explain!
CHAPTER XXVI
36. And yet, O my God, thou exaltation of
my humility and rest of my toil, who hearest my confessions and
forgivest my sins, since thou commandest me to love my neighbor as
myself, I cannot believe that thou gavest thy most faithful servant
Moses a lesser gift than I should wish and desire for myself from
thee, if I had been born in his time, and if thou hadst placed me
in the position where, by the use of my heart and my tongue, those
books might be produced which so long after were to profit all
nations throughout the whole world -- from such a great pinnacle of
authority -- and were to surmount the words of all false and proud
teachings. If I
had been Moses -- and we all come from the same mass,[498]
and what is man that thou art mindful of him?[499] -- if I had been
Moses at the time that he was, and if I had been ordered by thee to
write the book of Genesis, I would surely have wished for such a
power of expression and such an art of arrangement to be given me,
that those who cannot as yet understand _how_ God createth would
still not reject my words as surpassing their powers of
understanding. And I would have wished that those
who are already able to do this would find fully contained in the
laconic speech of thy servant whatever truths they had arrived at
in their own thought; and if, in the light of the Truth, some other
man saw some further meaning, that too would be found congruent to
my words.
CHAPTER XXVII
37. For just as a spring dammed up is more
plentiful and affords a larger supply of water for more streams
over wider fields than any single stream led off from the same
spring over a long course -- so also is the narration of thy
minister: it is intended to benefit many who are likely to
discourse about it and, with an economy of language, it overflows
into various streams of clear truth, from which each one may draw
out for himself that particular truth which he can about these
topics -- this one that truth, that one another truth, by the
broader survey of various interpretations. For
some people, when they read or hear these words,[500] think that
God, like some sort of man or like some sort of huge body, by some
new and sudden decision, produced outside himself and at a certain
distance two great bodies: one above, the other below, within which
all created things were to be contained. And when
they hear, "God said, 'Let such and such be done,' and it was
done," they think of words begun and ended, sounding in time and
then passing away, followed by the coming into being of what was
commanded. They think of other things of the same
sort which their familiarity with the world suggests to them.
In these people, who are still little children and whose
weakness is borne up by this humble language as if on a mother's
breast, their faith is built up healthfully and they come to
possess and to hold as certain the conviction that God made all
entities that their senses perceive all around them in such
marvelous variety. And if one despises these
words as if they were trivial, and with proud weakness stretches
himself beyond his fostering cradle, he will, alas, fall away
wretchedly. Have pity, O Lord God, lest those who
pass by trample on the unfledged bird,[501] and send thy angel who
may restore it to its nest, that it may live until it can
fly.
CHAPTER XXVIII
38. But others, to whom these words are no
longer a nest but, rather, a shady thicket, spy the fruits
concealed in them and fly around rejoicing and search among them
and pluck them with cheerful chirpings: For when they read or hear
these words, O God, they see that all times past and times future
are transcended by thy eternal and stable permanence, and they see
also that there is no temporal creature that is not of thy making.
By thy will, since it is the same as thy being,
thou hast created all things, not by any mutation of will and not
by any will that previously was nonexistent -- and not out of
thyself, but in thy own likeness, thou didst make from nothing the
form of all things.
This was an unlikeness which was capable of being formed by
thy likeness through its relation to thee, the One, as each thing
has been given form appropriate to its kind according to its
preordained capacity. Thus, all things were made
very good, whether they remain around thee or whether, removed in
time and place by various degrees, they cause or undergo the
beautiful changes of natural process.
They see these things and they rejoice in the light of thy
truth to whatever degree they can.
39. Again, one of these men[502] directs
his attention to the verse, "In the beginning God made the heaven
and the earth,"
and he beholds Wisdom as the true "beginning," because it
also speaks to us. Another man directs his
attention to the same words, and by "beginning" he understands
simply the commencement of creation, and interprets it thus: "In
the beginning he made,"
as if it were the same thing as to say, "At the first
moment, God made . . ." And among those who
interpret "In the beginning" to mean that in thy wisdom thou hast
created the heaven and earth, one believes that the matter out of
which heaven and earth were to be created is what is referred to by
the phrase "heaven and earth." But another believes that these
entities were already formed and distinct. Still
another will understand it to refer to one formed entity -- a
spiritual one, designated by the term "heaven" -- and to another
unformed entity of corporeal matter, designated by the term
"earth." But those who understand the phrase "heaven and earth" to
mean the yet unformed matter from which the heaven and the earth
were to be formed do not take it in a simple sense: one man regards
it as that from which the intelligible and tangible creations are
both produced; and another only as that from which the tangible,
corporeal world is produced, containing in its vast bosom these
visible and observable entities. Nor are they in
simple accord who believe that "heaven and earth" refers to the
created things already set in order and arranged.
One believes that it refers to the invisible and
visible world; another, only to the visible world, in which we
admire the luminous heavens and the darkened earth and all the
things that they contain.
CHAPTER XXIX
40. But he who understands "In the
beginning he made" as if it meant, "At first he made," can truly
interpret the phrase "heaven and earth" as referring only to the
"matter" of heaven and earth, namely, of the prior universal, which
is the intelligible and corporeal creation. For
if he would try to interpret the phrase as applying to the universe
already formed, it then might rightly be asked of him, "If God
first made this, what then did he do afterward?"
