Should we have a national park on the moon?
(2013-07-11 15:55:28)A bill (HR 2617) introduced by Reps. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) and
Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Tex.) on Monday, if passed, would
establish the Apollo Lunar Landing Sites National Historic park. So
no, this would not be a park that you pack the kids in the
Winnebago and summer vacation to —
But that possibility —
“Representatives of commercial entities have contacted NASA seeking guidance for approaching U.S. Government (USG) space assets on the lunar surface – out of respect for hardware ownership, and a sincere desire to protect general scientific and historic aspects of these sites. Because there is no precedent for this situation throughout nearly 50 years of spaceflight, there are no USG guidelines or requirements for spacecraft visiting the areas of existing USG-owned lunar hardware regardless of condition or location.”
Johnson is the ranking member of the House Committee on Science,
Space and Technology, while Edwards is the ranking member of the
House Subcommittee on Space. The bill, called
the
“Mr. Speaker, in 1969, led by the late Apollo Astronaut Neil
Armstrong, American ingenuity changed history as humanity took a
giant leap forward on the surface of the moon,”
said Edwards on the House floor Tuesday.
The artifacts left at the Apollo sites include equipment, impact markings, footprints and vehicle tracks. The bill would also protect these areas from future mining (a not entirely remote possibility), and calls on the Secretary of the Interior and NASA to submit an application to make the Apollo 11 landing site a United Nations World Heritage Site. The Apollo lunar surface missions concluded in 1972.
The bill reads in part:
“Establishing the Historical Park under this Act will expand and enhance the protection and preservation of the Apollo lunar landing sites and provide for greater recognition and public understanding of this singular achievement in American history.”
The bill would also authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in cooperative agreements with other agencies and foreign governments, international bodies and other organizations as well as accept and manage donations. NASA would also be authorized to accept donations towards the management of the site and fulfillment of the bill’s requirements. The bill also calls on the Smithsonian Institution to collaborate with NASA and the Interior Secretary to to catalog the items in the park.
If it becomes law, the bill would require that, within a year, the National Park System establish the park and that the application to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) be submitted for World Heritage Site status. Six months after the park is established, a “general management plan” for the park would have to be created.
“The Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act will ensure that the
scientific data and cultural significance of the Apollo artifacts
remains unharmed by future lunar landings.
In addition to the bill establishing the national park on the
moon, Edwards also introduced HR 2616,
A spokesman for NASA would not comment on the bill that would authorize the national park. But you can, of course, in the comments.