And, after the universe, he will find
nothing.
But then he must, however unwillingly, face the question,
How is this the first if there is nothing afterward?
But when he said that God made matter first
formless and then formed, he is not being absurd if he is able to
discern what precedes by eternity, and what proceeds in time; what
comes from choice, and what comes from origin. In
eternity, God is before all things; in the temporal process, the
flower is before the fruit; in the act of choice, the fruit is
before the flower; in the case of origin, sound is before the tune.
Of these four relations, the first and last that
I have referred to are understood with much difficulty.
The second and third are very easily understood.
For it is an uncommon and lofty vision, O Lord,
to behold thy eternity immutably making mutable things, and thereby
standing always before them. Whose mind is acute
enough to be able, without great labor, to discover how the sound
comes before the tune? For a tune is a formed
sound; and an unformed thing may exist, but a thing that does not
exist cannot be formed. In the same way, matter
is prior to what is made from it. It is not prior
because it makes its product, for it is itself made; and its
priority is not that of a time interval. For in
time we do not first utter formless sounds without singing and then
adapt or fashion them into the form of a song, as wood or silver
from which a chest or vessel is made. Such
materials precede in time the forms of the things which are made
from them. But in singing this is not so.
For when a song is sung, its sound is heard at the same
time.
There is not first a formless sound, which afterward is
formed into a song; but just as soon as it has sounded it passes
away, and you cannot find anything of it which you could gather up
and shape. Therefore, the song is absorbed in its
own sound and the "sound" of the song is its "matter." But the
sound is formed in order that it may be a tune.
This is why, as I was saying, the matter of the
sound is prior to the form of the tune. It is not
"before" in the sense that it has any power of making a sound or
tune. Nor is the sound itself the composer of the
tune; rather, the sound is sent forth from the body and is ordered
by the soul of the singer, so that from it he may form a tune.
Nor is the sound first in time, for it is given
forth together with the tune.
Nor is it first in choice, because a sound is no better than
a tune, since a tune is not merely a sound but a beautiful
sound.
But it is first in origin, because the tune is not formed in
order that it may become a sound, but the sound is formed in order
that it may become a tune.
From this example, let him who is able to understand see
that the matter of things was first made and was called "heaven and
earth" because out of it the heaven and earth were made.
This primal formlessness was not made first in
time, because the form of things gives rise to time; but now, in
time, it is intuited together with its form. And
yet nothing can be related of this unformed matter unless it is
regarded as if it were the first in the time series though the last
in value -- because things formed are certainly superior to things
unformed -- and it is preceded by the eternity of the Creator, so
that from nothing there might be made that from which something
might be made.
CHAPTER XXX
41. In this discord of true opinions let
Truth itself bring concord, and may our God have mercy on us all,
that we may use the law rightly to the end of the commandment which
is pure love.
Thus, if anyone asks me which of these opinions was the
meaning of thy servant Moses, these would not be my confessions did
I not confess to thee that I do not know. Yet I
do know that those opinions are true -- with the exception of the
carnal ones --
about which I have said what I thought was proper.
Yet those little ones of good hope are not
frightened by these words of thy Book, for they speak of high
things in a lowly way and of a few basic things in many varied
ways. But let all of us, whom I
acknowledge to see and speak the truth in these words, love
one another and also love thee, our God, O Fountain of Truth -- as
we will if we thirst not after vanity but for the Fountain of
Truth.
Indeed, let us so honor this servant of thine, the dispenser
of this Scripture, full of thy Spirit, so that we will believe that
when thou didst reveal thyself to him, and he wrote these things
down, he intended through them what will chiefly minister both for
the light of truth and to the increase of our fruitfulness.
CHAPTER XXXI
42. Thus, when one man says, "Moses meant
what I mean," and another says, "No, he meant what I do," I think
that I speak more faithfully when I say, "Why could he not have
meant both if both opinions are true?" And if
there should be still a third truth or a fourth one, and if anyone
should seek a truth quite different in those words, why would it
not be right to believe that Moses saw all these different truths,
since through him the one God has tempered the Holy Scriptures to
the understanding of many different people, who should see truths
in it even if they are different? Certainly --
and I say this fearlessly and from my heart -- if I were to write
anything on such a supreme authority, I would prefer to write it so
that, whatever of truth anyone might apprehend from the matter
under discussion, my words should re-
echo in the several minds rather than that they should set
down one true opinion so clearly on one point that I should exclude
the rest, even though they contained no falsehood that offended
me.
Therefore, I am unwilling, O my God, to be so headstrong as
not to believe that this man [Moses] has received at least this
much from thee. Surely when he was writing these
words, he saw fully and understood all the truth we have been able
to find in them, and also much besides that we have not been able
to discern, or are not yet able to find out, though it is there in
them still to be found.
CHAPTER XXXII
43. Finally, O Lord -- who art God and not
flesh and blood -- if any man sees anything less, can anything lie
hid from "thy good Spirit" who shall "lead me into the land of
uprightness,"[503] which thou thyself, through those words, wast
revealing to future readers, even though he through whom they were
spoken fixed on only one among the many interpretations that might
have been found? And if this is so, let it be
agreed that the meaning he saw is more exalted than the others.
But to us, O
Lord, either point out the same meaning or any other true
one, as it pleases thee. Thus, whether thou
makest known to us what thou madest known to that man of thine, or
some other meaning by the agency of the same words, still do thou
feed us and let error not deceive us. Behold, O
Lord, my God, how much we have written concerning these few words
-- how much, indeed! What strength of mind, what
length of time, would suffice for all thy books to be interpreted
in this fashion?[504] Allow me, therefore, in
these concluding words to confess more briefly to thee and select
some one, true, certain, and good sense that thou shalt inspire,
although many meanings offer themselves and many indeed are
possible.[505] This is the faith of my
confession, that if I
could say what thy servant meant, that is truest and best,
and for that I must strive. Yet if I do not
succeed, may it be that I
shall say at least what thy Truth wished to say to me
through its words, just as it said what it wished to Moses.
BOOK THIRTEEN
The mysteries and allegories of the days of creation.
Augustine undertakes to interpret Gen. 1:2-31 in a mystical
and allegorical fashion so as to exhibit the profundities of God's
power and wisdom and love. He is also interested
in developing his theories of hermeneutics on his favorite topic:
creation. He finds the Trinity in the account of
creation and he ponders the work of the Spirit moving over the
waters. In the firmament he finds the allegory of
Holy Scripture and in the dry land and bitter sea he finds the
division between the people of God and the conspiracy of the
unfaithful. He develops the theme of man's being
made in the image and likeness of God. He brings
his survey to a climax and his confessions to an end with a
meditation on the goodness of all creation and the promised rest
and blessedness of the eternal Sabbath, on which God, who is
eternal rest, "rested."
CHAPTER I
1. I call on thee, my God, my Mercy, who
madest me and didst not forget me, though I was forgetful of thee.
I call thee into my soul, which thou didst
prepare for thy reception by the desire which thou inspirest in it.
Do not forsake me when I call on thee, who didst
anticipate me before I called and who didst repeatedly urge with
manifold calling that I should hear thee afar off and be turned and
call upon thee, who callest me. For thou, O
Lord, hast blotted out all my evil deserts, not punishing me
for what my hands have done; and thou hast anticipated all my good
deserts so as to recompense me for what thy hands have done -- the
hands which made me. Before I was, thou wast, and
I was not anything at all that thou shouldst grant me being.
Yet, see how I
exist by reason of thy goodness, which made provision for
all that thou madest me to be and all that thou madest me from.
For thou didst not stand in need of me, nor am I
the kind of good entity which could be a help to thee, my Lord and
my God. It is not that I may serve thee as if
thou wert fatigued in working, or as if thy power would be the less
if it lacked my assistance. Nor is the service I
pay thee like the cultivation of a field, so that thou wouldst go
untended if I did not tend thee.[506] Instead, it
is that I may serve and worship thee to the end that I may have my
well-being from thee, from whom comes my capacity for
well-being.
CHAPTER II
2. Indeed, it is from the fullness of thy
goodness that thy creation exists at all: to the end that the
created good might not fail to be, even though it can profit thee
nothing, and is nothing of thee nor equal to thee -- since its
created existence comes from thee.
For what did the heaven and earth, which thou didst make in
the beginning, ever deserve from thee? Let them
declare -- these spiritual and corporeal entities, which thou
madest in thy wisdom -- let them declare what they merited at thy
hands, so that the inchoate and the formless, whether spiritual or
corporeal, would deserve to be held in being in spite of the fact
that they tend toward disorder and extreme unlikeness to thee?
An unformed spiritual entity is more excellent
than a formed corporeal entity;
and the corporeal, even when unformed, is more excellent
than if it were simply nothing at all. Still,
these formless entities are held in their state of being by thee,
until they are recalled to thy unity and receive form and being
from thee, the one sovereign Good. What have they
deserved of thee, since they would not even be unformed entities
except from thee?
3. What has corporeal matter deserved of
thee -- even in its invisible and unformed state -- since it would
not exist even in this state if thou hadst not made it?
And, if it did not exist, it could not merit its
existence from thee.
Or, what has that formless spiritual creation deserved of
thee -- that it should flow lightlessly like the abyss -- since it
is so unlike thee and would not exist at all if it had not been
turned by the Word which made it that same Word, and, illumined by
that Word, had been "made light"[507] although not as thy equal but
only as an image of that Form [of Light] which is equal to thee?
For, in the case of a body, its being is not the
same thing as its being beautiful; else it could not then be a
deformed body.
Likewise, in the case of a created spirit, living is not the
same state as living wisely; else it could then be immutably wise.
But the true good of every created thing is
always to cleave fast to thee, lest, in turning away from thee, it
lose the light it had received in being turned by thee, and so
relapse into a life like that of the dark abyss.
As for ourselves, who are a spiritual creation by virtue of
our souls, when we turned away from thee, O Light, we were in that
former life of darkness; and we toil amid the shadows of our
darkness until -- through thy only Son -- we become thy
righteousness,[508] like the mountains of God.
For we, like the great abyss,[509] have been the
objects of thy judgments.
CHAPTER III
4. Now what thou saidst in the beginning
of the creation --
"Let there be light: and there was light" -- I interpret,
not unfitly, as referring to the spiritual creation, because it
already had a kind of life which thou couldst illuminate.
But, since it had not merited from thee that it
should be a life capable of enlightenment, so neither, when it
already began to exist, did it merit from thee that it should be
enlightened. For neither could its formlessness
please thee until it became light -- and it became light, not from
the bare fact of existing, but by the act of turning its face to
the light which enlightened it, and by cleaving to it.
Thus it owed the fact that it lived, and lived
happily, to nothing whatsoever but thy grace, since it had been
turned, by a change for the better, toward that which cannot be
changed for either better or worse. Thou alone
art, because thou alone art without complication.
For thee it is not one thing to live and another
thing to live in blessedness; for thou art thyself thy own
blessedness.
CHAPTER IV
5. What, therefore, would there have been
lacking in thy good, which thou thyself art, even if these things
had never been made or had remained unformed?
Thou didst not create them out of any lack but
out of the plenitude of thy goodness, ordering them and turning
them toward form,[510] but not because thy joy had to be perfected
by them. For thou art perfect, and their
imperfection is displeasing. Therefore were they
perfected by thee and became pleasing to thee -- but not as if thou
wert before that imperfect and had to be perfected in their
perfection. For thy good Spirit which moved over
the face of the waters[511] was not borne up by them as if he
rested on them. For those in whom thy good Spirit
is said to rest he actually causes to rest in himself.
But thy incorruptible and immutable will -- in
itself all-sufficient for itself -- moved over that life which thou
hadst made: in which living is not at all the same thing as living
happily, since that life still lives even as it flows in its own
darkness. But it remains to be turned to him by
whom it was made and to live more and more like "the fountain of
life," and in his light "to see light,"[512] and to be perfected,
and enlightened, and made blessed.
CHAPTER V
6. See now,[513] how the Trinity appears
to me in an enigma.
And thou art the Trinity, O my God, since thou, O Father --
in the beginning of our wisdom, that is, in thy wisdom born of
thee, equal and coeternal with thee, that is, thy Son -- created
the heaven and the earth. Many things we have
said about the heaven of heavens, and about the earth invisible and
unformed, and about the shadowy abyss -- speaking of the aimless
flux of its being spiritually deformed unless it is turned to him
from whom it has its life (such as it is) and by his Light comes to
be a life suffused with beauty. Thus it would be
a [lower] heaven of that [higher] heaven, which afterward was made
between water and water.[514]
And now I came to recognize, in the name of God, the Father
who made all these things, and in the term "the Beginning" to
recognize the Son, through whom he made all these things; and since
I did believe that my God was the Trinity, I sought still further
in his holy Word, and, behold, "Thy Spirit moved over the waters."
Thus, see the Trinity, O my God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, the
Creator of all creation!
CHAPTER VI
7. But why, O truth-speaking Light?
To thee I lift up my heart -- let it not teach me
vain notions. Disperse its shadows and tell me, I
beseech thee, by that Love which is our mother;
tell me, I beseech thee, the reason why -- after the
reference to heaven and to the invisible and unformed earth, and
darkness over the abyss -- thy Scripture should then at long last
refer to thy Spirit? Was it because it was
appropriate that he should first be shown to us as "moving over";
and this could not have been said unless something had already been
mentioned over which thy Spirit could be understood as "moving"?
For he did not "move over" the Father and the
Son, and he could not properly be said to be "moving over" if he
were "moving over" nothing. Thus, what it was he
was "moving over" had to be mentioned first and he whom it was not
proper to mention otherwise than as "moving over" could then be
mentioned. But why was it not fitting that he
should have been introduced in some other way than in this context
of "moving over"?
CHAPTER VII
8. Now let him who is able follow thy
apostle with his understanding when he says, "Thy love is shed
abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, who is given to us"[515]
and who teacheth us about spiritual gifts[516] and showeth us a
more excellent way of love; and who bows his knee unto thee for us,
that we may come to the surpassing knowledge of the love of
Christ.[517] Thus, from the beginning, he who is
above all was "moving over" the waters.
To whom shall I tell this? How can I speak
of the weight of concupiscence which drags us downward into the
deep abyss, and of the love which lifts us up by thy Spirit who
moved over the waters? To whom shall I tell this?
How shall I tell it? For
concupiscence and love are not certain "places" into which we are
plunged and out of which we are lifted again.
What could be more like, and yet what more
unlike? They are both feelings; they are both
loves. The uncleanness of our own spirit flows
downward with the love of worldly care; and the sanctity of thy
Spirit raises us upward by the love of release from anxiety -- that
we may lift our hearts to thee where thy Spirit is "moving over the
waters." Thus, we shall have come to that supreme rest where our
souls shall have passed through the waters which give no standing
ground.[518]
CHAPTER VIII
9. The angels fell, and the soul of man
fell; thus they indicate to us the deep darkness of the abyss,
which would have still contained the whole spiritual creation if
thou hadst not said, in the beginning, "Let there be light: and
there was light"
-- and if every obedient mind in thy heavenly city had not
adhered to thee and had not reposed in thy Spirit, which moved
immutable over all things mutable. Otherwise,
even the heaven of heavens itself would have been a dark shadow,
instead of being, as it is now, light in the Lord.[519]
For even in the restless misery of the fallen
spirits, who exhibit their own darkness when they are stripped of
the garments of thy light, thou showest clearly how noble thou
didst make the rational creation, for whose rest and beatitude
nothing suffices save thee thyself. And certainly
it is not itself sufficient for its beatitude.
For it is thou, O our God, who wilt enlighten our
darkness; from thee shall come our garments of light; and then our
darkness shall be as the noonday.
Give thyself to me, O my God, restore thyself to me!
See, I love thee; and if it be too little, let me
love thee still more strongly. I cannot measure
my love so that I may come to know how much there is still lacking
in me before my life can run to thy embrace and not be turned away
until it is hidden in "the covert of thy presence."[520]
Only this I know, that my existence is my woe
except in thee -- not only in my outward life, but also within my
inmost self -- and all abundance I have which is not my God is
poverty.
CHAPTER IX
10. But was neither the Father nor the Son
"moving over the waters"? If we understand this
as a motion in space, as a body moves, then not even the Holy
Spirit "moved." But if we understand the changeless supereminence
of the divine Being above every changeable thing, then Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit "moved over the waters."
Why, then, is this said of thy Spirit alone?
Why is it said of him only -- as if he had been
in a "place" that is not a place -- about whom alone it is written,
"He is thy gift"? It is in thy gift that we rest.
It is there that we enjoy thee.
Our rest is our "place." Love lifts us up toward
that place, and thy good Spirit lifts our lowliness from the gates
of death.[521] Our peace rests in the goodness of
will. The body tends toward its own place by its
own gravity. A weight does not tend downward
only, but moves to its own place. Fire tends
upward; a stone tends downward. They are
propelled by their own mass; they seek their own places.
Oil poured under the water rises above the water;
water poured on oil sinks under the oil. They are
moved by their own mass; they seek their own places.
If they are out of order, they are restless; when
their order is restored, they are at rest. My
weight is my love. By it I am carried wherever I
am carried. By thy gift,[522] we are enkindled
and are carried upward. We burn inwardly and move
forward. We ascend thy ladder which is in our
heart, and we sing a canticle of degrees[523]; we glow inwardly
with thy fire -- with thy good fire[524] -- and we go forward
because we go up to the peace of Jerusalem[525]; for I
was glad when they said to me, "Let us go into the house of
the Lord."[526] There thy good pleasure will
settle us so that we will desire nothing more than to dwell there
forever.[527]
CHAPTER X
11. Happy would be that creature who,
though it was in itself other than thou, still had known no other
state than this from the time it was made, so that it was never
without thy gift which moves over everything mutable -- who had
been borne up by the call in which thou saidst, "Let there be
light: and there was light."[528] For in us there
is a distinction between the time when we were darkness and the
time when we were made light. But we are not told
what would have been the case with that creature if the light had
not been made. It is spoken of as though there
had been something of flux and darkness in it beforehand so that
the cause by which it was made to be otherwise might be
evident.
This is to say, by being turned to the unfailing Light it
might become light. Let him who is able
understand this; and let him who is not ask of thee.
Why trouble me, as if I could "enlighten every
man that comes into the world"[529]?
CHAPTER XI
12. Who can understand the omnipotent
Trinity? And yet who does not speak about it, if
indeed it is of it that he speaks?
Rare is the soul who, when he speaks of it, also knows of
what he speaks. And men contend and strive, but
no man sees the vision of it without peace.
I could wish that men would consider three things which are
within themselves. These three things are quite
different from the Trinity, but I mention them in order that men
may exercise their minds and test themselves and come to realize
how different from it they are.[530]
The three things I speak of are: to be, to know, and to
will.
For I am, and I know, and I will. I am a
knowing and a willing being; I know that I am and that I will; and
I will to be and to know. In these three
functions, therefore, let him who can see how integral a life is;
for there is one life, one mind, one essence.
Finally, the distinction does not separate the
things, and yet it is a distinction. Surely a man
has this distinction before his mind; let him look into himself and
see, and tell me.
But when he discovers and can say anything about any one of
these, let him not think that he has thereby discovered what is
immutable above them all, which _is_ immutably and _knows_
immutably and _wills_ immutably. But whether
there is a Trinity there because these three functions exist in the
one God, or whether all three are in each Person so that they are
each threefold, or whether both these notions are true and, in some
mysterious manner, the Infinite is in itself its own Selfsame
object -- at once one and many, so that by itself it is and knows
itself and suffices to itself without change, so that the Selfsame
is the abundant magnitude of its Unity -- who can readily conceive?
Who can in any fashion express it plainly?
Who can in any way rashly make a pronouncement
about it?
CHAPTER XII
13. Go forward in your confession, O my
faith; say to the Lord your God, "Holy, holy, holy, O Lord my God,
in thy name we have been baptized, in the name of the Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit." In thy name we baptize, in the name of the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. For among
us also God in his Christ made "heaven and earth," namely, the
spiritual and carnal members of his Church. And true it is that
before it received "the form of doctrine," our "earth"[531] was
"invisible and unformed," and we were covered with the darkness of
our ignorance; for thou dost correct man for his iniquity,[532] and
"thy judgments are a great abyss."[533] But
because thy Spirit was moving over these waters, thy mercy did not
forsake our wretchedness, and thou saidst, "Let there be light;
repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."[534]
Repent, and let there be light.
Because our soul was troubled within us, we
remembered thee, O Lord, from the land of Jordan, and from the
mountain[535] -- and as we became displeased with our darkness we
turned to thee, "and there was light." And behold, we were
heretofore in darkness, but now we are light in the
Lord.[536]
CHAPTER XIII
14. But even so, we still live by faith
and not by sight, for we are saved by hope; but hope that is seen
is not hope. Thus far deep calls unto deep, but
now in "the noise of thy waterfalls."[537] And
thus far he who said, "I could not speak to you as if you were
spiritual ones, but only as if you were carnal"[538] -- thus far
even he does not count himself to have apprehended, but forgetting
the things that are behind and reaching forth to the things that
are before, he presses on to those things that are ahead,[539] and
he groans under his burden and his soul thirsts after the living
God as the stag pants for the water brooks,[540] and says, "When
shall I come?"[541] --
"desiring to be further clothed by his house which is from
heaven."[542] And he called to this lower deep,
saying, "Be not conformed to this world, but be transformed by the
renewing of your mind."[543] And "be not children
in understanding, although in malice be children," in order that
"in understanding you may become perfect."[544]
"O foolish Galatians, who has bewitched
you?"[545] But this is not now only in his own
voice but in thy voice, who sent thy Spirit from above through Him
who both "ascended up on high"[546] and opened up the floodgates of
his gifts, that the force of his streams might make glad the city
of God.[547]
For that city and for him sighs the Bridegroom's
friend,[548]
who has now the first fruits of the Spirit laid up with him,
but who is still groaning within himself and waiting for adoption,
that is, the redemption of his body.[549] To Him
he sighs, for he is a member of the Bride[550]; for him he is
jealous, not for himself, but because not in his own voice but in
the voice of thy waterfalls he calls on that other deep, of which
he is jealous and in fear; for he fears lest, as the serpent
seduced Eve by his subtlety, his mind should be corrupted from the
purity which is in our Bridegroom, thy only Son.
What a light of beauty that will be when "we
shall see him as he is"[551]! -- and when these tears shall pass
away which "have been my meat day and night, while they continually
say unto me, 'Where is your God?'"[552]
CHAPTER XIV
15. And I myself say: "O my God, where art
thou? See now, where art thou?"
In thee I take my breath for a little while, when
I pour out my soul beyond myself in the voice of joy and praise, in
the voice of him that keeps holyday.[553] And
still it is cast down because it relapses and becomes an abyss, or
rather it feels that it still is an abyss. My
faith speaks to my soul --
the faith that thou dost kindle to light my path in the
night:
"Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you
disquieted in me? Hope in God."[554]
For his word is a lamp to your feet.[555]
Hope and persevere until the night passes -- that mother of
the wicked; until the Lord's wrath subsides -- that wrath whose
children once we were, of whom we were beforehand in darkness,
whose residue we still bear about us in our bodies, dead because of
sin.[556] Hope and endure until the day breaks
and the shadows flee away.[557] Hope in the Lord:
in the morning I shall stand in his presence and keep watch[558]; I
shall forever give praise to him. In the morning
I shall stand and shall see my God, who is the health of my
countenance,[559] who also will quicken our mortal bodies by the
Spirit that dwells in us,[560] because in mercy he was moving over
our lightless and restless inner deep.
From this we have received an earnest, even now in this
pilgrimage, that we are now in the light, since already we are
saved by hope and are children of the light and children of the day
-- not children of the night, nor of the darkness,[561] which we
have been hitherto. Between those children of the
night and ourselves, in this still uncertain state of human
knowledge, only thou canst rightly distinguish -- thou who dost
test the heart and who dost call the light day, and the darkness
night.[562] For who can see us clearly but thee?
What do we have that we have not received from
thee, who madest from the same lump some vessels to noble, and
others to ignoble, use[563]?
CHAPTER XV
16. Now who but thee, our God, didst make
for us that firmament of the authority of thy divine Scripture to
be over us?
For "the heaven shall be folded up like a scroll"[564]; but
now it is stretched over us like a skin. Thy
divine Scripture is of more sublime authority now that those mortal
men through whom thou didst dispense it to us have departed this
life. And thou knowest, O Lord, thou knowest how
thou didst clothe men with skins when they became mortal because of
sin.[565] In something of the same way, thou hast
stretched out the firmament of thy Book as a skin -- that is to
say, thou hast spread thy harmonious words over us through the
ministry of mortal men. For by their very death
that solid firmament of authority in thy sayings, spoken forth by
them, stretches high over all that now drift under it; whereas
while they lived on earth their authority was not so widely
extended. Then thou hadst not yet spread out the
heaven like a skin; thou hadst not yet spread abroad everywhere the
fame of their death.
17. Let us see, O Lord, "the heavens, the
work of thy fingers,"[566] and clear away from our eyes the fog
with which thou hast covered them. In them[567]
is that testimony of thine which gives wisdom even to the little
ones. O my God, out of the mouth of babes and
sucklings, perfect thy praise.[568] For we know
no other books that so destroy man's pride, that so break down the
adversary and the self-defender who resists thy reconciliation by
an effort to justify his own sins. I do not know,
O Lord, I do not know any other such pure words that so persuade me
to confession and make my neck submissive to thy yoke, and invite
me to serve thee for nothing else than thy own sake.
Let me understand these things, O good Father.
Grant this to me, since I am placed under them;
for thou hast established these things for those placed under
them.
18. There are other waters that are above
this firmament, and I believe that they are immortal and removed
from earthly corruption. Let them praise thy name
-- this super-celestial society, thy angels, who have no need to
look up at this firmament or to gain a knowledge of thy Word by
reading it -- let them praise thee. For they
always behold thy face and read therein, without any syllables in
time, what thy eternal will intends.
They read, they choose, they love.[569]
They are always reading, and what they read never
passes away. For by choosing and by loving they
read the very immutability of thy counsel. Their
book is never closed, nor is the scroll folded up, because thou
thyself art this to them, and art this to them eternally; because
thou didst range them above this firmament which thou madest firm
over the infirmities of the people below the heavens, where they
might look up and learn thy mercy, which proclaims in time thee who
madest all times. "For thy mercy, O Lord, is in
the heavens, and thy faithfulness reaches to the clouds."[570]
The clouds pass away, but the heavens remain.
The preachers of thy Word pass away from this
life into another; but thy Scripture is spread abroad over the
people, even to the end of the world. Indeed,
both heaven and earth shall pass away, but thy words shall never
pass away.[571] The scroll shall be rolled
together, and the "grass"
over which it was spread shall, with all its goodliness,
pass away; but thy Word remains forever[572] -- thy Word which now
appears to us in the dark image of the clouds and through the glass
of heaven, and not as it really is. And even if
we are the well-beloved of thy Son, it has not yet appeared what we
shall be.[573] He hath seen us through the
entanglement[574] of our flesh, and he is fair-speaking, and he
hath enkindled us, and we run after his fragrance.[575]
But "when he shall appear, then we shall be like
him, for we shall see him as he is."[576] As he
is, O Lord, we shall see him -- although that time is not
yet.
CHAPTER XVI
19. For just as thou art the utterly Real,
thou alone dost fully know, since thou art immutably, and thou
knowest immutably, and thou willest immutably.
And thy Essence knows and wills immutably.
Thy Knowledge is and wills immutably.
Thy Will is and knows immutably.
And it does not seem right to thee that the
immutable Light should be known by the enlightened but mutable
creature in the same way as it knows itself.
Therefore, to thee my soul is as a land where no
water is[577]; for, just as it cannot enlighten itself by itself,
so it cannot satisfy itself by itself. Thus the
fountain of life is with thee, and "in thy light shall we see
light."[578]
CHAPTER XVII
20. Who has gathered the "embittered
ones"[579] into a single society? For they all
have the same end, which is temporal and earthly happiness.
This is their motive for doing everything,
although they may fluctuate within an innumerable diversity of
concerns. Who but thee, O Lord, gathered them
together, thou who saidst, "Let the waters be gathered together
into one place and let the dry land appear" -- athirst for thee?
For the sea also is thine, and thou madest it,
and thy hands formed the dry land.[580]
For it is not the bitterness of men's wills but the
gathering together of the waters which is called "the sea"; yet
thou dost curb the wicked lusts of men's souls and fix their
bounds: how far they are allowed to advance, and where their waves
will be broken against each other -- and thus thou makest it "a
sea," by the providence of thy governance of all things.
21. But as for the souls that thirst after
thee and who appear before thee -- separated from "the society of
the [bitter]
sea" by reason of their different ends -- thou waterest them
by a secret and sweet spring, so that "the earth" may bring forth
her fruit and -- thou, O Lord, commanding it -- our souls may bud
forth in works of mercy after their kind.[581]
Thus we shall love our neighbor in ministering to
his bodily needs, for in this way the soul has seed in itself after
its kind when in our own infirmity our compassion reaches out to
the relief of the needy, helping them even as we would desire to be
helped ourselves if we were in similar need. Thus
we help, not only in easy problems (as is signified by "the herb
yielding its seed") but also in the offering of our best strength
in affording them the aid of protection (such as "the tree bearing
its fruit"). This is to say, we seek to rescue
him who is suffering injury from the hands of the powerful --
furnishing him with the sheltering protection which comes from the
strong arm of a righteous judgment.[582]
CHAPTER XVIII
22. Thus, O Lord, thus I beseech thee: let
it happen as thou hast prepared it, as thou givest joy and the
capacity for joy.
Let truth spring up out of the earth, and let righteousness
look down from heaven,[583] and let there be lights in the
firmament.[584]
Let us break our bread with the hungry, let us bring the
shelterless poor to our house; let us clothe the naked, and never
despise those of our own flesh.[585] See from the
fruits which spring forth from the earth how good it is.
Thus let our temporal light break forth, and let
us from even this lower level of fruitful action come to the joy of
contemplation and hold on high the Word of Life.
And let us at length appear like "lights in the
world,"[586] cleaving to the firmament of thy Scripture.
For in it thou makest it plain to us how we may distinguish
between things intelligible and things tangible, as if between the
day and the night -- and to distinguish between souls who give
themselves to things of the mind and others absorbed in things of
sense. Thus it is that now thou art not alone in
the secret of thy judgment as thou wast before the firmament was
made, and before thou didst divide between the light and the
darkness. But now also thy spiritual children,
placed and ranked in this same firmament -- thy grace being thus
manifest throughout the world --
may shed light upon the earth, and may divide between the
day and night, and may be for the signs of the times[587]; because
old things have passed away, and, lo, all things are become
new[588];
and because our salvation is nearer than when we believed;
and because "the night is far spent and the day is at hand"[589];
and because "thou crownest the year with blessing,"[590] sending
the laborers into thy harvest, in which others have labored in the
sowing and sending laborers also to make new sowings whose harvest
shall not be until the end of time. Thus thou
dost grant the prayers of him who seeks, and thou dost bless the
years of the righteous man. But thou art always
the Selfsame, and in thy years which fail not thou preparest a
granary for our transient years.
For by an eternal design thou spreadest the heavenly
blessings on the earth in their proper seasons.
23. For "to one there is given by thy
Spirit the word of wisdom"[591] (which resembles the greater light
-- which is for those whose delight is in the clear light of truth
-- as the light which is given for the ruling of the day[592]).
But to another the word of knowledge is given by
the same Spirit (as it were, the "lesser light"); to another,
faith; to another, the gift of healing; to another, the power of
working miracles; to another, the gift of prophecy; to another, the
discerning of spirits; to another, other kinds of tongues -- and
all these gifts may be compared to "the stars." For in them all the
one and selfsame Spirit is at work, dividing to every man his own
portion, as He wills, and making stars to appear in their bright
splendor for the profit of souls. But the word of
knowledge, scientia, in which is contained all the mysteries[593]
which change in their seasons like the moon; and all the other
promises of gifts, which when counted are like the stars -- all of
these fall short of that splendor of Wisdom in which the day
rejoices and are only for the ruling of the night.
Yet they are necessary for those to whom thy most
prudent servant could not speak as to the spiritually mature, but
only as if to carnal men -- even though he could speak wisdom among
the perfect.[594] Still the natural man -- as a
babe in Christ, and a drinker of milk, until he is strong enough
for solid meat, and his eye is able to look into the sun -- do not
leave him in a lightless night. Instead, let him
be satisfied with the light of the moon and the stars.
In thy book thou dost discuss these things with
us wisely, our God -- in thy book, which is thy "firmament" -- in
order that we may be able to view all things in admiring
contemplation, although thus far we must do so through signs and
seasons and in days and years.
CHAPTER XIX
24. But, first, "wash yourselves and make
you clean; put away iniquity from your souls and from before my
eyes"[595] -- so that "the dry land" may appear.
"Learn to do well, judge the fatherless, plead
for the widow,"[596] that the earth may bring forth the green herb
for food and fruit-bearing trees. "And come, let
us reason together, saith the Lord"[597] -- that there may be
lights in the firmament of heaven and that they may shine upon the
earth.
There was that rich man who asked of the good Teacher what
he should do to attain eternal life. Let the good
Teacher (whom the rich man thought a man and nothing more) give him
an answer -- he is good for he is God. Let him
answer him that, if he would enter into life, he must keep the
commandments: let him put away from himself the bitterness of
malice and wickedness; let him not kill, nor commit adultery, nor
steal, nor bear false witness[598] --
that "the dry land" may appear and bring forth the honoring
of fathers and mothers and the love of neighbor.
"All these," he replied, "I have kept." Where do
so many thorns come from, if the earth is really fruitful?
uproot the brier patch of avarice;
"sell what you have, and be filled with fruit by giving to
the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and follow" the
Lord if you would be perfect and joined with those in whose midst
he speaketh wisdom -- who know how to give rightly to the day and
to the night -- and you will also understand, so that for you also
there may be lights in the firmament of heaven -- which will not be
there, however, unless your heart is there also.
And your heart will not be there unless your
treasure is there,[599] as you have heard from the good Teacher.
But "the barren earth"[600] was grieved, and the
briers choked the word.[601]
25. But you, O elect people, set in the
firmament of the world,[602] who have forsaken all that you may
follow the Lord:
follow him now, and confound the mighty!
Follow him, O beautiful feet,[603] and shine in
the firmament, that the heavens may declare his glory, dividing the
light of the perfect ones[604] --
though not yet so perfect as the angels -- from the darkness
of the little ones -- who are nevertheless not utterly
despised.
Shine over all the earth, and let the day be lighted by the
sun, utter the Word of wisdom to the day ("day unto day utters
speech"[605]) and let the night, lighted by the moon, display the
Word of knowledge to the night. The moon and the
stars give light for the night; the night does not put them out,
and they illumine in its proper mode. For lo, it
is as if God were saying, "Let there be lights in the firmament of
the heaven": and suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as if it
were a rushing mighty wind, and there appeared cloven tongues of
fire, and they sat on each of them.[606] And then
they were made to be lights in the firmament of heaven, having the
Word of life. Run to and fro everywhere, you holy
fires, you lovely fires, for you are the light of the world and you
are not to be hid under a peck measure.[607] He
to whom you cleave is raised on high, and he hath raised you on
high. Run to and fro; make yourselves known among
all the nations!